Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Channel 4's High Class Call Girls  (Read 22745 times)

Offline Aspen

If you were a punting virgin, these girls would be enough to make you stay that way. It's no wonder the girls on saafe have probably got their claws out, these skanks give good WG's a bad name.

Agree totally.

It would put me off completely if I didn't know better. They seemed so pissed and stupid all the time, and really taking the piss too. At no time did I have any inclination towards either of them. Usually it doesn't take much, the sight of a leg or whatever, but this prog turned me off totally. It was sick.

I can't imagine many guys being interested by it. Maybe curious, but not to the point of wanting to book a girl. But there'll be quite a few girls take it up expecting easy money. But they'll be ill suited and screw it up for everyone else.

Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 345
I couldn't believe the start of the show where they are just sitting there not only slagging off other hookers (we're all one step away from being a streetwalker love) but ripping into clients.
Good luck with future bookings now your clients know you can't stand them.  :dash:

Offline Grumbleguts

Have a feeling the taxmen will be looking at a good few tax disclosures. Lot of girls going to get a visit from them soon. Should be able to recover enough cash to pay for the new Trident subs :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline kingkong

I have only pity for the men that pay this pair of "high class" prossies. Neither of them are even remotely pretty with or without makeup. Emily-B has admitted being an ex junky and has the worst fake tits I have seen in a long while.

Offline Aspen

I couldn't believe the start of the show where they are just sitting there not only slagging off other hookers (we're all one step away from being a streetwalker love) but ripping into clients.
Good luck with future bookings now your clients know you can't stand them.

I think most of us are realistic enough to know how we're regarded by most girls. You try to put that to one side for the duration of the session. But of course for it to be so blatant is another thing. They held their clients in contempt and made no attempt to hide it.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Aspen

I have only pity for the men that pay this pair of "high class" prossies.

I don't pity them in the slightest. They are just as stupid, if not more so. They deserve each other.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"


Offline Jay-Jay

I'll tell you where there is an excellent documentary in the making and that would be one about Adultwork. It's been mentioned on enough programmes about prostitution to date to have surely got some aspiring producer salivating?

I did find this programme watchable, though mostly from behind the sofa as they were a pretty scary pair though really,really sad.
The title more appropriately would have been, "Expensive Call Girls" or they could have just put a question mark at the end of it's actual title ?

Jay

Offline bensonhedges20

I found the show interesting

1- it was obvious they werent getting 500ph but they might have done from some clientele.
2- they were serving a niche clientele. Someone blowing 500-2000 is like a standard lunch for some fat cats
3- financial domination and sugar daddies are more common than you think.
4- even the plastic girls have lots of clients.
5- most clients who book for an hour are done after 15 minutes.

Now some positives:
- They choose to earn from the top end of the market. Good luck to them. Most of us guys might not book them as they charge megabucks but its entirely their choice. They
- They did have a shower or seemed to shower between clients
-even being on the high end of the escort price range cookie had fucked 1000+ clients.
- She seemed to have a working mentality. Yes its true they love the money, but its why they are there!!!! They were fine with the fact they were escorts.

I guess the programme highlighted 'high class' but the fact is 90% of the profiles on aw advertise themselves as high class. All the girls on AW behave just like them. They are no different. What you see in Aw PG and what you get is highlighted in the programme: one being an ex junkie and ex porn star and the other being an average young english girl. Every girl advertises themselves as a supermodel but ita how they are. Without make up they are plain janes but after dolling up cookie looked fine.

I would guess that C4 paid them about £10k each to make that show. Good luck to them. They seemed themselves throughout the show and werent being all fake. Yes they love the money but if they are earning 6 figures per annum doing escorting then good luck to them.

Final point, i didnt see them say that they were going to a gym once. What you saw were girls lounging around when they didnt have clients but i guess thats due to the fact they could get booked any minute and would be ready within 30 mins.

As for the money being splashed around, it seemed as if they counted the same money over and over. No one really folds 50s into a £100 bunch to hand over to a WG.

While most of you might get annoyed at them or their attitudes. ALL WG BEHAVE JUST LIKE THEM. They are your average working girls that you book dailly from AW.





Banning reason: Troll

Offline mark100max

now both charging 800 per hour incall 850 on there website, jesus good luck with that girls !

i had a bed dance from cookie jane in the fallen angels great yarmouth, then had an hour with her in the town, a few days later as i heard she was on tour in the area and was on AW, i couldnt get her out my head and had to have her, think i paid 175, she come across very different in this documentry to how i remember her.

