Author Topic: AliceHotThai - West Kensington  (Read 255 times)


8 review(s) for AliceHotThai (6 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by scouting]

Offline Jonestown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,728
  • Likes: 131
  •  
  • Reviews: 51
Www.adultwork.com/8564734

I’d lines up both Kuki and Alice after reading reviews on UKP.

Alice seems to have moved to the first floor rather than the basement that I had seen reported. I wasn’t sure it was the same girl at first she looked Indian rather than Thai, but then she got her boobs out and all doubt vanished, they are in deed large, soft, somewhat pendulous, with enormous dark and reactive nipples. To be honest, she’s not hot, the second photo in the red house coat is pretty close, she could do a lot to improve the visual aspect. Paid £80 for 30 minutes, I stripped off and got on the bed, she did the same, quick wet wiping and we were into OWO, ran with this for a bit then asked her to lay down and had a play with those nipples, they certainly are majestic. Moved on down to her full shaven quim, very open with plump outer lips and not much inside except for a rather challenging clit which took gentle diligence and patience to persuade it to come out and play, switched round to some more oral and with me slipping a thumb into her birth canal, deliciously velvety. On with the condom and finished in missionary.

Not the most exciting punt I’ve ever had but a willing girl.

She leaves on Monday, so if you’re interested you’ll have to move quick, ok if you live local but I wouldn’t encourage anyone to travel. I was going to make it a neutral, but a low positive is fair.

I got 20 mins action, out of 30 paid for.

Be interesting to see if there is someone else in the flat next week.


Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,862
  • Likes: 213
  •  
  • Reviews: 168

Offline Jonestown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,728
  • Likes: 131
  •  
  • Reviews: 51
Ah, sorry for that chaps, thanks for the correction