Irish kimm - Heathrow

[gurds]

Complete joke this girl.

Booked her for 30 min blowjob session in popular hotel in Heathrow used by loads of escorts. Booking confirmed in afternoon for later in evening.

I arrived , in anticipation of some sloppy toppy from this throat goat and getting balls drained. Was given room number and made my way there with a boner.

Knocked on door and then she said she wouldn't be seeing me

Complete waste of time, ended up seeing English Samantha again later in evening as she's working out of same hotel again like last week.

Absolute joke this girl, was £160 for 30 min Irish Kim's rate so some money saved.

External Link/Members Only

[Wayfarer]

Was given room number and made my way there with a boner. Knocked on door and then she said she wouldn't be seeing me

ended up seeing English Samantha again later in evening as she's working out of same hotel again like last week.

Hi Gurds,

I am really sorry that Irish Kimm was a waste of time. From your testimony, you actually had her room number and went right up to her door to be told she would not be seeing you? Did Kimm give you any reason for declining to see you?

I also have Irish Kimm on my hit list as someone to see, if I can get past the tattoos and bimbo look. I am not twice shy for your review of Irish Kimm.

I am really glad you saw English Samantha. I saw she was working from Monday to Wednesday this week in Heathrow. She is on my hit list and I quite fancy her.

W

[gurds]

Who knows maybe some reports even though I have 100 percent positive feedback on adultwork

Lot of escorts are missing out on lots of money in my view.

[LLPunting]

...
Lot of escorts are missing out on lots of money in my view.

You're trying to book lots of escorts and they're all turning you and your wad down?

[gurds]

Just saying in general, some escorts refuse to see clients with reports even if they have 100 percent positive feedback on adultwork. They are missing out on lots of money in my view

Dutch moroccan goddess told me that one of her best clients is someone that has loads of reports but his adultwork feedback is good

I think many escorts are missing out personally. Is their loss.

[LLPunting]

Loads of reports where?   In AW?  ClientEYE? SAAFE?

[Garyhart]

Just saying in general, some escorts refuse to see clients with reports even if they have 100 percent positive feedback on adultwork. They are missing out on lots of money in my view

Dutch moroccan goddess told me that one of her best clients is someone that has loads of reports but his adultwork feedback is good

I think many escorts are missing out personally. Is their loss.

Depends on what their reports are on. If it’s time wasting then most escorts will accept it. If it’s someone who’s abusive, stealthily, coercive etc, then they have every right to refuse seeing that punter. Some things simply aren’t worth the money whatsoever

[gurds]

Depends on what their reports are on. If it’s time wasting then most escorts will accept it. If it’s someone who’s abusive, stealthily, coercive etc, then they have every right to refuse seeing that punter. Some things simply aren’t worth the money whatsoever

think about reports as well is you can get for silly things even when you aren't to blame. One time had altercation with a madam in an apartment with some brazilian girls. She claims that I went over the time on purpose and I was taking advantage of the naivety of the brazilian girl that can't speak english, when I did nothing wrong.

Another time a Colombian girl that was a bit rude and I told her this and the madam reported me, etc. I find madams are a lot worse than the male pimps, they seem to be lot more controlling and vindictive.

[Jon Smith]

Maybe it's time for you change your number perhaps?

[CupidStunt]

Who knows maybe some reports even though I have 100 percent positive feedback on adultwork

Lot of escorts are missing out on lots of money in my view.

You might be on a list of clients who are known bb's, get a new SIM?

[LLPunting]

You might be on a list of clients who are known bb's...

This is a very good common reason for being denied a booking. 

Again OP, without stating where you think the reports are lodged we can't say if your mug isn't also captured for reference in case you do switch numbers to hide the risk you present to SPs who have no desire to see BBers.

[Garyhart]

This is a very good common reason for being denied a booking. 

Again OP, without stating where you think the reports are lodged we can't say if your mug isn't also captured for reference in case you do switch numbers to hide the risk you present to SPs who have no desire to see BBers.

