Are UK sex worker prices really that different? 11,000+ profiles across three sites say yesTL;DR: I pulled every UK-based profile with a priced listing from AdultWork, EuroGirls, and Tryst, normalized everything to a comparable GBP hourly rate, and compared them. The headline number depends
almost entirely on which site you're reading. AW says the UK median is ~£151/hr. Tryst says £439. EuroGirls lands in between at £299. That's a ~2.9× spread, and it holds up in every slice I threw at the data.
Step 1 — Set the scene: who has how much data?Hidden Image/Members OnlyAdultWork absolutely dominates the UK sample by volume — roughly
11,000 priced profiles — while EuroGirls and Tryst each contribute around
420. That's the first thing to internalize before looking at prices: the "UK market" from AW's perspective is something you can sample thousands at a time; from Tryst/EuroGirls it's a much narrower slice.
That matters for two reasons. First, any cross-site aggregate is going to be dominated by AW simply because AW is ~25× larger. Second, if AW and Tryst disagree, it is
not because one of them got unlucky with a handful of data points — AW alone has enough volume to pin its distribution down to within a few pounds.
Step 2 — The prices. Look at the gap.Hidden Image/Members OnlyThese are box plots (middle 50% in the box, line = median, whiskers show the p1–p99 range). Look at the boxes.
They barely overlap. AW's interquartile range sits roughly £130–£200. Tryst's sits £295–£590. Half of all Tryst providers are priced
above where AW's entire upper quartile starts. EuroGirls is visibly in between.
This is the thing I found really striking — it's not that the distributions have different averages but the same spread. They're cleanly tiered. You can almost guess the source of a random UK listing from its price alone.
Step 3 — Put a number on itHidden Image/Members OnlyIn GBP:
-
AdultWork: £151 median, £177 mean
-
EuroGirls: £299 median, £324 mean
-
Tryst: £439 median, £708 mean
A couple things worth flagging:
- The mean-vs-median gap is small for AW and EG but huge for Tryst (£439 → £708). That's a textbook heavy-tailed distribution — there are a small number of very expensive Tryst profiles that pull the mean up. The median is the honest summary here, and it's still nearly 2.9× AW's.
- If you were to report "the UK hourly rate" as a simple unweighted average across the three site medians, you'd get ~£296. That number is not wrong exactly, but it's describing a market that nobody actually buys in — you buy on
one site.
Step 4 — Is it just that Tryst is London-heavy?Obvious objection: London is expensive, Tryst might just be more London-concentrated than AW.
Hidden Image/Members OnlyNo. London-only, the pattern holds. AW London median is £221 (up from the £151 UK-wide figure — London IS more expensive on AW, as expected). EuroGirls London is £299. Tryst London is £448. Tryst is still
2.0× AW even inside the same city. Whatever is driving the gap, it's not London composition.
Step 5 — Does this hold across UK cities?Hidden Image/Members OnlyThis was the chart I most wanted to see, and yes — wherever two or three sources have overlapping UK coverage, AW sits at the bottom, EG in the middle, Tryst on top. The 2–3× multiplier is remarkably consistent across cities.
(Small caveat: EuroGirls provincial UK samples get tiny past London — Glasgow/Leeds/Liverpool have n ≤ 4, which is why several of them cluster at an identical value. That's small-sample noise from a common EUR pricing tier showing through, not a real per-city signal. The London EG figure is statistically robust; the provincial ones are more directional.)
Step 6 — Is the gap coming from the methodology?Fair question. I'm normalizing across different duration rates (1h, 2h, 4h, overnight) using a per-source scaling factor, because longer bookings are discounted per-hour. If Tryst providers mostly list overnight rates and I'm scaling those up to an "hourly" number, maybe I'm manufacturing the gap.
Hidden Image/Members OnlyI'm not. Every bar here shows what share of each source's UK records come from directly-observed 1h rates (greens) vs anything derived from longer durations (oranges/reds). AW and EG are
99% observed 1h. Tryst is
89% observed — the derived slices are visible but tiny.
Which means: the Tryst UK median of £439 is computed from ~370 providers who
actually published a 1-hour rate. The scaling factor layer isn't loading the dice.
Step 7 — Is it just age differences?Next obvious theory: maybe Tryst skews younger, or older, or has fewer 40+ providers, and price is really just an age proxy.
Hidden Image/Members OnlyNope.
Tryst is more expensive than AW in every single age bucket. Same for EG > AW in the age buckets where EG has 10+ samples. The
source effect is larger than the age effect — the gap between AW and Tryst in a single age bucket is bigger than the gap between the youngest and oldest buckets on either source alone.
Step 8 — What about ethnicity?Same question, different attribute.
Hidden Image/Members OnlySame answer. Wherever both sources have 15+ samples for an ethnicity, Tryst is more expensive — often substantially. There is no ethnicity category where AW is higher than Tryst, or where Tryst and AW are close. The platform dimension swamps the ethnicity dimension.
That's the strongest argument so far that this isn't composition — Tryst isn't "the same providers listed at the same prices" minus some demographic mix. It's a
different pool of providers listing at systematically different price points.
So what's actually going on?My best read, having lived in this data for a while:
1.
AdultWork is the mass-market UK site. Broad, deep, national coverage. Its £151 median reflects what most UK providers are actually charging.
2.
Tryst is a premium / international-facing platform. The providers who bother listing there are selecting for a clientele that pays ~2.9× what AW providers charge. Same country, different tier.
3.
EuroGirls sits structurally in between — some London premium presence, a lot of touring European providers who work through EG's European marketing reach.
These aren't the same market sampled three different ways. They are three different
layers of the market, each with roughly coherent internal pricing but very different absolute levels. Any "UK hourly rate" you quote without naming a source is a misleading number.
Open question I don't yet have the data to answerAre the same providers listing on multiple sites at different prices? If a given person has profiles on both AW and Tryst, do they charge £151 on one and £439 on the other, or is it genuinely a different pool of providers on each site?
I have names and URLs in the dataset but no identity graph yet. That's the next analysis — name/handle matching across sources. If the overlap is >10%, the "different prices for the same people" story becomes plausible; if it's <1% (which I suspect, honestly), the "different providers on each site" story wins.
I have updated
External Link/Members Only to tracks this data
