Author Topic: Little Katie  (Read 22733 times)


29 review(s) for x Little Katie x (27 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]
30 review(s) for Katie Skye 94 (28 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline bristolbcfc

External Link/Members Only

A review as per Sir Franks back in December.

I contacted her to make a booking weeks before as i was away working, she replied giving a date and time.
I've then contacted her a few days before to see if we were still on and she comes back to me denying all knowledge of any booking.
Again she's given another date and i've replied but no reply back.

Simply put, just not good enough.

Little Katie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
We never had a confirmed booking. I offered you a date and time back in December to which I never recieved a confirmation back on.. If I had, I would have put your name in my diary, given you my personal phone number or asked you to send me an official booking request. As I'm fully booked till mid February and everybody still due to see me has been given my number, there has been no need for me to reply to my AW emails every single day..  I was going to put an hour aside later this evening to reply to any email enquiries sent in the last 72 hours so you would have had your response then. I simply don't deserve a negative review because an email wasn't answered quick enough!  :dash:

Offline Bikerboy


I contacted her to make a booking weeks before as i was away working, she replied giving a date and time.

Bristolbcfc, what made you think you had a confirmed booking?

Offline Punting Valley

I thought a review is allowed only if the booking is confirmed  :unknown:

I'm fully booked till mid February

Fully booked till mid-February? I thought you are going to post your weekly availability on your profile starting in February. When can I attempt to make a booking with you? :)

Little Katie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm going away with a regular in the first week of Feb to celebrate his birthday. The 2nd week of Feb is "Mother nature week" so I clearly won't be available then. I will be back in action on the 14th and will update my availability on my profile in the 2nd week of Feb. xxx

Offline starman555

Why hasn't anyone posted a link to her advert on here, it would make life so much easier?

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Punting Valley

I'm going away with a regular in the first week of Feb to celebrate his birthday. The 2nd week of Feb is "Mother nature week" so I clearly won't be available then. I will be back in action on the 14th and will update my availability on my profile in the 2nd week of Feb. xxx

I will have to make my booking attempt(s) then   :thumbsup:

Why hasn't anyone posted a link to her advert on here, it would make life so much easier?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Ben4454

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Bristol - when katie replied to you the first time did she suggest a date and time or did she confirm a date or time? Post the email - if it reads like a suggestion then the negative wont stand unless you've sent a confirmation email. If it reads like a confirmation then the negative should stand.

The rules here are that it does not have to be a formal booking request but it can be a verbal confirmation as well (either phone call or E-mail) I.e WG suggests time and then you confirm and say you can do that time/confirm = a booking.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2015, 07:47:01 pm by Ben4454 »

Tony Montana

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest


Sounds like a communication breakdown and I agree it should not be a negative review.

If a girl suggests a date/time to me I always reply to confirm and then create an AW booking stating "as agreed in email 27/01/15 10:15" or whatever so there is no misunderstanding

Sorry bristolbcfc but i think you're responsible for this one unless you replied with confirmation at the time of the offer.

Ben4454

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
He said she 'gave' him a date and time. 'Suggest' and 'Gave' are different - I think he may have misinterpreted the E-mail as a confirmation rather than a suggestion. At any expense - A confirmation E-mail by Bristol should have been sent.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2015, 08:06:26 pm by Ben4454 »

Offline bristolbcfc

The message in from Katie

Hi XXXXX! What about the 29th Jan at 2pm? Please send me your phone number and I'll be in contact nearer the date to give you my address if this is ok with you? Look forward to meeting you! K xxx

My reply out

Hi Katie that sounds fine my number is 07*********, looking forward to it!!

You make your minds up.

Offline bristolbcfc

If someone can tell me how to post photos on here i'll do a screenshot of the messages on AW.

Offline Johny Stone

Install Screengrab add on to mozilla firefox: External Link/Members Only

Then save, copy or upload, all are safe.

