Author Topic: Naughty Mel - lied about services to get me there - wasted evening, took my cash  (Read 11143 times)


21 review(s) for NAUGHTY.MEL (15 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by ]

lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

Ok, this ended in disaster. I will set it out, blow by blow.


About 6.30pm this evening i saw Mel on adultwork search as it came up under search term CIM and Rimming (giving). I texted to get next available booking but did not hear back for 45 mins (obv fine! No prob). In meantime i searched her on this site and could not find anything about her giving rimming. So i was a little wary on services on whether she really did it as rimming is really important to me. In fact its a deal breaker. Limits me to a much smaller group of girls (although less small than many wound realise).

She  texted back to say 9pm. So i then texted to say "thanks, just checking that CIM and rimming (giving) is included in price (shaved and showered) :) "

Her response was "all information about services and price you can read on my profile". Which maybe should have set alarm bells as a simple "yes" would have been easier for her. But i thought maybe she is just fed up with people keep doubting things on her site or something and so had some copy paste stock answers.

So i texted back "great! See you at 9pm" and she sent me her warwick road address.

(Her long list of FAQ at question 17 is - "do you provide all your services In your likes list?" With the answer "YES ALL OF THEM" in capitals and then also that "the fee is all inclusive. No extras". (In bold).)

Anyway, got there, saw her. Face prettier than i expected (albeit expected  in a way given the reviews here). Breasts seemed like not great boob job (exactly as can be seen in her private photos). I got shower. Kissed then started blowjob. Then started licking balls etc. 6 mins in i then said, "could you rim me for a bit now? And she said no she did not do that and i said that i had specifically checked and it had been confirmed she did as it was on her list of likes.

So she said did i want to leave and get my money back and i said yes. But she then said she would only give me 50 back as we had started. (This would be fair enough if i had started and then simply changed my mind or something but she had got me to travel across london by deliberately misleading me).

She then said "lets check my website then" and i said there was no need as i was 100% sure it said rimming (give) while she said it said rimming (receive). Absolutely certain. Anyway she started pretending she was having difficulty with the internet but (and it was really embarrassing even watching this) i could see she was logging on to change her site then logged back off then came over to show me after "internet working again"  :scare:her logging on and sure enough it was back to rimming (receive).  :wackogirl:

So i just laughed at her  :lol: and said "i just watched what you did there is no point doing this - i know what your website said - thats why i came here."

Other posters have said she is totally focused on getting as much money as she can. She obviously did not want to lose my booking by telling the truth. And then would not give me my money back.

Anyway, thus is the girl i would have booked if Mel had not wasted my evening, Angela:


External Link/Members Only

She is very pretty (some would say sexier than Mel facially and in terms of body - i would myself). Anyway she does enthusiastic rimming and CiM both inclusive. Also alevels (but for 50 extra).

By the time i left Mels i could not book angela anymore. Plus lost the 50 i could have used for anal with angela at some future time For 6 mins with liar Mel. And with 1.5 hour round trip.

Mel said noone would believe me as she had so many good reviews on adultwork. Well, clearly that is the calculation she does when she does stuff like this. And she is probably right. But i fekt i had to set this down as is vvvvvv annoying.


password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So did you get any money back?

Another couple point as its your 1st review.

1. You have been registered here on UKP for +3 years - Was this your first ever punt?
2. If No, Have you seen any other girls either on AW or from an agency?

I always get suspicious regardless of the Negative or Positive reviews from a 1st time reviewer - I know they have to start from somewhere BUT to be here on UKP as a member for +3 years and then do a Negative - Have you never had a bad experience before?

If this review is true then I would have done a BIG FAT NEGATIVE as well

Offline lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
I very much doubt if this is actually a genuine review but there's an attempt of highlighting another prossie Angela.

 :rolleyes:

Offline NightKid

I would believe this review mainly because there's been a spate of less than satisfactory reviews about her lately.
Also, her greed has been made known before - in a positive review, no less ... see quote below.

One small annoyance is I told her my plans for the evening consisted of going out for something to eat with a friend who is a lesbian. She mentioned that I should bring her along next time I see her and we can both pay her £150 each for the hour. I told her it would be weird as she is just a friend and this is a more discrete hobby of mine but she pushed it for a good 5mins which just come across as a bit greedy and looking for a business opportunity.

The ending promotion of Angela was rather unnecessary though, if not dodgy.

