Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Channel 4's High Class Call Girls  (Read 27921 times)

Aspen

  • Guest
If you were a punting virgin, these girls would be enough to make you stay that way. It's no wonder the girls on saafe have probably got their claws out, these skanks give good WG's a bad name.

Agree totally.

It would put me off completely if I didn't know better. They seemed so pissed and stupid all the time, and really taking the piss too. At no time did I have any inclination towards either of them. Usually it doesn't take much, the sight of a leg or whatever, but this prog turned me off totally. It was sick.

I can't imagine many guys being interested by it. Maybe curious, but not to the point of wanting to book a girl. But there'll be quite a few girls take it up expecting easy money. But they'll be ill suited and screw it up for everyone else.


Offline Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 573
  • Likes: 9
I couldn't believe the start of the show where they are just sitting there not only slagging off other hookers (we're all one step away from being a streetwalker love) but ripping into clients.
Good luck with future bookings now your clients know you can't stand them.  :dash:

Grumbleguts

  • Guest
Have a feeling the taxmen will be looking at a good few tax disclosures. Lot of girls going to get a visit from them soon. Should be able to recover enough cash to pay for the new Trident subs :hi: :hi: :hi:

kingkong

  • Guest
I have only pity for the men that pay this pair of "high class" prossies. Neither of them are even remotely pretty with or without makeup. Emily-B has admitted being an ex junky and has the worst fake tits I have seen in a long while.

Aspen

  • Guest
I couldn't believe the start of the show where they are just sitting there not only slagging off other hookers (we're all one step away from being a streetwalker love) but ripping into clients.
Good luck with future bookings now your clients know you can't stand them.

I think most of us are realistic enough to know how we're regarded by most girls. You try to put that to one side for the duration of the session. But of course for it to be so blatant is another thing. They held their clients in contempt and made no attempt to hide it.

Aspen

  • Guest
I have only pity for the men that pay this pair of "high class" prossies.

I don't pity them in the slightest. They are just as stupid, if not more so. They deserve each other.


Jay-Jay

  • Guest
I'll tell you where there is an excellent documentary in the making and that would be one about Adultwork. It's been mentioned on enough programmes about prostitution to date to have surely got some aspiring producer salivating?

I did find this programme watchable, though mostly from behind the sofa as they were a pretty scary pair though really,really sad.
The title more appropriately would have been, "Expensive Call Girls" or they could have just put a question mark at the end of it's actual title ?

Jay

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
I found the show interesting

1- it was obvious they werent getting 500ph but they might have done from some clientele.
2- they were serving a niche clientele. Someone blowing 500-2000 is like a standard lunch for some fat cats
3- financial domination and sugar daddies are more common than you think.
4- even the plastic girls have lots of clients.
5- most clients who book for an hour are done after 15 minutes.

Now some positives:
- They choose to earn from the top end of the market. Good luck to them. Most of us guys might not book them as they charge megabucks but its entirely their choice. They
- They did have a shower or seemed to shower between clients
-even being on the high end of the escort price range cookie had fucked 1000+ clients.
- She seemed to have a working mentality. Yes its true they love the money, but its why they are there!!!! They were fine with the fact they were escorts.

I guess the programme highlighted 'high class' but the fact is 90% of the profiles on aw advertise themselves as high class. All the girls on AW behave just like them. They are no different. What you see in Aw PG and what you get is highlighted in the programme: one being an ex junkie and ex porn star and the other being an average young english girl. Every girl advertises themselves as a supermodel but ita how they are. Without make up they are plain janes but after dolling up cookie looked fine.

I would guess that C4 paid them about £10k each to make that show. Good luck to them. They seemed themselves throughout the show and werent being all fake. Yes they love the money but if they are earning 6 figures per annum doing escorting then good luck to them.

Final point, i didnt see them say that they were going to a gym once. What you saw were girls lounging around when they didnt have clients but i guess thats due to the fact they could get booked any minute and would be ready within 30 mins.

As for the money being splashed around, it seemed as if they counted the same money over and over. No one really folds 50s into a £100 bunch to hand over to a WG.

