Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Let's name and shame these bareback escorts  (Read 13858 times)

Offline grandaddybadman

I've noticed a rise in escorts that provide bareback :diablo: :diablo: :mad: :angry:. We need to create a blacklist and shame these inconsiderate careless people and the guys that see them :vomit: :vomit:  :vomit:. Here is a couple profiles.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tbrad

why does it matter to you, if other people enjoy having bareback sex? i mean seriously it's not really any of your business, is it?

get a life eh? find a hobby!

Offline cueball

Your list is gonna be a bloody big thing granddad, I wouldn't bother myself. It's on their likes list, punters choice.

Dodo

  • Guest
why does it matter to you, if other people enjoy having bareback sex? i mean seriously it's not really any of your business, is it?

get a life eh? find a hobby!
My thought exactly. Surely its up to them or am I missing something. 

Captain Kang

  • Guest
Wind your neck in you feeble minded old coot.

Offline Taggart

While the OP has a point, perhaps what we should be doing is identifying WGs who openly offer or indulge in BB during a meeting but to not indicated such practice on their profile. I would certainly not like to go down on a WG after he previous client may have accepted the BB on offer. It's disgusting and hellishly risky, and a perfect way to spread STIs.   :crazy:

We can steer clear of BB girls because it's listed on a profile, it's the devious skanks we need to be aware of.

Offline cueball



We can steer clear of BB girls because it's listed on a profile,

That's why I would rather it stayed in their likes list, better the devil you know

jjpsweet

  • Guest
I've noticed a rise in escorts that provide bareback :diablo: :diablo: :mad: :angry:. We need to create a blacklist and shame these inconsiderate careless people and the guys that see them :vomit: :vomit:  :vomit:. Here is a couple profiles.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

I notice feedback on the second profile from a punter called antivirus man. Worrinf

Offline grandaddybadman

BAREBACK IS SERIOUS. I thought this forum was about protecting and informing customers of a punting habit that can be enjoyable but also detrimental and dangerous to the naive, uninformed or compulsive punter.
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bangers and Gash

BAREBACK IS SERIOUS. I thought this forum was about protecting and informing customers of a punting habit that can be enjoyable but also detrimental and dangerous to the naive, uninformed or compulsive punter.

The last thing we need is a database for bug chasers to use.  :vomit:

Aspen

  • Guest
That's why I would rather it stayed in their likes list, better the devil you know
Obviously. It's no good driving things like that underground.

The OP has clearly got a drum he wants to beat. But I don't see the point of pursuing it. I'd prefer the dangers clearly flagged, so that we adults can all make our own judgements.

petite_kav

  • Guest
Its probably best if they had bb on teir profiles; that way you can decide to not pick them. So no point in shaming them, as in a way they are helping you not catch diseases :p

yorkshire123

  • Guest
BAREBACK IS SERIOUS. I thought this forum was about protecting and informing customers of a punting habit that can be enjoyable but also detrimental and dangerous to the naive, uninformed or compulsive punter.

That is true but if someone wants to offer it I would much rather they openly displayed it so I can avoid them.
As Taggart stated below  :thumbsup:

While the OP has a point, perhaps what we should be doing is identifying WGs who openly offer or indulge in BB during a meeting but to not indicated such practice on their profile. I would certainly not like to go down on a WG after he previous client may have accepted the BB on offer. It's disgusting and hellishly risky, and a perfect way to spread STIs.   :crazy:

We can steer clear of BB girls because it's listed on a profile, it's the devious skanks we need to be aware of.

Aspen

  • Guest
BAREBACK IS SERIOUS. I thought this forum was about protecting and informing customers of a punting habit that can be enjoyable but also detrimental and dangerous to the naive, uninformed or compulsive punter.

What about those that want to protect all the naïve uninformed and compulsive punters by banning prostitution altogether. That's what the nanny state wants. You're just one step removed from that. Beware what you wish for.

Unless of course you're simply a troll.

Offline Private Parts

why does it matter to you, if other people enjoy having bareback sex? i mean seriously it's not really any of your business, is it?

get a life eh? find a hobby!
With you Brad on this. Its the ones who hide the fact that they offer "BB" and trade as "protected" that we should be naming.
PP

Offline Trevor12

perhaps what we should be doing is identifying WGs who openly offer or indulge in BB during a meeting but to not indicated such practice on their profile.

This is a much better idea IMO. Listing the ones who include BB in there likes seems pointless, as its quite easy to simply exclude those in your AW searches.

Offline grandaddybadman

While the OP has a point, perhaps what we should be doing is identifying WGs who openly offer or indulge in BB during a meeting but to not indicated such practice on their profile. I would certainly not like to go down on a WG after he previous client may have accepted the BB on offer. It's disgusting and hellishly risky, and a perfect way to spread STIs.   :crazy:

We can steer clear of BB girls because it's listed on a profile, it's the devious skanks we need to be aware of.

