Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Paul and Louise. That was a lucky accident !  (Read 3048 times)


2 review(s) for paulNlouise (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline ico23

Well, that was a surprise !

I was looking through AW idly at work as you do and was running a search when I accidentally clicked on couples instead of females and a handful of results turned up. Curiosity getting the better of me I started looking through and this profile looked interesting.

https://www.adultwork.com/1514168 or https://www.adultwork.com/paulNlouise

Special offer when booking through AW £140 an hour. Interesting I thought, seems reasonable. Read on, didn't seem to be full of BS or over promising and under delivering. Plenty of glowing feedback so by now my interest was really piqued ! A quick peek at the private gallery (again £1.20 for 500+ pics is definite VFM) and I fired off an email.

I have never been with a couple before so was understandably a little hesitant but an email arrived swiftly back from Paul to make arrangements which I replied to, had to ring a number which was answered by Louise. I get a feeling for nice people when you speak on the phone and Louise did sound nice, and genuine. All good so far. (Communication 10/10)

Arrangements made, On the day I call from the car and am given the house number which is a Victorian terrace in BS16 area. Door answered by Paul with a warm welcome and shown through to meet Louise.  WHOA ! These guys are great ! After that little bit of awkwardness when meeting anyone new I was perfectly at ease in their company as Paul is a genuinely friendly bloke and Louise is that and HOT with it. Offered a drink as we sat chatting for a bit then it was off up to the bedroom.

I wont get into specific detail, but they have a very extensive likes list and I have no reason to believe that anything would be off limits and as it was my first meet with a couple there are probably things on that list I wouldn't be into anyway. This would be the main concern of many as the worry would be that you'd get a cock shoved up your ass without a by your leave. This is not the case. Paul goes as far as you want to and at no point did I feel uncomfortable although he does have a very suckable cock. Can I leave it like that ?  You get the drift I'm sure. Louise is the centre of attention however so you can be as bi or curious as you like without the awkwardness. Oh, and she's hot ! I think I mentioned that. Taller than you think, and again the profile is spot on with their ages/sizes etc. The pictures really don't do her justice (I hate that phrase) but in this case it's absolutely true. Very pretty indeed.

All in all then, a terrific hour spent with a great couple who profess to meet only once a day which I believe to be true. They genuinely appear to do it for the fun and a bit of extra cash which is refreshing.

Top value for money. Highly recommended.

 


2 review(s) found for paulNlouise linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline James999

I wont get into specific detail,

Often when people say that it turns out to be the pro$$ie / pimp who wrote the "report"

Does read like an advert

Just saying  :sarcastic:

Offline ico23

Hey James, think what you like but I had a cracking time !

It does get a bit boring here when everyone's discussing the same people. Just thought I'd share my experience of these two I had this morning who would usually get overlooked in a normal AW search as it's a bit different to the norm that's all. I don't believe they have been mentioned before which is why I posted my review in the first place.

Won't bother again. I'll keep it all to myself and just post stupid one liners.




Offline Natwest

Hey James, think what you like but I had a cracking time !

It does get a bit boring here when everyone's discussing the same people. Just thought I'd share my experience of these two I had this morning who would usually get overlooked in a normal AW search as it's a bit different to the norm that's all. I don't believe they have been mentioned before which is why I posted my review in the first place.

Won't bother again. I'll keep it all to myself and just post stupid one liners.

Full marks to you for seeing it through. I enjoyed reading it and must admit I have been tempted to dabble with a couple but haven't quite had the nerve. One for the bucket list. Don't be put off by James pointless comments. He doesn't actually punt so this is the nearest he can get to experiencing it.

Offline vt

Hey James, think what you like but I had a cracking time !

It does get a bit boring here when everyone's discussing the same people. Just thought I'd share my experience of these two I had this morning who would usually get overlooked in a normal AW search as it's a bit different to the norm that's all. I don't believe they have been mentioned before which is why I posted my review in the first place.

Won't bother again. I'll keep it all to myself and just post stupid one liners.

Cheers for the fake review Paul...your missus does indeed look very fuckable...but the mention of your cock being 'very suckable' means that I'm out!!  :hi:

Now if you could spend the whole hour out of the room...and not just the first 30 mins...you might have a deal!!  ;)

Offline ico23

Thank you Waverley.

That was more of the response I was hoping for. I was very nervous !

I thought for a long time about posting the review seeing how these threads always seem to revert to accusations which are totally groundless. But there you go. A look through my previous posts would say I was genuine.

Like I say. Wont bother again. There loss.

Offline Natwest

Thank you Waverley.

That was more of the response I was hoping for. I was very nervous !

I thought for a long time about posting the review seeing how these threads always seem to revert to accusations which are totally groundless. But there you go. A look through my previous posts would say I was genuine.

