Author Topic: Claire, Bamboo Natural Therapy - King's Cross  (Read 4762 times)

Offline OliverK

External Link/Members Only

Date: 11.11.25

After reading several reviews on here about Claire and her large naturals I thought I'd give her a try.

Comms: I called about 40 minutes in advance and asked for Claire. Luckily she was free.

Location: A massage shop front on Judd Street near Euston and King's Cross stations.  You can't park on Judd Street but there are side roads nearby where you can. On entry there's immediately a narrow corridor with an old maid sat behind a desk. I paid her the entry fee and walked down a steep staircase to a series of massage rooms. The place was empty as it was the middle of the day so Claire and another girl (Ya Ya) were sat on a sofa waiting.
Price - £60 for 1hr door fee + £100 for naked B2B, HR and titwank. Total = £160.

The girl: Claire has a fairly pretty face with straight, black, shoulder length hair. As others have said, although she's Indian she looks more Nepalese.
If I didn't already know, I would never guess that she's Indian.
She has enhanced her lips but not too much. She wears plenty of make up but it's not badly done. Her stomach is flat (I think via liposuction) and her butt is amazing - round and perfectly formed - also fake I believe.
When it comes to her tits, I was mildly disappointed. Don't get me wrong, she has good tits but other reviews led me to believe they were better/larger than they are. I would describe them as a full C cup rather than the D cups I was expecting. They look natural to me but I could be wrong. Pussy was shaved and slightly stubbly.

Personality wise she was chatty, friendly and quite inquisitive.  She was flattered and embarrassed by the fact I'd asked for her by name so she was very curious to know who had recommended her.  Just as another reviewer had done, I had to invent a friend rather than mention this site. She wanted to know whether that 'friend' was English, where he lived, what he had said about her, how much he had paid etc. etc.  She was nice about it but there were far too many questions.

The action: I showered and lay face down in a small dark massage room. She conducted the entire massage fully clothed and it was very much a legit massage. Nothing much sensual about it. Pressure was good - not painfully firm and not too soft either. She's clearly been trained and worked out a few knots.
That part of the event was good and beneficial.
On the flip she asked me what I wanted. I wasn't offered the topless B2B for £70 and furthermore she denied ever having quoted that price to my 'friend'. I wouldn't have taken it anyway so I didn't care.  Her only offer was £120 for fully nude B2B inc. HR.  I refused to pay the £120, especially as it didn't include RO, DFK, fingering, OWO, or even OW.  She refused all of those things.
In the end we agreed on £100 for nude B2B including lip kissing.

As it was so dark in there I asked her to turn the lights up slightly but she was a bit irritating about it. There was a dimmer switch so I asked her just to take it up a notch but she said she was too shy. Personally, if I'm paying money to someone who I've chosen because of their looks I want to see them!
Firstly she said "I'll turn it up for 30 seconds while you look at me then I'll turn it down ok?"  I refused and told her my eyes were really bad and I couldn't see anything in the current light etc. etc. She really didn't want to (fuck knows why) but she agreed in the end. That was five minutes wasted.  :dash:

Finally she stripped off, oiled me up and leaned over my face. I tried to kiss her on the lips but she didn't really want that despite having just agreed to it.
She climbed on the table and rubbed her tits up and down my body while working the old chap. I grabbed her firm arse and tits. She allowed me to touch her pussy but outside only.  Strangely it didn't turn me on at all.  I think it was because her pussy was bone dry and she didn't react in any way to me rubbing her clit.  She just kept on talking about stuff.  A fake moan at this point would've really helped.
Her version of edging was to wank me in the normal way for a few seconds and then leave it alone for a minute and then come back to it. A bit basic and no lingam techniques used.
She finished me off with a titwank which was great to be fair.

Summary - Claire has a sexy, curvy body but she has more boundaries than I'd hoped for. No lingam and central London prices make this borderline poor vfm. However, the legit part of the massage was worth paying for.

Would I return?  No. For various reasons this was a low positive so I'll keep shopping around. On the way in (and out) I noticed this young Thai girl with a very pretty, natural face (and I'm not usually attracted to Thai/Chinese faces). She was really cute and through her clothes she seemed to have enhanced C cups so I asked her name. She gave me a huge smile and said Ya Ya.
The only way I'd return is to see her.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Thanks for warning :drinks:

Was thus meant to be a positive, reads more like a neg or a very generous neutral ?

Offline OliverK

Thanks for warning :drinks:

Was thus meant to be a positive, reads more like a neg or a very generous neutral ?

