Lil Blond - Camden

[Sunbeam]

External Link/Members Only

Arranged to see Lil Blond at short notice.
All coms by text.
Was sent a list of extras such as anal, cim and swallow.

Location was a flat 10 min walk from Camden Town.
Not a luxury penthouse and a bit rough but was ok for the deed.

Paid 200 for the hour, no extras.

Lil is tiny. 5ft and very petite.
Not stunning but not unattractive and photos on AW are her.
Tiny tits with pierced nipples and a tidy pussy.
She had a number of scars across her body, but not off putting.
She’s a nice enough girl and easy to talk with but don’t expect an intellectual conversation.

Started with a bit of fondling, no kissing because I’m not in to that, but is included in rate.

Then some owo. Condom on and I do her mish and doggy to finish.

I’ll give it a positive as I enjoyed my time and was great pumping a tiny little thing.
Just a slight hesitation due to the condition of the flat and slight lack of refinement about the girl.

[Duck]

Thanks for the review. I have also seen her here - External Link/Members Only

[leekahn99]

Thanks for this, been thinking about it.
Any issues with hygiene? It’s been noted previously

[Prince]

I find her difficult to book. We will agree on a time and then go quiet.

P

[Heph]

External Link/Members Only

She had a number of scars across her body, but not off putting.
She’s a nice enough girl and easy to talk with but don’t expect an intellectual conversation.
 
Just a slight hesitation due to the condition of the flat and slight lack of refinement about the girl.

Didn't/doesn't she have something in her ad which boasts 'chav', or words to that effect?

Yes, I had the impression from her ad that she might be a self-harmer, which I find very a discomfiting prospect - it's a strong signal that her reasons for being in the business are unlikely to be sound. The other signals, which taken together corroborate and amplify this (at least for me)- facial ironmongery; over-bloated lips; tattoos-swarms; are all present and correct, as the theory calls-for.

Also of note, the linked summary of her User ID here, gives 1 review, but actually she currently has two - both positive.

[deg_dilemma]

Didn't/doesn't she have something in her ad which boasts 'chav', or words to that effect?

Yes, I had the impression from her ad that she might be a self-harmer, which I find very a discomfiting prospect - it's a strong signal that her reasons for being in the business are unlikely to be sound. The other signals, which taken together corroborate and amplify this (at least for me)- facial ironmongery; over-bloated lips; tattoos-swarms; are all present and correct, as the theory calls-for.

Also of note, the linked summary of her User ID here, gives 1 review, but actually she currently has two - both positive.

The other review also had a post of someone getting an offer of bareback from her.

[AboveAndBelow]

At that size I imagine she's tight?

[Sunbeam]

Didn’t have any issues with hygiene and the scars didn’t look like self harm, but I’m no expert.

I didn’t have time to do any research, was any port in a storm after plan a let me down last min and I was on a deadline.

I messaged as was there asap.

If I’d had the time, I might not have gone.


Still, the review is how I found it. Unlikely to revisit.

[Heph]

Unlikely to revisit.

Whilst it doesn't alter the overall colour and tone of the review, that's a very important post-script.