Like I say. Wont bother again. There loss.

I did read through your previous posts and came to the conclusion it would have been a hell of an elaborate scheme for self promotion. Having said that taking over two years to post a review was probably leaving yourself slightly open to criticism. Please do keep on posting. It was good to see something a bit different and is something I personally explored on AW. However tentative enquiries produced some not great responses so I shelved the idea. Maybe this might make me think about having another go. The Review section is here to give us ideas and suggestions so please more of them. Perhaps not waiting another two years?

Offline ico23

I haven't had much to add Waverley ! A very infrequent punter at best and I just thought this warranted a post as it WAS different. I'll try not to leave it so long next time !


Offline spkmstr48

Banning reason: Prossie fanboy

Offline vt

I haven't had much to add Waverley ! A very infrequent punter at best and I just thought this warranted a post as it WAS different. I'll try not to leave it so long next time !

Does Louise not let you out very often then??  :unknown:

Look buddy, I don't know if you're a fake or not. I hope not, as fake reviewers are lowlife scum. I was following James 6th sense on these matters, but as Waverley points out your post history would suggest that you might just be a genuine punter. You've been on here for a while and know what a bunch of cynics we can be...so why the fuck would you choose to write such a blatant fluffy advert for your first review??   :wacko:

Hopefully the post-punt euphoria has worn off now and you can tell us what you were most disappointed with...about their looks, about the venue, about the service, about the awkwardness of fucking a guy's wife in front of him for the first time...and then sucking him off in front of her on a first meeting...surely there was something?!? Did his cock taste of gorgonzola or brie?? You really do need to go into specific detail to recover from the smell of BS on this one!!  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: May 05, 2015, 08:26:18 PM by vt »

Online alchemist

I have meet Paul and Louise on a number of occasions as I quite enjoy mmf punts.  Paul is happy to be straight during a meet and this fits with what I'm looking for, just a straight mmf session.  The original poster seems to be getting slated so I thought I'd chip in. I find them a really friendly couple, Lou is fun, gorgeous and extremely horny. I do get the feeling that she is up for most things and more importantly for me she enjoys what she does (they both do).  The first time I met them the situation was a bit strange at first but they put me at ease very quickly.  Not for everyone I appreciate but definately a genuine couple if that's your thing.

Offline Natwest

I have meet Paul and Louise on a number of occasions as I quite enjoy mmf punts.  Paul is happy to be straight during a meet and this fits with what I'm looking for, just a straight mmf session.  The original poster seems to be getting slated so I thought I'd chip in. I find them a really friendly couple, Lou is fun, gorgeous and extremely horny. I do get the feeling that she is up for most things and more importantly for me she enjoys what she does (they both do).  The first time I met them the situation was a bit strange at first but they put me at ease very quickly.  Not for everyone I appreciate but definately a genuine couple if that's your thing.

Unfairly slated in my opinion and the posts prior to it were pretty conclusive that he is genuine. However I do hope the OP does come back on and fleshes out his review - or maybe you can expand on your posting? It is a topic that rarely gets discussed and it is a shame that the thread had to go the way it did. Time for sulking over really and lets get some more detail.

Offline Cornish sub

Unfairly slated in my opinion and the posts prior to it were pretty conclusive that he is genuine. However I do hope the OP does come back on and fleshes out his review - or maybe you can expand on your posting? It is a topic that rarely gets discussed and it is a shame that the thread had to go the way it did. Time for sulking over really and lets get some more detail.
Yes, his, "I won't go into specifics," bollocks should be reserved for AW field reports, not ukpunting. Well, with one caveat; he should leave out any mention of any mm cock sucking (which his original review alluded to)  :vomit:

Offline vt

Yes, his, "I won't go into specifics," bollocks should be reserved for AW field reports, not ukpunting. Well, with one caveat; he should leave out any mention of any mm cock sucking (which his original review alluded to)  :vomit:

All that got my BS-meter ticking...the 'lucky accident' of mistakenly stumbling across the MF couples section...which prompts a 'nervous', 'infrequent punter' to go on his first ever couple meet and he gets so carried away he finishes up sucking the husband off!!   :bomb:

I'm sorry, but it just reads like experienced kinky swinger husband Paul's wet dream fantasy to me!   :rolleyes:

I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but the OP better come up with something good...some more believable detail here and a few more detailed & realistic reviews of other punts would be certainly help!   :)

Waste of time as a review especially with the "I won't go into detail" bit and it certainly does read like story the sp would concoct to read like a real review which in reality is a poor attempt at self promotion.