Offline bristolbcfc

Install Screengrab add on to mozilla firefox: External Link/Members Only

Then save, copy or upload, all are safe.

I can do a screengrab and convert to jpg and save to HD no problem, but some forums I post on you can upload from you HD, I can't see how to do it on here. :unknown:

Offline bristolbcfc

Install Screengrab add on to mozilla firefox: External Link/Members Only

Then save, copy or upload, all are safe.

I can do a screengrab and convert to jpg and save to HD no problem, but some forums I post on you can upload from you HD, I can't see how to do it on here. :unknown:

Ben4454

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

I have no reason to believe Bristol is lying - he would have nothing to gain.

Bristol sent a confirmation E-mail thus securing the booking - negative should stand.

If the screen grab shows his confirmation E-mail than a very bad show on Katie for lying on the boards.



Little Katie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
BRISTOLBCFC - As stated in my most recent AW email to you.. I'm sorry but I never received your confirmation message. Whatever the case - Unsent, unread, misinterpreted or otherwise unacknowledged, I gave you the benefit of the doubt and offered you my next available date as compensation.
As a member of this forum, I'm sure you were aware of the email influx situation and the subsequent communication negligence that ensued around the same time our email exchanges took place so forgive my blind optimism in hoping you would take any previous comments into account before penning your own hasty frustration and going over old ground.
I didn't cost you any money or time.. Well, perhaps the time it takes to send 1 email which surely my apology and offer of a new date were sufficient means of acquittal.
Honestly, I wish I had the spare time to waste reporting petulant crimes, arguing the toss over tit for tat and downloading screen grab software.. There are some real criminals out there you know! x  :unknown:


Little Katie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
BEN4454 - I'm far from perfect but one thing I am not is a liar. If anything, It's my open mind and often brutal honesty that gets me into trouble in life. Please try to remember I'm just a human like you that's more than likely half your age with half your experience - I'm not a catalogue item or a walking filofax. xxx

Offline Bikerboy

I have no reason to believe Bristol is lying - he would have nothing to gain.

Bristol sent a confirmation E-mail thus securing the booking - negative should stand.

If the screen grab shows his confirmation E-mail than a very bad show on Katie for lying on the boards.

Ben, the last time I checked, in the UK you can't be Judge and Jury (unless your name's Nik!). There are some Overseas, they are called Kangaroo Courts.

Can we please all lighten up a bit here.

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Ben, the last time I checked, in the UK you can't be Judge and Jury (unless your name's Nik!). There are some Overseas, they are called Kangaroo Courts.

Can we please all lighten up a bit here.
Agreed, but at the end of the day it's just a negative review about a comms malfunction - most punters who wish to see Katie already know she's bogged down with messages and has had comms issues due to SirFrank's negative review about her comms.  Those punters for whom good comms are a must will know to look elsewhere and will be doing her a favour as it will give her inbox a rest.

Those who are still sold on her 7 glowing positive reviews - or who have already seen her and are keen to see her again - will persevere regardless and probably have a slightly easier time booking her as a result.  All reviews help paint a picture and help punters make their own minds up.  It's a win-win. :hi:

Offline Bikerboy

Agreed Quesadilla,

My sentiments exactly  :)

Little Katie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Ditto!   :thumbsup:
If you don't want to wait for a cocktail at my bar then there are plenty of other bars with plenty of other drinks available. For those that prefer a quick shot of tequila.. Perhaps your thirst would be better quenched at a parlour. Cheers boys..  :drinks: xxx

squeezebox

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have no reason to believe Bristol is lying - he would have nothing to gain.

Bristol sent a confirmation E-mail thus securing the booking - negative should stand.

If the screen grab shows his confirmation E-mail than a very bad show on Katie for lying on the boards.

IMO, neither party is lying. It's just another day in the lives of a punter/prossie trying to arrange a punt together. If we all posted a negative for poor comms from our punting endeavours, the board will be awash with them!

Conversely, to balance things out, we never see a positive of a successful comms, again the board will be inundated with all the crap. 

