Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Miss-Alexxx Glasgow  (Read 8211 times)


6 review(s) for Miss-Alexxx (5 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

GlasgowGuy91

  • Guest
"Feet give me the fear" that's about the most feminine answer you could have given. 

Our cynicism was proved to be correct with Roo, as your very first post was a review and it was backed up in the manner it was by that prick makes you look like you are in it together.

Funny Roo went for the same tact of having a better command of the English language too!

I've been on boards like this before and been shot down for asking too much advice before giving any.
Now I'm getting slaughtered for the opposite? You cunts are laughable, genuinely get a grip. Don't think I'm genuine? That's fine, just done take my advice. It's simple.

I'm the meantime I'll keep giving it where needed.

Offline Happyjose

Regrettably feet give me the fear S, so I can't say I took much notice.

Kind of worrying how cynical everyone on here can be! I write like a girl? My apologies for having a good command of the English language!

Cynical with good reason generally. If you're genuine and offended then please accept my apology. Using terms like wow and sooo, plus the overall gushing tone of your review raise red flags, which you should realise if you've been reading reviews on here. Respected reviewers on here give a balanced account of their experiences. Strange that you take such a position when one dodgy poster has already been found out. Out of interest can you tell me one aspect of your punt that wasn't perfect?

I also think it's bad form to pick up on any members spelling or grammar. It's no indication of usefulness to the forum. Seeing as how you brought it up, your command of English isn't that good - look up discrete/discreet

GlasgowGuy91

  • Guest
Cynical with good reason generally. If you're genuine and offended then please accept my apology. Using terms like wow and sooo, plus the overall gushing tone of your review raise red flags, which you should realise if you've been reading reviews on here. Respected reviewers on here give a balanced account of their experiences. Strange that you take such a position when one dodgy poster has already been found out. Out of interest can you tell me one aspect of your punt that wasn't perfect?

I also think it's bad form to pick up on any members spelling or grammar. It's no indication of usefulness to the forum. Seeing as how you brought it up, your command of English isn't that good - look up discrete/discreet

One aspect which wasn't perfect was the fact I had asked for a bath together.
When the hotel was eventually booked by Alex there was no bath, just a shower. It wasn't mentioned in my review as I can hardly expect any escort to be booking a hotel purely based on such a small request by ONE of her clients for the next few days.

I didn't pick anyone up for bad grammar, I simply pointing out that it seemed as if my own personal use of English was less manly than it should be.
While we are on the subject, note the difference between "good", as I claimed, and "perfect" as you tried to shoehorn into my words.

As I know I am genuine, I'll personally take that as an apology from you. It's appreciated, and accepted.

Offline Happyjose

One aspect which wasn't perfect was the fact I had asked for a bath together.
When the hotel was eventually booked by Alex there was no bath, just a shower. It wasn't mentioned in my review as I can hardly expect any escort to be booking a hotel purely based on such a small request by ONE of her clients for the next few days.

I didn't pick anyone up for bad grammar, I simply pointing out that it seemed as if my own personal use of English was less manly than it should be.
While we are on the subject, note the difference between "good", as I claimed, and "perfect" as you tried to shoehorn into my words.

As I know I am genuine, I'll personally take that as an apology from you. It's appreciated, and accepted.

No problem. Being let down on an agreed part of the punt (i.e. the shared bath) would I think be worth mentioning.

Offline J_H

First time I read this review, some of the phrases struck a bit of a false note; a bit different the normal iron-jawed hairy-arsed punter you normally find on here. Reading the thread I forgot about that as Roo-gate developed. Then the OP stirred up the hornet’s nest again.

As it happens, I have (and have for some time) made part of my living from my ability not only to write in clear English but to interpret what others have written in the English language. I’m not going to say any more, as it may blow my cover, but I am also no stranger to textual analysis.