It's not as simple as staying away from escorts that provide bb :(. If a customer who get's an STD from a BB escort also goes with one of your regs even with protection certain std's can still be passed. Therefore, we need to create a standard in the market. This is about standards.  :hi:

Over the past 10 years punting has gotten worse because punters are too desperate :scare:.  Several years ago we could walk into a parlour and pick loads of top chicks to choose from  :D. Now it's like a witchhunt trying to find a decent chick and that because standards are not kept high :dash: :dash:.

Any chick can make profit from escorting  :thumbsdown: and THEY DON'T TAKE US SERIOUSLY BECAUSE WE DON'T KEEP THE WG'S TO A HIGH STANDARD. WE KEEP PAYING THEM BECAUSE THERE IS VERY LITTLE ELSE TO CHOOSE FROM. And we wonder why we only see the shitty unreliable emotionally broken, unprofessional, crackhead looking or overweight escorts around on AW. KEEP YOUR STANDARDS. 

I only want to see chicks that are in shape, young, professional, pretty that look straight off a ZOO model shoot. I pay for a fantasy. I dont want some 30+ worn out unhealthy overweight woman that does not even look like MILF material and probably only has big tits because she's so fat. They need to leave the business because it does nothing for them and does nothing for us. :mad:
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline grandaddybadman

Its probably best if they had bb on teir profiles; that way you can decide to not pick them. So no point in shaming them, as in a way they are helping you not catch diseases :p

Good point
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

a10

  • Guest
Have it as a reason for including on the already existing Pro$$ie blacklist. "Offers unadvertised bareback" or some such?

Advertised, I don't see the problem, allows those of us wishing to avoid AIDS a chance, unadvertised, however is a whole different kettle of fish

Offline grandaddybadman

Ok guys, you got some good points here that are calming me down. But I still feel standards need to be kept.
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

greychap

  • Guest
Even though I do not agree with escorts advertising BB and it could also be to infect a punter on purpose and for a punter to visit a girl also and feel they have the right to infect them if they offer that.

But I think Adultwork is the one that makes this worse they should take this off there likes so girls don't pick it and also it encourages more BB to go on or even for escorts to say they do it when they don't or foreigners that just tick everything not knowing what it is.

Personally does it warrant a black list I would say no as CIM and OWO have some risks to it also, not as much though as BB but I personally just avoid those types of girls that offer BB.

Simplysimon

  • Guest
What would be useful, is a list of escorts that don't list unprotected sex but offer it when meeting face to face ,

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

As an example

a10

  • Guest
... But I think Adultwork is the one that makes this worse they should take this off there likes so girls don't pick it and also it encourages more BB to go on or even for escorts to say they do it when they don't or foreigners that just tick everything not knowing what it is.

Personally does it warrant a black list I would say no as CIM and OWO have some risks to it also, not as much though as BB but I personally just avoid those types of girls that offer BB.

Utter bollocks. On your logic all WGs would be shitting on everyone as AW offers hardsports as an option!  :dash: :wacko:

If AW has bb removed from their likes list, how would you know which girls offer it before you met them?

greychap

  • Guest
The standards years ago most girls never did OWO, Kissing, CIM and used these dental type sheets if a punter wanted to go down on a girl so there was protection on that as well.

But times have changed very much and OWO is considered the norm, I remember years ago most escorts were usually disgusted with any other escort that started to offer OWO and CIM but now most do and if they don't they wont earn much money.

xxxx

  • Guest
There are some that do bb but it isnt on the profile. But then if you just go by profile you get all those non-english lot who don't know what bb means & have it on - but then after a while they add it to their profile that they don't but still have it on the list.

Offline socks

Ok guys, you got some good points here that are calming me down. But I still feel standards need to be kept.
Good job too, I was thinking here comes a potential WotW!!!

greychap

  • Guest
Utter bollocks. On your logic all WGs would be shitting on everyone as AW offers hardsports as an option!  :dash: :wacko:

If AW has bb removed from their likes list, how would you know which girls offer it before you met them?

Hard Sports is disgusting to me so that would be good to see that removed also.

By offering it as a like it encourages all the punters that want that particular service to go to that escort so more risks as some that might have liked to have that might not mention it to the escort if it was not put on the likes and it might remain just a fantasy in the punters head.

But what is bollocks is all the escorts that say they offer that I doubt they all do just like some say OW at discretion

Punters asking for BB has become more normal by the amount of escort that put it as a like on AW that is why girls that don't offer it a lot make a bold point of saying don't dare ask me for BB or you will be blocked!!!!