IMO, if a meeting took place and the comms were crap, but the service was good, a neutral may be in order. I would glean what I need from the review accordingly.

Loveit

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am really bored by this thread. Can we please call it a day?

Tony Montana

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am really bored by this thread. Can we please call it a day?

No one is forcing you to read it.

Offline Roth

I am really bored by this thread. Can we please call it a day?

Too many fluffy posters. :dancegirl:

yorkshire123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I was seriously considering joining the queue & taking the 300 mile round trip to see this young lady.
However based on the arrogance she has started to develop in her posts I don't think I will bother  :(

Offline Roth

I was seriously considering joining the queue & taking the 300 mile round trip to see this young lady.
However based on the arrogance she has started to develop in her posts I don't think I will bother  :(

+1.

Plenty of other decent Bristol prossies to fuck if you do make that trip Yorkshire123!!  :drinks:

ATMIV

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am really bored by this thread. Can we please call it a day?

Agreed, but in the long run it may prove to be beneficial to all including Katie

Any time wasters here will be put off trying to contact here in the hope of some ping pong email thrills

Only those genuinely interested or those looking for a repeat visit will preserver.

That will mean Katie is still going to be busy but less bogged down with time wasting correspondence

To the OP - I'm sorry you didn't get to see her - perhaps a further email to settle the differences and try again - she is worth it so don't cut your nose if to spite your face

Offline Roth

Should we now have a separate Little Katie Section on UKP with the amount of posting she is doing?

 :unknown:

Thoughts? :unknown:    Just joking  :D :lol: :P

Or maybe she could set up her own punting feedback site?   :wackogirl:

Offline iPad3

Well I've found a nice comfy seat at the bar and am currently deciding on what I'm going to have, it'll most likely be Katie in some very slutty underwear and a strap on (if I can convince her).

In the meantime though the bar snacks are very good and all the bickering makes for some great entertainment!!

Ohhhhh hang on she's just bent over to get some ice........what a lovely ass!!!!!

Offline Boundless

IMO, neither party is lying. It's just another day in the lives of a punter/prossie trying to arrange a punt together. If we all posted a negative for poor comms from our punting endeavours, the board will be awash with them!

Conversely, to balance things out, we never see a positive of a successful comms, again the board will be inundated with all the crap. 

IMO, if a meeting took place and the comms were crap, but the service was good, a neutral may be in order. I would glean what I need from the review accordingly.

Too true mate!!

Comms problems are just part of punting.
It's hard enough arranging for a plumber, builder, chippy etc to come round at a set time.
If you then add in that most punters are doing it in total secrecy and usually need an excuse to cover their punting activities, then any decent WG needs to be discreet, has to fit clients in around their normal life and that they get loads of texts/e-mails/calls from time wasters who have no intention of meeting, it's not surprising that these things happen.

If I posted every time something like this happened, I'd need my own website!

Offline Roth

Well I've found a nice comfy seat at the bar and am currently deciding on what I'm going to have, it'll most likely be Katie in some very slutty underwear and a strap on (if I can convince her).

In the meantime though the bar snacks are very good and all the bickering makes for some great entertainment!!

Ohhhhh hang on she's just bent over to get some ice........what a lovely ass!!!!!

Is it time for another pint yet?  My shout.  :D

Offline Roth

Too true mate!!

Comms problems are just part of punting.
It's hard enough arranging for a plumber, builder, chippy etc to come round at a set time.
If you then add in that most punters are doing it in total secrecy and usually need an excuse to cover their punting activities, then any decent WG needs to be discreet, has to fit clients in around their normal life and that they get loads of texts/e-mails/calls from time wasters who have no intention of meeting, it's not surprising that these things happen.

If I posted every time something like this happened, I'd need my own website!

