Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Spotting a timewaster  (Read 1327 times)

Offline Ben4454

1. Feedback dates: Look at her last confirmed feedback date. If her last confirmed feedback is months ago and she is logging in everyday then there is a good chance she is time wasting on the site or has turned into a webcammer who keeps escorting up for the extra traffic. combine with other factors. Try to look at all of her feedback and see how many no-shows she gives punters. If a girl has 50 feedbacks and has around 5 feedback-onlys of no shows than she is most likely a double-booker.

2. Pictures: Has she put up a lot of natural looking photos like they came off Facebook instead of sexual ones to attract the punter? It might be for a reason, either a pissed off boyfriend or someone who isn't taking it seriously. i have actually come across a few girls who treat the site like Twitter and get off on the amount of guys who E-mail them as it brings them self-esteem. Also maybe a private gallery scam to reel you in.

3. Number displayed: Does she have a number displayed ? I know it costs money for a working girl to display the number, however genuine working girls will give a number in the profile box if genuine. Also watch out for the ones who do not want to use a phone but to only arrange via E-mail. Any girl who does not have a punting phone in my opinion does not take this job seriously.

4. Holidays: Girls who just seem to constantly be on holidays. I know one profile who logs in every day yet has been on holiday for the past year but changes the details every couple of weeks. You will find this is a variation of the public gallery scam.

5. Services offered: We all know any profile with recieving hardsports listed on the likes list is quite dodgy - like the working girl did not really put any thought into her likes list - if combined with other factors may potentially be a timewaster.

6. Profile content: How much effort went into the working girls profile ? If you come across a profile who has written two lines and just doesn't seem like a lot of effort went in then they may be a time waster.

7. Communications: Never put in a booking if you haven't spoken to the girl on the phone. Time wasters like to do everything with the least effort possible and they will keep shrugging off your attempts to have a phone conversation with you and delaying.
If they take weeks to respond to your E-mails than I would not bother either which is obvious to some but not to others.

8. Romanians: I would not punt them and just save your money instead.

9. Vital statistics: Look at the information listed and look at the profile pictures which have been submitted. Do they match up with the working girl? Look at the interview section and again look at the information and see if it matches with the working girl in question.

Anyone else have any tips for spotting a timewaster?
« Last Edit: December 17, 2014, 03:26:22 PM by Ben4454 »
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

I search AW each day for newly registered girls in my area. If any take my interest I do a bit of 'google research' and then put them into my default HL (quarantine) and wait......

I periodically check from time to time to see how they're 'developing'. If nothing, they get ditched. If they start to get feedback, particularly from punters I recognise, they make it on to my HL in their particular age group. Not many make it through quarantine I have to say.

tcm

Offline Ben4454


I do not bother with hot lists. Girls seem to be changing their location too much. Someone on my hot list one week will be up north the next.
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site


Offline Qwerty

Profile says "new in this town", "new in your town", "I wait you", "NO RUSH"

Nearly always Romanian, though may say Latino (rather than Latina) or claim to be Italian/Spanish etc...


Offline Diehard

If they have read your email but don't reply then almost certainly a timewaster and not worth contacting again.

Any profile that says last x amount of days in y so book fast is almost certainly a timewaster or scammer. Any profile linked to a group I steer clear of.

Any foreign lady I avoid, too many of them are timewasters.

Any profile that is like war and peace to read and has lots of dos and donts is best avoided.

Any profile that says non smoker is likely to be a bad sign and could suggest an inaccurate enjoys list. I have yet to meet an escort who doesn't smoke.

Any escort who raises an issue about punters with negative notes if you have good feedback is almost certainly a timewaster as any genuine clued up escort knows the notes system is open to abuse by disgruntled escorts who have had negative feedback left them

3. Number displayed: Does she have a number displayed ? I know it costs money for a working girl to display the number, however genuine working girls will give a number in the profile box if genuine. Also watch out for the ones who do not want to use a phone but to only arrange via E-mail. Any girl who does not have a punting phone in my opinion does not take this job seriously.

I couldn't agree more. If there are in the business of selling sexual services, then a phone is their point of sale. To not have a number is just ridiculous (and a source of irritation for me). I have seen quite a few WGs on AW that I would absolutely book a sesh with but for the fact they have no number.

Any WGs reading this thread . . . if you don't have a number you are losing business (yeah yeah yeah . . . I don't want to hear the 'but we get texts and calls and time wasters with phones') - every self-respecting business person has to do a bit of annoying admin from time-to-time (like wade through voicemails). You're not special. Get a phone and better your business.

Offline Sienna_Bronze

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 288
The non smoking bit is a bit odd, I'm a non smoker and I'm sure quite a few other girls are, it's hardly an indication of providing a bad service.
Banning reason: Trolling

Offline Qwerty

I've seen quite a few non-smokers.

And had good punts with the initial contact made by email, no phone no. displayed. If I stuck to ones with phone nos, the selection would be even slimmer than it is now - I'm in a rural area

Offline kingkong

If they have no feedback but have had a profile for weeks/months then avoid.

Offline Ben4454


There is also a breed of piss-takers that I personally call HAPs.... (Half-assed prossies)

These are the girls who want you to send a picture first or some kind of silly hoop to see if you're good enough for her. They also only re-book clients who they fancy and ignore other potential regulars - usually in rude fashions.

A variation of this is the prossie who wants you to 'stand' in a specific location like outside a bank so she can 'awkwardly' try and walk past you discreetly to see if she fancies you or not.

Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

Offline MrBridger

Best thing I find is to use 'indirect recommendations' - i.e find a girl you like and trust, check her feedback list for regular clients who have positive feedback from her, and check who else they give good feedback to. Can't really go wrong that way, I'd rather have a limited choice of trustworthy contacts than take chances on newbies who may not be all they seem.
Banning reason: Spreading allegations against another punter because of personal dispute

Offline Trevor12

A variation of this is the prossie who wants you to 'stand' in a specific location like outside a bank so she can 'awkwardly' try and walk past you discreetly to see if she fancies you or not.

I've experienced a variation of this, where she asks you to stand somewhere specific, then walk to this point, etc whilst watching you through a window. Passed the test (although it's more can I tolerate him for the fee, rather than do I fancy him) and had an incredibly poor punt. I think an element of this is that prossies know that the guys who jump through these hoops (not me anymore-lesson learned) are more likely to accept shit service than those who do not.

PS, The girl I'm referring to is NathalieVIP, who I have reviewed.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)