Escorts refusing to see because of UKP

[Sunny]

 Was randomly looking at escort rankings the other day and noticed a service provider left a positive review of herself on her own profile (Mistakenly put her name down) Suspect she might have also “created” other reviews on her profile page as well. Thank god for UKP

[RandomGuy99]

Many see UKP as punters being two faced as they leave a positive on AW and then maybe a negative on here and then the drama starts. They also don't like the language and detailed descriptions some SSs use in their reviews. SPs tolerate UKP. None of them actually like it.

[myothernameis]

Many see UKP as punters being two faced as they leave a positive on AW and then maybe a negative on here and then the drama starts. They also don't like the language and detailed descriptions some SSs use in their reviews. SPs tolerate UKP. None of them actually like it.

Before Ukpunting there were other forums, and one particular forum, like UKP had a big section for reviews.   Some of the reviews were quite graphic in detail, and some punters would not tell what went on between escort and the punter

So when UKP wasn't around, and we relied on other forums for reviews, so with escorts did they have issues with these other forums

[RandomGuy99]

Before Ukpunting there were other forums, and one particular forum, like UKP had a big section for reviews.   Some of the reviews were quite graphic in detail, and some punters would not tell what went on between escort and the punter

So when UKP wasn't around, and we relied on other forums for reviews, so with escorts did they have issues with these other forums

I imagine that they did. SPs want to get on with servicing customers and making money with the minimum of drama. SSs just want to have a good time and spend their money wisely also with the minimum of drama. Some kind of review site is helpful to SPs as it drives work to good SPs and away from not so good ones and SSs as it helps us find the good ones although we all like different things so what one SS considers a bad looking SP might be exactly what another SS is looking for. You're never going to be able to please all SPs and SSs but I think UKP is a good resource for both although I agree that sometimes the language used by some can be offensive and reviews on here can cause drama for SPs and SSs. Reviews do set a SS's expectations and of the SP doesn't deliver a similar experience to all then SSs are disappointed and confused. They blame the SP and in some cases that is unfair.  I think it takes both SS and SP to be working well together on a booking to make it a good one.

[Munter84]

Many see UKP as punters being two faced as they leave a positive on AW and then maybe a negative on here and then the drama starts. They also don't like the language and detailed descriptions some SSs use in their reviews. SPs tolerate UKP. None of them actually like it.

That's because the AW review system is biased against punters and open to abuse. I would trust a UKP review over an AW one any day of the week. We punters know very well that any AW feedback we give had better be gushing praise, or else we can expect smears and blacklisting in revenge.

By the nature of sex work, a review is going to be personal, but beyond that I don't get what the big issue is that some WGs have with being reviewed? If I wanted to hire a plumber I'd seek out reviews that give an honest appraisal of their skill and VFM. 

[RandomGuy99]

That's because the AW review system is biased against punters and open to abuse. I would trust a UKP review over an AW one any day of the week. We punters know very well that any AW feedback we give had better be gushing praise, or else we can expect smears and blacklisting in revenge.

By the nature of sex work, a review is going to be personal, but beyond that I don't get what the big issue is that some WGs have with being reviewed? If I wanted to hire a plumber I'd seek out reviews that give an honest appraisal of their skill and VFM. 

Possibly being described as the back of a bus or fat isn't something anyone wants to read about themselves on the internet?

There are other less offensive ways of saying the SP like saying she was curvy.

Remember being an SP is a lonely job and sometimes to kill the time between bookings they read this site and it can be quite offensive and upsetting to read some of the things people have been known to say on it. There's no need to be offensive in a review. Also revealing personal information that was shared on a booking isn't good and can cause a lot of drama as it could be used to out the SP. 

[Munter84]

Possibly being described as the back of a bus or fat isn't something anyone wants to read about themselves on the internet?

Oh sure, I understand that, and surely it goes without saying that it's uncalled for. SPs are entitled to boundaries and privacy and in part that's why the mods here are (correctly) strict on not posting socials, exact addresses, photos that aren't in current ads, and so on.