But most plumbers builders and chippies are not charging £150ph. :D

Offline bristolbcfc



To the OP - I'm sorry you didn't get to see her - perhaps a further email to settle the differences and try again - she is worth it so don't cut your nose if to spite your face

I'll take my money else where, I usually go for women over 40 but wanted to see what all the fuss was about. Wish I'd stuck to one of the regulars I see. It has also cost me money, this is the busiest time of year for me workwise and I could literally work 24/7 7 days a week at the moment so punting this time of year takes a lot of planning and usually I have to have a half day of work.

And to all the fluffys out there she actually gave me another date and time to which I said yes but I've had no reply. Fuck her, as I said above I'll be spending my hard earned cash on a WG who's a bit more reliable.

She has come on here and blatantly lied about it, I will get a screen shot up over the weekend, and given the ethos of this site 'UK PUNTING' it's run by punters for punters, I'm fairly new to this and there seems to be a lot of fluffiness over her and given all this I think admin should ban her as her posts are now getting arrogant and almost to the point of self promotion.

Offline Roth

I'll take my money else where, I usually go for women over 40 but wanted to see what all the fuss was about. Wish I'd stuck to one of the regulars I see. It has also cost me money, this is the busiest time of year for me workwise and I could literally work 24/7 7 days a week at the moment so punting this time of year takes a lot of planning and usually I have to have a half day of work.

And to all the fluffys out there she actually gave me another date and time to which I said yes but I've had no reply. Fuck her, as I said above I'll be spending my hard earned cash on a WG who's a bit more reliable.

She has come on here and blatantly lied about it, I will get a screen shot up over the weekend, and given the ethos of this site 'UK PUNTING' it's run by punters for punters, I'm fairly new to this and there seems to be a lot of fluffiness over her and given all this I think admin should ban her as her posts are now getting arrogant and almost to the point of self promotion.

Vote with your feet mate.   :thumbsdown:

If your going to spend that then go for Soph (just pretend she's older) or Angelina.  Cheaper options would be the hot Blonde Roxy or  Lilly.   Also KristinaJ is a mature who is in town next week. :thumbsup: :drinks:

Offline Boundless

But most plumbers builders and chippies are not charging £150ph. :D

Well, thats true, but they only charge that when you get to see them.
Not wishing to sound fluffy in any way, but WG's get a huge number of communications that don't result in a meeting. This of course is no consolation to the serious punters who sometimes get lost in the noise.

Little Katie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's not arrogance.. It's a bit of light hearted humour to address a valid point.. I don't see any rules condemning that.
Anyone put off by my banter has probably done me and the genuinely interested a favour.
I haven't once tried to self-promote, flirt, seek attention or slander anybody on here.. I regard all human beings as equals regardless of stance and disposition.. I don't start my own threads nor do I particularly enjoy having to repeatedly defend myself within them, I've simply been answering your questions and trying to clear up any confusion for the benefit of us all.
If admin decide to ban me then so be it and I will bow out gracefully.  :thumbsup: xxx

Offline ciscoxxx69

IMO, neither party is lying. It's just another day in the lives of a punter/prossie trying to arrange a punt together. If we all posted a negative for poor comms from our punting endeavours, the board will be awash with them!

Conversely, to balance things out, we never see a positive of a successful comms, again the board will be inundated with all the crap. 

IMO, if a meeting took place and the comms were crap, but the service was good, a neutral may be in order. I would glean what I need from the review accordingly.

+1
....at last some sense!

yorkshire123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's not arrogance.. It's a bit of light hearted humour to address a valid point.. I don't see any rules condemning that.
Anyone put off by my banter has probably done me and the genuinely interested a favour.
I haven't once tried to self-promote, flirt, seek attention or slander anybody on here.. I regard all human beings as equals regardless of stance and disposition.. I don't start my own threads nor do I particularly enjoy having to repeatedly defend myself within them, I've simply been answering your questions and trying to clear up any confusion for the benefit of us all.
If admin decide to ban me then so be it and I will bow out gracefully.  :thumbsup: xxx

I assume that was aimed at my post?
What you call banter I read as arrogance, maybe its an age thing?
However you seem to have plenty of willing customers (and a few fan-boys) to keep you busy so my money will hardly be missed.

