First time I read this review, some of the phrases struck a bit of a false note; a bit different the normal iron-jawed hairy-arsed punter you normally find on here. Reading the thread I forgot about that as Roo-gate developed. Then the OP stirred up the hornet’s nest again.
As it happens, I have (and have for some time) made part of my living from my ability not only to write in clear English but to interpret what others have written in the English language. I’m not going to say any more, as it may blow my cover, but I am also no stranger to textual analysis.
The phrases which jumped out at me in this FIRST POST were:
‘So here's my way of saying thank you’;
‘Sooo, this girl really ticked all boxes’;
‘memorable experience which I could NOT move on from without reviewing.’;
‘but she was more discrete’ (sic) – classic gaffe for somebody who has just picked up someone on ‘bad’ English/grammar/spelling. Makes the OP look an even bigger clown in my opinion. And somebody has also pointed this out;
‘programmed for smiling’ – excuse me a moment while I empty the pukebin, uncurl my toes, and unclench my sphincter;
‘so difficult to meet a genuinely lovely girl’;
‘who works in the industry’ (as opposed to ‘fucks for money’);
‘meet her again. And again. And again’;
‘I'm going to have to wrap this up’;
‘WOW’; in upper case. On UKP. Quod erat demonstrandum.
Gushing? Fuck me, makes Kenneth Williams sound macho.
Then the emotional roller coaster kicks off, and the mask of hauteur slips a bit with, ‘you cunts are laughable’!!
The defence rests it case, m'lud.