Sensual Sofia A Wolverhampton

[Mick799]

External Link/Members Only

So right away I need to make clear I didn’t meet with this WG, this is just to let people know all her extras as they are not mentioned in her profile. I had a little text tennis with her and quickly established that to get what she advertises will actually cost you a fair whack more.

Comms were fine, no obvious language barrier and prompt replies.

I asked for my usual, 2 x owo cim if possible. Thinking £70 for 30 mins is really good value these days I’d have been happy to pay that for one x cum if the build up was made to last.

She replied with what I assume is a stock message: Hi x 69, French kiss, sex with condo, owo, massage including x£70 cash only x x 30 mins. Anal extra £40, CIM extra £40, Deep throat extra £40, Lap Dance extra £40.

In answer to my 2x cum request she said “if you cumming very quickly 2x”

Ok, so for what I wanted £90. But now she’s brought deep throat into the equation and at a price, so I ask if that can be head over bed deepthroat.

She replied no only 1x, Not 2x

Ok, 1x head over bed deepthroat Cim, then 1 ordinary blowjob cim. I then apologised for all the questions.

“Bed deepthroat?” “Extra only 1x not 2x”.  This is actually fair enough, I can’t complain at £110 for head over bed deepthroat and CIM.

I describe what I mean by head over bed and she replies with “No sorry x”

So I now decide that £110 for what will essentially be a normal blowjob with CIM is a little too steep, especially since I saw British Angel a couple weeks ago at £150 HH all inclusive, facefucking cim as many times as I could manage.

So the reason this is a negative is I’m getting peeved by these Eastern European profiles not stating any extras, or saying they’ll do this and that but say no when you message them about it. Pickings are pretty slim for decent WGs so I just get annoyed by it by the time wasting.

[RandomGuy99]

But when you contact them they do give you their extras and if you want something non-standard like you requested then other restrictions or fees may apply. Seems pretty straightforward to me.

Personally, I find Hungarian SPs very easy to deal with and they usually deliver a good service.

[Mick799]

Mostly I agree they do, it’s rare that they lie and then change things when you get there, but that has happened to me before. In this instance it’s more that the extras were part of her opening texts. Why not just put them on the profile once rather than messaging them to each and every punter? That conversation was 18 texts long (I’ve just deleted it) it could have been completed in half that, or maybe I wouldn’t have messaged her at all if it were all on her profile. She could easily create an extras tab lake many others do.
But it’s just my opinion. At least now some other punters can approach her armed with a little more info. And that’s the point of these reviews. It isn’t a debate, it’s information that can’t be found on their profiles.

[daviemac]

So right away I need to make clear I didn’t meet with this WG, this is just to let people know all her extras as they are not mentioned in her profile. I had a little text tennis with her and quickly established that to get what she advertises will actually cost you a fair whack more.

You need to have an agreed booking before a review can be left mate.

[Mick799]

I’m sure others would like to know these details. I would have. Plenty of reviews like this on here.

[alabama1]

I recall walking from her a few years ago. Reason being..short and overweight.

[RandomGuy99]

Mostly I agree they do, it’s rare that they lie and then change things when you get there, but that has happened to me before. In this instance it’s more that the extras were part of her opening texts. Why not just put them on the profile once rather than messaging them to each and every punter? That conversation was 18 texts long (I’ve just deleted it) it could have been completed in half that, or maybe I wouldn’t have messaged her at all if it were all on her profile. She could easily create an extras tab lake many others do.
But it’s just my opinion. At least now some other punters can approach her armed with a little more info. And that’s the point of these reviews. It isn’t a debate, it’s information that can’t be found on their profiles.

I think because some like to advertise their extras and others don't, but they do tell you their extras if you ask.

[daviemac]

I’m sure others would like to know these details. I would have. Plenty of reviews like this on here.

As you are arguing against the rules can you link to any review on here where there hasn't been an agreed booking? Any that are seen by mods, admin or forum helpers are moved to discussions.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criterion is that she has accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban.
Reviews must be within the last 6 months, for ALL members now.
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exceptions are sex parties, duos, etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider).
The title of the review should only have SP Name - Location - (B&S / TOFTT / SCAM label if needed), and there are no abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

Useful information it might be but the rules are very clear. We could fill the review section with 'reviews' of unanswered messages, unanswered phone calls, or whatever else where a booking was no agreed, all pointless as a review.

[Mick799]

So you can delete those reviews? No I won’t do that work for you.
It is useful information and would prevent time wasting, that’s the point.
I’d asked for a meet, at a specific time. She’s agreed all that it was all the extras after that imo could easily be on her profile and would have prevented me wasting my time and hers with loads of texts. I was trying to help others not waste their time or at least contact her informed beforehand.

[RandomGuy99]

So you can delete those reviews? No I won’t do that work for you.
It is useful information and would prevent time wasting, that’s the point.
I’d asked for a meet, at a specific time. She’s agreed all that it was all the extras after that imo could easily be on her profile and would have prevented me wasting my time and hers with loads of texts. I was trying to help others not waste their time or at least contact her informed beforehand.

Calm down.  This post in the non-review section still delivers what you wanted.

Many SPs don't list their extras on their profile. Different SPs work in different ways.

[MaxVerstappen]

External Link/Members Only

So right away I need to make clear I didn’t meet with this WG, this is just to let people know all her extras as they are not mentioned in her profile. I had a little text tennis with her and quickly established that to get what she advertises will actually cost you a fair whack more.

Comms were fine, no obvious language barrier and prompt replies.

I asked for my usual, 2 x owo cim if possible. Thinking £70 for 30 mins is really good value these days I’d have been happy to pay that for one x cum if the build up was made to last.

She replied with what I assume is a stock message: Hi x 69, French kiss, sex with condo, owo, massage including x£70 cash only x x 30 mins. Anal extra £40, CIM extra £40, Deep throat extra £40, Lap Dance extra £40.

In answer to my 2x cum request she said “if you cumming very quickly 2x”

Ok, so for what I wanted £90. But now she’s brought deep throat into the equation and at a price, so I ask if that can be head over bed deepthroat.

She replied no only 1x, Not 2x

Ok, 1x head over bed deepthroat Cim, then 1 ordinary blowjob cim. I then apologised for all the questions.

“Bed deepthroat?” “Extra only 1x not 2x”.  This is actually fair enough, I can’t complain at £110 for head over bed deepthroat and CIM.

I describe what I mean by head over bed and she replies with “No sorry x”

So I now decide that £110 for what will essentially be a normal blowjob with CIM is a little too steep, especially since I saw British Angel a couple weeks ago at £150 HH all inclusive, facefucking cim as many times as I could manage.

So the reason this is a negative is I’m getting peeved by these Eastern European profiles not stating any extras, or saying they’ll do this and that but say no when you message them about it. Pickings are pretty slim for decent WGs so I just get annoyed by it by the time wasting.

 

You are reviewing a text messaging convo not an actual booking.

[daviemac]

So you can delete those reviews? No I won’t do that work for you.

You can't do that work because there aren't any. All 'reviews' without an agreed booking get moved to general discussions as per the very clear rules.

Where the SP has agreed to a date, time and duration of a booking a review can be left, warnings about issues with comms, making the booking etc go in general discussions, it's very easy and it leaves reviews for where details of actual sexual services can be posted.