Nightmare scenario

[kiltedviking]

Possibly not nightmare on the grand scale of things, but a theoretical sticky situation...

All the adverts and website have the same phrase, "any money exchanged is for the companion's time, anything else... consenting adults etc...".

Fine and probably not worth a second thought. What if you got there and the WG said, " to be honest I don't really fancy you/it/that. I'll happily spend an hour with you but that's it, that's what you are paying for after all ".

Apart from feeling very irate, it strikes me that there's not much a punter can do about it. She's not wrong after all.

Of course there is reviews on UKP and other sites to consider, reputational damage for the WG, probably better scams in the shape of the " bf home unexpectedly " but it is something that crossed my mind a few times.

Thoughts please? Anyone encountered the scenario?

[RedKettle]

I think you worry too much!

Chill and get punting.

[AgedCases]

I read a thread somewhere on this site that this actually happened.

And the poor bastard had paid for an overnight!

[superchamp]

I think what you're describing is otherwise known as "marriage role play".

[closeshave]

 

[JV547845]

No means no, but they should offer a refund otherwise I'd do my damndest to make sure she never got any work in the sex industry ever again.

[threechilliman]

One of those odd things I've thought about and on occasion nearly said 'Here's your money for an hour, do you consent to have sex with me'. Never done it, but it has crossed my mind.

One or two that I see probably wouldn't let you out until you'd fucked them!

tcm

[Ben4454]

Scenario won't pop up if you ask what she enjoys to do sexually beforehand and before handing the money over..

[smiths]

Possibly not nightmare on the grand scale of things, but a theoretical sticky situation...

All the adverts and website have the same phrase, "any money exchanged is for the companion's time, anything else... consenting adults etc...".

Fine and probably not worth a second thought. What if you got there and the WG said, " to be honest I don't really fancy you/it/that. I'll happily spend an hour with you but that's it, that's what you are paying for after all ".

Apart from feeling very irate, it strikes me that there's not much a punter can do about it. She's not wrong after all.

Of course there is reviews on UKP and other sites to consider, reputational damage for the WG, probably better scams in the shape of the " bf home unexpectedly " but it is something that crossed my mind a few times.

Thoughts please? Anyone encountered the scenario?

Personally I seek confirmation that the services I require like kissing and OWO are on offer when I enquire and book, if the WG or maid/pimp say they are then the WG finding ME attractive or not is neither here nor there as its fucking for cash not dating. IF they actually aren't available it will be because the WG or maid/pimp are lying low lifes.

I have had the scenario where the WG has agreed the services when I enquired, booked and in person before I handed my cash over only for her to return from stashing it saying they aren't anymore, fortunately a rare occurrence.

[kiltedviking]

Definitely a good idea about confirming don't details before money is handed over. As a few have suggested, I don't think this is something you'd encounter with any well reviewed, established working girls, just a thought exercise to liven up a quiet evening.

I've been on here every day for the last few weeks researching, reading, joining in debates etc, while the main frustration has been that I've been unable to engage in any sexual activity due to a medical procedure that needs to resolve itself before I can "unleash the beast".

I can't bloody wait to start knocking women off my hot lost and see if I agree with all the good reviews I've read.

[King Kenny]

All that crap about money being paid for time not for sex is only relevant at a parlour, and is a piss poor attempt to stay on the right side of the law. As prostitution is still legal, there's no need for independents to ever say this in their marketing.

[DG]

All that crap about money being paid for time not for sex is only relevant at a parlour, and is a piss poor attempt to stay on the right side of the law. As prostitution is still legal, there's no need for independents to ever say this in their marketing.

Been discussed before on here but you are absolutely right. One WG, an independent, told me so long as you didn't place the money in her hand, ie. Leave it on a table or something, that kept it legal. Turns out that is bollocks. So long as there is no soliciting or coercion involved, you can hand as much cash over as you like and do what you like without fear of prosecution.

Different story with parlours/bro tells of course.

[bod666]

The interesting thing is when you meet a girl who actually has an engaging personality (as well as being a good shag) & the fluffy takes over and starts thinking about dinner dates. I take the published rate as applicable for shagging and that a lower rate can be negotiated for non-sexual activities.