Wow, there's some uber cynicism on this forum isn't there?! I've no reason to doubt the OP and have myself spent some quality time with these guys on webcam. For my mind they're a bonafide couple from Bristol and she is hot as fuck. I've no desire to get bi with Paul but I'd like to get into a threesome with her in the middle. Might get stage fright as he's a bit of an athlete in sexual terms!

Offline Roth

Waste of time as a review especially with the "I won't go into detail" bit and it certainly does read like story the sp would concoct to read like a real review which in reality is a poor attempt at self promotion.

+1  :thumbsup:

Offline ico23

Hey guys, that's fine, I won't bother again.

The contradictions at every level totally dissuade anyone from posting reviews here. On one side I'm criticized by vt for not being more "specific" and yet on the other hand Cornish sub seems to just want the specifics he's interested in and censor the parts he's not. The other posting police just jump on the bandwagon.

So what makes a more specific review ? Lets have a look at this one.....

 "Kinkerbell69 from Cornwall is a beautiful brunette, predominantly submissive but happy to give a convincing and severe domination service. Also, much to my delight, specialises in smoking fetish."

And no, that's not just a quote from the review, that is it in its entirety, not even two full lines, so no specifics whatsoever there  then at all. Who posted it ? Cornish sub did.....talk about pot and kettle....... but is it useful ?  I'd say it is. Would I criticise it ? Nope. Any review of any length with many specifics or very few is still useful in making a decision as long as it is honestly given. I hate fake reviews as much as the next man and if they can be outed then that's all for the good but even now that we've had a few posts corroborating my original post the cynics still abound.

This whole conspiracy theory is quite frankly ludicrous. It would take the genius of a Bond villain to fake my join date, my other posts, and build up over a two year period to post one fake review ? Get real.

Anyway, I'll leave you all to it and keep my punting experiences to myself in future so the dogs can be called off now. I certainly didn't envisage all that grief !


Offline Natwest

Hey guys, that's fine, I won't bother again.

I think that would be a shame and it is an unfortunate fact that once one shark circles, several others come in for the kill. However if you post up your next punt, all will be sweetness and light I am sure.

I looked through the reviews of all the protestors and I am not going to pick out examples but there were a few that had very little detail once you cut through the scene setting. However like the OP's report, I read them at the time without any criticism. Reviews are the life blood of this forum and the only part I read. For every reviewer who gets torn about I bet there are loads of people reluctant to review in case the same happens to them.

I totally agree with the OP's comment on his last post. If you are going to use this forum for a bit of self promotion, then you are not going to do it over a period of two years with a handful of posts. Most times you join, post and then fuck off or get banned.

So toys back in the pram to the OP and everybody else play nicely!

Offline Cornish sub

It's the term 'I won't go into specifics' that grates in the OP's review. There's a thread elsewhere on this site - Most Hated Punting Clichés - and 'I won't go into detail' is up there as one of the lines that most grates in reviews. As for me being picky in which specifics I'd like to see in a review; I'd imagine I'm in the vast majority on here who don't want to read about a punter sucking another bloke's cock.

Offline Roth

As for me being picky in which specifics I'd like to see in a review; I'd imagine I'm in the vast majority on here who don't want to read about a punter sucking another bloke's cock.

+1. :thumbsup:

Offline spkmstr48

It's the term 'I won't go into specifics' that grates in the OP's review. There's a thread elsewhere on this site - Most Hated Punting Clichés - and 'I won't go into detail' is up there as one of the lines that most grates in reviews. As for me being picky in which specifics I'd like to see in a review; I'd imagine I'm in the vast majority on here who don't want to read about a punter sucking another bloke's cock.

But it is his first review, give him a chance. And although most of us, me included, don't include cock sucking in things we like, it wouldn't be the weirdest kink written about on here. To be honest it's not even sufficient to make him gay or bi. Look up BDSM polysexual.  You're a sub judging by your nickname, what if your mistress told you to do it?
« Last Edit: May 08, 2015, 07:00:27 PM by spkmstr48 »
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy

Offline Cornish sub

But it is his first review, give him a chance. And although most of us, me included, don't include cock sucking in things we like, it wouldn't be the weirdest kink written about on here. To be honest it's not even sufficient to make him gay or bi. Look up BDSM polysexual.  You're a sub judging by your nickname, what if your mistress told you to do it?
Would never happen, I only have sessions with females. As for the polysexual term you mention; wtf?!! I've never heard of it, not a clue what it means, but if you're a male and you suck cock, even if only under the orders of a mistress, you're bi or gay, no matter what trendy, 'right on' term you give yourself.

Offline spkmstr48

Whatever our individual prejudices, the fact remains that a new reviewer has potentially been scared off by aggressive stances of people who want more details at the same time as they want to list details that it is not acceptable to include. You can't have it both ways.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)