While most of you might get annoyed at them or their attitudes. ALL WG BEHAVE JUST LIKE THEM. They are your average working girls that you book dailly from AW.






mark100max

  • Guest
now both charging 800 per hour incall 850 on there website, jesus good luck with that girls !

i had a bed dance from cookie jane in the fallen angels great yarmouth, then had an hour with her in the town, a few days later as i heard she was on tour in the area and was on AW, i couldnt get her out my head and had to have her, think i paid 175, she come across very different in this documentry to how i remember her.

The other girl first time i heard of her, she appeared to have issues just wanted to fall in love and have some look after her, and leave escorting, reading between the lines think she had enough of it.

only wish the documentry had shown some of the negatives of escorting and not just all positives,

Anyway girls i wish you well, and thanks to cookie for that memorable hour in yarmouth.




Aspen

  • Guest
They are your average working girls that you book dailly from AW.

Speak for yourself.

A lot may be like that, but I avoid them. The last time I was confronted with a girl like that was a long time ago, and I left pretty sharpish.

Pdubz

  • Guest
this show had me cracking up!
the part when cookies mum described her job!!  :dash:

emily b would be a decent shag at 80-100ph but cookies face eerghh that being said i would for a tenner

Offline Taggart

I have only pity for the men that pay this pair of "high class" prossies. Neither of them are even remotely pretty with or without makeup. Emily-B has admitted being an ex junky and has the worst fake tits I have seen in a long while.
And the trout face lips too?

I explained to the OH, who said I might find it interesting (!?), that high class was an accepted euphemism for overpriced.

My view is that for what the likes of Molly Swedish, Little Honey Jessica, Holly Golightly and others of that ilk are charging per hour, some of us are getting utter bargains.

As for blokes who do pay £500 for either those two, they have loads of money, but no bloody sense.
And for £500, I'd want a bag over the head of Emily, she looked every inch a dog. Fake, fake, fake.

No thanks, give me genuine girls anytime. I think C4 has turned guys off punting !




Offline LanceVance

I only saw bits of it, it was a bit boring and didn't reveal anything new to me that was not in similar documentaries. The main bullet points were:

1) The programme should be a good fluffy antidote.
2) There are some men out there who really do have more money than sense.
3) Neither of the girls are attractive to me and certainly not worth £500ph, IMHO.
4) You can find better looking and cheaper Eastern Europeans for a fraction of the price.
5) Adultwork got some good publicity, indeed you can argue that it was an hour long ad for their mobile webapp.
6) It was interesting that Channel 4 showed the girls covered in spunk, the BBC would have probably blurred those details out.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2015, 05:33:18 pm by LanceVance »

Aspen

  • Guest

6) It was interesting that Channel 4 showed the girls covered in spunk, the BBC would have probably blurred those details out.

Looked like toothpaste to me,

Offline j122

It was probably all filmed within a matter of hours with no real punters (either friends or extras paid a few quid to appear) and fake phone calls.

Offline tazz

The mother of the essex whore didnt remotely seem to be related to her, just cant accept shes her mum. Sounded and looked worlds apart. Also im sure channel 4 must have asked her to come in naked with spunk on her tits. Think a lot of guys will pay £200-300 an hour for a middle class english girl as they prefer their company and easier to chat to. As many guys are on 6 and even 7 figure salaries and come from wealthy families £300 or £500 is neither here nor there.Guy i worked with has a nephew who made millions from JP Morgan in a year. They also prefer a whore that isnt fucking 30-50 guys a week.


Offline tazz

They also appeard on ITV morning programme revealing more crazy stuff. See

External Link/Members Only

Offline anonyorks

I'd pay £100 for a hour with cookie.

I watched it with the Mrs, why would a guy who can afford £2000 for an overnight be wearing a trackie though?

And the guy who wanted to fuck a porn star?  I watch a hell of a lot of porn and have never heard of the other one.