LL

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks for the review.
Lesson of the day.  If you take a smartphone with you on a punt, load the profile of the girl you're about to visit before you arrive.  Then if there are any disputes about services offered or if you're uncertain that the girl stood before you is the one depicted on the profile (i.e. possible bait n switch) then you can take your smartphone out of your pocket and settle it.

scorpion61

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
To the OP if you are looking for rimming then Alice is up for it.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=52991.0


lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So did you get any money back?

Another couple point as its your 1st review.

1. You have been registered here on UKP for +3 years - Was this your first ever punt?
2. If No, Have you seen any other girls either on AW or from an agency?

I always get suspicious regardless of the Negative or Positive reviews from a 1st time reviewer - I know they have to start from somewhere BUT to be here on UKP as a member for +3 years and then do a Negative - Have you never had a bad experience before?

If this review is true then I would have done a BIG FAT NEGATIVE as well

Many punts. Mainly on adultwork now but occasionally on maxes angels. Plus agency gurks tgat i have the personal number of as mote than 200 an hour us just not sustainable for me.

I review on adultwork fairly regularly. But v wary of giving negative feedback there now as that then often leads to a retaliatory negative and then some girls refuse to see me. Even though the negative feedback i gave was inky ever to expose actual lying/ bait and switch etc rather than just technique. Last negative one i did was in 2012 and mostly they now are ok about that with my 20+ positive reviews.

Anyhow, did this review as i was so annoyed. This happens to me very rarely these days as i check so carefully due to previous experience. But the positives on this site plus what she said on services swung it for me. After i posted i actually saw some of the negative ones this week which rang true in terms of her attitude. One other weird off thing happened while i was there as well which i dud not include as did not want to deflect from main point.

The other thing was just after she started the blowjob she said "do you like vibrators?" And i said "on you? Yes, on me yes too but only when im about to cum" and she said "you dont understand what i mean" so i got her to repeat and i said that no dont worry i understood what she meant. And repeated what i said. All pleasant. Then her face darkened and she said "so when you just about to cum i will go and get the vibrator, put a condom on it, then put it in your arse.?! But you will have cum already that will take too long" and i chuckled trying to keep the mood light and said "well i will know a long time before i want to cum, we have 30 mins" and then she did a big sigh and shook her head and said "nevermind". At that point i was losing my erection and then she did the ball licking fir a bit before i then asked if she would rim me for a bit which is where it links back into my review above.

Presumably she was thinking if she could get a vibrator in my ass straight away then she could avoid the rimming discussion? I dont know, but it was weird and bad attitude.

Shes not an absolute stunner either. Very pretty but not stunner. And body us not amazing either (particularly the mot very good boob job - as in private pics as i said).

Not sure if i will do adultwork one -weighing the risks. As she said - she has so many good reviews who would believe me.

Offline Brazilian Martian

I very much doubt if this is actually a genuine review but there's an attempt of highlighting another prossie Angela.

 :rolleyes:

I think he's a faker he's just jumping on the bandwagon

306

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
1. You have been registered here on UKP for +3 years - Was this your first ever punt?
2. If No, Have you seen any other girls either on AW or from an agency?

I always get suspicious regardless of the Negative or Positive reviews from a 1st time reviewer - I know they have to start from somewhere BUT to be here on UKP as a member for +3 years and then do a Negative - Have you never had a bad experience before?

a 1st review and only 4 posts states a lot  is it a wg is it a pimp is it a correct review
you really need to  join in on ukp a little more fellow !!

lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
1. You have been registered here on UKP for +3 years - Was this your first ever punt?
2. If No, Have you seen any other girls either on AW or from an agency?

I always get suspicious regardless of the Negative or Positive reviews from a 1st time reviewer - I know they have to start from somewhere BUT to be here on UKP as a member for +3 years and then do a Negative - Have you never had a bad experience before?

a 1st review and only 4 posts states a lot  is it a wg is it a pimp is it a correct review
you really need to  join in on ukp a little more fellow !!


Lol, yeah the fact that i have only done a few posts (look at them - they are about me wanting to locate an amazing previous wg who was very pretty and who rimmed) and this is my first review is evidence i am a pimp. Wow, yeah i can see how the evidence points to that. Jeez. Think about it. Fir even a moment.  :wackogirl:

lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
And here us the link to my previous posts:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=5928.msg138432;topicseen#msg138432


Isnt it more likely that i posted a few years back when there was an important reason to do so (found the site searching for this girls name) and then thought to post here when had very bad experience due to damage of adultwork reviewing of lying girl?  :wackogirl:

Offline Vivago

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,051
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 38
I think he's a faker he's just jumping on the bandwagon

Does seem a bit odd that I give her a first NEGATIVE on Thursday and 2 more follow in quick succession.

