Author Topic: Aleksandra – North Acton  (Read 18605 times)


56 review(s) for xALEKSANDRA24x (50 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

External Link/Members Only

Communications:

Good text comms and telephone manner in advance.

Venue/Facilities:

2 minute walk from North Acton station to a perfectly pleasant block of flats. Good sized room and excellent shower.

Appearance:

First things first, the picture on her AW profile is not Aleksandra. Neither are her PG pics, with the possible exception of 1 in the outfit noted below. No point in wasting money on her AW PG. 

Having said that, Aleksandra (or Ola) looked fucking incredible in a short length clingy black dress with matching stockings. I would say she’s about 5’ 6” and a size 8-10, nearer 8. Honey blondish coloured hair. She has a fabulous body and really nice medium sized tits, with little bright nipples. Closer up facially she does have some spots, but these are well concealed by her make-up and her lovely blue eyes assuaged any issues for me.  To me, she has a passing remblance to Kasia from LMP/TPC, which is no bad thing. Discreet tattoo behind ear.

Cost:
£100 for 1 hour.

Services:

Started with some nice relaxed DFK and mutual fondling before she dropped to her knees to give me some very teasing and nicely varied OWO. She got me excited fairly quick, so I offered to return the compliment and soon had her buckling up into crab mode on her back as she coated my mush. I then asked her to get on top for some cowgirl, before flipping her over into mish and finally shooting my load into her doggy. In between rounds we had a nice chat and canoodled. She maintained great eye contact throughout. After a little time recovering she started some OWO to what I hoped would be a CIM finish, but despite her really trying hard, it didn’t happen. Good dtbj, but too much quick gobbling for me and she gave me a 5 minute warning that just killed little Mr B.
   
Positives:

- Despite obvious AW photo issues, she is a very good looking girl with a very good body.
- Lovely personality. Intelligent with it.
- Despite negatives below, she gave me 50 highly dedicated and quality GFE minutes.

Negatives:

- Misleading AW pics
- Gave me a 5 Minute warning which did nothing to help pop No. 2
- Didn’t count my shower time (5-10 mins)

Would I recommend ?

Yes.

Would I see again ?

Yes, but I will be making sure I get my full hour next time. 

BeesKnees

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
A B&S is positive?

Sure you had a good time, but you got suckered! Also, how can you recommend her when she doesn't have an honest profile?

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is Neg mate. 
Not first report which showing her profile using by someone else
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=44465.0

Old monk

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Guys stop thinking with your knob!!

B and S!

Short timed!!

 :scare: :scare:

This has to be a negative  :dash: :dash:

west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is a big fat NEGATIVE

1. You're reviewing a completely different girl to that presented in the Adultwork profile.

2. Bait and switch is NEVER acceptable. It's fucking out of order.

3. Knock on the door? I never had that (yet). Not sure how I'd respond other than to tell the maid to fuck off and wait until I'm good and ready. When the girl tells me 'time is up', time is up. No cunt of a maid/pimp/madam whatever is ever going to do that.

That said ... the girl you did meet sounds intriguing so purely in the interests of research I will investigate.  :drinks:

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
A B&S is positive?

Sure you had a good time, but you got suckered! Also, how can you recommend her when she doesn't have an honest profile?

Doobie I and others have commented a number of times that Alexandra's photos are NOT her.  If the OP was aware of this when he booked he was NOT  "suckered." I think this comes down to whether we think that deception in the profile automatically warrants a negative review.  My personal opinion, for what it is worth, is if you are aware of deception in the profile, and if you point out the deception in the review but you have a good experience I think a positive rating is Ok.  I think this is distinctly different from the all to common occurance where you are told one thing on the phone and it is something different when you arrive,

I should also point out that you criticism applies wholeheartedly and indefensibly to MY review of Aleksandra.  I was "suckerd" and did not spot or indicate in my review.  Same applies to Valentina and probably Sweet Chantelle.  It is not always easy to determine if photos are genuine. 

But in my view an automatic ruling is too simplistic particularly because a large number of profiles are deceptive to a greater or lesser degree.

