Author Topic: Sadie O'Shea - London hotel  (Read 5668 times)

Offline Mxx2025

External Link/Members Only

I met Sadie in early December 2025 in London. The meeting lasted two hours, and overall it was a very positive experience—exactly my style.
Communication started via email and later moved to WhatsApp. She doesn’t advertise her phone number on her website, so I won’t share it here.

She arrived on time and had booked the hotel herself for the agreed duration, which shows she’s well organised and professional.

She has beautiful blue eyes, a completely natural body, and fantastic proportions. Her figure is especially impressive, and I honestly wished the time could have gone on longer (as I could surely enjoy the doggy view endlessly!) .

She’s an excellent kisser, which is very important to me, and intimacy was delivered confidently and enthusiastically. Her oral skills were outstanding, and she genuinely seemed to enjoy my part of the show as well—she became very responsive, which made the experience feel mutual and engaging. Whether that was entirely genuine is always hard to know, but it certainly felt natural in the moment.

I would happily meet her again for sure!

One thing I noticed is that she doesn’t seem overloaded with appointments. She may have another day job, but she’s quite flexible with scheduling. I had to reschedule a few times (all done several days in advance), and she was happy to accommodate without any issues.

Points to consider:

Price: £1,000 for two hours, which included the daytime hotel fee (around £150).

Age: Her website photos hide her face. In person, she appears to be around 40–45+. This is absolutely fine for me, as I value experience over youth, but it may matter to some.

Voice: Her way of speaking is quite unique, and at first her voice seemed a bit weak, as if she might be recovering from an illness. However, once I got used to it, it wasn’t an issue at all.

Overall, a well-organised, enjoyable, and memorable experience.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,108
  • Likes: 578
  •  
  • Reviews: 519
Welcome to UKP and thanks for your first review matey, Merry Christmas  :drinks:

Offline Mxx2025

Thank you!
Merry Christmas for you too!

Offline Haderach

Is there any celebrity she has a similarity to, for some reason when I looked at the website, I was thinking Abby Clancy.

Offline Mxx2025

Yes, the face might be a bit. I would say they are cousins, but not sisters ☺️.

However, from body proportions point of view - Sadie way more hotter and much better to enjoy the view.

Offline patelprat

Hello, for that price I think punters would find it useful to know what other services were provided in more detail (if you are comfortable to share) and how she performed and whether you would consider her worth that price tag vs others. Obviously also noting she is not in her 20s/30s as you say.
At the moment, I read just kissing and oral.

What is your view of her body stats, would you guess? For example, the website says late 30s, but you think older. Do you think all her published stats are accurate?

Thanks.

« Last Edit: December 24, 2025, 10:35:27 pm by patelprat »

Offline Mxx2025

Hi mate,
Yes, I believe she worth £1000. I even consider inviting her for an overnight once I have proper time. Don’t know exactly what it might cost. But I would surely like to spend some unrushed time with her.
2 of my biggest points of interest are DFK and OWO. She does DFK as a proper one ! With decent tongue involvement . OWO delivered perfectly too.

Performance wise - she was great IMO. Enthusiastic and natural. I haven’t tried many different services, but she certainly doesn’t provide CIM. Deepthroat was amazing! Balls liking too.
I’m not interested in rimming or anal - so hasn’t asked for that and don’t know if she delivers it or not. She was happy to receive oral too and used some toys to boost herself.

She seemed to be interested to be under control though - nothing rough, but still.

The body overall is slim, but not really fit. Just average body type. Natural tits , not too big, not too small. Just average size. Not responsive nipples though.

Her main asset is bum I would say. This is my another soft spot after DFK and proper oral. Her bum is just amazing - wide and firm. However, would benefit from some gym. But still fine by me.

So I believe in general, her body type presented accurately on her visuals, but those photos likely taken couple of years ago.

Feel free to let me know if I missed something.