There are a few girls who I've shagged 4-5+ times who I do start to think about doing some of the more traditional non-sexual escort services with.  Still not done it yet mind

[King Kenny]

Of course a contract for sex is unenforceable in civil law. Something about contracts for immoral purposes being unenforceable.  Perhaps that's why they want paying upfront?

[kiltedviking]

Fair point King Kenny,  I was trying to compare that type of arrangement with other services you purchase.  Eating out at a restaurant  (pardon the pun) and you generally pay after,  although there's obvious risk of receiving the "service" and defaulting on payment.  Perhaps if restaurants are as paranoid as WGs we'd all have to pay for food up front.

Come to think of it,  I can't think of too many services toy but where you need to pay up front (although parlours are a bit more like that I guess too).

[raylondoner]

Lots of upfront payments if you think about it, such as
Sporting events
Theatre or cinema
Travel

All with no guarantee of good value

[kiltedviking]

Good point,  I obviously never thought that through hehe.

In fact a lot of "live entrainment"  is paid up front (circus,  theme parks etc)  perhaps because the owners are scared of people refusing to pay if the service wasn't  that great.  Also very true for WGs, I wonder how many punters would refuse to pay full amount if service wasn't that good in their opinion.

[charger70]

This topic throws up a follow up question, how many punters actually hand over the cash pre action? I have only once, on my first ever punt, then with no feedback etc. Since then it's always been afterwards, upon leaving, is this uncommon then?

[cueball]

This topic throws up a follow up question, how many punters actually hand over the cash pre action? I have only once, on my first ever punt, then with no feedback etc. Since then it's always been afterwards, upon leaving, is this uncommon then?

What? You always pay after the podging? That's a first on me, I've always paid straight away, I must be doing sommat wrong here

[virtualplayer]

What? You always pay after the podging? That's a first on me, I've always paid straight away, I must be doing sommat wrong here

Depends on the girl some ask upfront some don't some that were upfront payment let me pay as leaving.

[smiths]

What? You always pay after the podging? That's a first on me, I've always paid straight away, I must be doing sommat wrong here

Put it this way I have been punting over 30 years and its always been the norm to pay before the punt in person to the WG, except with some regulars and at some parties. I know many punters and its been the norm for them to do the same plus most have posted the same on the two punting forums I have posted on in the last 7 years.

[Sonny Crockett]

If I ever encountered this from a WG, I would walk away with my money intact. It is very unprofessional for a lady to do this!!!!!!   

[sticko]

Depends on the girl some ask upfront some don't some that were upfront payment let me pay as leaving.

+1.  With regs I pretty much always hand over the readies at the end; with women I haven't seen before it varies.  I like it when money doesn't exchange hands until the end of the session (see my recent review for Lola Bell), but it's entirely understandable that most ask for it upfront.

S

[freddiej]

This topic throws up a follow up question, how many punters actually hand over the cash pre action? I have only once, on my first ever punt, then with no feedback etc. Since then it's always been afterwards, upon leaving, is this uncommon then?

I paid on leaving on my first punt, wasn't asked at the start and didn't even think about it till after.  So took the same line from then on and find about half the time I pay at the end even with WG's I haven't seen before.  I don't mind paying upfront but if you haven't actually handed money over it would be easier to leave if it really started badly. It's not happened yet.

I'd be interested to know if this is fairly normal too.

[charger70]

Just a follow up to my earlier post, with one, who has subsequently become a regular, she nearly forgot to ask for, and take the cash with her, I reminded her as she was going out of the door ! (in call to a Hotel)
Before you ask, she is fucking hot, and right up my street, So worth  keeping everything on the level! (bet she would have remembered  before she got home, and would have come back to claim it !

[MrBridger]

Here's the thread of the poor bastard who got the full wife experience:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=48413.350

I also forgot to pay once and she forgot to ask. Walking back to my car, reached into my pocket for my phone and found the envelope. Headed back and paid up. Half hoping she might say 'no that was so good I didn't want you to pay', sadly no such luck.