However they do say that things tend to run in three's. ;)
Banned reason: For taking the piss after being advised
Banned by: Head1

306

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
quote
« on: November 19, 2012, 10:49:19 pm »
Hi has anyone seen this girl (was called Kate 25xxx) since she stopped being on adultwork i :rose:n February. She was amazing and I would lobe to see her again

a lober of course all clear now

Online PLeisure

Not sure if i will do adultwork one -weighing the risks. As she said - she has so many good reviews who would believe me.

That is precisely why you should be telling the truth  :rolleyes:

If you're so concerned about your AW reputation then simply post a link to this review. Job done.  :thumbsup:

lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Does seem a bit odd that I give her a first NEGATIVE on Thursday and 2 more follow in quick succession.

However they do say that things tend to run in three's. ;)

Yup i didnt see the 2 recent negative review (inc yours) till after i had posted. I thought they were all positive. To be honest if i had i probably would still have made the mistake   :dash:

Offline pumps

It seems like the natural way to break ones UKP review virginity is to start with a negative.


by your accounts your no spring chicken when it comes to punting, I guess confirming the services face to face moments before handing over the cash is king here and the lesson to be learnt.

Good luck in finding more rimming! Keep the reviews flowing they'll be helpful, & you'll build up a reputation.

 


Offline Bartolomeo

I had Mel on my hot list, but from reviews, the impression that she doesn't leave time before bookings put me off. With the few non-positive reviews that came in, she's definitely off my list.


Big Cat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Annoys me a bit when someone who's been registered here since 2012 has only done one review. Makes me not want to do any more myself. Share the knowledge people... stop being greedy :drinks:

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Annoys me a bit when someone who's been registered here since 2012 has only done one review. Makes me not want to do any more myself. Share the knowledge people... stop being greedy :drinks:

Have been saying the same thing last 12/18 months - That's 1 of the reasons I am slowing down considerably with my punting as well especially  my reviews. There are so many lurkers and ''Guests'' here that its a 10 to 1 ratio of members and lurkers/guests.

These parasites just read and take the positive reviews without giving anything back in return - Either too lazy or cannot be bothered to share.

Offline shagbambi

Have been saying the same thing last 12/18 months - That's 1 of the reasons I am slowing down considerably with my punting as well especially  my reviews. There are so many lurkers and ''Guests'' here that its a 10 to 1 ratio of members and lurkers/guests.

These parasites just read and take the positive reviews without giving anything back in return - Either too lazy or cannot be bothered to share.

I agree with this 100%. 

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Have been saying the same thing last 12/18 months - That's 1 of the reasons I am slowing down considerably with my punting as well especially  my reviews. There are so many lurkers and ''Guests'' here that its a 10 to 1 ratio of members and lurkers/guests.

These parasites just read and take the positive reviews without giving anything back in return - Either too lazy or cannot be bothered to share.

Perfect example from today's STATS -

Members Online Members Online Today - 26,535 Visitors - 24,988 Guests, 1,547 Members

Really sums it all up - FCKING LURKER CU*TS


Big Cat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Restricting access to the Reviews section could be an idea (this is obviously a non-profit site so no biggie). But then I guess you run the risk of people posting fake reviews to gain access.

Offline Bartolomeo

might be worth doing a special members only section, whereby access is granted by vote from existing 'vip' members?

'vip' members would be those who have done numerous reviews and generally thought of as contributing to the forum

Offline pumps

Have been saying the same thing last 12/18 months - That's 1 of the reasons I am slowing down considerably with my punting as well especially  my reviews. There are so many lurkers and ''Guests'' here that its a 10 to 1 ratio of members and lurkers/guests.

These parasites just read and take the positive reviews without giving anything back in return - Either too lazy or cannot be bothered to share.

Gotta agree here, I'm starting to wind down on the reviews as well, I probably only review 10% of my punts these days.

It grinds my gears a bit when you get a member post a negative review and about 3 or 4 members (who don't review) all chime in saying they received a terrible experience as well  :dash:

Hidden Image/Members Only

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Gotta agree here, I'm starting to wind down on the reviews as well, I probably only review 10% of my punts these days.