But some SPs object to being reviewed at all - positive or negative - which is bizarre because they're literally advertising themselves on various platforms, setting prices for their services, laying out criteria for who they'll see and what their boundaries are. All business. But the one part of the transaction they object to is client reviews? Like, you'll offer sex for money, put face pictures on your AW, suck and fuck a guy, but the same guy posting "Not bad, 8/10" is the step too far? Bizarre.

This is just me moaning out loud btw, I'm not expecting SPs to change their attitude on this.

[RandomGuy99]

Oh sure, I understand that, and surely it goes without saying that it's uncalled for. SPs are entitled to boundaries and privacy and in part that's why the mods here are (correctly) strict on not posting socials, exact addresses, photos that aren't in current ads, and so on.

But some SPs object to being reviewed at all - positive or negative - which is bizarre because they're literally advertising themselves on various platforms, setting prices for their services, laying out criteria for who they'll see and what their boundaries are. All business. But the one part of the transaction they object to is client reviews? Like, you'll offer sex for money, put face pictures on your AW, suck and fuck a guy, but the same guy posting "Not bad, 8/10" is the step too far? Bizarre.

This is just me moaning out loud btw, I'm not expecting SPs to change their attitude on this.

I think SPs can easily spot when a review has been posted on here as they're getting bombarded with requests and they probably go "Oh FFS, not another review on UKP! Those bastards are always demanding and if anything goes wrong like I'm running late because a previous SS finished late or I give someone a toothy BJ, then I'll get a negative review". Reviews on here put pressure on SPs and nobody really likes pressure.

[Charliehutton]

I think SPs can easily spot when a review has been posted on here as they're getting bombarded with requests and they probably go "Oh FFS, not another review on UKP! Those bastards are always demanding and if anything goes wrong like I'm running late because a previous SS finished late or I give someone a toothy BJ, then I'll get a negative review". Reviews on here put pressure on SPs and nobody really likes pressure.

Do you think so? The vast majority of punters aren't members of UKP, so I'm not sure how big an impact reviews have on them, be they positive or negative. Some girls have had lousy reviews on here, to the point where you'd imagine no member would bother, but they seem to carry on regardless.

[RandomGuy99]

Do you think so? The vast majority of punters aren't members of UKP, so I'm not sure how big an impact reviews have on them, be they positive or negative. Some girls have had lousy reviews on here, to the point where you'd imagine no member would bother, but they seem to carry on regardless.

SPs can get 100s a message a day. I think a positive review on here makes more impact. Any review on here can cause them drama as well as driving work their way.

[MLawro93]

SPs can and will refuse to see you for a number of reasons. No point trying to rationalise it too much. It is their decision in the end.

Some girls are savvy and can easily ID your UKP profile just by how you write/talk, or identical AW and UKP aliases, or they can just look at your review history and connect the dots with your AW feedback. Girls do flag numbers on CE as having a UKP account, as many aren't a fan for obvious reasons.

I think SPs can easily spot when a review has been posted on here as they're getting bombarded with requests and they probably go "Oh FFS, not another review on UKP! Those bastards are always demanding and if anything goes wrong like I'm running late because a previous SS finished late or I give someone a toothy BJ, then I'll get a negative review". Reviews on here put pressure on SPs and nobody really likes pressure.

All I ask for is respect for my time. Its what I primarily give a negative for unless I vibe terribly with the SP. I think some can be a demanding lot, but I think the rest aren't. Its just no one likes to be judged, people naturally get defensive when they get rightly criticised, plus there is the lack of owning ones own mistakes and proactively taking accountability. But that really does depend on ones personality. Some SPs can take it on the chin and others simply won't.

[Zimbaman]

Possibly being described as the back of a bus or fat isn't something anyone wants to read about themselves on the internet?

There are other less offensive ways of saying the SP like saying she was curvy.

That generally happens when an escort advertises as size 8 with 15 year out of date pics. If they are honest, the reviews tend to reflect that. I suspect there is a direct correlation between imaginative advertising and ‘back of a bus’ comments in reviews