Author Topic: Lucy of Prestige + NorthEastIncalls  (Read 2493 times)

Offline ProfessorYaffle

External Link/Members Only

I booked Lucy for a 1 hour incall. Price was £110.

Communications were good, they texted me the postcode when I made the booking, then I rang up just before the start of the booking to get the house number.

Her house is located in Heworth. It's a quiet and respectable area. There was parking outside and in the nearby streets. It was quite a hike from Heworth metro station, the best part of a mile and a lot of it was uphill.

Inside it was pleasant enough though there was the faint smell of cigarette smoke.

I'd say her photos are misleading or at least not representative of what she actually looks like. They give the impression she's rather sexy and glamorous facially, but in reality she's pretty average looking (or maybe a bit above) and I didn't find her particularly attractive. At least part of the problem was she didn't appear to be wearing any make-up, and very few girls look good bare-faced in my experience. She might have looked attractive with some slap on but I'm not sure. Her hair was tied up and was blonde but with a lot of dark root showing.

Her body is good though, fairly big well shaped boobs that are enhanced but it's a really good job, they're soft and I couldn't tell by sight at all. Nice curvy hips and bum. Her pussy is hairy which is very unusual these days in my experience. Nice tan. She was dressed in a basque with black stockings and knickers.

I was half tempted to walk due to the disappointment with her face but her boobs did look rather appealing and I didn't have any sort of plan B in place so I stayed.
 
She's a nice girl, she seemed a touch stiff or shy initially but warmed up after a bit and was friendly enough.

Her hygiene was fine and I could smell soap on her skin (no smell of cigarettes either).

I sorted the paperwork and asked if I could take a shower. She seemed a bit taken aback and said she didn't have one but I could have a bath, which I declined but did use the sink to get a quick wash. There was soap and a clean towel.

She offered me a Swedish massage which I declined.

Services: DFK, OWO, HJ, Reverse O, 69, sex (missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, doggy, missionary), cum on boobs.

She said she doesn't do CIM, facials or anal.

She did DFK but didn't seem all that keen on it, her OWO was good and she was responsive during reverse O but didn't cum. I enjoyed the sex and got the feeling she did too. She bucked back in doggy and pulled me into her in missionary. I was close to cumming during the 69 and sex and had to keep stopping.

Overall, I have mixed feelings. Ultimately I did get some enjoyment out of it but couldn't get over the disappointment of her misleading / unrepresentative pics so I'm giving this a neutral rating. I wouldn't return.

Online johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,029
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 40
Great informative review thanks Prof.

Agree this should be a neutral based on misleading pics & not being too keen on the DFK.

Offline foreverchanges

Thanks Prof...the hairy pussy will be enough to put me off never mind the misleading photos.

I thought you were seeing Holly NNE but then I read that she had no showed..bad crack all round. :thumbsdown:

Offline ProfessorYaffle

Thanks Prof...the hairy pussy will be enough to put me off never mind the misleading photos.

I thought you were seeing Holly NNE but then I read that she had no showed..bad crack all round. :thumbsdown:

I saw Lucy a few days ago, I was going to see Holly today but when she cancelled I ended up seeing Alex of NNE instead. I'm writing up her review now.

Offline PlasticGeordie

Thanks for the review. Her pics do look great so nice to know they are a bit misleading. 2 neutrals in a row. Hope you have better luck next time.

Offline ProfessorYaffle

Thanks for the review. Her pics do look great so nice to know they are a bit misleading. 2 neutrals in a row. Hope you have better luck next time.

Me too haha

greychap

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

I booked Lucy for a 1 hour incall. Price was £110.

Communications were good, they texted me the postcode when I made the booking, then I rang up just before the start of the booking to get the house number.

Her house is located in Heworth. It's a quiet and respectable area. There was parking outside and in the nearby streets. It was quite a hike from Heworth metro station, the best part of a mile and a lot of it was uphill.

Inside it was pleasant enough though there was the faint smell of cigarette smoke.

I'd say her photos are misleading or at least not representative of what she actually looks like. They give the impression she's rather sexy and glamorous facially, but in reality she's pretty average looking (or maybe a bit above) and I didn't find her particularly attractive. At least part of the problem was she didn't appear to be wearing any make-up, and very few girls look good bare-faced in my experience. She might have looked attractive with some slap on but I'm not sure. Her hair was tied up and was blonde but with a lot of dark root showing.

Her body is good though, fairly big well shaped boobs that are enhanced but it's a really good job, they're soft and I couldn't tell by sight at all. Nice curvy hips and bum. Her pussy is hairy which is very unusual these days in my experience. Nice tan. She was dressed in a basque with black stockings and knickers.