The phrases which jumped out at me in this FIRST POST were:
   ‘So here's my way of saying thank you’;
   ‘Sooo, this girl really ticked all boxes’;
   ‘memorable experience which I could NOT move on from without reviewing.’;
   ‘but she was more discrete’ (sic) – classic gaffe for somebody who has just picked up someone on ‘bad’     English/grammar/spelling. Makes the OP look an even bigger clown in my opinion. And somebody has also pointed this out;
  ‘programmed for smiling’ – excuse me a moment while I empty the pukebin, uncurl my toes, and unclench my sphincter;
  ‘so difficult to meet a genuinely lovely girl’;
   ‘who works in the industry’ (as opposed to ‘fucks for money’);
   ‘meet her again. And again. And again’;
   ‘I'm going to have to wrap this up’;
   ‘WOW’; in upper case. On UKP. Quod erat demonstrandum.

Gushing? Fuck me, makes Kenneth Williams sound macho.

Then the emotional roller coaster kicks off, and the mask of hauteur slips a bit with, ‘you cunts are laughable’!!

The defence rests it case, m'lud.

GlasgowGuy91

  • Guest
First time I read this review, some of the phrases struck a bit of a false note; a bit different the normal iron-jawed hairy-arsed punter you normally find on here. Reading the thread I forgot about that as Roo-gate developed. Then the OP stirred up the hornet’s nest again.

As it happens, I have (and have for some time) made part of my living from my ability not only to write in clear English but to interpret what others have written in the English language. I’m not going to say any more, as it may blow my cover, but I am also no stranger to textual analysis.

The phrases which jumped out at me in this FIRST POST were:
   ‘So here's my way of saying thank you’;
   ‘Sooo, this girl really ticked all boxes’;
   ‘memorable experience which I could NOT move on from without reviewing.’;
   ‘but she was more discrete’ (sic) – classic gaffe for somebody who has just picked up someone on ‘bad’     English/grammar/spelling. Makes the OP look an even bigger clown in my opinion. And somebody has also pointed this out;
  ‘programmed for smiling’ – excuse me a moment while I empty the pukebin, uncurl my toes, and unclench my sphincter;
  ‘so difficult to meet a genuinely lovely girl’;
   ‘who works in the industry’ (as opposed to ‘fucks for money’);
   ‘meet her again. And again. And again’;
   ‘I'm going to have to wrap this up’;
   ‘WOW’; in upper case. On UKP. Quod erat demonstrandum.

Gushing? Fuck me, makes Kenneth Williams sound macho.

Then the emotional roller coaster kicks off, and the mask of hauteur slips a bit with, ‘you cunts are laughable’!!

The defence rests it case, m'lud.

Aside from opening up to you all and inviting you to ask me anything you want about any Glasgow girls I may have seen for proof I'm an actual punter, I don't know how to respond to that drivel. So, fire away!

Offline J_H

Squeeee!!!

Hey, I mean, like, WOW! Yeah, that reply is, like, MAJORLY AWESOME!

*swoons*

Offline Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 573
  • Likes: 9
Glasgowguy, does 91 mean your year of birth or your age?

GlasgowGuy91

  • Guest

Offline auldie63

Finally somebody on here older than me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Offline J_H


bensonhedges20

  • Guest
She has good comms. Only issue was she was unavailable till late When i found out she was doing an incall via hotel. Maybe i could book in advance but work commitments mean i cant book till closer.

She doesnt see just 2-3 a day but she seems eager yet enthusiastic, as described and one to see.

Shes a hotter and fitter version of  KENDRA and who ACTUALLY resembles her pictures.

When she gets an incall flat i will visit her as i would rather be her first of the day rather than number X.


Tjkooker

  • Guest
She has good comms. Only issue was she was unavailable till late When i found out she was doing an incall via hotel. Maybe i could book in advance but work commitments mean i cant book till closer.

She doesnt see just 2-3 a day but she seems eager yet enthusiastic, as described and one to see.

Shes a hotter and fitter version of  KENDRA and who ACTUALLY resembles her pictures.

When she gets an incall flat i will visit her as i would rather be her first of the day rather than number X.


Hmmmmmmm

Tjkooker

  • Guest
I really don't know why you made that comparison. From what I hear the girls are nothing alike service wise, looks wise and bodily. Both profiles are also pretty clear about what guys can expect. Do you have a motive for posting that comment? Think you might be worth watching especially as your making these comments without having met Alex. Have you ever met Kendra or you just flinging comments without experience? I've never met her but talked to at least a dozen guys that would rate her as one of the best.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2015, 06:54:26 am by Tjkooker »

RandyF

  • Guest
She has good comms. Only issue was she was unavailable till late When i found out she was doing an incall via hotel. Maybe i could book in advance but work commitments mean i cant book till closer.

