Molly was sacked from our agency yesterday for stealing clients and trying to take them independent via this profile on adultwork, which we only discovered a few days ago with the help of this forum. She wouldn't have lasted much longer either way as we did used to receive complaints regarding her service level and making clients feel rushed. The reason for my post is that upon her dismissal I made her aware of the forum, she laughed it off face to face but since then I have been aware that she believes myself (the agency) to have created all these accounts entirely to slag her off. Her exact words "I haven't seen anyone called diehard so that's fake" 
I no how these forums work and that admin would not allow me to control all these profiles just for the sake of creating this post and I am sure we would all be banned if that was the case and I am sure admin can vouch for all the above members being genuine. She is planning on joining the forum to let everyone know her theory and report the accounts involved, which should be amusing, but that is why I wanted to get in here first to explain the situation. I won't be posting again as I respect this is a forum just for punters.
Thanks xx
Welcome to UKP and posting your side of the story on Molly, and more importantly, acknowledging that this is a punter's site and not get yourself banned, like other WGs/Agencies previously have. I suspect you may come back and post, if you need to reply to any member regarding any queries raised against you. You remind me of Moss of LMP, who used a similar approach to his postings on here, i.e. took a backseat and only posted as and when he thought it was necessary. Although I am not a fan of Agencies (read the Nottingham VIP thread), I cannot see you get banned if you follow the site rules.
No doubt Admin will look into each of the above posters, but I know of diehard and have exchanged loads of emails with him, so am confident that he is a punter. Admiitedly, not everyone likes him, esp WGs