Offline Barneypunt

Sounds very average. But if you feel you got value for your money then  :thumbsup:

Offline patelprat

Hi mate,
Yes, I believe she worth £1000. I even consider inviting her for an overnight once I have proper time. Don’t know exactly what it might cost. But I would surely like to spend some unrushed time with her.
2 of my biggest points of interest are DFK and OWO. She does DFK as a proper one ! With decent tongue involvement . OWO delivered perfectly too.

Performance wise - she was great IMO. Enthusiastic and natural. I haven’t tried many different services, but she certainly doesn’t provide CIM. Deepthroat was amazing! Balls liking too.
I’m not interested in rimming or anal - so hasn’t asked for that and don’t know if she delivers it or not. She was happy to receive oral too and used some toys to boost herself.

She seemed to be interested to be under control though - nothing rough, but still.

The body overall is slim, but not really fit. Just average body type. Natural tits , not too big, not too small. Just average size. Not responsive nipples though.

Her main asset is bum I would say. This is my another soft spot after DFK and proper oral. Her bum is just amazing - wide and firm. However, would benefit from some gym. But still fine by me.

So I believe in general, her body type presented accurately on her visuals, but those photos likely taken couple of years ago.

Feel free to let me know if I missed something.

Thanks. Any sex? You haven't been explicit about that.


« Last Edit: December 25, 2025, 02:00:39 am by patelprat »

Offline Mxx2025

Well, sex was fine (at least for me). In different positions.
Not sure what else to mention

Offline Rubberneck141

Considering what you could get from other similar looking girls for a fraction of the price, you're not exactly getting across to why 2 hours was worth a grand - not that you have to convince anyone, but even your description of her body just sounds okay.

I guess a detail that missing is how many times did you have sex/cum during the meet? How many times was allowed? Is she submissive during sex? Are you directing her, or is she directing you?

And also description wise, how much does her appearance differ from the "professional" photos on her website? You said her bum was wide and firm. Did it look/feel like she had any work done?

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,915
  • Likes: 393
  •  
  • Reviews: 213
you're not exactly getting across to why 2 hours was worth a grand -

For £500 per hour, I would expect the OP's review to be full of to be superlative adjectives. Maybe that's just not his style  :unknown:

Offline RegionalAndy

Hi Sadie , merry Xmas and love your review

Offline patelprat

Hi Sadie , merry Xmas and love your review

Unlikely to be her, unless she's happy admitting that at £500/hour, her body is not really fit and could do with gym time, as per the quotes above  :D

« Last Edit: December 25, 2025, 02:49:54 pm by patelprat »

Offline Mxx2025

Considering what you could get from other similar looking girls for a fraction of the price, you're not exactly getting across to why 2 hours was worth a grand - not that you have to convince anyone, but even your description of her body just sounds okay.

I guess a detail that missing is how many times did you have sex/cum during the meet? How many times was allowed? Is she submissive during sex? Are you directing her, or is she directing you?

And also description wise, how much does her appearance differ from the "professional" photos on her website? You said her bum was wide and firm. Did it look/feel like she had any work done?


Never meant to convince anyone in anything mate. I’m certainly not her sales agent 😂

Offline webpunter

Hi Sadie , merry Xmas and love your review

Merry Xmas from [edit: me] too
Only just seen the review
We are on the same page

If from an established UKPer doing a review i'm thinking some wealthy luvved up punter who likes having his wallet emptied
No mention of how the tanks were emptied
Its got Mills&B written all over it

As for a 1st review even the replies have a burd speak feel to it
Like trying to portray negatives which really aren't that bad

Her bum is just amazing - wide and firm. However, would benefit from some gym. But still fine by me.
So I believe in general, her body type presented accurately on her visuals, but those photos likely taken couple of years ago.