I will finish by wishing you well in your studies & your chosen profession  :hi:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'll take my money else where, I usually go for women over 40

Perhaps that's where the problem lies, in that these older women will be grateful that the phone has rung and given them a break from loose women and Jeremy Kyle, they will have days to prepare for your meet and there is little chance of an error or a dopuble booking as no other fucker wants to see them.

This situation is clearly different, she's young and fit and willing to let old perves have a ride for £150, there is clearly a high demand for her and unlike the 40 year olds she probably also has a life.

What she'd probably like to say to you (but is to polite) is "fuck off and whinge at someone else" she clearly doesn't need or want your business, it's a supply and demand thing, Fit young ones are in higher demand and as such more difficult to see, stick to the desperate old ones or the fat ones and you can get a booking whenever you want, and she'll be more grateful  :hi:

Offline Roth

And I just bought another pint and a bag of crisps ....   :lol:

Gonna finish then quick and head off to a real pub! :cool: :yahoo:
« Last Edit: January 31, 2015, 01:01:53 pm by Roth »

Offline bristolbcfc

Perhaps that's where the problem lies, in that these older women will be grateful that the phone has rung and given them a break from loose women and Jeremy Kyle, they will have days to prepare for your meet and there is little chance of an error or a dopuble booking as no other fucker wants to see them.

This situation is clearly different, she's young and fit and willing to let old perves have a ride for £150, there is clearly a high demand for her and unlike the 40 year olds she probably also has a life.

What she'd probably like to say to you (but is to polite) is "fuck off and whinge at someone else" she clearly doesn't need or want your business, it's a supply and demand thing, Fit young ones are in higher demand and as such more difficult to see, stick to the desperate old ones or the fat ones and you can get a booking whenever you want, and she'll be more grateful  :hi:

She can say all she wants, the fact remains she gave me a date and time and asked me to reply with my contact number to confirm if it was ok, to which I did. When I contacted her a few days before she denied all knowledge of any booking and then offered me another booking again I confirmed and again I heard nothing, hence my negative review. She has then come on here and lied, plain and simple. Again I go back to the ethos of the site about WG's who come on here and lie or has the board all of a sudden gone all fluffy? Time for the lying bint to be booted into touch.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Again I go back to the ethos of the site about WG's who come on here and lie or has the board all of a sudden gone all fluffy? Time for the lying bint to be booted into touch.

You seem desperate to get her banned as some sort of revenge  :unknown:

And fluffy, yeah I'm known for my fluffy approach  :sarcastic:

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She can say all she wants, the fact remains she gave me a date and time and asked me to reply with my contact number to confirm if it was ok, to which I did. When I contacted her a few days before she denied all knowledge of any booking and then offered me another booking again I confirmed and again I heard nothing, hence my negative review. She has then come on here and lied, plain and simple. Again I go back to the ethos of the site about WG's who come on here and lie or has the board all of a sudden gone all fluffy? Time for the lying bint to be booted into touch.
Where did she lie exactly? What I saw was her come here and apologise and say she either never received or just didn't register your confirmation back to her.

BRISTOLBCFC - I'm sorry but I never received your confirmation message. Whatever the case - Unsent, unread, misinterpreted or otherwise unacknowledged, I gave you the benefit of the doubt and offered you my next available date as compensation.

Given her email issues that doesn't seem remotely unlikely.  So what exactly is the lie she told?

Offline bristolbcfc

You seem desperate to get her banned as some sort of revenge  :unknown:

And fluffy, yeah I'm known for my fluffy approach  :sarcastic:
Revenge? Not interested in the slightest, however since I've been on here any WG's that have come on and have and either touted or self promoted themselves or lied have been booted or have I got something wrong there?

Where did she lie exactly? What I saw was her come here and apologise and say she either never received or just didn't register your confirmation back to her.

