Author Topic: Cute_Valentina - St Pancras  (Read 1250 times)


4 review(s) for Cute_Valentina (1 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Cupid Stuntz]

Offline oinki

Cute Valentina
External Link/Members Only

Cost: £140 for the hour + £20 for OWO
Month of visit: September (before any negative reviews were up)
Services: Lipkissing only (no tongue), OWO, Reverse oral, Protected sex, COB

Likeness - IMO like an aged Daisy Edgar-Jones, dark circles under eye, but yet captivating eyes.

Body: Late 20s. Body is not toned and has a small belly, size perhaps 12-14? Nice bum though and some nice tits. Tattoos all over her body and as per pictured. The pictures are definitely a couple of years old though, on some of them you can spot the extent of the belly, by any means not fat though.

Booking:
Confirmed day before what her start time was, and got that booked in. I wanted to confirm in the morning again, and she didn't do this until an hour before booking, so somewhat later than I wanted - she did confirm just 20 minutes later that we had to move the booking due to train issues. I was fine with this. Same issues as others - was told to wait outside a coffee shop (about 10 min walk from St Pancreas) for a few min. 15 min later and it was in 5 min. 5 min later and I sent her a final text, and started texting my backups.

She responded to my last message and said she was ready, so 30 min delay (informed of), and an additional 21 min until "ready" message. Pretty shitty comms but at least not 30 min.

Location:
Downstairs flat, fit for purpose, shower with hot water, double bed for the deed. No chairs so had to put things on floor though.

Deed:
Found her eyes captivating actually and she was also happy to hold eye contact throughout at various points. Started with lip kissing (unfortunately no tongue, but as active lip kissing as one can get) and caressing her body, licking / sucking her nipples and then a long OWO session. Found her BJ decently average and no teeth, no ball licking (that I can remember) and good variation - nothing to rave about but I did appreciate the endurance as she was on it for 10 min or so before we switched to 69. She didn't taste shower fresh, but also not "used" or lubed, but she was responsive and there were no offputting smell so continued for a bit. Had some stubble if I can recall correctly, not an issue.

Protected intercourse - Cycled through cowgirl, missionary and doggy. More passive than active from her end but still with occasional encouraging noises. Would have been good if she was more active participant though, but definitely one where you have to do more of the work. She was still engaging, held good eye contact and lip kissing available. Got close, and had to hold off, we switched back to OWO to give me some break. Her OWO felt nice, but not good enough to take me over the line - she did say at a point to cum in her mouth, wasn't sure if that would have carried extra charges, but I prefer to come on body / face anyways. She did further OWO for a bit, before I asked for a condom to get me closer via doggy. Has a nice bounce to her ass when pounding her, but no ripples - and thankfully not flat either so it was a decent sight. Once I was close, I took the condom off and came over her boobs (own handrelief).

During the deed, she also said I only had 15 minutes left when I asked her - which was blatantly short changing me on time, as I saw that I had left the property only having spent 40 minutes there.

Summary - Negative
Clearly bad comms, with resulting long wait - Negative
Looks - Neutral, my type if she was some years younger facially.
No DFK, and not fresh fresh downstairs - Negative
Deed - Was actually decent - Neutral (needed more reciprocation for Pos)
Short changing of time - Negative


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 20, 2026, 07:32:11 pm by oinki »

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,926
  • Likes: 395
  •  
  • Reviews: 213

was told to wait outside a coffee shop (about 10 min walk from St Pancreas)



Autocorrect?  :lol:

I fixed the title BTW
« Last Edit: September 21, 2026, 01:16:59 am by PilotMan »

Offline oinki

Autocorrect?  :lol:

I fixed the title BTW
:drinks:
Thanks, I should have stuck to kings X that I originally put down!

Offline Heph

Autocorrect?  :lol:

I fixed the title BTW

Not all heroes wear capes


Side point: she surprisingly acquired a positive yesterday, bringing her overall review score to a very shoddy 1:0:3 (of which, one of the negatives is mine), but the tally has failed to account for the positive, and is only showing 0:0:3. Might anyone know why, or be able to manually correct this?

« Last Edit: September 21, 2026, 01:38:01 pm by Heph »

Offline koshkaj

assuming you are referring to joker's review, he posted that about an hour ago. i believe the forum software updates review counts around 1am so would not expect to see this reflected yet.

Offline Denzel112

I had her hotlisted 3 weeks back when she advertised a memorable hot sloppy deep throat blowjob, but guessing from this review her BJ is average and not worth the visit.

I took her off my HL after her first 2 negatives of double booking customers, will definitely not attempt to contact her after this. Thanks.