I was half tempted to walk due to the disappointment with her face but her boobs did look rather appealing and I didn't have any sort of plan B in place so I stayed.
 
She's a nice girl, she seemed a touch stiff or shy initially but warmed up after a bit and was friendly enough.

Her hygiene was fine and I could smell soap on her skin (no smell of cigarettes either).

I sorted the paperwork and asked if I could take a shower. She seemed a bit taken aback and said she didn't have one but I could have a bath, which I declined but did use the sink to get a quick wash. There was soap and a clean towel.

She offered me a Swedish massage which I declined.

Services: DFK, OWO, HJ, Reverse O, 69, sex (missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, doggy, missionary), cum on boobs.

She said she doesn't do CIM, facials or anal.

She did DFK but didn't seem all that keen on it, her OWO was good and she was responsive during reverse O but didn't cum. I enjoyed the sex and got the feeling she did too. She bucked back in doggy and pulled me into her in missionary. I was close to cumming during the 69 and sex and had to keep stopping.

Overall, I have mixed feelings. Ultimately I did get some enjoyment out of it but couldn't get over the disappointment of her misleading / unrepresentative pics so I'm giving this a neutral rating. I wouldn't return.

Was the neutral review just because you did not find her face attractive? How was the pictures misleading?

Offline ProfessorYaffle

Was the neutral review just because you did not find her face attractive? How was the pictures misleading?

Basically yes. I'd say her photos are misleading (or not representative) in that she looks nothing like the girl in the pics.

Have you ever seen a "porn stars with and without make-up" gallery?

External Link/Members Only

To me based on her photos I was expecting a "porn star with make-up" and what I got a was "porn star without make-up".


Offline marbella punts rule

Basically yes. I'd say her photos are misleading (or not representative) in that she looks nothing like the girl in the pics.

Have you ever seen a "porn stars with and without make-up" gallery?

External Link/Members Only

To me based on her photos I was expecting a "porn star with make-up" and what I got a was "porn star without make-up".

im not trying to pick here but I don't get the "misleading" thing... if there were pics of her face all made up like a porn star fair enough... but from what I can see its a lass in her bra and pants with a bit lipstick on... I do understand your disappointment expectations not met I guess  :hi:

Offline ProfessorYaffle

im not trying to pick here but I don't get the "misleading" thing... if there were pics of her face all made up like a porn star fair enough... but from what I can see its a lass in her bra and pants with a bit lipstick on... I do understand your disappointment expectations not met I guess  :hi:

Look at the girl in the pics. You can see the bottom of her hair and face unblurred. From what you can see, does she look like she's going to have an attractive face?

Offline marbella punts rule

Look at the girl in the pics. You can see the bottom of her hair and face unblurred. From what you can see, does she look like she's going to have an attractive face?

hmmmmm I dunno... I guess so... I wouldn't be expecting a minger anyhow.. but then only seeing her mouth and a bit of her hair I wouldn't make the assumption she was gonna be a porn star looker... guessing you didn't request her to be made up (porn star style)?.. although  I would expect as i'm guessing you were a little bit of an effort with makeup etc...

Offline ProfessorYaffle

hmmmmm I dunno... I guess so... I wouldn't be expecting a minger anyhow.. but then only seeing her mouth and a bit of her hair I wouldn't make the assumption she was gonna be a porn star looker... guessing you didn't request her to be made up (porn star style)?.. although  I would expect as i'm guessing you were a little bit of an effort with makeup etc...

I was just using the porn star thing as an analogy. The point is that to me her photos make her look like she's going to be facially attractive. In reality she wasn't, IMO. To be honest I can't even tell if it's the same girl.




Offline marbella punts rule

I was just using the porn star thing as an analogy. The point is that to me her photos make her look like she's going to be facially attractive. In reality she wasn't, IMO. To be honest I can't even tell if it's the same girl.

fair play.... guess she just wasn't what you was expected.. 

better luck next time  :drinks:

Offline superfurryanimal

Thanks Prof...the hairy pussy will be enough to put me off never mind the misleading photos.

I thought you were seeing Holly NNE but then I read that she had no showed..bad crack all round. :thumbsdown:

I quite like a hairy pussy; I know it's easier for ladies to clean up without a hairy one, but I wish a few more would sport one. It's a USP in imho.

It's a pity you didn't find her attractive Prof, but judging by the services rendered, you certainly gave her a good seeing to!
« Last Edit: April 07, 2015, 07:17:45 am by superfurryanimal »

Offline Jamessn

At least you didn't pay prestige for a £150 outcall with her, they own the agency you booked with. Things must be slow as they have just started the incall site too.

Only used this agency twice, both times they turned up late, went early and not attractive. Owner not interested.