As I said in my comment Buggsy may have high standards and there is nothing at all wrong with that. What I might perceive as a 8/10 experience someone else might think 6/10.
I was attempting to be helpful in what come across in a critical way of the majority of the Red reviews. As has been pointed out the comments about the experience support the rating but almost all of the SP’s have either no other reviews or limited sketchy feedback.
These types of bookings are high risk and if Buggsy has high standards as I perceive then these types of bookings might not be best suited.
We are all different and when it comes to reviews there’s no right or wrong way of doing it.
Correct, there is absolutely nothing wrong with us having high standards. Especially, with this being an industry that provides services. However, we as punters should always be looking at our own standards and always looking at ways to improve our conduct too, and constantly looking at what reflects us and most importantly our escorting reviewing platform in the best way, e.g things that we can control such as good booking etiquette, clear and concise communications when reaching out to SP's that are strictly in adherence with the SP's advertising profiles. Good hygiene, being well groomed is important, and a good level of fitness etc is most beneficial (
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=449128.0), which in turn supports our mental health. These are all things that we can control that will put us in the best frame of mind from our side, which will also in turn get positively noticed by the SP's. Don't misconstrued me here, you'll always get a few incompetent SP's and SP managers, and when that happens, this is where we feed that information back through our reviews and regional discussions to warn others. Sure, we may get CE reviews against us for leaving negative reviews. Firstly, we can't control that and secondly, if them SP's want to damage their own income potential by not facing up to and rectifying the poor services that they provide and want to also damage other SP's income potential because then other SP's read them CE reports, and then in turn don't want to see us, then so be it. It makes no difference to us as long as we're following the correct process and doing what we should be doing as reviewers, then that's what counts. We'll just change our punting phone numbers every now and then, and steer clear of the bad eggs. To my final point as touched on before (
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=453985.msg4449209#msg4449209). As long as our reviews are done with total truthfulness, honestly and accuracy, then that's what ultimately matters regardless of the written style/format.