It grinds my gears a bit when you get a member post a negative review and about 3 or 4 members (who don't review) all chime in saying they received a terrible experience as well  :dash:

Hidden Image/Members Only

+1 100000%  -Other well know UKP members have also got feed up and have even stopped reviewing -

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If one is unhappy with UKP, then they should leave rather than stick around and try rally up others to hate the site. In doing so doing a favour for every bad prossie, sergie, scammer, thief, etc. who wants to see the downfall of UKP.

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Admin its not a question of not liking the site - Its the fact that we have over +20,000 lurkers / guests who take and take all the info from the members, the reviews and everything else that this great site offers.

Yet they (The Lurkers & Guests) give absolutely ZERO back to the forum. At least sign up and be a member rather than staying anonymous.

 

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
There are downsides with both setups - being open and public (like now) or being invite-only and exclusive.

If someone doesn't want to post a new positive review because they don't want guests to leech off the info, then they'll either have to use PM facility to share with other trusted members, or wait for a new site to come online in the coming months. But even then there will be issues as to who will be invited.

Anyway we are going off-topic, this is a negative review and there shouldn't be issue with guests reading it (as many punters as possible).

306

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
all good comments but
 i did think that members here would be more likely to post a negative or netual review   ?
 on ukp than a posative now i am not so sure ??

figleaf

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Annoys me a bit when someone who's been registered here since 2012 has only done one review. Makes me not want to do any more myself. Share the knowledge people... stop being greedy :drinks:

As soon as The guy did he got shot down for being a fake reviewer.

When I posted a review a few days ago I just got a load of moaning too.

UKP is becoming quite hostile to people trying to contribute.

Offline TheOracle

Does seem a bit odd that I give her a first NEGATIVE on Thursday and 2 more follow in quick succession.

However they do say that things tend to run in three's. ;)

Mine was a neutral, BTW, I found her somewhat annoying but I still had a reasonable time. But I don't find that odd at all: maybe she's hitting a bad spell, is in a bad mood, has had a bad experience, is tired, etc., and various people at the same time are noticing that.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
As soon as The guy did he got shot down for being a fake reviewer.

When I posted a review a few days ago I just got a load of moaning too.

UKP is becoming quite hostile to people trying to contribute.
I was lucky with my first one then a few days ago, was nervous about response but all was a positive experience for me. 

yorkshire123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
As soon as The guy did he got shot down for being a fake reviewer.

When I posted a review a few days ago I just got a load of moaning too.

UKP is becoming quite hostile to people trying to contribute.

May I ask where is said review?

password02

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
As soon as The guy did he got shot down for being a fake reviewer.

When I posted a review a few days ago I just got a load of moaning too.

UKP is becoming quite hostile to people trying to contribute.

Get over it - I assume you are over 18?

We all go through this process until we gain some creditability - There are a lot of fakes and trolls here on UKP - If you can get through your first few reviews and comments then it is a lot easier going forward.

A lot of the experienced members on UKP will always question new members on their first reviews - Its why UKP is the best punting site in the UK and probably the world.


Offline MrDog

You guys have gotta stay on track with what UKP is all about.
I only recently joined UKP but have many punting years behind me and have been doing my reviews on UKP as when they happen. If everyone said ' well im not reviewing anymore because no one else does' then UKP ceases to be a valuable tool and that would be a damn shame.
You can't seriously mean that you would withhold reviewing because you don't want anyone else to know about a good prossie because there's 25k lurkers and 'why should I give up all the good ones so some lurker can enjoy the fruits of my labour, im only going to do negative reviews' - Well that's what this site is all about, sharing the wealth of knowledge but it seems that some of you feel that because you've reviewed 30, 40, or 50 then your view is the only one that matters - that's wrong, your experience and knowledge of the tricks are of course invaluable to all but its the reviews POSITIVE, NEUTRAL AND NEGATIVE that helps balance out this pretty one sided 'quest to spunk' 
The scammers out there, prossies, pimps, pimpettes and fake reviewers (and as I have seen on this site they do get caught out eventually such as UBER) would love us/you all to stop reviewing, keeping the good ones for ourselves like sad little wankers but UKP isn't or wasn't about that. Its about enabling us the punter to have a balanced view of whether or not to purchase a product from someone based on a 'tried and tested' basis.
To only give certain people viewing rights is not the way for this forum to go, it just would be the same old reviews about the same women (and that wouldn't be doing anyone much service.)
So UKP isn't perfect because of the lurkers, but UKP is a damn site more trustworthy than AW and Galahads failed PunterNet.

Share the wealth people, the fact that you 'think' you are keeping hidden gems away from the rest of us is delusional because one thing is for sure, you will not be the only punter seeing that hidden gem, because she's a WG and she needs to see punters to make a living.