Dave

west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Doobie I and others have commented a number of times that Alexandra's photos are NOT her.  If the OP was aware of this when he booked he was NOT  "suckered." I think this comes down to whether we think that deception in the profile automatically warrants a negative review.  My personal opinion, for what it is worth, is if you are aware of deception in the profile, and if you point out the deception in the review but you have a good experience I think a positive rating is Ok.  I think this is distinctly different from the all to common occurance where you are told one thing on the phone and it is something different when you arrive,

I should also point out that you criticism applies wholeheartedly and indefensibly to MY review of Aleksandra.  I was "suckerd" and did not spot or indicate in my review.  Same applies to Valentina and probably Sweet Chantelle.  It is not always easy to determine if photos are genuine. 

But in my view an automatic ruling is too simplistic particularly because a large number of profiles are deceptive to a greater or lesser degree.

Dave

If the OP - or any reviewer for that matter - was not reviewing the girl presented in the profile, then said review is automatically a Negative.

Jesus, do we REALLY want to start accepting that a profile with fake pics is acceptable just because the ACTUAL girl is hot and a great fuck.

No, we don't!


london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I think if this report to AW they will put the profile down

Her pimp is idiot . He can make new profile for his new slave  :dash:

west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I think if this report to AW they will put the profile down

Her pimp is idiot . He can make new profile for his new slave  :dash:

Do you know for a fact she's pimped? That would REALLY suck.

Offline lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
If the OP - or any reviewer for that matter - was not reviewing the girl presented in the profile, then said review is automatically a Negative.

Jesus, do we REALLY want to start accepting that a profile with fake pics is acceptable just because the ACTUAL girl is hot and a great fuck.

No, we don't!

Well how about this two? No pictures at all.

External Link/Members Only   .........22 Positive

External Link/Members Only   .........9 Positive

:rolleyes:



Old monk

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Lewishamguy, I dont understand your point, if there is no photos then you aren't going to be lured in by the girls looks but if you see a photo of, I don't know, lets say Pamela Anderson type bleach blonde fake tits type and the girl who appears looks like, I don't know, Kiera Knightly. You have been B and S.

Now the fact that this operation is swapping the advertised girl with someone who sounds decent looking and gives good head, i was going to say good service but thats not true either, as she short timed him. People think thats acceptable, its just not.

What if the next guy reads the review and thinks I will go for it, and gets the Fatima Whitbread look alike, he aint gonna be chuffed.

If you give this a positive review or agree with this as a positive then you are saying that B and S is acceptable, which it is not, ever.

west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well how about this two? No pictures at all.

External Link/Members Only   .........22 Positive

External Link/Members Only   .........9 Positive

If you explain to me how you equate no pics with fake pictures, perhaps I will be able to give an opinion?

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If the OP - or any reviewer for that matter - was not reviewing the girl presented in the profile, then said review is automatically a Negative.

Jesus, do we REALLY want to start accepting that a profile with fake pics is acceptable just because the ACTUAL girl is hot and a great fuck.

No, we don't!

I understand your opinion - I just don't agree with the unqivocal rule you want to base on it.  Punting is a game of risk that necessarily includes a bit of cheating..  If you don't want to go and see her as a point of principle that is fine.  Personally I am more concerned where the REVIEW misrepresents the girl or the service which I think is far more damaging to this board than a punter calling out a deception as the OP did.

Dave

Offline lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
If you explain to me how you equate no pics with fake pictures, perhaps I will be able to give an opinion?

How you will review a girl as positive if there is no pic? So apparently you don't know who you're going to see. Is it like based on her services, attitudes or based on previous reviews that you're also rating her as positive?

:rolleyes:

As for this girl Aleksandra I went to see her based on her previous profile and she has had her real pictures in this profile at the beginning. But now I'm slightly confused who's the girl working under this profile. :unknown:

Offline lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
Lewishamguy, I dont understand your point, if there is no photos then you aren't going to be lured in by the girls looks but if you see a photo of, I don't know, lets say Pamela Anderson type bleach blonde fake tits type and the girl who appears looks like, I don't know, Kiera Knightly. You have been B and S.

Now the fact that this operation is swapping the advertised girl with someone who sounds decent looking and gives good head, i was going to say good service but thats not true either, as she short timed him. People think thats acceptable, its just not.

What if the next guy reads the review and thinks I will go for it, and gets the Fatima Whitbread look alike, he aint gonna be chuffed.

If you give this a positive review or agree with this as a positive then you are saying that B and S is acceptable, which it is not, ever.

I've never experienced B/S and I've no interest to see those prossie's who don't show any pictures at all. What I expect at least one of her real physical appearance.

 :hi:

west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
How you will review a girl as positive if there is no pic? So apparently you don't know who you're going to see. Is it like based on her services, attitudes or based on previous reviews that you're also rating her as positive?

