MAYA GIRLFRIEND XO - Goodge Street

[Jaylondon7]

External Link/Members Only / External Link/Members Only

When?: So the initial meet took place mid way into January 2026 around 12:00PM, followed by 2 other attempts to arrange further meetings.

Location & venue: Goodge street, around 10 minutes walk from Great Portland Street station. Small flat on a busy street, entrance is right next to a small food store. Not discrete at all, members of the public will definitely see you entering and leaving.

Fee & Service: £160 for 1 hour. Service includes, protected sex, oral with condom, kissing, 69 and 2 blows in the sack.

Comms: Communication is made through Whatsapp via a receptionist or another working girl. Maya is not fluent in English and can only have basic conversations.

The girl: Her Adultwork profile says she's 22 which is hard to believe. She looks to be in her late 20's. She's a short 5'4, white Brazilian women with natural tits and a great round ass. Facially she is attractive also but I would say, her body is her greatest asset.

The meet: Upon opening the door, I was greeted by her. She was wearing white lingerie underneath a see-through black robe. She smelt like she'd just come out of a shower. After sorting out the paper work, I washed my hands and the meeting commenced. We engaged in foreplay for about 10 minutes, I'd asked her to sit on top of me whilst I caressed her tits and I caught a whiff of her breath which didn't smell pleasant. Thankfully we didn't engage in any kissing. I asked her to get into the doggy position so I could eat her pussy. She was clean shaven, her pussy tasted great and had no bad scent. On to the blowjob, it was neither incredible or bad. It was an average 5/10 blowjob but she was eager to please and sucked on my balls which felt great. On to the sex. The sex was great, we started off with reverse cowgirl where she slowly rode me for about 5 minutes, great view of her ass. We transitioned next to, missionary for about 10 minutes which offered a great view of her tits. Finally on to doggy, which was the best part of the meet. Started off slow, gradually picking up pace and then pounding away. She can take a good pounding which I loved because, not every women will let you pound fast or she'll limit how deep you can go. She took every inch for about 8 minutes until I blew in the sack. After cleaning up, I had no energy for a second round so she offered me a massage and we conversed in Portuguese for about 20 minutes until it was time to leave.

Would I book again?: Having had such a great first encounter with her, I attempted to book her again on the 31st of January 2026. We'd agreed a time through Whatsapp and I made my way to the address. Upon arriving and messaging her, she responded that she'd just had a family issue and was unable to see me. Annoyed I'd wasted the journey, I was able to overlook this due to her reason and we agreed to reschedule for another time. We scheduled another booking on the 7th of February. Again when I arrived and messaged her, she responded that she was unable to see me at our agreed time and that I could see her friend instead. I have left a negative review for this reason. If you're willing to try your luck go ahead because our initial meeting was quite good but ever since, she's been very flaky. £120 for 30 minutes and £160 for 1 hour, are above the average rates so I expect better service. I will not be attempting to see her again.

[The_Don]

So you punted this W/G 3 times in total and 2 of those (including B&S) . She wasted your time after, you had travelled to the location.


Solid red all day.


Thanks for the warning and review.   

[Jaylondon7]

Yep, well actually the second time she stood me up I just went home because I didn't want to risk punting on someone else. It was on the third attempt, where she offered I see her friend. I ended up seeing Lisza, whom I will leave a review for.

[The_Don]

Yep, well actually the second time she stood me up I just went home because I didn't want to risk punting on someone else. It was on the third attempt, where she offered I see her friend. I ended up seeing Lisza, whom I will leave a review for.

Thanks in advanced for the forthcoming review 

[GCAS9]

I feel a different sentiment to the original poster(OP) and to Online The_Don.
The OP comes across to me as being somewhat unfair and even churlish: he has the first meeting with Maya which is positive, but then lumps that meeting together with second and third attempts to meet which are negative.

The fairer thing to do is to make the first meeting a separate positive review in its own right, then the second / third times he tries to meet again marked as negative reviews

[Jaylondon7]

@GCAS9 So by your logic if you ordered take away from a restaurant 3 times and on the first occasion the food was great but, the second and third occasion the meat was poorly cooked and the food bland, you would still hold the restaurant in high regard? Everywhere else in the world, your competency is based on consistency. No one cares about the striker who had one good season out of 5 or the student who scored an A* in one subject and failed everything else. Why should I divert from this standard when assessing escorts? I didn't completely slate her did I? I mentioned that our first meeting was positive. I mentioned that I was willing to overlook being stood up the first time due to the reason she gave (which could have been a lie) and I even concluded the review still suggesting that punters could try their luck. I think I've been more than reasonable. I don't like my time or money being wasted, perhaps you do.