Andrew Sanderson

  • Guest
Isn't best to focus on letting fellow punters know about WGs who do BB but do not state this anywhere on their profile?  Then we would be giving useful additional info.

yorkshire123

  • Guest
Hard Sports is disgusting to me so that would be good to see that removed also.

By offering it as a like it encourages all the punters that want that particular service to go to that escort so more risks as some that might have liked to have that might not mention it to the escort if it was not put on the likes and it might remain just a fantasy in the punters head.

But what is bollocks is all the escorts that say they offer that I doubt they all do just like some say OW at discretion

Punters asking for BB has become more normal by the amount of escort that put it as a like on AW that is why girls that don't offer it a lot make a bold point of saying don't dare ask me for BB or you will be blocked!!!!

Have you and the old geezer been out for a few shandy's together this afternoon  :unknown:

Offline Bigus Dickus

No point as you should always treat everyone you have sex with as an unknown health risk! Why create a meaningless list that's might lull someone into a false premise, just because someone isn't on it they might be safer? It's in everyone's interest that both punters and prossies play it safe.

I always research not only the girl but also her previous punts. If she has met with a barebacker then she goes on my blacklist!

Another consideration is managing a bareback database; the ones who need to be on it use multiple profiles. Focusing on them would drive them underground and make them difficult to detect! What's to stop someone malicious manipulating the list?  :unknown:

The best way forward is to research your punts and don't let your cock make decisions. With good risk management you can minimise or even almost eliminate it. Regular check-ups are also essential! If the government legalised it like other countries then this could all be regulated. The UK are still living in a Victorian moral age IMHO.

Just my thoughts!

« Last Edit: December 29, 2014, 08:33:07 pm by Bigus Dickus »

Offline smiths

No point as you should always treat everyone you have sex with as an unknown health risk! Why create a meaningless list that's might lull someone into a false premise, just because someone isn't on it they might be safer? It's in everyone's interest that both punters and prossies play it safe.

I always research not only the girl but also her previous punts. If she has met with a barebacker then she goes on my blacklist!

Another consideration is managing a bareback database; the ones who need to be on it use multiple profiles. Focusing on them would drive them underground and make them difficult to detect! What's to stop someone malicious manipulating the list?  :unknown:

The best way forward is to research your punts and don't let your cock make decisions. With good risk management you can minimise or even almost eliminate it. Regular check-ups are also essential! If the government legalised it like other countries then this could all be regulated. The UK are still living in a Victorian moral age IMHO.

Just my thoughts!

Good post. :thumbsup: Being a realist i would rather have BB on the list than not as at least i can avoid those that say they offer it. It is the case some foreign WGs or their pimps think BB means OWO but as i see it a WG should learn what the terms mean BEFORE posting a profile online.

Offline OakTree



But I think Adultwork is the one that makes this worse they should take this off there likes so girls don't pick it and also it encourages more BB to go on


Yeah that'll do it....... In Narnia!  Are you fucking barmy?

greychap

  • Guest
Have you and the old geezer been out for a few shandy's together this afternoon  :unknown:

I wish could do with a couple in fact you have just reminded me I have some in the fridge so will sit back and relax with them :thumbsup:

Offline jsparky

Just do a quick check on AW with only the 'like' button on 'bareback' in UK throw up 1703 profiles on 35 pages. So, here is your blacklist on Adultwork.

I'll prefer it was layout in the open, so anyone could decide on their own risk. I would have put them on my blacklist

However, that's only limited to AW, what about WG's who offer bareback and yet off the radar of AW?

Offline myothernameis

Your list is gonna be a bloody big thing granddad, I wouldn't bother myself. It's on their likes list, punters choice.

what you should be doing is naming the punters who have seen escort who offer bareback, all because they see other escorts who don't offer bareback, but don't think there are aware

If the bareback escort doesn't leave feedback for the punter, how do you know he has had unprotected sex

anton11

  • Guest
It,s all down to choice, personally by a girl advertising it at least you know not to book her if that's what your choice is. Incidentally there are some on A/W that advertise NO B.B but indeed offer it.

Sienna_Bronze

  • Guest
BB is a part of life and most sexually active adults will be having bb sex with someone, be it a regular partner or one night stand. The only thing you can do is to protect yourself and not worry what other people choose to do.

Offline hendrix

I don't know who you've seen OP, but I'd be willing to bet that they were all doing bb with somebody. And, quite possibly just before you saw them. If you can't accept that and understand that all you can do is look after yourself, punting might not be for you.

