Vidaloca456 - Refreshing new lady - West London

[OnTheSly]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I had a reverse booking out for nearly 3 weeks knowing about a visit to London I had planned with work, the majority of the bids totally ignored my booking so thought I wasn't going to have any luck so had booked a certain unreliable lady as a plan B.  Then right at the last minute Nicola placed a bid and from the messages sounded right up my street - so took a punt on her!

Area
Really lovely part of town (Ealing area) - never been to before but a world apart from some of the scummy places visited in the past.

Looks / Personality
Whilst the pictures give nothing away on AW, she did send a face pic and it was definitely her.  Slim, around 5'5" with a very toned body, long brown hair and brown eyes, probably 32B (gorgeous IMO) boobs.  Extremely friendly and made me feel at home.

Services Received
An amazing pamper session for me after having a very physical evening at work the previous day - I wasn't looking for rough fast sex, I just wanted to do nothing to be honest and have her do all the work - which is what I got:
Nice stroking / teasing / playful massage
OWO
RO
Sex: CG, Doggy and some positions that I don't even know the names off to be honest!

FK was offered but that's not my thing so didn't take her up on it.


She certainly doesn't do this often and is not a clock watcher (I had booked 1.5 hours and by the time I left I was at her flat for 2 hours in total) - I didn't feel rushed and we spent a bit of time just talking and stroking each other.  This is one of the things I love about good Brits compared to other ladies in this profession.

Would I see her again?  Certainly, but not at her normal rates - fortunately the bid was lower than advertised on AW.  From a VFM point of view, I think the great personality, ability to actually talk to the girl and the non-rushed services is worth the extra (for me) compared to the conveyor belt systems the cheaper providers offer.  But that's just my opinion.

[sweetas]

Thx for the review

Can I ask what you paid?
Currently emailing back and forth so be good to know what would be considered a fair price.

Out of 10, how pretty would you say she is?

Cheers

[OnTheSly]

Id say 7.5/10. Girl next door look, very fit body (she is 32 and you wouldn't be able to tell). Lovely Welsh accent too

It was a reverse booking; a bit more than her hourly rate for 1.5hrs.

Ask her for a face pic, she sent one to me really quickly and this is what made me accept her bid.

[password02]

Thanks fro the review - HL

[cheek]

Planning to see her this week after she placed a bid on my RB. Was the only person who sent something that was even personalised to me!

[marty_mcfly]

Thanks for the review. It has helped me keep my hot list down to a manageable size. She's not in it because at £160 per hour and that too for a 37-38 year old lady with very limited services is just not worth it. By the way, 32 escort years is really 37-38 in actual years.

[OnTheSly]

She's pretty convincing then, even her email address has year of birth in it (which ties up with the AW age). Easily setup I agree.

If you're right then I just slept with my first older woman - something I never thought I'd do 

[password02]

Thanks for the review. It has helped me keep my hot list down to a manageable size. She's not in it because at £160 per hour and that too for a 37-38 year old lady with very limited services is just not worth it. By the way, 32 escort years is really 37-38 in actual years.

I have seen a face picture and can agree with the OP that she is early 30's so 32-33 is about right.  Can I ask Mr MM how you got her age late 30's 37-38 or is it just a guess? Did she send you face pictures as well?

[marty_mcfly]

I have seen a face picture and can agree with the OP that she is early 30's so 32-33 is about right.  Can I ask Mr MM how you got her age late 30's 37-38 or is it just a guess? Did she send you face pictures as well?

I was using a general rule of thumb for working girls. More often than not their quoted ages are exaggerated, usually by 5-6 years. I applied the same formula in this case. No offence intended.

[Expl1cit]

I was using a general rule of thumb for working girls. More often than not their quoted ages are exaggerated, usually by 5-6 years. I applied the same formula in this case. No offence intended.

Smells to me like to general rule of bullshit.

Of course generally speaking, the age for prossies can be exaggerated, but to assume anyone who advertises as 32, is actually 5-6 years older when you haven't seen a face pic, is certainly stretching the imagination.

Shall we all pick up 12-13 year old girls, because really speaking they are 18-19 and of legal age?