Sexy Roxi 21 Barking

[brushhand811]

Saw Roxi last night  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only. Not the girl in the photo, which was what I expected of those professional pictures, so didn't walk. A pretty blonde polish girl who introduced herself as Magda and didn't seem too aware of what was on her profile. She met me in jeans and jumper and looked good in those. She quickly changed into nice underwear and black hold-ups as requested and looked even better. Nice flat in gated development, easy to find and easy to park.

I would say she matches her physical description on website but probably an 8/10 in body size, not a 6/8. Older than stated, probably mid twenties. A lovely figure and she showed me a good time over a two-pop hour session. Light kissing only, which is more than I usually want, but she instigated and kept up throughout the punt and I enjoyed it.

She shares the flat but didn't find out who her friend was.

Al in all an excellent punt with a friendly girl.

One slight negative, no facepic. in private gallery, but as above probably not down to her. She is attractive.

[Silver Birch]

Saw Roxi last night  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only. Not the girl in the photo, which was what I expected of those professional pictures, so didn't walk. A pretty blonde polish girl who introduced herself as Magda and didn't seem too aware of what was on her profile. She met me in jeans and jumper and looked good in those. She quickly changed into nice underwear and black hold-ups as requested and looked even better. Nice flat in gated development, easy to find and easy to park.

I would say she matches her physical description on website but probably an 8/10 in body size, not a 6/8. Older than stated, probably mid twenties. A lovely figure and she showed me a good time over a two-pop hour session. Light kissing only, which is more than I usually want, but she instigated and kept up throughout the punt and I enjoyed it.

She shares the flat but didn't find out who her friend was.

Al in all an excellent punt with a friendly girl.

One slight negative, no facepic. in private gallery, but as above probably not down to her. She is attractive.

How is this a positive? 

[Previouslyonlost]

How is this a positive? 

Maybe for that. 

Saw Roxi last night  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only. Not the girl in the photo, which was what I expected of those professional pictures, so didn't walk. A pretty blonde polish girl who introduced herself as Magda and didn't seem too aware of what was on her profile. She met me in jeans and jumper and looked good in those. She quickly changed into nice underwear and black hold-ups as requested and looked even better. Nice flat in gated development, easy to find and easy to park.

I would say she matches her physical description on website but probably an 8/10 in body size, not a 6/8. Older than stated, probably mid twenties. A lovely figure and she showed me a good time over a two-pop hour session. Light kissing only, which is more than I usually want, but she instigated and kept up throughout the punt and I enjoyed it.

She shares the flat but didn't find out who her friend was.

Al in all an excellent punt with a friendly girl.

One slight negative, no facepic. in private gallery, but as above probably not down to her. She is attractive.

[punk]

How is this a positive? 

may be it was because the profile was total bull,but the woman in question was a good shag?

[Silver Birch]

So Roxi was the bait, but not the provider, yet her profile now has a positive review.  In my book, a B&S is always a NEGATIVE.

If there was a link for Magda too, then it might be of some use and if anything, that is the profile that could have a positive review. Still a B&S though.

As it currently stands, the op is describing... well WHO is he describing??

A pointless review. 

[brushhand811]

On looking again those photos maybe of Magda, I should have asked, but, if so they are smoothed out slightly. I always prefer "real" photos taken in their room, with face showing, when you can be certain the girl opening the door is the girl in the profile. I have reported obvious switches in this sort of case as negative. Many girls look totally unrecognisable in glamour shots, but Roxi is close to Magda.

She is a lovely girl and deserves a positive.

[Previouslyonlost]

On looking again those photos maybe of Magda, I should have asked, but, if so they are smoothed out slightly. I always prefer "real" photos taken in their room, with face showing, when you can be certain the girl opening the door is the girl in the profile. I have reported obvious switches in this sort of case as negative. Many girls look totally unrecognisable in glamour shots, but Roxi is close to Magda.

She is a lovely girl and deserves a positive.

Don't take any notice. You fucked the girl so you decide whether is positive or not. You put your little soldier in her cunt and in her mouth, so you have the elements to judge. The opinion of a guy who didn't fuck, didn't see and didn't call the girl is utterly irrelevant.

Thanks for the review, but further details would be appreciated, beyond she is a positive. What did you do? How did you do? Is she a clockwatcher? does she suck well? Is she responsive? Does she care balls when sucking? Admits fingers? Rimming? DFK or FK? CIM, CIF, swallows, are her WG enjoys real or they are part of the fake profile? We want the specifics! 

[Lance]

Don't take any notice. You fucked the girl so you decide whether is positive or not. You put your little soldier in her cunt and in her mouth, so you have the elements to judge. The opinion of a guy who didn't fuck, didn't see and didn't call the girl is utterly irrelevant.

 

[punk]

entirely up to the reviewer if he thinks the WG give a good service despite not looking like any of the photos on her profile then that is up to him and others to judge if they want to see her.

Note however that if you book, you may end up not seeing the one the O.P saw

[brushhand811]

all totally irrelevant now, the profile is now named Sexy Bella 21 who is definitely NOT magda

[west8]

In my book, a B&S is always a NEGATIVE.

Word. Anyone who Green Lights a B&S clearly has an agenda and doesn't mind misleading punters.