AuroraKushh - Wallsend

[EngCalS]

External Link/Members Only

Meet was 30 minutes for £120, comms were not too bad really and was able to fit me in at late notice

The location is not hard to find with the postcode but did take me a little while to figure out her instructions so was walking the streets like a doylum for 5 minutes after parking nearby

Once I arrived she was instantly very friendly, as others have noted there were plenty of animals in the house and it was certainly lived in and cluttered but not unclean

In the bedroom were her dogs who left the room once we started getting undressed etc so they didn’t bother me. We had a little chat and she started with some DFK and great oral for probably 15 minutes. Condom on then moved onto cowgirl for a while and then back into more oral on me. Into missionary and she really seemed to be enjoying it. About 15 minutes into missionary I started to smell a funky fishy smell which was obviously her vagina so she isn’t amazingly clean and it put me off and I couldn’t focus anymore.

I climbed off to take a break and potentially go for CIM or something as her oral is quite good and didn’t want to leave loaded. During this she took the opportunity to check her phone and realised she had another client waiting, as our 30 minute meet ended up being 45 minutes so definitely no clock watching.

She quickly dressed the bed as I threw on my clothes and made a hasty exit with a quick kiss and cuddle at the door. Nice enough girl but on the day I met her she must have been very busy and obviously doesn’t leave time in between clients for any kind of hygiene, hence the smell and having another client lined up straight away - which is my reasoning for the neutral. Would have been a negative but her profile is accurate and her oral is very good and she’s happy to put the effort in.

Nice lass but I doubt I’ll be back.

[EngCalS]

I also forgot to add that after the oral but before the condom we were doing lots of non penetrative grinding and kissing but she was rubbing the tip of my cock against her vagina and almost entering which was making me uneasy and I was about to ask her to stop when she asked “do you want a condom?”.

Not sure if she was planning on BB but I’m not the type to take the risk, but I also think any kind of unprotected contact down there is unacceptable.

I’ve done BB before with a very popular and well reviewed SP who I developed a bit of a relationship with and is no longer in the area and ever since I count myself lucky and just cannot recommend SPs who do it or attempt it or come close to it.

[hamchang]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Iloveoral]

To answer your report

Rule 10 Review deletion
That is impossible, as the notice on the review creation page made clear.

I don’t know why you are discussing UKP with a SP to be honest.

[EngCalS]

To answer your report

Rule 10 Review deletion
That is impossible, as the notice on the review creation page made clear.

I don’t know why you are discussing UKP with a SP to be honest.

Notice of the rule is enough, your opinion isn’t required.

[daviemac]

Notice of the rule is enough, your opinion isn’t required.

It's not an opinion, it's a rhetorical question, discussing UKP with service providers is something that is frowned upon and in certain circumstances can get you banned.

I will ask the question directly, why are you discussing this site with escorts? what are you hoping to gain?   

[EngCalS]

It's not an opinion, it's a rhetorical question, discussing UKP with service providers is something that is frowned upon and in certain circumstances can get you banned.

I will ask the question directly, why are you discussing this site with escorts? what are you hoping to gain?   

It quite clearly wasn’t a rhetorical question, it was a statement of opinion.

You may ask the question directly; but I’d suggest before asking why I did something, it may be worth confirming that I did it.

That said, I have no interest in validating your investigation considering it is entirely meaningless

[daviemac]

It quite clearly wasn’t a rhetorical question, it was a statement of opinion.

You may ask the question directly; but I’d suggest before asking why I did something, it may be worth confirming that I did it.

That said, I have no interest in validating your investigation considering it is entirely meaningless

You have been asked by the escort to remove this post, how does she know that it was you who posted it? 

"I don’t know why you are discussing UKP with a SP to be honest." is not an opinion, it's a reasonable assumption given the escort knows who posted the review and has asked you to delete it.

I will rephrase the question, how does the escort know it was you who posted the review and what reason did she give during the non discussion for wanting it removed.

As a member of this site you should have the courage of your convictions to stand by what you have posted and not bow down to an escort just because you have exposed the fact she does not leave a lot of time between punters.

The only way this would be removed is if it isn't true and you have made it up as some way of 'getting back' at her or damage her reputation for some reason, is this the case?

[EngCalS]

You have been asked by the escort to remove this post, how does she know that it was you who posted it? 

"I don’t know why you are discussing UKP with a SP to be honest." is not an opinion, it's a reasonable assumption given the escort knows who posted the review and has asked you to delete it.

I will rephrase the question, how does the escort know it was you who posted the review and what reason did she give during the non discussion for wanting it removed.

As a member of this site you should have the courage of your convictions to stand by what you have posted and not bow down to an escort just because you have exposed the fact she does not leave a lot of time between punters.

The only way this would be removed is if it isn't true and you have made it up as some way of 'getting back' at her or damage her reputation for some reason, is this the case?

I received a single text from the girl months after the meet. How she figured out it was me is anyone’s guess - and I’d rather not know as it potentially exposes my identity. Her reasoning for wanting it removed is irrelevant, my reason for wanting it removed was because I seen my review as more damaging to her reputation than it should be, considering she has glowing reviews and I appear to have caught her on what is evidently a very rare off day. That said, of course I see the value in unbiased independent reviews hence being a member of this forum in the first place.

[Shutty238]

I received a single text from the girl months after the meet. How she figured out it was me is anyone’s guess - and I’d rather not know as it potentially exposes my identity. Her reasoning for wanting it removed is irrelevant, my reason for wanting it removed was because I seen my review as more damaging to her reputation than it should be, considering she has glowing reviews and I appear to have caught her on what is evidently a very rare off day. That said, of course I see the value in unbiased independent reviews hence being a member of this forum in the first place.

I worry you're digging yourself a bit deeper here and should maybe take the advice of mods on the chin. Catching an SP on a bad day is when their service is tired or attitude poor, you wrote a review alleging back to back service was affecting her hygiene and she potentially offers bareback. If you didn't think that would be damaging to her reputation I don't know what would be. That said, most SSs take reviews in the round so would probably weigh this up against her sequence of greens.
Maybe time to move on. Thanks for review.

[daviemac]

I received a single text from the girl months after the meet. How she figured out it was me is anyone’s guess - and I’d rather not know as it potentially exposes my identity. Her reasoning for wanting it removed is irrelevant, my reason for wanting it removed was because I seen my review as more damaging to her reputation than it should be, considering she has glowing reviews and I appear to have caught her on what is evidently a very rare off day. That said, of course I see the value in unbiased independent reviews hence being a member of this forum in the first place.

The reason she wants it removed is anything but irrelevant, it a major consideration in what action we take, so again what reason did she give for wanting it removed.

[Druidtoad]

I'll settle this. Removed.

[daviemac]

I'll settle this. Removed.

No I will, by giving you a couple of weeks break for having a blatant disregard for the rules.

[portable]

I think OP is being a bit melodramatic with the 'potential BB' issue to be honest. Ignoring that as the likely cause of dram, I'm more surprised by the back-to-back bookings and keeping dogs in the same room you're taking guys into. As for the hygiene issue, it might well be a medical issue, but either way, how a woman can't be aware of it is just baffling. That's three huge red flags right there.

[toon972]

Looks like i dodged a bullet by her not replying to my message. 

[EngCalS]

The reason she wants it removed is anything but irrelevant, it a major consideration in what action we take, so again what reason did she give for wanting it removed.

She said it affected her mental health. I’ll say no more on the matter as this is just getting ridiculous.