She doesnt see just 2-3 a day but she seems eager yet enthusiastic, as described and one to see.

Shes a hotter and fitter version of  KENDRA and who ACTUALLY resembles her pictures.

When she gets an incall flat i will visit her as i would rather be her first of the day rather than number X.

More confused than ever here B&H!

External Link/Members Only the vanilla services only lass, with the big fake tits, lashes, not a hair out of place - has the TOWIE look going on?

I looked at Alexxx's PG last night and she's almost the exact opposite. No tits to speak off, some tacky tatts, but generally natural looking...with a big black as the Ace of Spades, hairy mediterranean fanny.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2015, 09:17:49 am by RandyF »

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
More confused than ever here B&H!

External Link/Members Only the vanilla services only lass, with the big fake tits, lashes, not a hair out of place - has the TOWIE look going on?

I looked at Alexxx's PG last night and she's almost the exact opposite. No tits to speak off, some tacky tatts, but generally natural looking...with a big black as the Ace of Spades, hairy mediterranean fanny.

Apparently its smooth and nicely shaved - Has been confirmed by the lady herself.

Im talking about the picture gallery and how the girl looks and represents herself.

kendras pictures dont resemble her now. They are atleast half a decade old

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
I really don't know why you made that comparison. From what I hear the girls are nothing alike service wise, looks wise and bodily. Both profiles are also pretty clear about what guys can expect. Do you have a motive for posting that comment? Think you might be worth watching especially as your making these comments without having met Alex. Have you ever met Kendra or you just flinging comments without experience? I've never met her but talked to at least a dozen guys that would rate her as one of the best.

I have met K. She didnt resemble her pics. At 100 p/h you wouldnt walk.

Im not singeling her out but both are similar in the sense their main focus is vanilla and both would be ideal for slower longer bookings.

Comparisons: both scottish, similar aged, regardless of the services they offer - both offer vanilla. Not much choice in glasgow with girls at the moment unfortunately.

Ask the dozen guys if she is a true representation of her three profile pictures - compare them to the girl who opens the door.

I never did criticise her performance. She delivers all the services in the profile BUT looked nothing like her pictures (didnt buy her PG).

Ill see alexx some time next month if the diaries can sync
« Last Edit: February 25, 2015, 12:53:38 pm by bensonhedges20 »

RandyF

  • Guest
Aye, now if GlasgowGay91 had written even the most basic of reviews, we'd all have been much the wiser.



Drillakilla

  • Guest
She has good comms. Only issue was she was unavailable till late When i found out she was doing an incall via hotel. Maybe i could book in advance but work commitments mean i cant book till closer.

She doesnt see just 2-3 a day but she seems eager yet enthusiastic, as described and one to see.

Shes a hotter and fitter version of  KENDRA and who ACTUALLY resembles her pictures.

When she gets an incall flat i will visit her as i would rather be her first of the day rather than number X.

So to be clear here, you have met miss Alex?

Tjkooker

  • Guest
I get the feeling the old fag end is just bumping his gums with zero actual experience.

Offline tazman1002001

External Link/Members Only

Well let me start with an apology to Miss Alexxx as I had thought she may have been a guy posing as a girl. However I can 100% that Miss Alexxx is ALL  :kissgirl: women and a really hot one at that.....and I mea PM really hot.

Miss Alexxx is a double of Nelly Furtado -

External Link/Members Only

And probably not far off body wise....so in other words she is a really cites and sexy girl.

Saw her earlier today for great 30mins GFE punt with OWO, foot fetish, French kissing....... The short version is met this gorgeous girl today, started with great OWO and slow hand releif......this girl has the cutest toes ever......she sucked me off whilst I played and sucked on her gorgeous toes and kept her pussy wet with my fingers......ended up shooting a BIG loads over her gorgeous toes....