Precisely, changing numbers may prove ineffective if they know your face. It could be a reason why she made you go to the hotel. It’s hard for a punter to know what reports are made of them though. I racked up 5 reports over the years on my punting phone, all for timewasting but only 2 SPs have shown me this out of 20+ ive seen since the first report was made (with one rejecting me over text while showing the screenshot). Most SPs don’t care about TW but take other reports more seriously.

If its BB, you’ll have a harder time as you’ve mentioned it on 2/3 occasions in recent days that you’ve been turned down.

[funlovingguy]

Complete joke this girl.

Booked her for 30 min blowjob session in popular hotel in Heathrow used by loads of escorts. Booking confirmed in afternoon for later in evening.

I arrived , in anticipation of some sloppy toppy from this throat goat and getting balls drained. Was given room number and made my way there with a boner.

Knocked on door and then she said she wouldn't be seeing me

Complete waste of time, ended up seeing English Samantha again later in evening as she's working out of same hotel again like last week.

Absolute joke this girl, was £160 for 30 min Irish Kim's rate so some money saved.

External Link/Members Only

Loooks like she has NBA both black and brown

[Garyhart]

Loooks like she has NBA both black and brown

Can’t see that anywhere on her profile

[Massage Bloke]

If OP was knocking on the door, it's seems a bit late in the day for the SP to be doing her screening!

[gurds]

If OP was knocking on the door, it's seems a bit late in the day for the SP to be doing her screening!

Lol bit of a joke 🤣. I don't bother changing my number as there are lots of escorts around. If someone doesn't want to see me then is what it is.

I think I am good client as never been violent with any girls, always treated them well. If you read saafe there are reports there every day of clients abusing the girls, attacking them, forceful kissing, forced throatpie, etc.

[Illuminated4000]

Yes, SAAFE makes for compelling reading, for sure.

[Illuminated4000]

When I booked to see Val Feraz, she mentioned to me during comms that I had reports somewhere but that she was willing to give me a chance! I was honestly shocked. I can’t think what for. She said some girls blocked me on WhatsApp and I have no idea why. I tried to get more info about it during our chat when we met about what the reasons were, but she couldn’t remember and it was put behind us 🙂.

[Illuminated4000]

I mean, Gabriella Barcellos blocked me for no reason on the morning of the day I was hoping to see her. Maybe because I was using a translator for English to Portuguese so she thought I was Brazilian and didn’t want to see me because of that? Gossip, privacy, discretion and all that. Bella Sadim blocked me because of my neutral review but then unblocked me after we talked about it. No idea who else, or why! Oh well!

[gurds]

Bella sadim blocked me as well lol.

Is what it is, there are probably thousands of escorts in London alone though. If you have seen a girl already multiple times before then they won't have a problem.

[Illuminated4000]

Oh really? Did you see her, or she blocked you during comms? What happened (assuming you know lol)?

[gurds]

Oh really? Did you see her, or she blocked you during comms? What happened (assuming you know lol)?

I msg on WhatsApp, she agrees booking then later in day she blocks me

[Illuminated4000]

Wow! That’s bad.

[Wayfarer]

I msg on WhatsApp, she agrees booking then later in day she blocks me

That constitutes a negative review.

[Mstar86]

I msg on WhatsApp, she agrees booking then later in day she blocks me

Mate I think you’ve got some seriously bad reports somewhere for girls to be getting this spooked.

Loads of cancellations is bad enough but at the hotel door is crazy!

How many in total now?

[LLPunting]

That constitutes a negative review.

It's an interesting conundrum, usually we consider it a matter of "innocent" punter suffers unjustified or unreasonable  treatment to warrant a neg.  In this case without knowing what all the "many" reports about him, wherever they are, actually say we have no idea what the situation is or the motive(s) of the SPs who reject him.