Offline Johny Stone

No way that's their true age:


Emily B, 28 (left) Cookie Jane, 24, spoke candidly on ITV's This Morning about life as high-class call girls

 
Hidden Image/Members Only


Offline Cuntminion

No way that's their true age:


Emily B, 28 (left) Cookie Jane, 24, spoke candidly on ITV's This Morning about life as high-class call girls

 
Hidden Image/Members Only

Brunette, way to much make up

Aspen

  • Guest
Brunette, way to much make up

And a botox health warning ~ don't take the risk, this could happen to you!!!

Redhead Lover

  • Guest
28 and 24?  And the fucking rest!

Offline anonyorks

Just been on mnet

"Those dogs looked so confused all of the time"

Will no one think of the dogs!!  :scare:

Jay-Jay

  • Guest
I still can't help thinking how very sad the girl's lifes really were. They've both had surgery to attempt perfection and missed by a mile,were dependant on alcohol to get them through the day and were men haters but ironically so needy for honest male acceptance outside of the " can I come on your tits?" variety that they ended up transfering that need to their ratty dogs and the,supposed amount of money thy earn!

Jay

MrBridger

  • Guest
28 and 24?  And the fucking rest!

Sadly I think the ages are about right. Drinking/drug abuse, botox/fillers and poor diet will do that to a girl.

jcdmj12

  • Guest
No way that's their true age:


Emily B, 28 (left) Cookie Jane, 24, spoke candidly on ITV's This Morning about life as high-class call girls

 
Hidden Image/Members Only

I knew Emily B was famous from somewhere:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Tony Montana

  • Guest
Just been on mnet

"Those dogs looked so confused all of the time"

Will no one think of the dogs!!  :scare:

They were talking about cookie & emily.

Offline Cuntminion

just proper watched it

Blonde one is an arsehole, could be doing any job and she would have a deplorable attitude

Brunette feel sorry for to a degree , seems emotionally unstable and needs a good break


Biggest victims ? Their pet dogs, they did not look happy

Diehard

  • Guest
No way that's their true age:


Emily B, 28 (left) Cookie Jane, 24, spoke candidly on ITV's This Morning about life as high-class call girls

 
Hidden Image/Members Only

Does anyone find this pair attractive? They are revolting. Only clients they may get are rich Arabs who would fuck any white girl with a pulse for the novelty factor and don't know any better.

BoabT

  • Guest
CJ looks attractive enough. The other one looks as though she has gone 12 rounds with Rocky Balboa.

Diehard

  • Guest
It was funny. When the brunette walked out covered in cum I had to rewind as I couldn't believe what I'd just seen. High class my arse! Strangely though  didn't dislike them - f*** them? No not at that price anyway - didn't fancy either of them but have to say you can't blame them. If it's true that they can charge that much and get it you can't blame them. Some of these bankers and city boys in London aren't normal Joes like the majority of us and the amount of money they earn is ridiculous. A grand to them is like a tenner to us. It was great tv and I found it a laugh tbh. Bless em  :rolleyes:

You really miss the point. If I were a billionaire I simply wouldn't fuck either of them. When I see a nice looking woman I get a hard on because I'm a dirty bastard! I'm sat looking at those two and my cock seems to be hiding! I can't even find it to go for a piss!!

Affording them has nothing to do with it...they are just very ugly and not worth fucking.

Diehard

  • Guest
Most wouldn't be foolish enough to appear on this or any other TV show as common sense tells you they will show you in the worse light possible so they have to take whoever they can get.  At least once a month loads of us get emailed about appearing in a show about sex work and only the very foolish or desperate would say yes.  It's different for those who appear on debate shows as they tend to be intelligent in the main apart from that do called ex street worker from Ireland who was proven to have never worked as a prossie (can't remember her name)

They picked two expensive women and called it high class. There was nothing high class or vlast about either of those two.  For a start someone with class would not be doing a pregnancy test on a TV show and would have kept that private

It's a shame as we could do with some TV shows that show this job how it really is and how diverse the range of women who do it are. From the hard nosed chavs to the normal everyday woman who isn't hard, crazy, on coke, trying to scam cash etc but the decent woman would t be foolish enough to let a TV show make them look like idiots
I watched even though I could see before hand how the show would go

I consider all hookers to be desperate. I don't think any enjoy what they do. However, I make that statement as a generalisation on the basis I think it is accurate depiction of the overwhelming majority. There are a very select few escorts who simply love the risqué aspect. They tend to have really top jobs. I've met a few. However as u rightly say them appearing on a show like this is just not going to happen.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
A drunk and a surgically-deformed coke addict.