Offline gorge

I think we should have a similar list of any who kiss - I find it disgusting to think that a WG has been doing this before rimming me

Offline NIK

I daresay some do bb and hardsports and some even actually DO RECEIVE hardsports, but my cynicism says that often these profiles and lists of likes and dislikes are fake.
Back in the day when in my naivety I used to think AW was worthwhile and I actually patronised it, I came across a couple of girls who didn't even KNOW what was on their likes and dislikes, and I daresay there are hundreds more like that.  :rolleyes:

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,048
  • Likes: 0
Problem is, this forum has 1000s of lurkers, and if a list is compiled and published of all the BBers who DON'T advertise, it will just be a huge advertisement for all the ladies who willingly do BB on the quiet. I say leave the free publicity to the sites who openly discuss BBers.

Offline Gothic D

It's not as simple as staying away from escorts that provide bb :(. If a customer who get's an STD from a BB escort also goes with one of your regs even with protection certain std's can still be passed. Therefore, we need to create a standard in the market. This is about standards.  :hi:

Over the past 10 years punting has gotten worse because punters are too desperate :scare:.  Several years ago we could walk into a parlour and pick loads of top chicks to choose from  :D. Now it's like a witchhunt trying to find a decent chick and that because standards are not kept high :dash: :dash:.

Any chick can make profit from escorting  :thumbsdown: and THEY DON'T TAKE US SERIOUSLY BECAUSE WE DON'T KEEP THE WG'S TO A HIGH STANDARD. WE KEEP PAYING THEM BECAUSE THERE IS VERY LITTLE ELSE TO CHOOSE FROM. And we wonder why we only see the shitty unreliable emotionally broken, unprofessional, crackhead looking or overweight escorts around on AW. KEEP YOUR STANDARDS. 

I only want to see chicks that are in shape, young, professional, pretty that look straight off a ZOO model shoot. I pay for a fantasy. I dont want some 30+ worn out unhealthy overweight woman that does not even look like MILF material and probably only has big tits because she's so fat. They need to leave the business because it does nothing for them and does nothing for us. :mad:
Putting aside the BB issue it seems to me that you want everyone to like what you like and anyone that doesn't meet your high standards should be ostracised.
Bollocks to you mate we all like different things and different types of WG who the fuck are you to say that a fat bird  or an older well worn woman shouldn't be escorting.There are times when I fancy all of those things.As long as she is clean and professional with a good attitude.Methinks you are in the wrong hobby.


Offline grandaddybadman

Putting aside the BB issue it seems to me that you want everyone to like what you like and anyone that doesn't meet your high standards should be ostracised.
Bollocks to you mate we all like different things and different types of WG who the fuck are you to say that a fat bird  or an older well worn woman shouldn't be escorting.There are times when I fancy all of those things.As long as she is clean and professional with a good attitude.Methinks you are in the wrong hobby.

There is a reason why in many disciplines from the trades all the way to sports you have term "professional" and ''amateur". Show me a fat boxing champ or fat 100m gold medalist. Show me a dumb german engineer working for mercedes with an IQ of 70. My comment was not abut liking what I like, this is about keeping the standards high. That way these hoes know that they need to be on top of their game and can't get away with taking the piss if they want to make good money. You do have a point abut subjectivity and beauty being relative but my point still remains.
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Dave2014

  • Guest
Show me a fat boxing champ. . .

Er . . . okay, what about, for example:

1.  "Big" George Foreman
2.  James "Buster" Douglas
3.  James "Lights Out" Toney

You didn't really think that through, did you? Notwithstanding, the above examples also address the deficiency of your underlying premise.

That way these hoes know that they need to be on top of their game and can't get away with taking the piss if they want to make good money . . .

To be honest mate, and I say this with total humility and respect, and not at all intending to be confrontational . . . you come across like a complete pr*ck.

Both the nature of this thread and the language you use make me think that either (a) you are a 13 year old boy trolling with friends, or (b) you are quite sinister and if I were a WG, I would be happy for our paths never to cross.

You clearly have control/inferiority issues.

but my point still remains.

No. No it does not. Not in the slightest.

Happy New Year.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2015, 03:38:09 am by Dave2014 »

Offline JohnEv

Savannah Sanitoa, shot-putter but did 100m sprint at the 2009 World championships.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline cueball

Yeah that'll do it....... In Narnia!  Are you fucking barmy?

Lol, narnia lmfao

Ben4454

  • Guest

Completely agree. Who would risk shoving their penis into something that could be  a bees nest.

Offline Horizontal pleasures

What would be useful, is a list of escorts that don't list unprotected sex but offer it when meeting face to face ,

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

As an example

thanks for the heads-up. How do you know that she does BB?

Offline Horizontal pleasures

Isn't best to focus on letting fellow punters know about WGs who do BB but do not state this anywhere on their profile?  Then we would be giving useful additional info.
indeed very useful.