Great POSITIVE punt for me.....and like I said she is 100% a woman.
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Tjkooker

  • Guest
The fluffies will be raging that that you have outfluffed them with their new favourite pro$$ie.

Offline tazman1002001

The fluffies will be raging that that you have outfluffed them with their new favourite pro$$ie.

I kept it simple and not fluffy at all ....I didn't even mention the bathroom......even though it was immaculate and had fluffy towels....... :thumbsup:

I haven't posted a review as sick of the shit feedback from some who have no input apart from moaning and picking to pieces a good review.......

The only reason I posted was to apologise and clarify that's Miss Alexxx is a female and her service and pics are accurate as there has been some suggestion she is a fake or her reviews are not true.

Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

stuart_gla

  • Guest
Good stuff Taz!

She'd bid on my RB for Friday, but I went to see Gabriella instead.

One for the hot list I think, although not such a fan of hotels really.

Offline tazman1002001

Miss Alexxx is a double of Nelly Furtado -

External Link/Members Only
.

Just to clarify for all those moaners out there...she reminds "me" of Nelly Furtado...... I don't want loads moaning comments about how you thought she looks nothing like her.......
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Tjkooker

  • Guest
You don't need to defend yourself taz. It's only your view not a statement of fact.

stuart_gla

  • Guest
Don't listen to the haters Taz, get the review up!

Offline tazman1002001

Im quite happy with what I've put up......  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

RandyF

  • Guest
Im quite happy with what I've put up......  :thumbsup:

Did she ask you not to write a review Taz, or is this your decision?

Anyhow, your info's 10000x more useful that the long gone and forgotten GlasgowGay91 tout.

Offline tazman1002001

Did she ask you not to write a review Taz, or is this your decision?

Anyhow, your info's 10000x more useful that the long gone and forgotten GlasgowGay91 tout.

We never discussed writing a review at all it is always my own choice to write a review.... And in this instance I just wanted to apologise for calling her a bloke in disguise and to only to only write a brief bit of detail about my punt .....as I mentioned I'm getting bored of reviews getting ripped to shreads so not writing a detailed one this time.......
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Tjkooker

  • Guest
Don't be like that taz. I love reading your reviews. Reminds us bitter sceptical bastards that there is still fun in punting.

Offline tazman1002001

Don't be like that taz. I love reading your reviews. Reminds us bitter sceptical bastards that there is still fun in punting.

TJ I'm going to take a back seat for now (I might change my mind Tomm) but I'm going to really enjoy girls like Miss Alexxx and the other regulars and keep it to myself.

Let's see what positive input some of these fannys put on here becos I don't think it will be much....
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline Happyjose

Always enjoy your reviews Taz

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
The fluffies will be raging that that you have outfluffed them with their new favourite pro$$ie.

Its nice to see the penpal has had a change of heart.

DG

  • Guest
TJ I'm going to take a back seat for now (I might change my mind Tomm) but I'm going to really enjoy girls like Miss Alexxx and the other regulars and keep it to myself.

Let's see what positive input some of these fannys put on here becos I don't think it will be much....

I have often mentioned a regular girl I see but haven't reviewed on here. Your comments reflect my reasons for not doing so, but in particular, the reason I found this site was as a result of Googling her AW name and found a thread on here. She was slated by about half a dozen guys who had never met her, mostly regular contributors, based entirely on her profile. And of course there was the one guy who had actually seen her (I know who is is despite his name change on here) who gave a very positive FB on AW, but gave a throw away line in the thread that she wasn't up to much.; playing up to the zealots I dare say. The fact that she gives me exactly what I want and operates in a way that suits me, I will continue to keep her to myself. All WGs aren't the same; there are a few gems out there.

Tjkooker

  • Guest
Its nice to see the penpal has had a change of heart.

Hi SilverMonkey/Glader. Thanks for confirming who you are.

Handheld

  • Guest
Hi SilverMonkey/Glader. Thanks for confirming who you are.

Ha. That explains a lot.

I thought the writing style was familiar
« Last Edit: March 01, 2015, 07:50:42 pm by Handheld »

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
Whatever floats your boat... Whoever that may be.

glas847

  • Guest
Anyone know what happened to Miss Alexxx?

Offline Courtney