It reads like Sadie has got a mate to help her probably a bloke who ain't got experience of our fave sport
& they've wizzed it through AI for a rewrite

If the pics are her no reason to suggest otherwise she looks banging 
& she will appeal to certain punters wealthy ones who want to engage particulalrly on longer bookings
Pretending they have a GF, why not if you can afford it
The wording says it all: Time Is Relative / Ephemera [Qué? - Manuel springs to mind] / The 25th Hour / In Deep Time
Its aspirational bollox  :rolleyes:

As @patelprat referenced 'Any sex ?' i cant see anything 
At a bag of sand for two hours i'd expect to be shagged senseless blow a load do it all again & at least one of them down the hatch no disposing of

Lets see what other reviews this new UKPer manages to deliver up which might provide further insight

I wonder how much In Deep Time 72 hrs is ? Think of a number, double triple ... it etc
I cant see even one of UKPers biggest spenders @Momodan38 enaging
He knows better ways to get the wallet & tanks emptied  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 26, 2025, 12:24:09 am by webpunter »

Offline webpunter


Never meant to convince anyone in anything mate. I’m certainly not her sales agent 😂

You may find that the tenure is short lived

The more important question is which UKPer gave you a like ?

Whoever it was best to fess up coz i'm assuming it can be traced !

Offline Rubberneck141

The more important question is which UKPer gave you a like ?

Lol seconded :lol: Responded to my comment, but couldn't answer the question of how many times they had sex.


Offline puntingking




It is comments like this that could put new members off from reviewing.  :thumbsdown:

Hi Sadie , merry Xmas and love your review

Just because this member is new, doesn't mean he is the escort in question.  :unknown:

I was not the one who gave the op a "like" but I will now give this op a "like" to show my appreciation off this review.  :hi:

Offline puntingking


Never meant to convince anyone in anything mate. I’m certainly not her sales agent 😂


Not to worry mate. There is no evidence that you are the escort in question.
Some members can come across a bit judgemental when new members type up a review of a sp who have not been reviewed before I think.

Many Thanks for this review.
I hope you continue to review in the future.  :drinks:


Offline Mxx2025

no probs! and thank you for your support!

Will surely place more reviews in future. But I will do in my own style, based on things important for me.
I genuinely think that this forum does a great thing and helps to avoid wasting tons of money/time! Many thanks for you to keep it alive!

I am also surprised that some guys measure quality of the services by number of times they had sex.  :wacko: :crazy: I don't really understand how this metric applies. it might be 1 fantastic or 100 awful-plastic ones. Which one is better than? Why that would matter for anyone?

I believe the real value is general opinion of the lady - whether my experience was positive or negative. And it doesn't really matter how many times she let me had a sex.

Offline jamiekinkxxx

oh my god guys give the OP a break!

We all have to write our first review, we all have different writing styles.

The SP is not £500ph the £1k for 2hrs incl hotel of £150, so £425ph is not overly expensive for outcall indy girl fee.

Also why would the OP state in the review that the SP, who states on her website that she is late 30's, say she is actually 40-45 if the OP were in fact the SP. 

Offline puntingking

oh my god guys give the OP a break!

We all have to write our first review, we all have different writing styles.

The SP is not £500ph the £1k for 2hrs incl hotel of £150, so £425ph is not overly expensive for outcall indy girl fee.

Also why would the OP state in the review that the SP, who states on her website that she is late 30's, say she is actually 40-45 if the OP were in fact the SP.

I don't normally agree with you, but on this occasion I do agree.
Well said  :hi:

Offline puntingking

no probs! and thank you for your support!

Will surely place more reviews in future. But I will do in my own style, based on things important for me.
I genuinely think that this forum does a great thing and helps to avoid wasting tons of money/time! Many thanks for you to keep it alive!