:rolleyes:

As for this girl Aleksandra I went to see her based on her previous profile and she has had her real pictures in this profile at the beginning. But now I'm slightly confused who's the girl working under this profile. :unknown:

Quite easily. No pictures = chance of bait and switch as you have no idea of what's awaiting you. So FAR more likely to read the reviews before booking a girl with no pictures.

Personally, I would never book the girl you linked to as she has seen more bodily fluids than a teaching hospital. Nor would I book ANY girl who displays no pictures.

Fake pictures = equal chance of bait and switch, but at least you have an expectation of what the girl will look like - and therefore a damn good reason for cancelling (incall) or telling her to fuck off (outcall).


Offline lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
...

Personally, I would never book the girl you linked to as she has seen more bodily fluids than a teaching hospital.
Nor would I book ANY girl who displays no pictures.


TIC  :D

Offline SamLP

Profile gone. I guess it was reported. She sounded good. Does she work in the same place as Candy?

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is not B&S

profile sold or passed to someone else

however is not big deal any more ...

PROFILE GONE , good lesson for her stupid pimp   :diablo:

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is not B&S

profile sold or passed to someone else

however is not big deal any more ...

PROFILE GONE , good lesson for her stupid pimp   :diablo:

I do not think she works for pimp she is educated girl university student, speaks very good english. strange she was verified but profile gone. :(

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Profile gone. I guess it was reported. She sounded good. Does she work in the same place as Candy?

yes she works on the same building where Candy works. But different flat and she is not related to Candy. Alexandra and Lucy work together.

 :)

 

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I do not think she works for pimp she is educated girl university student, speaks very good english. strange she was verified but profile gone. :(

Loads of educated smart WGs i have punted with have worked for pimps, some WGs prefer to work for a pimp and let him or her get the WGs punters and do her advertising for her.

Its also the case ANY WG COULD have a pimp for all punters would know for definite.

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I do not think she works for pimp she is educated girl university student, speaks very good english. strange she was verified but profile gone. :(

U mean girls are eligible to have pimp if they can't speak English and they not educated .

I don't want to go to details but Polish mafia in London never let polish girls work with no pimp unless be level of MI .



« Last Edit: January 15, 2015, 04:02:56 pm by london »

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
U mean girls are eligible to have pimp if they can't speak English and they not educated .

I don't want to go to details but Polish mafia in London never let polish girls work with no pimp unless be level of MI .

my friend it is just my thought having some chat with her I realized she is working for paying her tuition fees. I did not feel that she is under pressure of pimps. Of course all the new girls who are coming cannot speak English they are definitely working with pimps.

 :)

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Loads of educated smart WGs i have punted with have worked for pimps, some WGs prefer to work for a pimp and let him or her get the WGs punters and do her advertising for her.

Its also the case ANY WG COULD have a pimp for all punters would know for definite.

I understand your point but sometimes it is very difficult to identify who is genuinely independent. But I believe once they worked for pimps and after few years they gone independent.
 :) 

west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Loads of educated smart WGs i have punted with have worked for pimps, some WGs prefer to work for a pimp and let him or her get the WGs punters and do her advertising for her.

Its also the case ANY WG COULD have a pimp for all punters would know for definite.

I didn't actually see anyone, but I heard a guy talking as I entered a flat yesterday.

The flat of a well-reviewed girl who (post-coital chat) is university educated.

Boyfriend or pimp I have no idea, but it made me feel uneasy nonetheless.

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
my friend it is just my thought having some chat with her I realized she is working for paying her tuition fees. I did not feel that she is under pressure of pimps. Of course all the new girls who are coming cannot speak English they are definitely working with pimps.

 :)

All polish girls I met needed money for education ,mum  debt or X BF put them in credit card debt
Never mind
Enjoy ur punting.  :drinks:

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
All polish girls I met needed money for education ,mum  debt or X BF put them in credit card debt
Never mind
Enjoy ur punting.  :drinks:

Do you know any Polish girl who just enjoy sex? :kiss:

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I didn't actually see anyone, but I heard a guy talking as I entered a flat yesterday.

The flat of a well-reviewed girl who (post-coital chat) is university educated.

Boyfriend or pimp I have no idea, but it made me feel uneasy nonetheless.

