Close ups of fannies and arses.

[NIK]

There are so many AW profiles with close ups of fannies and arses. Close up photos of someone's fanny or arse is not only no good to me, it actually puts me off as it suggests not only a lack of awareness of what makes an attractive profile, but also a lack of class.   

Furthermore it could be anyone's naughty bits!

[ForrestGump]

Presumably intended to attract those making testosterone driven choices

[Jimmyredcab]

I have all but given up on Adultwork, whenever I do a search I get profiles like this, totally useless, I know some on here will say that I am missing out on some gems but I am no longer willing to waste my time and money on wild goose chases across London, if they can't post a decent photo they can piss off.     

Hidden Image/Members Only

[HappyandLucky]

Close up vag shot and I just ignore them, but a sexy full body shot with a subtle hint of vag and i'll get my coat 

[anyfucker]

I have all but given up on Adultwork, whenever I do a search I get profiles like this, totally useless, I know some on here will say that I am missing out on some gems but I am no longer willing to waste my time and money on wild goose chases across London, if they can't post a decent photo they can piss off.     

Hidden Image/Members Only

Jimmy, what about if she had a number of positive reviews on here and no pics, such as misskdd?

[Jimmyredcab]

Jimmy, what about if she had a number of positive reviews on here and no pics, such as misskdd?

It would depend on who did the reviews ---------------- some of our members are VERY easy to please.   

[Stealthshagger]

I can understand why they put vag and anus and sex and bj etc in private gallery, as those that want that pay a small amount for it and it funds the available now option and number display. For gallery and front of profile I prefer nice but unedited face and body pics, more so I can see what they look like and not in an atrocious selfie.

I reckon a mix of clothed day to day moving to lingere to nude would be a tempting proposition, and explicit just for private gallery. Might just be my taste? I like the normalish woman Clothed then progressing to the sexy to the nude. It gets me interested anyway.

[jackdaw]

A lot of WG photos are nigh useless.

 I can understand not wanting to do a clear face picture...but there's no reason not to do good quality body shots...not if body is half way reasonable. (Note to any aspiring prossies: don't have your name and address tattooed on your torso.)

[bensonhedges20]

It would depend on who did the reviews ---------------- some of our members are VERY easy to please.   

Lol. /Me points to TAZ

I think body shots are fine if the images show the full body.

Close up shots of the vagina or asses are a sign of a lack of class as you say but i bet every profile states 'high class' lol or 'courtesan'.

I think 70% of these profiles spend all day bidding on reverse bookings as they have shit pictures which wont attract clients

[SirFrank]

I like to have a bit left to my imagination. I do like to see a nice ass but full on pics of some birds kebab does nowt for me, especially if it resembles a chainsaw wound

[Drillakilla]

I like to have a bit left to my imagination. I do like to see a nice ass but full on pics of some birds kebab does nowt for me, especially if it resembles a chainsaw wound

You've hit the nail in the head, if it does look like a chainsaw wound I would run a mile!!

Also I checked out a girls pg once and she had little folds of skin on her asshole, obviously the grapes of wrath..that put me off booking her and I was glad to know in advance her ringpiece had flaps as big as her pie! Urgh still makes me shudder!!

[Siadwel]

Full frame pussy shots are classless, could be anyone's, and can be ugly. These have already been pointed out before I got here, so............. why do they do it? 

A full-frontal nude, standing up, not posing particularly sexually, preferably with a face but understandably not always possible, is always guaranteed to sell me on a girl more than a gaping great gash.

And as for ring-piece, 'See my asshole gaping after BBC lol' shots 

[greychap]

There are so many AW profiles with close ups of fannies and arses. Close up photos of someone's fanny or arse is not only no good to me, it actually puts me off as it suggests not only a lack of awareness of what makes an attractive profile, but also a lack of class.   

Furthermore it could be anyone's naughty bits!

Could not agree more!

It says to me there desperate and think a close up picture of there bits hanging out is what they think is needed to advertise yourself.

I think of scammer, crack head and a thick escort when they do this. There is no pride.

[socks]

I like to see the gory details, especially the bum hole as licking it is a key thing in my punts. So I'm all for at least one pic showing me the treats (or not) laying in store. It's probably the same motivation as wanting to look under the bonnet of a potential second hand car before purchase. The bodywork and upholstery can look as good and clean as you like. If the engine's oozing oil and water from its gaskets, I ain't buying.

[Stealthshagger]

Frankly, if her vagina looks like a chainsaw wound the picture isn't the part that bothers me about the punt. It's the idea of paying to have a prop from Saw on the end of my organic sprinkler.