Are AW reviews fake?

[johncollins]

I am seeing an awful lot of similarity when looking at AW reviews, same phrases, same amount of text, same style of typing.
From what are supposed to be different people.

Can girls pay for / generate reviews using fake profiles? How common a practice do people think this is?

[EmmaJ]

I believe fake feedback is common with group of girls run by pimps.

[RandomGuy99]

Yes, there are a lot of fake reviews around.

[scutty brown]

two or three laptops, multiple web browsers, a fistful of PAYG SIM cards and three or four weeks and you could create quite a good fake review history for a girl (or multiple girls). Dead easy
In fact many of the AW groups these girls join offer such a "market optimisation" service as part of the deal - think of it as just another form of website enhancement/promotion

It doesn't mean all reviews are fake, just some of them

[Jonestown]

Yes there are a lot of fake reviews on AW, but some will be from real punters who not infrequently have a standard set of phrases they use in these situations, if only just for speed and convenience, not everyone creates a bespoke response to every meet, unless it’s especially memorable.

[bops909]

It doesn't mean all reviews are fake, just some of them

100% this.

OP - if you have seen something you're not sure about, please share the profile in question and UKP members can have a look too, and you'll also be able to cross reference against UKP members reviews.

[RandomGuy99]

I believe fake feedback is common with group of girls run by pimps.

or egomaniacs

[Cheltclient]

I take AW feedback with a hefty pinch of salt. First thing I do is check on here. 99% of the time, if there is no intel on here, I move on. However some feedback is of course genuine. If I click on the profile that has left an SP feedback, I see the other escorts that have been seen. If the profile of the punter has also seen well reviewed escorts and they have left him feedback confirming the booking happened, then I tend to think theres more chance of it being genuine for all girls. Still, with no intel here, I tend not to take the risk these days.

You can usually spot the dubious feedback. The punters have single digit feedback themselves and often seem to be reviewing the same gang of girls.

[advent2016]

This is one of the most reliable places.

[Atrueyorkie]

90% are bullshit.

It’s a you scratch my back I scratch yours. Therefore there will never be any negative feedback.

You want some more reliable unfiltered feedback, look on here.

On ukp you can take it with a bit more confidence.

For some reason people’s standards on AW are gutter, basement low.

[johncollins]

It's more the language that I found was a giveaway.

I don't want to post links or anything, but for example, one guy has seen 4-5 different girls, yet almost all girls that reviewed him used the same sort of words to do so.
("Babe, "Gent", "fab", "come again" etc..) all, singular sentences. Typed in the same style, yet supposedly different girls...

A bit like BBC Comments... They're obviously mostly in-house bull-shiters with a political agenda.
(That's BBC the broadcaster btw, not...) 

[WAY-WARD]

There's a group I know of where a few guys seem to have seen all the girls.
I suppose it's possible they are genuine and as most of the SPs are good,
and if they're local, why look elsewhere.
But while they leave AW FB there is little evidence of them ever leaving a UKP review

[puntingking]

It is not whether aw reviews are fake. It is whether a punter can review a sp honestly whereas a punter may choose to leave a negative but feels unable to because he would be easily identifiable to the sp and other sps may not want to see him because of negative reviews he may of left in the past.
Also, if a punter leaves a negative then a sp can choose to leave a negative of the punter on the same site so it is counterproductive to leave a negative reviews on there.

So because leaving a negative review on aw is not wise, this makes all positive feedback on there meaningless whereas no punter should take the advice or see a sp based on positive feedback on there.


Ukpunting reviews are the only reviews punters should take on board and see a sp based on previous reviews on here of a particular sp.

 

[puntingking]

to the op -


You have been a member of this site a few years longer than me which makes me wonder why you don't know the answer to this question yourself 


Knowledge is one thing but wisdom comes with age. You must be an experience punter which is surprising to me that you don't know the answer to this question yourself 

[johncollins]

makes me wonder why you don't know the answer to this question yourself 

My dear fellow, I am far from wise and have only gone and fell totally in love with the girl...
A story I am not unpacking here.

[Heph]

Look through the feedback for this one

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I don't want to go through a point-by-point critique of why the feedback is so obviously, laughably false, lest the pimp catch on to the red flags that point towards fakeness. Seasoned punters or even reasonably literate or sceptical people will be able to see them for what they are.

[merseyrob]

The main thing to look for is a field report rather than a few words of feedback as it takes time and effort to write. In my experience it is more likely the punter is posting a genuine review. But they are not that common. It is the first thing I look for if an SP has no UKP reviews.