Can you give a link of that university girl? :)

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I understand your point but sometimes it is very difficult to identify who is genuinely independent. But I believe once they worked for pimps and after few years they gone independent.
 :)

Its impossible to know who has a pimp for definite. The pimp might not be in the premises and there is no way of knowing, a WG saying she doesnt have a pimp isnt proof she doesnt of course. Having a pimp that a WG agrees to pay a set cut to has been part of punting throughout history, unless a WG is being forced when its obviously disgusting i have no probelm punting through pimps and neither do many many punters who punt through Agencies, parlours/brothels and parties.

I agree some WGs start off working for a pimp and then seem to go Indie, whether they really are Indie i dont know as once again i have no way of knowing.

A pimp could be a WGs partner who leeches off her like a ponch sitting in the pub all day drinking but does her advertising for example.

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Do you know any Polish girl who just enjoy sex? :kiss:
If u back and see my hot list polish girls link y will see I mentioned that polish girl they trying enjoying their time while they are pimped
This is back to their culture and they love to live   .

Offline barnstorm123

I'd be surprised if she wasn't working for a pimp having seen the setup at this flat. I'm pretty sure the Polish girls working out of Old Street are pimped as well - same prices, working out of same flat, etc.

I still don't see why people say this has to be a negative review by default. She's a good service provider and anyone who reads her reviews on UKP knows that she wasn't using pictures of herself. For those of us that saw her we knew it was a bit of a roll of the dice but we accepted it and it paid off. If admin wants to place a rule saying that fake pics are an automatic negative then OK, until then, let people determine their own ratings based on their experience instead of hectoring from the sidelines. I thought that was the point of a community site like this.

BeesKnees

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
To put this in perspective, I book Platinum Cindy. I meet her but she says she's busy and see Michelle Indie instead. Is it right to write a review about Cindy even though I saw Michelle instead? It makes sense to write a totally different review. You can't mislead punters like this.

Who cares if you knew this might happen, you're just facilitating the wg taking advantage of punters! I reckon if the wg you met turned out to look like Ann Widdecombe you'd write a neg instantly.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Sorry for the trail of posts, views and claims expressed since I posted this review.

In hindsight, I should have provided more detail and better context for my review and rating. So here goes.

Firstly, Aleksandra made my hotlist, and my priority hotlist at that, on the basis of her positive reviews on this forum, and not because of her AW profile pic. 4 out of 5 of her last reviews (links below) had a common enough thread (of the same girl) running through them for me to believe she was a good service provider, despite the misleading AW profile pic which was referred to in her most recent review (1st review link listed below). I entered into this punt knowing, therefore, I was not seeing the girl in the AW pic. No B&S, therefore, as far as I am concerned. I believe the girl I saw was the same as the girl noted in the 4 reviews below. I was prepared to walk if she was not to my tastes, but she most certainly was.

I posted my comment about her AW profile pic and PG in my review in bold red as I thought it was important to point out in bold, as anyone skim-reading her reviews might miss this (important) detail. I should have provided context to this though.

Just to add, I do not believe this girl is pimped. She seemed free, independent, happy and intelligent. She said she was doing this to raise £12K for her studies. She told me she shared the flat with SweetLucySweet - External Link/Members Only.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=44465.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=40324.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=35046.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34493.0

In terms of my negative comments about her time warning and cheating, I will say this:

- The time warning was a big put off and once spoken does nothing for me in terms of reaching satisfaction.
- As regards not getting full time, I was not wearing a watch as usual (battery failure), but I could tell from my phone when I rang to say I had arrived and when I left the building. It didn’t seem a big deal at the time as she gave me a thoroughly excellent 50 mins and I was flagging to make pop no. 2 (even before the 5 minute warning). I thought it fair to note in the review though.

Finally, as far as my positive rating of the punt is concerned, I stand by this. If others wish to view it on their terms as a negative or neutral, that is entirely their prerogative, but I know that 5/6th’s of my time with Aleksandra/Ola was thoroughly excellent. I therefore stand by my review and my rating.

It’s a pity that her profile has disappeared, perhaps due to my initial review and lack of context, as the girl I saw was a very good service provider who I would certainly see again. Thankfully I have her tel. no.

Hope this helps. Happy to answer any follow-up comments/questions.

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Sheer Tights

Did you ask if she has started doing 3somes with her flatmate Sweet Lucy Sweet

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Did you see this girl instead of Aleksandra ?
External Link/Members Only

No. I don't recall Aleksandra (Ola) having a tattoo of that nature on her right arm.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Did you ask if she has started doing 3somes with her flatmate Sweet Lucy Sweet

No, I didn't. I asked if she shared the flat with anyone and she said Sweet Lucy Sweet. I think she may have then asked if I wanted to see her (for future reference), but I declined.

