What I find interesting is what I view as the hypocrisy of some punters regarding owo and bareback sex. There are those who will lambast punters who bareback, but freely admit to only punting with girls who do owo.
Both feel better than the covered versions and both carry risk. The only difference, as far as I can see, is the perceived degree of risk.
In all honesty, having used punting forums for several years, I can not think of one case of a punter catching an STI by bareback sex, but several from owo. Obviously more owo happens than bareback (I think) and those who catch via bareback are less likely to admit it due to the attached stigma.
I'm not saying bareback is as safe/safer than owo, I don't believe it is, and, for the record, I never bareback prossies and will often request covered oral. But I also try not to criticise other punters just because they have set their risk/reward to a different level than I.