Well Done, Channel 4  :dash:

They call them high class! Emily B looked more like a former expelled pupil or an ex-convict. Her language, style and whole attitude was worse than someone from a council estate.

Both girls were very unattractive, even with make up. Why on earth would anyone pay more than £100 an hour to see those obese ladies?

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
You really miss the point. If I were a billionaire I simply wouldn't fuck either of them. When I see a nice looking woman I get a hard on because I'm a dirty bastard! I'm sat looking at those two and my cock seems to be hiding! I can't even find it to go for a piss!!

Affording them has nothing to do with it...they are just very ugly and not worth fucking.

LMAO. The show is over now. I bet you've found your cock now!

Offline king tarzan

Ony a very rare handful of clients would pay them that ridicilous rate of £500ph..
Wealthy people are some of the most tightest individuals too, they would not be wealthy if they were throwing money away like on them too...
If they did earn these enormous sums then quit and set themselves up some other business? I know that level of money would be an addiction, but not a happy joyful addiction so the stop button would be near bye?
I wanted to see cookiejane, not the most attractive i must admit, but there was something about her, her rate was £200ph but there was no owo so i gave her a miss...
Many beautiful and plentyfull stunners out there at half of there prices max, even much cheaper.. tall leggy beautiful models..
some i even ask that they have had past modelling experinces and they tend to blush and admit yes they did..
Not the most appealing (cookiejane something sexy about her) if they get those sums out of mugs then fair game to them, but i believe it is not common and everyday as they make out.. once in a blue moon..
Rich men tend to be tight that is why they are rich, they wont dwindle away there fortune on these sort of women as they have worked hard for their money.. on the other hand if they have not easy come and easy go and these women will certainly help in that easy go..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Jason

  • Guest
Their physical appearance in the documentary doesn't worth £50 for a duo let alone £500 for 121. In the External Link/Members Only they looked better than in the documentary, especially Cookie Jane who during the documentary looked really ugly. However the way they looked in the morning show was after the professional application of a ton of External Link/Members Only. It is evident from the documentary that they don't look like this when they are whoring and even if they did, the maximum reasonable price for them would be £60ph and that assuming a great service.

As for the documentary here are a few negative and positive points:

Negatives
1. Wrong title. High class my arse. The title should have been “Grossly overpriced classless pro$$i€$”

2. It sends the wrong message about prostitution prices and what level of prostitute's attractiveness one can find (especially for £500).

3. It says that websites such as Adultwork replace pimps and madams. Although it is true that it is easy for a girl to set up a profile and work as independent we all know that pimps and madams are still well present and this is very unlikely to ever cease to be the case. Pimps are involved by running a lot of AW profiles, providing the premises where many girls work from, handling the comms with the clients, etc, All of course done in exchange of taking a share from the prostitutes' "hardly-earned" money.

Positives
1. It introduces to those who don't know it already that prostitution has evolved and what girls need is instead of a street presence, an online presence. I do note the intentional omission of the Adultwork website and its portrayal as only a mobile phone application but that is presumably to make it look more “technologically advanced” 2015 form of prostitution.

2. It confirmed that in London there are guys who have more money than sense. Paying chubby mingers like Cookie or Emily £500ph? WTF?

3. It captures well the mentality, ambitions and behaviour of most hookers. Although the two girls are mingers and extremely overpriced, they think, aim, behave and operate like pretty much every prostitute in UK of any price range - especially those who have not received university or college education. In External Link/Members Only you can see a documentary of 3 Polish prostitutes in Poland (with English subtitles). The similarities in their inner beliefs are eerie.