Yeah, you're right.  Probably should've been a neutral. 
I was trying to be generous because some of things that I complained about wouldn't bother other people at all. For example the dark room, the unavailable extras, the price etc.  I try to separate the objective from the subjective.
If you're looking for a curvy, pretty young girl in central London who'll give you a naked titwank she should be on your list.  Still a big upgrade from the usual Chinese rub n' tug place imo.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Yeah, you're right.  Probably should've been a neutral. 
I was trying to be generous because some of things that I complained about wouldn't bother other people at all. For example the dark room, the unavailable extras, the price etc.  I try to separate the objective from the subjective.
If you're looking for a curvy, pretty young girl in central London who'll give you a naked titwank she should be on your list.  Still a big upgrade from the usual Chinese rub n' tug place imo.

Thanks for elaborating.
Would you like it changed to Neutral or even Neg?

You don't have to temper reviews for the opinions of readers, you rate it based on your satisfaction or lack of it for the service wanted and value to you given what you paid and what that has gotten you elsewhere.  Being "generous" is not objective, nor is second guessing what others might think.  You did a bang up job of describing looks, attitude, services agreed, skills shown in their delivery, price and how you felt about it all; let each reader weigh them as they want.   :drinks:

Offline Massage Bloke

I didn't think people still drove into Central London, what with the congestion charge and parking issues.  :unknown:

Also it often seems to be a case  of YMMV when it comes to massage SPs.

 An escort has more or less got to take on all cumers, but with massage shops and mobile massage (outcall) services, the sexual services are, of course, an adjunct. The SPs pick and choose what they will do and with whom, and not all the time! And how much they will charge on a given day, depending on who knows what.  :wackogirl:

OP read this SP's reviews, acted upon them, and it was a let down. 
« Last Edit: November 17, 2025, 12:42:34 pm by Massage Bloke »

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I didn't think people still drove into Central London, what with the congestion charge and parking issues.  :unknown:

Also it often seems to be a case  of YMMV when it comes to massage SPs.

 An escort has more or less got to take on all cumers, but with massage shops and mobile massage (outcall) services, the sexual services are, of course, an adjunct. The SPs pick and choose what they will do and with whom, and not all the time! And how much they will charge on a given day, depending on who knows what.  :wackogirl:

OP read this SP's reviews, acted upon them, and it was a let down.

An escort is under no such obligation unless you're referring to coerced ones.
Escorts can of course take your money and deliver shit service and reduce or deny services after money taken to see you off before time.
Massage girls can hide behind house rules if they don't fancy offering extras to any given punter, or quote excessive extras prices if he's undesirable but acceptable for the right price.

Offline Massage Bloke

An escort is under no such obligation unless you're referring to coerced ones.
Escorts can of course take your money and deliver shit service and reduce or deny services after money taken to see you off before time.
Massage girls can hide behind house rules if they don't fancy offering extras to any given punter, or quote excessive extras prices if he's undesirable but acceptable for the right price.

Believe it or not, I know escorts are under no obligation.  :rolleyes:   That's the problem with forums, someone always takes your words literally!

I meant it's the business model of escorts to provide sexual services.  Where as, for massage service SPs, sexual services are an adjunct.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Believe it or not, I know escorts are under no obligation.  :rolleyes:   That's the problem with forums, someone always takes your words literally!

I meant it's the business model of escorts to provide sexual services.  Where as, for massage service SPs, sexual services are an adjunct.

Escorts can also suddenly quote extras pricing once face to face, again allowing them some control over who stays or goes or gets what.  So not really alot of service difference to a brothel or a massage shop known to be offering extras.  All have right to outright refusal of service for whatever (unjust or prejudiced) reason.  Sure an fs provider might have to get (partially) naked to extract some payment before delivering a shit service that sends the punter packing possibly after confrontation for some part refund that may not be granted, but to those kinds of grofters it's no more "inconvenience" than a suppoed masseuse deciding she doesn't want to offer extras and just does a shit massage for the door fee. 

That's the problem with forums, when someone says something incomplete or without context or their undeclared assumptions others have to step in to seek clarification so the uninitiated or easily misled don't get the wrong idea, even if we all hope it's common sense.

Offline OliverK

Would you like it changed to Neutral or even Neg?

On reflection I think I would like it changed to a neutral.  Mainly because of her personality but also her lack of skills in the sensual part of the massage.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
On reflection I think I would like it changed to a neutral.  Mainly because of her personality but also her lack of skills in the sensual part of the massage.

 :drinks:

Offline OliverK

:drinks:

Thanks for doing that.
You may also want to edit the last line about being a low positive.   :D