Offline the lurker

My 2p worth. I saw Aleksandra in December based on reviews here, including knowing the pics "weren't going to be her". She was friendly, fit and a great shag, as others have said. I was ready to walk if I had to but I didn't. In no special order I think these 3 things

If you would have reviewed as a neg that's up to you, but all these guys plus me call it a pos experience, who are you to say otherwise? The only thing that can be def wrong with a review is not telling the truth, we are all grown up enough to decide for ourselves if we get the right info.

If you reported her profile and you have not seen her then shame on you, you have fucked up a good girls career when its none of your business. Delete from hot list and move on, and keep your nose out.

Last thing,as it happens I disagree with other punters and I think the pics are actually her. The body is right and its def in that flat, the face is blurred anyway, and the PG pics show different hair colours. I just don't see why they wouldn't use pics of her, and I think they did. The comments about her skin ( lower right cheek guys, just to check?) make me sure I saw the reviewed girl, and call me blind if you want but I think that's her.

There are few enough decent WG s around without having profiles hounded out by people who've not even punted there. Have a look in the mirror.

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Did you see this girl instead of Aleksandra ?
External Link/Members Only

Did you check her phone number?. It is her pimp's number who is selling a car. Same phone number in this site.

External Link/Members Only

 :D :lol:

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Did you check her phone number?. It is her pimp's number who is selling a car. Same phone number in this site.

External Link/Members Only

 :D :lol:

Also he has a room for rent for 145 PW :)

Old monk

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
@Sir Lurker, get off your white charger and think about what you are writing.

First off, you were B&S, you see a photo its someone else, that is what Bait and Switch means.
Second, you are the only person who states that its the same girl as the photos, yet you said you knew it was going to be a different girl.
All other punters are at least clear in their reports, its not the same girl.

She has sucked the common sense from you my friend, you and the other 3 or so guys may have had a brilliant time, but if she is as fit as you guys say and it was the same girl all the time, then why doesn't she just put up a genuine photo, then all your fluffy reviews would count for some thing. By the way I am amongst the fluffiest on this site so they don't bother me at all.

I suspect that the reason she doesn't put up a photo is because multiple girls are using this account and as such there is no way that you can get a consistent idea of what you are going to receive in the way of service or even indeed WG.

Thirdly and this is why I feel your sailing close to the white Knight territory, below is your second review, where you attest your hatred of liars and B and S.

Quote
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Bait, switch, walk

Part of the "best-escort" group who have had some OK reviews on here, but I travelled a fair way only to be told "she is busy, you can see me instead" followed by "or we have another friend?" when I said I was leaving, neither were ugly but I hate liars in this game, icing on the cake was seeing "accessing from Romania" on her profile when I went to delete it from hot list

Offline the lurker

I know what B+S means, and we are all allowed to be a bit inconsistent sometimes! The review you quote, I wanted to see that girl (with full face pics) and she wasn't there, not even in the country. Aleksandra was a last minute plan because I was in the area, I would have walked if not happy, so it was a different situation. I hadn't put myself out to get there. I am pretty sure (from the bad skin comments) that we have all seen the same girl, and when you look at a few body photos with blurred face I find it hard to see how people are so sure it isn't her. The PG had pics with different hair colours including the dark blonde the girl I saw had. I think they are all the same girl, and for sure they were taken in that flat.

I'm not on a white charger, I'm just annoyed that a girl I enjoyed fucking has gone, maybe because of someone on here. How is that helping other punters?

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I know what B+S means, and we are all allowed to be a bit inconsistent sometimes! The review you quote, I wanted to see that girl (with full face pics) and she wasn't there, not even in the country. Aleksandra was a last minute plan because I was in the area, I would have walked if not happy, so it was a different situation. I hadn't put myself out to get there. I am pretty sure (from the bad skin comments) that we have all seen the same girl, and when you look at a few body photos with blurred face I find it hard to see how people are so sure it isn't her. The PG had pics with different hair colours including the dark blonde the girl I saw had. I think they are all the same girl, and for sure they were taken in that flat.

I'm not on a white charger, I'm just annoyed that a girl I enjoyed fucking has gone, maybe because of someone on here. How is that helping other punters?