Online PLeisure

^^ Well articulated - thank you  :hi:

I certainly look forward to contributing, as and when my wallet agrees to cooperate   :rolleyes:

306

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline tomato sauce and waffles

You guys have gotta stay on track with what UKP is all about.
I only recently joined UKP but have many punting years behind me and have been doing my reviews on UKP as when they happen. If everyone said ' well im not reviewing anymore because no one else does' then UKP ceases to be a valuable tool and that would be a damn shame.
You can't seriously mean that you would withhold reviewing because you don't want anyone else to know about a good prossie because there's 25k lurkers and 'why should I give up all the good ones so some lurker can enjoy the fruits of my labour, im only going to do negative reviews' - Well that's what this site is all about, sharing the wealth of knowledge but it seems that some of you feel that because you've reviewed 30, 40, or 50 then your view is the only one that matters - that's wrong, your experience and knowledge of the tricks are of course invaluable to all but its the reviews POSITIVE, NEUTRAL AND NEGATIVE that helps balance out this pretty one sided 'quest to spunk' 
The scammers out there, prossies, pimps, pimpettes and fake reviewers (and as I have seen on this site they do get caught out eventually such as UBER) would love us/you all to stop reviewing, keeping the good ones for ourselves like sad little wankers but UKP isn't or wasn't about that. Its about enabling us the punter to have a balanced view of whether or not to purchase a product from someone based on a 'tried and tested' basis.
To only give certain people viewing rights is not the way for this forum to go, it just would be the same old reviews about the same women (and that wouldn't be doing anyone much service.)
So UKP isn't perfect because of the lurkers, but UKP is a damn site more trustworthy than AW and Galahads failed prozzienet.

Share the wealth people, the fact that you 'think' you are keeping hidden gems away from the rest of us is delusional because one thing is for sure, you will not be the only punter seeing that hidden gem, because she's a WG and she needs to see punters to make a living.

Completely agree.

I bet the guys complaining about lurkers, have probably been using Wikipedia for over a decade but never submitted an article or made an edit.

Members here should realise having large numbers of lurkers, strickly using this forum for info gathering, is just part and parcel of being a public website. Just like troubleshooting a PC problem, finding a forum that contains info on resolving said problem, taking the info, but not registering/posting on the forum. I'm sure a lot of people here have done that. Nothing wrong with that, not all of have to be participants of everything.

Offline HappyandLucky

This thread is bobbing and weaving into all interesting areas, but back to the OP and view on first reviews. Firstly well done for posting and your credibility will build with more relevant posts and reviews.

lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just to say, I have not been lurking since 2012. I found this site in 2012 when looking for a particular girl who disappeared (this site came up on Google as she was discussed here). Only been back a few times since.

Offline Turtle1

What a total cunt. Hope this bitch reads this. Youre a lowlife scum, lying and stealing money off punters. The nerve to edit profile and not give money back,

This bitch needs to avoided but i know fellow punters on here will go que outside her door...

Offline HappyandLucky


lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Btw the Angela I mentioned was reviewed by someone who has done lots of reviews:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=56524.0
 
Seems he missed out on the amazing rimming (included) though. Don't leave without it!

 :cool:

lukedavis

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
 :bomb: WARNING!!!! NAUGHTY MEL IS BACK to rip people off again:

External Link/Members Only


Watch out ....

NickFury

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I go for agency girls from time to time, and she's now at admiral for £500ph too
External Link/Members Only

Offline anyfucker

some people must be stupid to pay £500

Offline tantric talents

I had Mel on my hot list, but from reviews, the impression that she doesn't leave time before bookings put me off. With the few non-positive reviews that came in, she's definitely off my list.
Well I for one believe the review.
My experience with Mel was a big comms negative and she is well off my list now.
PM me if you want elaboration as I won't be doing it here esp in the current climate of the MM fiasco.  :hi:

Offline flouch

I'm one of the lurkers who doesn't review often.  Apologies!  I don't punt often, but I am trying to review whenever I see someone new. 

Offline yuiop300

Well I for one believe the review.
My experience with Mel was a big comms negative and she is well off my list now.
PM me if you want elaboration as I won't be doing it here esp in the current climate of the MM fiasco.  :hi:

MM fiasco?  I read a few other posts and is it about the martymcfly guy?

Offline yuiop300

I'm one of the lurkers who doesn't review often.  Apologies!  I don't punt often, but I am trying to review whenever I see someone new.

Good job on your two reviews.