4. It is a good lesson to all those pathetic fluffies out there who become infatuated with some pro$$i€$ and think of them as something special. A lesson that you should never believe that the External Link/Members Only that prostitutes may show you during a booking is the reality. The difference between the morning show and the documentary illustrates this well. The former showed the tip, the latter showed what lies beneath.

5. Emily B getting pregnant by her boyfriend confirmed two things we have always kept saying here:
(i) Prossies are likely to bareback someone (boyfriend, pimp, etc) so visiting one always contains some risk to contract an STD. That said you limit that risk substantially by using a condom.
(ii) It showed that at a least a few prostitutes, even those who charge high rates, may not take further contraception measures (e.g. pill) and rely only the male condom.

6. It illustrated a case of how the parents of a girl who is known to be a prostitute cope with it. Cookie’s mother wants to be in denial. I actually felt sorry for her.

7. It provides a good reference about the typical British prossie in London: Unattractive, overweight, overpriced, severely lying about her age, uneducated, unreliable in her bookings, lazy, ungrateful and up her own arse. In London they are by far the worst VFM nationality. Yes, there are *very few* exceptions of good and reasonably priced British girls in London but are so few that they are exactly that: exceptions.

8. It debunks the “high-class” prossie myth and demonstrated that higher rates certainly don’t guarantee class, education or looks. Both girls did their absolute best to debunk this myth. Surely there are WGs out there who combine beauty, class, education, great service etc BUT paying £500ph doesn’t guarantee you will get one of them. You may instead get a classless dog like Cookie or Emily.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
What??? Five hundred bucks for TWO HOURS with that...

Scarlett may well be a prossie, part Polish, shit tattoos (some of the worst on a celebrity other than Amy Winehead).

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
I didn't watch that documentary. Very good summary. Thanks  :hi:

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
. It provides a good reference about the typical British prossie in London: Unattractive, overweight, overpriced, severely lying about her age, uneducated, unreliable in her bookings, lazy, ungrateful and up her own arse. In London they are by far the worst VFM nationality. Yes, there are *very few* exceptions of good and reasonably priced British girls in London but are so few that they are exactly that: exceptions.

I disagree. This is national - not solely London.

British Indian and most British escorts are what your point above summarises

Offline HappyandLucky

I didn't watch that documentary. Very good summary. Thanks  :hi:
+2 but did watch it.  :drinks:

Offline Brazilian Martian

The worst thing  is they probably think they are celebrities after this went out on airwaves

Diehard

  • Guest
Interesting neither has appeared on here! They must be reading what is posted here.

I didn't see them on this morning but I fail to see why this morning editors feel their viewers would be interested? Or is there a hidden suggestion that many mothers have whored, aspire to whore or are are whoreing?
« Last Edit: May 23, 2015, 11:59:44 pm by Diehard »

Offline Matium

They've been on Prossienet, probably too afraid of the reaction they'll get to come on here.

Diehard

  • Guest
They've been on Prossienet, probably too afraid of the reaction they'll get to come on here.

Gutless low rent skanks. They make Romanians seem worth seeing!

Diehard

  • Guest
Their physical appearance in the documentary doesn't worth £50 for a duo let alone £500 for 121. In the External Link/Members Only they looked better than in the documentary, especially Cookie Jane who during the documentary looked really ugly. However the way they looked in the morning show was after the professional application of a ton of External Link/Members Only. It is evident from the documentary that they don't look like this when they are whoring and even if they did, the maximum reasonable price for them would be £60ph and that assuming a great service.

As for the documentary here are a few negative and positive points:

Negatives
1. Wrong title. High class my arse. The title should have been “Grossly overpriced classless pro$$i€$”

2. It sends the wrong message about prostitution prices and what level of prostitute's attractiveness one can find (especially for £500).

