Having now read the posting history and both reviews of this user, I genuinely struggle to believe this is a normal independent punter account. Two glowing reviews for the Rebecca Ryder Parties, at the exact same Sutton venue within the space of about a month is already unusual enough, but when you actually read them side by side the pattern becomes painfully obvious
.
Every post follows the same formula: session schedules, lineup breakdowns, performer namedrops, “great atmosphere/vibes”, “very active girls”, and a big recommendation at the end. They read less like natural punter reports and more like polished promotional writeups designed to reassure potential customers.
What really gives it away is the complete lack of genuine friction or unpredictability that real reviews usually contain. Even the negatives are framed to immediately protect the venue, girls missing? Don’t worry, replacements arrived. Didn’t get enough time? Still amazing. Not every girl his type? Still “something for every taste”. It constantly circles back to selling the experience.
Then you look at the forum posts outside the reviews and it gets even worse
. The account jumps into threads to defend performers personally, despite openly admitting he hasn’t even met some of them and only follows them on X/watches their videos
. That is not normal detached punter behaviour. It comes across like someone emotionally or commercially invested in promoting the scene and protecting the brand image around these parties.
Honestly, the whole thing reads like venue self-promotion written by somebody trying a bit too hard to sound like an enthusiastic customer. The repeated Sutton hype, the brochure-style structure, the constant positivity, the performer promotion and the weirdly defensive fanboy posting all scream “promo account” far louder than “genuine punter” to me.