[gurds]

It's an interesting conundrum, usually we consider it a matter of "innocent" punter suffers unjustified or unreasonable  treatment to warrant a neg.  In this case without knowing what all the "many" reports about him, wherever they are, actually say we have no idea what the situation is or the motive(s) of the SPs who reject him.

On my adultwork though I have 100% positive feedback, 13 positive feedback out of 13.

[Garyhart]

On my adultwork though I have 100% positive feedback, 13 positive feedback out of 13.

With all due respect we all know AW ratings don’t mean much. Many SPs with wholly negative reviews on here have good overall feedback on AW. It’s a scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours type of situation.

I do agree that something damning has probably been shared among a wide group of SPs about you to warrant a mass wave of them who no longer want to see you. It’s hard for you to know what that is if you can’t see the reports or if you do know, it’d make sense that you wouldn’t want to say what that is

[gurds]

Also by virtue of law of large numbers, someone that has only seen 3-4 escorts is highly unlikely to have any negative reports.

Someone that has seen in the vicinity of hundreds of escorts over many yrs like me will be lot more likely to have negative reports even if you are a good client.

Think Ron on here has seen huge numbers of escorts over the yrs and I believe he has multiple numbers he uses to make contact. I don't bother with this, if an escort doesn't want to see me then it is what it is.

[Garyhart]

Also by virtue of law of large numbers, someone that has only seen 3-4 escorts is highly unlikely to have any negative reports.

Someone that has seen in the vicinity of hundreds of escorts over many yrs like me will be lot more likely to have negative reports even if you are a good client.

Think Ron on here has seen huge numbers of escorts over the yrs and I believe he has multiple numbers he uses to make contact. I don't bother with this, if an escort doesn't want to see me then it is what it is.

I know, most of us have reports on us, I’ve got 5 (all time wasting / punctuality related). What’s most important is the type of reports vs the number of it. 20 timewasting reports holds less weight than 5 stealthing or altercation reports.

You yourself said that you had an altercation with a maid. I’m sure that’s a type of report (if it was made) that most punters don’t have to their name, which will understandably influence which SPs would want to see you. If that was published on clienteye, you can’t be surprised why there’s a mass wave of women rejecting you, which is more telling in an economic environment like now.

[LLPunting]

Also by virtue of law of large numbers, someone that has only seen 3-4 escorts is highly unlikely to have any negative reports.

Someone that has seen in the vicinity of hundreds of escorts over many yrs like me will be lot more likely to have negative reports even if you are a good client.
...

This doesn't wash.  Your framing is prejudicial as it's founded on the presumption that you've done nothing that any, some or all of the SPs might find undesirable if not offensive.  But if you've been found by one here on UKP and they've dug around what you've been saying then at the least they may've discovered you're a bber and could be, with all good intention, notifying their community that you're a health risk.  Any of the SPs you've reviewed may've (maliciously) reported you're a ukp reviewer or taken offense at what you wrote here in a review or how you talk about things here.  Again without seeing what's been reported none of us can know how deserving you are of the rejection you've been receiving.

By your "law of large numbers" if you've been getting all these rejections how many do you think the really profligate punters here should be getting?   I'm not getting the sense that anyone let alone lots here is being victimised like you are.

Something you could try, if you haven't already, use a new AW profile, get a new number and try a few months of punting without saying a thing on any forum. 
If you still get rebuffed then you'll know that you've offended the provider community so much that they have your face on file across multiple advisories that might be used by different groups of SPs.

[gurds]

yh is what it is.

May be a good way to cut back on number of escorts you see.