The other girl first time i heard of her, she appeared to have issues just wanted to fall in love and have some look after her, and leave escorting, reading between the lines think she had enough of it.

only wish the documentry had shown some of the negatives of escorting and not just all positives,

Anyway girls i wish you well, and thanks to cookie for that memorable hour in yarmouth.




Offline Aspen

They are your average working girls that you book dailly from AW.

Speak for yourself.

A lot may be like that, but I avoid them. The last time I was confronted with a girl like that was a long time ago, and I left pretty sharpish.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Pdubz

this show had me cracking up!
the part when cookies mum described her job!!  :dash:

emily b would be a decent shag at 80-100ph but cookies face eerghh that being said i would for a tenner
Banning reason: Creating multiple identities + Previously banned (aka Pdubz / hardnpulsing / mckintosh / Anthony / captainavenger / docbydaypunterbynight / Warrior)

Offline Taggart

I have only pity for the men that pay this pair of "high class" prossies. Neither of them are even remotely pretty with or without makeup. Emily-B has admitted being an ex junky and has the worst fake tits I have seen in a long while.
And the trout face lips too?

I explained to the OH, who said I might find it interesting (!?), that high class was an accepted euphemism for overpriced.

My view is that for what the likes of Molly Swedish, Little Honey Jessica, Holly Golightly and others of that ilk are charging per hour, some of us are getting utter bargains.

As for blokes who do pay £500 for either those two, they have loads of money, but no bloody sense.
And for £500, I'd want a bag over the head of Emily, she looked every inch a dog. Fake, fake, fake.

No thanks, give me genuine girls anytime. I think C4 has turned guys off punting !




I only saw bits of it, it was a bit boring and didn't reveal anything new to me that was not in similar documentaries. The main bullet points were:

1) The programme should be a good fluffy antidote.
2) There are some men out there who really do have more money than sense.
3) Neither of the girls are attractive to me and certainly not worth £500ph, IMHO.
4) You can find better looking and cheaper Eastern Europeans for a fraction of the price.
5) Adultwork got some good publicity, indeed you can argue that it was an hour long ad for their mobile webapp.
6) It was interesting that Channel 4 showed the girls covered in spunk, the BBC would have probably blurred those details out.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2015, 05:33:18 PM by LanceVance »

Offline Aspen


6) It was interesting that Channel 4 showed the girls covered in spunk, the BBC would have probably blurred those details out.

Looked like toothpaste to me,
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline j122

It was probably all filmed within a matter of hours with no real punters (either friends or extras paid a few quid to appear) and fake phone calls.

Offline tazz

The mother of the essex whore didnt remotely seem to be related to her, just cant accept shes her mum. Sounded and looked worlds apart. Also im sure channel 4 must have asked her to come in naked with spunk on her tits. Think a lot of guys will pay £200-300 an hour for a middle class english girl as they prefer their company and easier to chat to. As many guys are on 6 and even 7 figure salaries and come from wealthy families £300 or £500 is neither here nor there.Guy i worked with has a nephew who made millions from JP Morgan in a year. They also prefer a whore that isnt fucking 30-50 guys a week.



I'd pay £100 for a hour with cookie.

I watched it with the Mrs, why would a guy who can afford £2000 for an overnight be wearing a trackie though?

And the guy who wanted to fuck a porn star?  I watch a hell of a lot of porn and have never heard of the other one.

Offline Johny Stone

No way that's their true age:


Emily B, 28 (left) Cookie Jane, 24, spoke candidly on ITV's This Morning about life as high-class call girls

 



Offline comaminion

No way that's their true age:


Emily B, 28 (left) Cookie Jane, 24, spoke candidly on ITV's This Morning about life as high-class call girls

 


Brunette, way to much make up
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Aspen

Brunette, way to much make up

And a botox health warning ~ don't take the risk, this could happen to you!!!
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

28 and 24?  And the fucking rest!

Just been on mnet

"Those dogs looked so confused all of the time"

Will no one think of the dogs!!  :scare:

Offline Jay-Jay

I still can't help thinking how very sad the girl's lifes really were. They've both had surgery to attempt perfection and missed by a mile,were dependant on alcohol to get them through the day and were men haters but ironically so needy for honest male acceptance outside of the " can I come on your tits?" variety that they ended up transfering that need to their ratty dogs and the,supposed amount of money thy earn!

Jay


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)