Given her email issues that doesn't seem remotely unlikely.  So what exactly is the lie she told?

Lie? Denying the booking.

Email in from her on 31/12/2014 06:09:59
Hi XXXXX! What about the 29th Jan at 2pm? Please send me your phone number and I'll be in contact nearer the date to give you my address if this is ok with you? Look forward to meeting you! K xxx

My reply  to her on 31/12/2014 18:54:58    
Hi Katie that sounds fine my number is 07********, looking forward to it!!
Read on 11/01/2015 06:06:10

My email to her on 26/01/2015 18:33:11 Hi Kate, Are we still ok for Thursday?
Read on 27/01/2015 00:41:59

Her reply to me on 27/01/2015 00:46:14 Hi! I don't have you in my diary for Thursday babe? I have your name and number at the top of my "need to see" list but no scheduled date as yet. I could see you on the 13th Feb as that is when I am next available? xxx

My reply to her on 27/01/2015 14:15:54  Hi Katie you sent me a message on the 31/12 asking if the date and time were ok, not a problem, can you make the 13th as early as possible please.
Read on 27/01/2015 15:31:36

To which I've not had a reply and I don't want really want one now.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Wher's the booking, you just said sounds fine and sent her your number, a month later you contacted her and she said she didn't have you down, fucking hell talk about storm in a tea cup  :music:
« Last Edit: January 31, 2015, 02:31:53 pm by James999 »

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Revenge? Not interested in the slightest, however since I've been on here any WG's that have come on and have and either touted or self promoted themselves or lied have been booted or have I got something wrong there?

Lie? Denying the booking.

I read it differently - she does not deny she may have received your e-mail and even read it, just that she didn't register it or acknowledge it. She said it was either "unsent, unread, misinterpreted or otherwise unacknowledged". 

Given how many e-mails she gets it is entirely plausible that she opened the email and didn't register it.  In fact it looks like she read it at 6am probably half asleep:

My reply  to her on 31/12/2014 18:54:58   
Hi Katie that sounds fine my number is 07********, looking forward to it!!
Read on 11/01/2015 06:06:10

And that was now nearly two weeks after your initial communications which was on New Year's Eve so your first communication was likely long forgotten.  The e-mail itself is not immediately obvious what it's referring to - you might have referenced you were confirming 29th Jan at 2pm as per her mail for example?

Shit happens, and she gave you the benefit of the doubt that it was indeed her mistake and so offered her next available date.  Can't see how that qualifies as lying?  Bad comms yes - as she has accepted before, lying no.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2015, 02:36:30 pm by Quesadilla »

Offline bristolbcfc

?

Shit happens, and she gave you the benefit of the doubt that it was indeed her mistake and so offered her next available date.  Can't see how that qualifies as lying?  Bad comms yes - as she has accepted before, lying no.

Lying no, you say? She says we never had a confirmed booking? Read my previous post or do you think I'm making it up?
She clearly says she 'never received confirmation' I replied within 5mins of receiving her email, again see my previous post or again do you think I'm making it up?

We never had a confirmed booking. I offered you a date and time back in December to which I never recieved a confirmation back on.. If I had, I would have put your name in my diary, given you my personal phone number or asked you to send me an official booking request. As I'm fully booked till mid February and everybody still due to see me has been given my number, there has been no need for me to reply to my AW emails every single day..  I was going to put an hour aside later this evening to reply to any email enquiries sent in the last 72 hours so you would have had your response then. I simply don't deserve a negative review because an email wasn't answered quick enough!  :dash:

I read it differently - she does not deny she may have received your e-mail and even read it, just that she didn't register it or acknowledge it. She said it was either "unsent, unread, misinterpreted or otherwise unacknowledged". 

Just explain in plain English how 'you read it differently' see my previous post she clearly sent back a date and time or again do you think I'm making it up?

I think your 3hr punt with her has gone straight to your head and you're going fluffy.