Some feedback I have on aw from some well reviewed girls:

"Lovely guy . Second meet . Can’t wait to see again"  ebony444

"Seen this guy twice, he's reliable and genuine. Great arms too "  baby ariel

"We always have a great time very intelligent and handsome x" lola may (now english lollie)

"Nice Guy, good body and clean xxx" dutch maroccan goddess

"Great guy had an amazing time! Hopefully see you again soon xx" brandi british

"I enjoy every meeting with this guy, he's a beautiful person inside and out" eng nicole

[Garyhart]

This doesn't wash.  Your framing is prejudicial as it's founded on the presumption that you've done nothing that any, some or all of the SPs might find undesirable if not offensive.  But if you've been found by one here on UKP and they've dug around what you've been saying then at the least they may've discovered you're a bber and could be, with all good intention, notifying their community that you're a health risk.  Any of the SPs you've reviewed may've (maliciously) reported you're a ukp reviewer or taken offense at what you wrote here in a review or how you talk about things here.  Again without seeing what's been reported none of us can know how deserving you are of the rejection you've been receiving.

By your "law of large numbers" if you've been getting all these rejections how many do you think the really profligate punters here should be getting?   I'm not getting the sense that anyone let alone lots here is being victimised like you are.

Something you could try, if you haven't already, use a new AW profile, get a new number and try a few months of punting without saying a thing on any forum. 

Woah, you have good intentions but I’m not sure this is sound advice, especially IF SPs have noted him down for BB’ing, which is a fair reason to blackball him. He did say he had an altercation with a maid. We don’t know if they published that altercation on him on clienteye or saafe. What he can do to see if somethings on him is copy and paste the first 9 digits of his number on SAAFE. If it’s flagged there recently, or there’s a lot of discussion about his number / description, then there’s a high likelihood that it’s been spread around on WhatsApp / other private platforms.

Maybe Irish Kim invited him to the hotel to get a better description of his face - I’ve read reports on saafe where those with multiple reports on them do have their face published / known among a wide group of SPs.

[Garyhart]

yh is what it is.

May be a good way to cut back on number of escorts you see.

Some feedback I have on aw from some well reviewed girls:

"Lovely guy . Second meet . Can’t wait to see again"  ebony444

"Seen this guy twice, he's reliable and genuine. Great arms too "  baby ariel

"We always have a great time very intelligent and handsome x" lola may (now english lollie)

"Nice Guy, good body and clean xxx" dutch maroccan goddess

"Great guy had an amazing time! Hopefully see you again soon xx" brandi british

"I enjoy every meeting with this guy, he's a beautiful person inside and out" eng nicole

Mate…..AmourC is currently trying to leverage AW feedback to prove she’s not a had a bad experience with a punter before. Everyone knows most experienced SPs don’t use punter feedback on AW as a credible source, same way we don’t use it to assess whether a WG is reliable or not. Both parties have a vested interest to protect themselves from one another and AW isn’t a platform for doing that. It’s UKP for punters and client eye, SAAFE and others for SPs

[LLPunting]

Woah, you have good intentions but I’m not sure this is sound advice, especially IF SPs have noted him down for BB’ing, which is a fair reason to blackball him. He did say he had an altercation with a maid. We don’t know if they published that altercation on him on clienteye or saafe. What he can do to see if somethings on him is copy and paste the first 9 digits of his number on SAAFE. If it’s flagged there recently, or there’s a lot of discussion about his number / description, then there’s a high likelihood that it’s been spread around on WhatsApp / other private platforms.

Maybe Irish Kim invited him to the hotel to get a better description of his face - I’ve read reports on saafe where those with multiple reports on them do have their face published / known among a wide group of SPs.

Well this speaks to the truth of the matter.  If he's the boyscout he claims then only he loses out by starting over.  If he isn't, then like others preying on the SPs he will likely switch identities anyway.  The photo and or physical description on file will protect them as best as it would've anyway.  Anything more sinister should likely already be with the cops.

[gurds]

All nonsense though in my view , the reporting system.

Ted Bundy or Richard Ramirez could turn up for example with 0 reports to see an escort.

I think the adultwork feedback is reputable personally. If you didn't have good experience with a girl you could always leave her negative feedback on aw.

Fact that Dutch Moroccan goddess told me as well that her best client is a man with loads of reports says a lot!!

[LLPunting]

...