[GCAS9]

External Link/Members Only / External Link/Members Only

Would I book again?: Having had such a great first encounter with her, I attempted to book her again on the 31st of January 2026.

@GCAS9 So by your logic if you ordered take away from a restaurant 3 times and on the first occasion the food was great but, the second and third occasion the meat was poorly cooked and the food bland. Everywhere else in the world, your competency is based on consistency.

 Why should I divert from this standard when assessing escorts? I didn't completely slate her did I? I mentioned that our first meeting was positive.  I even concluded the review still suggesting that punters could try their luck. I think I've been more than reasonable. I don't like my time or money being wasted, perhaps you do.

I don't think you get the point I'm making: I'm saying it is unfair and even misleading to lump together the first positive meeting with the subsequent second/third contacts as if they were all the one bad meeting that happened at the same time.  What if you hadn't decided to return, then your view of her would be totally positive.

To use your analogy, it's as if i walked into your restaurant in July and had a great fill, then tell everybody I had a bad time in July because they kept cancelling my Christmas dinner order in December.

[PilotMan]

@GCAS9 So by your logic if you ordered take away from a restaurant 3 times and on the first occasion the food was great but, the second and third occasion the meat was poorly cooked and the food bland, you would still hold the restaurant in high regard? Everywhere else in the world, your competency is based on consistency. No one cares about the striker who had one good season out of 5 or the student who scored an A* in one subject and failed everything else. Why should I divert from this standard when assessing escorts? I didn't completely slate her did I? I mentioned that our first meeting was positive. I mentioned that I was willing to overlook being stood up the first time due to the reason she gave (which could have been a lie) and I even concluded the review still suggesting that punters could try their luck. I think I've been more than reasonable. I don't like my time or money being wasted, perhaps you do.

Unfortunately, your analogy doesn't quite apply. You never tasted the goods on the second and third bookings.

More appropriate would be you booked a restaurant and had a great meal.

"The next two bookings were cancelled when I arrived."

In my opinion this should be two reviews.

The first a positive.

The second two negative.

[Jaylondon7]

As far as I'm aware, once a review is posted it can't be taken down or edited.

[PilotMan]

As far as I'm aware, once a review is posted it can't be taken down or edited.

Reviews aren't deleted, that's in the rules.

Reviews can be re-rated by a Helper or Mod.

[The_Don]

At the end of the day its the OP punt review and rating.

[Jaylondon7]

I didn’t see the point in leaving 3 separate different reviews and just thought I’d summarise all 3 bookings into 1 but I’ll take on board the constructive criticism for future reviews.

[Assessor]

I see a lot of the negative reviews for Maya are for b/s or otherwise being stood up. I’ve seen her 3 times and following her advice on the first visit, I’ve double checked with the handler on the day that I’m seeing Maya herself and the time is still good. See my review for the first visit, the 2nd and 3rd were equally as good. IMO she is absolutely gorgeous, clean and smelt nice each time, so she’s right at the top of my ATF and very much hope I’ll be seeing her when I’m next in London.

[koshkaj]

your coment comes across as 'you guys are being unfair, she's always good for me, read my review'. if you didn't have more reviews, might think you were SP herself as you have specifcially targeted everything that has been listed as a negative and made an excuse for it. seems a bit white knighty imo.

[Jaylondon7]

your coment comes across as 'you guys are being unfair, she's always good for me, read my review'. if you didn't have more reviews, might think you were SP herself as you have specifcially targeted everything that has been listed as a negative and made an excuse for it. seems a bit white knighty imo.

She seems to be in a lot of peoples good books so they're all quick to come to her defence. It is what it is.

[The_Don]

Current stats on UKP are

Review Score: 3
Review Stats: 11 review(s) - 6 positive, 0 neutral, 5 negative
First Review: June 03, 2025, 12:03:10 pm
Last Review: February 10, 2026, 03:56:58 pm

After reading the reds, seems that this profile has form for messing punters around and very mixed bag, IMO.
 

[Jaylondon7]

@The_Don: Yep, she definitely has a habit of playing with peoples time.

[PilotMan]

@The_Don: Yep, she definitely has a habit of playing with peoples time.

It's normal for the whole of the W1T B&S Crew - the maid agrees to everything.

What the reality is when you're there on site, is another matter.