3. It says that websites such as Adultwork replace pimps and madams. Although it is true that it is easy for a girl to set up a profile and work as independent we all know that pimps and madams are still well present and this is very unlikely to ever cease to be the case. Pimps are involved by running a lot of AW profiles, providing the premises where many girls work from, handling the comms with the clients, etc, All of course done in exchange of taking a share from the prostitutes' "hardly-earned" money.

Positives
1. It introduces to those who don't know it already that prostitution has evolved and what girls need is instead of a street presence, an online presence. I do note the intentional omission of the Adultwork website and its portrayal as only a mobile phone application but that is presumably to make it look more “technologically advanced” 2015 form of prostitution.

2. It confirmed that in London there are guys who have more money than sense. Paying chubby mingers like Cookie or Emily £500ph? WTF?

3. It captures well the mentality, ambitions and behaviour of most hookers. Although the two girls are mingers and extremely overpriced, they think, aim, behave and operate like pretty much every prostitute in UK of any price range - especially those who have not received university or college education. In External Link/Members Only you can see a documentary of 3 Polish prostitutes in Poland (with English subtitles). The similarities in their inner beliefs are eerie.

4. It is a good lesson to all those pathetic fluffies out there who become infatuated with some pro$$i€$ and think of them as something special. A lesson that you should never believe that the External Link/Members Only that prostitutes may show you during a booking is the reality. The difference between the morning show and the documentary illustrates this well. The former showed the tip, the latter showed what lies beneath.

5. Emily B getting pregnant by her boyfriend confirmed two things we have always kept saying here:
(i) Prossies are likely to bareback someone (boyfriend, pimp, etc) so visiting one always contains some risk to contract an STD. That said you limit that risk substantially by using a condom.
(ii) It showed that at a least a few prostitutes, even those who charge high rates, may not take further contraception measures (e.g. pill) and rely only the male condom.

6. It illustrated a case of how the parents of a girl who is known to be a prostitute cope with it. Cookie’s mother wants to be in denial. I actually felt sorry for her.

7. It provides a good reference about the typical British prossie in London: Unattractive, overweight, overpriced, severely lying about her age, uneducated, unreliable in her bookings, lazy, ungrateful and up her own arse. In London they are by far the worst VFM nationality. Yes, there are *very few* exceptions of good and reasonably priced British girls in London but are so few that they are exactly that: exceptions.

8. It debunks the “high-class” prossie myth and demonstrated that higher rates certainly don’t guarantee class, education or looks. Both girls did their absolute best to debunk this myth. Surely there are WGs out there who combine beauty, class, education, great service etc BUT paying £500ph doesn’t guarantee you will get one of them. You may instead get a classless dog like Cookie or Emily.

Plus one! Great post

Offline Denhamhoop

Hmm having seen the whole of the programme i feel a little sorry for the brunette as she seems to have kind of "accepted" her life but to me seems to be quite a tortured soul at heart.The other one yes i think her attitude towards work would be bad whatever "job" she did.As ive said elsewhere worries me that neither seems to expect guys to want or like them for anything other than sex .Still i suppose this business can dehumantise both the girls and their attitudes towards men.
This programme probably makes me even fluffier than before as i feel sorry for the brunette

Offline Brazilian Martian

Gutless low rent skanks. They make Romanians seem worth seeing!

Second that  :bomb:

Offline Brazilian Martian

Hmm having seen the whole of the programme i feel a little sorry for the brunette as she seems to have kind of "accepted" her life but to me seems to be quite a tortured soul at heart.The other one yes i think her attitude towards work would be bad whatever "job" she did.As ive said elsewhere worries me that neither seems to expect guys to want or like them for anything other than sex .Still i suppose this business can dehumantise both the girls and their attitudes towards men.
This programme probably makes me even fluffier than before as i feel sorry for the brunette

Your not fluffy you just have compassion but Emily b does not deserve it what type of woman rubs her belly and says hello baby knowing well that she is having a termination. :unknown: then the scene where she has spunk on her chest no wonder her boyfriend turned his phone off

Offline Dogfather

Neither my type and the doc just confirmed it. Blacklisted already.
Hopefully more new additions to the scene because of the program and less fluffying from customers.