Fact that Dutch Moroccan goddess told me as well that her best client is a man with loads of reports says a lot!!

All that means is she is happy to see someone who may be a menace to others or at least put up with him for his wad.

[Garyhart]

All nonsense though in my view , the reporting system.

Ted Bundy or Richard Ramirez could turn up for example with 0 reports to see an escort.

I think the adultwork feedback is reputable personally. If you didn't have good experience with a girl you could always leave her negative feedback on aw.

Fact that Dutch Moroccan goddess told me as well that her best client is a man with loads of reports says a lot!!

So you yourself admitting to having an altercation in person (not over the phone) is nonsense? Let’s say that altercation has been made public to an SP forum / reporting platform, can you be surprised if they take it seriously and all of a sudden don’t want to see you? Surely you can’t dismiss that as nonsense. I’m no sp but I’m sure for every report on a disruptive punter they make, there are many more incidents regarding that same punter in other instances which go unreported

[EmmaJ]

yh is what it is.

May be a good way to cut back on number of escorts you see.

Some feedback I have on aw from some well reviewed girls:

"Lovely guy . Second meet . Can’t wait to see again"  ebony444

"Seen this guy twice, he's reliable and genuine. Great arms too "  baby ariel

"We always have a great time very intelligent and handsome x" lola may (now english lollie)

"Nice Guy, good body and clean xxx" dutch maroccan goddess

"Great guy had an amazing time! Hopefully see you again soon xx" brandi british

"I enjoy every meeting with this guy, he's a beautiful person inside and out" eng nicole

As a SP, it's taken me all of a couple of minutes with this info to find you're aw, number and reports
 And without disclosing any details. I wouldn't see you either.

[LLPunting]

As a SP, it's taken me all of a couple of minutes with this info to find you're aw, number and reports
 And without disclosing any details. I wouldn't see you either.

How close to the reports would GrokAI be if we fed in the profiles of those girls and yours and asked what kind of guy would succeed with them but be refused by you? 

[Garyhart]

How close to the reports would GrokAI be if we fed in the profiles of those girls and yours and asked what kind of guy would succeed with them but be refused by you?

I won’t say much but I can also see his AW account based on what he’s said. I don’t know what Emma knows but if she says she won’t see him (alongside multiple SPs), theres a lot which he won’t tell us about his actions of course.

[Waterhouse]

yh is what it is.

May be a good way to cut back on number of escorts you see.

Some feedback I have on aw from some well reviewed girls:

"Lovely guy . Second meet . Can’t wait to see again"  ebony444

"Seen this guy twice, he's reliable and genuine. Great arms too "  baby ariel

"We always have a great time very intelligent and handsome x" lola may (now english lollie)

"Nice Guy, good body and clean xxx" dutch maroccan goddess

"Great guy had an amazing time! Hopefully see you again soon xx" brandi british

"I enjoy every meeting with this guy, he's a beautiful person inside and out" eng nicole

No accounting for good taste.   

[Mr Garmin]

I won't be the only one who's spidey senses are tingling here.

Edit to say that EmmaJ posted while I was typing.  Looks like I was right.

[EmmaJ]

I think it's important to consider how girls screen potential clients... Some don't even know that there are so many different sites/apps to use.

Like clients would do, looking into aw feedback and different reports to see if the good out weighs the bad.
For example for clients who don't have feedback, but reports elsewhere for time wasting/no shows I would consider as long as they do pay a deposit.


However there was a time I didn't check a client before booking in, he sent the deposit however shortly before the booking, I had a strange gut feeling so I checked he's number.....A report for carrying a knife. That wasn't a risk I was willing to take so explained to him that I have now decided to refuse the booking due to a serious report. He didn't even question this and the deposit was swiftly returned to him.