 :drinks:

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,108
  • Likes: 578
  •  
  • Reviews: 519
Any what do we say about having a pop at other members, especially new ones ?  :dash:

If there’s a problem, report it
Having a pop just stops members and anyone else new reading from reviewing in fear of getting harassed like this  :dash: :dash:

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,915
  • Likes: 393
  •  
  • Reviews: 213


I am also surprised that some guys measure quality of the services by number of times they had sex.  :wacko: :crazy:


Some guys seem obsessed by the number and not much else; maybe there's some sort of ego competition between guys on here  :unknown:

There was recently some comments / complaints about SP's limiting the number of "cums" per given period, and even charging extra for it. Some SP's do this in order to prevent having to deal with guys who literally want to spend the duration of the meet banging away.

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Any what do we say about having a pop at other members, especially new ones ?  :dash:

If there’s a problem, report it
Having a pop just stops members and anyone else new reading from reviewing in fear of getting harassed like this  :dash: :dash:

100% agree Iloveoral.  :thumbsup:

I cannot see why some members also insist that all reviews should be graphic in detail. There is room on here for all kinds of review styles.

Read between the lines I say, we are (all) intelligent men (well OK maybe not all  :D)

Also if anything is missed the OPs can always add details (as this OP has done)

Offline jamiekinkxxx

I don't normally agree with you, but on this occasion I do agree.
Well said  :hi:

 :thumbsup:

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Some guys seem obsessed by the number and not much else; maybe there's some sort of ego competition between guys on here  :unknown:

There was recently some comments / complaints about SP's limiting the number of "cums" per given period, and even charging extra for it. Some SP's do this in order to prevent having to deal with guys who literally want to spend the duration of the meet banging away.

100% agree PilotMan  :thumbsup:

Offline patelprat

100% agree Iloveoral.  :thumbsup:

I cannot see why some members also insist that all reviews should be graphic in detail. There is room on here for all kinds of review styles.


Nothing wrong with asking for more details politely, which is all I did. I won't comment on the other comments.
Especially if people are considering paying that price, i think it personally becomes more useful to have that detail and an idea of how accurate her website stats vs reality is.

Doesn't need to be graphic, like i usually write  :D

Useful information came from the ask - we got to know more about the SP's body, for example, and that she doesn't do CIM. And no issues with sex/different positions. All useful intel that the OP kindly provided on follow-up.

« Last Edit: December 26, 2025, 12:19:23 pm by patelprat »

Offline puntingking



The op has clearly got good support being a new member since he has now 4 "likes" because of this review.

We thank the op.  :hi:

I am for one glad the op has typed up this review.  :)

I will be looking forward to hearing about his next punting experiences in the future.  :thumbsup:

Offline Mxx2025

Some guys seem obsessed by the number and not much else; maybe there's some sort of ego competition between guys on here  :unknown:

There was recently some comments / complaints about SP's limiting the number of "cums" per given period, and even charging extra for it. Some SP's do this in order to prevent having to deal with guys who literally want to spend the duration of the meet banging away.

I think that would be a good idea to measure how wet the pussy is at the begging, in the middle and at the end of the encounter.

There are some good pieces of the equipment for such things at Amazon. 😂😂
Those data would make a great review with solid statistical data on background.

The guys who like numbers - would love such reviews! ☺️☺️

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline crazyinsanity

Barney bro, can you DM me, i cant

Offline webpunter

Lets see what other reviews this new UKPer manages to deliver up which might provide further insight

2nd review has landed pretty sharpish
Straight in with no Mills&B mullarkey & a negative to boot
I wasn't necessarily wrong however i wasn't right either
I duly concede
& have added a like
 :hi:

Offline 90125

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,100
  • Likes: 67
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Barney bro, can you DM me, i cant
Another volunteer to receive a ban!

Rule 33 Access to Private Messages (PMs) and members' post history are governed by separate, undisclosed criteria. Attempts to bypass these criteria, including requesting PMs, may result in a ban. Discussions related to PMs or rule 19 cannot be shared

Also, Rule 27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..
« Last Edit: December 30, 2025, 11:36:30 pm by 90125 »