I was also in the minority and felt that Lily was a little invasive on occasions. Nice to hear then that she may have adapted slightly. I look forward to finding out.
Ain't we the spoiled bastards? "Yes, I ENJOYED her kissing, don't get me wrong, but her passion, though welcome, was a tad too - what can I say - vehement? When snogging, I have a - call me fussy - a 5 centimetre rule. The first few centimetres tells me that there's attraction, and a gingerly poked tongue is acceptable, only if it's intermittently thrust into my mouth. Lily is obviously enthusiastic, and that's commendable, but - you know - has she not heard of the slow-burner? Hmmmm?"
It will be only a short time until WHICH rates escorts, and there is some kind of sliding scale in which kissing is rated from 0 to 5. The expectation being that if you book x escort she will deliver kissing to the standard decreed in the review, in the same way that a washing machine will spin your wet kecks at a certain rate. So Lily, as the sexual equivalent of a washing machine, will be expected to deliver deep french kissing at so many tongue-revolutions per minute. It'll be timed and objectively verified and in the interests of quality assurance, she will be regularly inspected. Transparency. Customer rights. Get what you paid for. All good.
My own personal theory is that some girls kiss deeply as a way of getting into the moment, since they're being asked to fuck men twice or thrice their age who lack their own personal charms. Kissing oils that disparity. Since kissing is nice and creates good feeling.
I think that us old, plain, not-hot guys ought to allow girls whatever means they need to get into the zone. And not be too picky.