[gurds]

So you yourself admitting to having an altercation in person (not over the phone) is nonsense? Let’s say that altercation has been made public to an SP forum / reporting platform, can you be surprised if they take it seriously and all of a sudden don’t want to see you? Surely you can’t dismiss that as nonsense. I’m no sp but I’m sure for every report on a disruptive punter they make, there are many more incidents regarding that same punter in other instances which go unreported

I understand, also true that lot of girls can report for random reasons, make up lies as well.

I accept it though, some escorts will see me and some won't. You don't even need an army of escorts, even just a few good ones that see you is sufficient.

I'm fortunate as well that I'm still in touch with Ruby, the best looking girl in England, even though she's off the table now from adultwork. She was flattered by my review of her.

[patelprat]

I'm still in touch with Ruby, the best looking girl in England

 

Enough superlatives for Ruby.

So she'll be flattered you keep saying that too.

[Garyhart]

I understand, also true that lot of girls can report for random reasons, make up lies as well.

I accept it though, some escorts will see me and some won't. You don't even need an army of escorts, even just a few good ones that see you is sufficient.

I'm fortunate as well that I'm still in touch with Ruby, the best looking girl in England, even though she's off the table now from adultwork. She was flattered by my review of her.

What seems like Multiple reports against your name probably aren’t all lies. By your logic in the first line, why on earth should we believe your negative review of Irish kimm?? Maybe you’re also a liar on negatives as this is her first one out of multiple reviews on UKP. Accept the fact that you’ve done something to warrant multiple unrelated SPs not wanting to see you. If it was for something as minor as time wasting it wouldn’t be this much of an issue but only you and those who’ve reported you / seen your reports know the real reason……..

[Garyhart]

I think it's important to consider how girls screen potential clients... Some don't even know that there are so many different sites/apps to use.

Like clients would do, looking into aw feedback and different reports to see if the good out weighs the bad.
For example for clients who don't have feedback, but reports elsewhere for time wasting/no shows I would consider as long as they do pay a deposit.


However there was a time I didn't check a client before booking in, he sent the deposit however shortly before the booking, I had a strange gut feeling so I checked he's number.....A report for carrying a knife. That wasn't a risk I was willing to take so explained to him that I have now decided to refuse the booking due to a serious report. He didn't even question this and the deposit was swiftly returned to him.

This is insane and good catch by doing your due diligence in advance. I’m sure the punter in this case would’ve said you just refused to see him for whatever minor reason and claimed his innocence in a review if you didn’t make him very aware of why you’re turning him down  (without mentioning his past messed up actions).

[gurds]

What seems like Multiple reports against your name probably aren’t all lies. By your logic in the first line, why on earth should we believe your negative review of Irish kimm?? Maybe you’re also a liar on negatives as this is her first one out of multiple reviews on UKP. Accept the fact that you’ve done something to warrant multiple unrelated SPs not wanting to see you. If it was for something as minor as time wasting it wouldn’t be this much of an issue but only you and those who’ve reported you / seen your reports know the real reason……..

still if I am so bad how do you explain the 13/13 positive feedback I have on aw.

[Garyhart]

still if I am so bad how do you explain the 13/13 positive feedback I have on aw.

Same reason why SPs who get a bad review here reference their aw feedback. We had an example of that today with amourc. Every punter knows AW feedback is a case of you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours. It’s been said multiple times by a range of punters that aw feedback isn’t the most reliable, for both punters and SPs alike. Most people on UKP judge SPs via their reviews on here as it’s harder to ruin your own rep vs on aw and SPs use client eye and saafe where they can be more honest about meetings / dangers of particular individuals without punters just replying with a bad review as they do on AW.

It’s no surprise why many punters have got a weird sense about you based on the breadth of women who all of a sudden no longer want to see you

It’s clearly something recent that’s been made known about you to SPs which explains you telling on yourself as to many of them blocking or refusing to see you. We even had an sp come onto this forum and explicitly state based on your number, she wouldn’t see you. I’ve got multiple timewasting reports that I’ve seen for myself and have never had multiple women turn me down for it . If I had a report(s) for something sinister, I’d also expect to get blackballed like the way you are right now