My friend I am also agree with you. Alexandra's picture were very accurate when I saw her some months ago just the difference was in her hair colour. and body wise she is slim size 8 (uk).

 :)

london

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is not first time reported her profile changed to someone else and not a girl in the picture

Her pimp didn't want lose the profile with great review in AW and UK

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=44465.0

Surly she will come live soon with new profile

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

My 2p worth. I saw Aleksandra in December based on reviews here, including knowing the pics "weren't going to be her". She was friendly, fit and a great shag, as others have said. I was ready to walk if I had to but I didn't. In no special order I think these 3 things

If you would have reviewed as a neg that's up to you, but all these guys plus me call it a pos experience, who are you to say otherwise? The only thing that can be def wrong with a review is not telling the truth, we are all grown up enough to decide for ourselves if we get the right info.

If you reported her profile and you have not seen her then shame on you, you have fucked up a good girls career when its none of your business. Delete from hot list and move on, and keep your nose out.

Last thing,as it happens I disagree with other punters and I think the pics are actually her. The body is right and its def in that flat, the face is blurred anyway, and the PG pics show different hair colours. I just don't see why they wouldn't use pics of her, and I think they did. The comments about her skin ( lower right cheek guys, just to check?) make me sure I saw the reviewed girl, and call me blind if you want but I think that's her.

There are few enough decent WG s around without having profiles hounded out by people who've not even punted there. Have a look in the mirror.

Thanks Lurker. In terms of your 3 points, I would say this.

1. Agreed.

2. Agreed. I'm gutted that I may have (inadvertently) led to this girl's profile being downed. She is, all things considered, a good service provider. I hope her profile re-appears for the benefit of any punter on here that wants, overall, a good positive experience for £100, which is what this girl gave me. If anyone connected with this thread reported her, I would ask that you re-report and retract your suspicions, PARTICULARLY IF YOU HAVE NOT PERSONALLY SEEN HER.

3. Unfortunately because of the above, I cannot re-evaluate her photos and the location of these, but I feel the photos project a size 6 taller girl (5' 8" as noted in the profile) as opposed to a size 8-10 of around 5' 6" with predominatly blond honeyish coloured hair that I saw.     

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Did you check her phone number?. It is her pimp's number who is selling a car. Same phone number in this site.

External Link/Members Only

 :D :lol:

Do not believe this question is aimed at me, but just for the avoidance of doubt this is NOT the tel no. I have for Aleksandra.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

@Sir Lurker, get off your white charger and think about what you are writing.

First off, you were B&S, you see a photo its someone else, that is what Bait and Switch means.
Second, you are the only person who states that its the same girl as the photos, yet you said you knew it was going to be a different girl.
All other punters are at least clear in their reports, its not the same girl.

She has sucked the common sense from you my friend, you and the other 3 or so guys may have had a brilliant time, but if she is as fit as you guys say and it was the same girl all the time, then why doesn't she just put up a genuine photo, then all your fluffy reviews would count for some thing. By the way I am amongst the fluffiest on this site so they don't bother me at all.

I suspect that the reason she doesn't put up a photo is because multiple girls are using this account and as such there is no way that you can get a consistent idea of what you are going to receive in the way of service or even indeed WG.

Thirdly and this is why I feel your sailing close to the white Knight territory, below is your second review, where you attest your hatred of liars and B and S.

There's many a reason a girl may not put up a genuine photo. In terms of Aleksandra/Ola she did tell me something about her family, that may well explain why she would not show full face genuine pictures. There are many profiles of a similar nature on AW.

I repeat, yet again, however, that I saw her on the basis of her favourable reviews on here, not for her photos. On the basis her photos were mainly blurred in any event, I'm sure most educated punters on here would have done the same (i.e. only seen her on the basis of her reviews and not her photos). 

UberX

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Do not believe this question is aimed at me, but just for the avoidance of doubt this is NOT the tel no. I have for Aleksandra.

Hey my friend I was not aiming at you, I was actually chatting with london about this girl he posted the link. How funny it is. Any way I also know Alexandra's phone number and it is not same and I also believe this girl is not working with Alexandra,

 :)

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Hey my friend I was not aiming at you, I was actually chatting with london about this girl he posted the link. How funny it is. Any way I also know Alexandra's phone number and it is not same and I also believe this girl is not working with Alexandra,

 :)

Thanks Uber. I just thought that with the passing of time (and no response from anyone) it would assists if I answered too, in order to avoid any doubt.