X-Miss_Katie-X in Leicester (nearly positive)

[Lt Shaffer]

Met Katie in a central Leicester hotel.  Comms was great, phone and text, no problems at all.  Looks-wise she's a girl-next-door 7.9/10 and has the most fantastic body - perfect, natural, large puppies, slim waist, soft and tanned skin, very edible pussy.  No stretch-marks, no tattoos!  You'll struggle to find a WG with a more impressive figure.

More positives once we got going... owo was good - wet, sloppy, deep, some eye-contact and best of all prolongued!  Katie's pussy is very inviting too, no need to get the lube-tube out and was a nice, snug fit for the wee colonel.

So, why the Neutral report?  Well, she spent way too much time watching the tv whilst she was receiving oral (I'm not that bad at it, or maybe I am?!) and she didn't get "into" the session.  I'd actually rather that she'd acted a bit more or even tried to enjoy herself.  Katie's a little too sub for my taste - she doesn't lead at all, but on the other hand she does respond well to instruction so will suit others more than me.

Katie tours and is fairly regularly in Leicester I think.  To get my hands on that young, lithe figure and those great tits I'd be tempted to see her again but I wouldn't do so simply because there's no connection, no sexual chemistry when you're with her.  Others might well find her more appealing.  Did I mention her amazing body?!

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Diehard]

Met Katie in a central Leicester hotel.  Comms was great, phone and text, no problems at all.  Looks-wise she's a girl-next-door 7.9/10 and has the most fantastic body - perfect, natural, large puppies, slim waist, soft and tanned skin, very edible pussy.  No stretch-marks, no tattoos!  You'll struggle to find a WG with a more impressive figure.

More positives once we got going... owo was good - wet, sloppy, deep, some eye-contact and best of all prolongued!  Katie's pussy is very inviting too, no need to get the lube-tube out and was a nice, snug fit for the wee colonel.

So, why the Neutral report?  Well, she spent way too much time watching the tv whilst she was receiving oral (I'm not that bad at it, or maybe I am?!) and she didn't get "into" the session.  I'd actually rather that she'd acted a bit more or even tried to enjoy herself.  Katie's a little too sub for my taste - she doesn't lead at all, but on the other hand she does respond well to instruction so will suit others more than me.

Katie tours and is fairly regularly in Leicester I think.  To get my hands on that young, lithe figure and those great tits I'd be tempted to see her again but I wouldn't do so simply because there's no connection, no sexual chemistry when you're with her.  Others might well find her more appealing.  Did I mention her amazing body?!

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

But for the sloppy oral, which I did not get, my experience was very similar as I've explained in my report but I think neutral is being kind. We both have stated we won't return, has to be a negative in my book.

She does state she is submissive but that is bollocks. What she means is, she is so disinterested that she isn't going to get involved in the session and she hides behind the submissive explanation.

I'm not sure out of the two of us who had the worse experience. Had I been giving her oral and she was watching the telly that would have severely pissed me off, that is taking the piss.

What she is suited for is to be used as a 15 minute cum dump.

[Lt Shaffer]

Yeah, I might have been being a bit kind with that. The trouble is I see so much utter trash that Katie was actually quite good compared to many! But I do agree that you get nowhere near a GFE. If, however, you want a 30 minute fuck and then dump a load into a fit, non-EE then you could do worse.