Author Topic: Harriet21 - Liverpool  (Read 5697 times)


3 review(s) for Harrietxox (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Kool Keef]
40 review(s) for Chloe02x (27 positive, 1 neutral, 12 negative) [Indexed by Kool Keef]

Offline lewisjones23

External Link/Members Only

Saw this one by accident, it is the new profile of https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=37975

Booked in easy enough but wasn't looking to see this WG again, didn't realise she was on a new profile.

Made the most of it though, she sucks dick very well so let her get on with it to the natural conclusion.

30 min
£120


Offline lewisjones23

Can the reviews off old profile be linked?

Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,875
  • Likes: 66
  •  
  • Reviews: 198

Offline smit1234

Let's see if she starts pissing around with bookings too like she used to

Is she dealing with her Comms now do you know?

Offline lewisjones23

Let's see if she starts pissing around with bookings too like she used to

Is she dealing with her Comms now do you know?

It seemed so yes

Offline TomD1343

Nice one mate thanks been hoping to see her again since she disappeared

Offline Galileo

What a coincidence, I spotted this profile today, pictures look like Chloe

External Link/Members Only

Offline Tommygunn81

External Link/Members Only

Saw this one by accident, it is the new profile of https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=37975

Booked in easy enough but wasn't looking to see this WG again, didn't realise she was on a new profile.

Made the most of it though, she sucks dick very well so let her get on with it to the natural conclusion.

30 min
£120

Yes definitely the best blow job I’ve ever had! It’s a bit misleading though as the photos look nothing like her.

Offline Maraluke

IN what way are the photos misleading by the way?

Always had an eye on this one but put off by the range of views on her looks, and most importantly her messing people around..

H.

Offline OakTree

IN what way are the photos misleading by the way?

Always had an eye on this one but put off by the range of views on her looks, and most importantly her messing people around..

H.

The only way they’re misleading is they show her with some ink. She actually hasn’t got any.

Looks wise I’d say she was attractive to good looking. I wouldn’t call her stunning but good looking all the same.


Offline lewisjones23

I don't think the photos are her tbh

Offline OakTree

I don't think the photos are her tbh

They don’t give much away do they. She told me she’d added the ink but who knows.

Offline Maraluke

Private gallery is 2.40. Might have a look later.