[puntingking]

The main thing to look for is a field report rather than a few words of feedback as it takes time and effort to write. In my experience it is more likely the punter is posting a genuine review. But they are not that common. It is the first thing I look for if an SP has no UKP reviews.

a lot of these so-called "field reports" say things like "be nice to her" or some other white knights statements. Also they leave out all the useful details in these "field reports". it is nothing more than a way to advertise the sp to other potential punters.

[therichardrichard]

I never take the reviews at face value and beyond the obvious red flags I do click through to a few of those that gave a review to see if

1) the girl in question has reviewed back,
2) that person has varied looking feedback from other girls, and most importantly
3) that person has feedback a girl who I have met.

None of this is infallable of course but it just adds to (or detracts from) my level of confidence in the legitimacy of the profile.

[signy]

Checking an escort with low feedback, another thing to beware of is when that feedback includes a large proportion from other SPs. A new escort sets up ghost bookings with other group members to get her feedback up-and-running.

[MaxVerstappen]

90% are bullshit.

It’s a you scratch my back I scratch yours. Therefore there will never be any negative feedback.

This. 

[raging_bull]

A good method I use is to look at the feedback they received and the number next to the user who left feedback. This shows how much feedback that user has from SPs. If it's 1 or a low number, then it's usually a fake review.

[puntingking]

A good method I use is to look at the feedback they received and the number next to the user who left feedback. This shows how much feedback that user has from SPs. If it's 1 or a low number, then it's usually a fake review.

no method is a "good method"and since punters don't leave negative feedback means we do not know if the sp has some complaints from previous punters - AVOID ALL AW FEEDBACK 

I don't even look at the feedback on aw, there is no reason to 

[MaxVerstappen]

I don't even look at the feedback on aw, there is no reason to 

This is the first time that I can say that I agree with you 100% 

[scutty brown]

no method is a "good method"and since punters don't leave negative feedback means we do not know if the sp has some complaints from previous punters - AVOID ALL AW FEEDBACK 

I don't even look at the feedback on aw, there is no reason to 

You should.
By reading it properly you can often screen out some real dogs

[puntingking]

This is the first time that I can say that I agree with you 100% 

 

[Heph]

no method is a "good method"and since punters don't leave negative feedback means we do not know if the sp has some complaints from previous punters - AVOID ALL AW FEEDBACK 

I don't even look at the feedback on aw, there is no reason to 

There is a good reason: negative feedback - whilst some of this may come from other advertisers or malicious actors, nevertheless, the cost of leaving it, either through rebuttal or the risk of being seen as a complainer, means that AW negatives do carry some weight.

An advertiser with several negative feedbacks, and where they're greater than, say, 5% of her overall feedback, will more likely than not, have deserved them, and should be swerved.

You should.
By reading it properly you can often screen out some real dogs

Correct

[MaxVerstappen]

You should.
By reading it properly you can often screen out some real dogs

 

[Ivor Hunch]

not all are fake.

indeed, a good way of finding new leads is to look at the feedback for someone you have met and liked, and see who people who have reviewed her have also seen and reviewed.

I liked Samantha, and Dave also liked Samantha, there is at least a chance I will like other SP's Dave has seen and liked.

[Bonker]

Are some AW feedback reports fake?
Does the pope shit in the woods?

[alabama1]

Are some AW feedback reports fake?
Does the pope shit in the woods?

Is the bear a Catholic 

[Bonker]

You got it 

[puntingking]

Is the bear a Catholic 

is the sky blue 

[scutty brown]

Are some AW feedback reports fake?
Does the pope shit in the woods?

Have you got a ginger cat?

[GreyDave]

not all are fake.

indeed, a good way of finding new leads is to look at the feedback for someone you have met and liked, and see who people who have reviewed her have also seen and reviewed.

I liked Samantha, and Dave also liked Samantha, there is at least a chance I will like other SP's Dave has seen and liked.

Well thats more or less wha we all do on here , add the info of our age and shape and then you get an idea of how the SP will respond.
Ive found Ive only ever got feedback from Brit girls and the others ive booked by phone and asked about booking via AW system just dont bother .

  Its easy to spot the fake reveiws on there as many are done at same time and the feedback the reveiwer has is also blocke written some are Mills and Boon others Wham Bang Hot bitch style 
You get a sense for whats BS funnily if you read this site its same with the Mills and Boon reveiws