Any WG over £100 an hour is . . .

[Dave2014]

. . . taking the piss, in my opinion.

I've punted all over the world, and have thrust the pink log into both tres expensive and tres cheap fireplaces. And upon reflection have concluded that, actually WG vaggies are pretty much the same the world over at both ends of the price spectrum . . .

Every time I see a WG with £STUPIDPRICE per hour I think, why would anyone pay that rate for this?

Ceteris paribus, I just do not believe that the level of service for a £500-1000 per hour WG is 5-10 times better than a £100 per hour WG.

Thoughts?

[Anadin]

I've only ever met one WG that charged £100 an hour, most I see now are £200+ and while I wish they were cheaper they'd be nuts to charge less if they can get that.

[Melfort212]

I think even £100 an hour is too much.

Any other job giving that rate of pay other than doctors?

[threechilliman]

Pretty much agree with the OP. I have 6 girls that I'd return to and only one of these charges £120 for an hour. The others are £100 or less. One I 'found' a couple of weeks ago only charges £75 for an hour of unrushed, and I have to say, thoroughly enjoyable sex.

Rebecca More is my most expensive and yes, she's good alright particularly if you like a demanding girl, but I do question my own sanity when I parted with £250 for the pleasure. Then again, sanity isn't a word this game recognises!!

tcm

[RedKettle]

I agree with OP.  I am very reluctant to pay more than £100 and usually go for the 30 minute option to keep it well under.  There are a few where I pay more but often with regret.

When I first started I saw this woman who I would now think of as an old slapper and worth perhaps £50 for a go, but I used to pay her £140 and saw her loads of times.  That was before I discovered the variety that was available.

[CBPaul]

Not far off puntico IMO. I tend to pay £100 - £120 per hour as it's the going rate in these parts. Anything under £100 tends to be a scam of some sort and not worth the risk. I can't say all of the 120's have been better than all of the 100's though.

The most I've ever spent is £150 for an hour and she was definitely not worth the extra but then again everything about her blurred into ordinariness along with all of the cheaper profiles - she didn't have anything outstanding to offer.

If you are after sticking your dick in a variety of holes then 100 quid an hour should get you want you want. Works for me anyway. If you are after paying for more of a specific fantasy, some of the more unusual services or banging a porn star I can understand why prices go up because you already have the base price to work from.

Anything above £120 is too much for what I want. What pisses me off is the English girls who charge £140 plus just because they are English and the EE girls are charging £120. Nationality doesn't automatically demand a premium, they all have tits, pussies and arses which are remarkably similar and sometimes the lack of English is actually useful when avoiding vacuous conversation.

[Jimmyredcab]

An attractive young girl in Central London can easily get £150 an hour, if you don't want to pay it then someone else will.
No one in their right mind would pay £500 an hour.   

[Bangers and Gash]

No one in their right mind would pay £500 an hour.   

..... or tell a pro$$ie to up her prices. 

[smiths]

. . . taking the piss, in my opinion.

I've punted all over the world, and have thrust the pink log into both tres expensive and tres cheap fireplaces. And upon reflection have concluded that, actually WG vaggies are pretty much the same the world over at both ends of the price spectrum . . .

Every time I see a WG with £STUPIDPRICE per hour I think, why would anyone pay that rate for this?

Ceteris paribus, I just do not believe that the level of service for a £500-1000 per hour WG is 5-10 times better than a £100 per hour WG.

Thoughts?

I punt with WGs i fancy who charge between £60-190 an hour. My maximum is £200 an hour, i wouldnt pay more than this to punt with any WG. In the past i paid £350 an hour and those WGs were no better than others who charged me £80-100 an hour.

In London as reviews show there are many good WGs charging between £60-100 an hour and my usual range at present is £70-120 an hour where i have punted with many good WGs as well as met some low lifes.

If a punter knows there is no correlation between what a WG happens to charge and how good she might be he can save himself some serious money.

On here it doesnt help that a punter like redcab labels ALL WGs who charge under £100 an hour as skanks, disproven rubbish of the highest order or that he advised a WG to raise her prices while keeping him on her old rate, something he has posted he would do again. IMO its up to the WG what she charges, its certainly not my business.

I am actually paying less on average than i was 10 years ago, a mixture of finding punting forums and the help they can give, knowing other punters whose help is much appreciated and be able to locate good WGs at lower prices.

[punk]

£100 max. personally no bird is worth more, that i have come across.

[smiths]

£100 max. personally no bird is worth more, that i have come across.

Your business but you are missing out on some excellent WGs like Hot Ameera at £120 an hour, in my view she is well worth the extra £20 an hour.

[punk]

Your business but you are missing out on some excellent WGs like Hot Ameera at £120 an hour, in my view she is well worth the extra £20 an hour.

ops i forgot about her, never been able to get a booking, though she was great on the phone.

[smiths]

ops i forgot about her, never been able to get a booking, though she was great on the phone.

I have found it harder to get one myself since i did my review on her, a case of keep trying and punted with her a few times now, always excellent so far.

[Jason]

The thing is that there is correlation between price and looks. Yes there are a few exceptions here and there but statistically speaking the physically very attractive girls (and please spare me with the beauty is on the eye of the beholder) are charging high. Yes there are mingers who also charge high but the point is not about percentages but about absolute numbers. Numerically (not percentage wise) how many stunners can you count in the sub £100ph range?… very few is the answer and in those you also include some skanky piss-taking Romanians who charge £80ph for 3-5 minutes per hour penetration and half a minute shit blowjob which equivalently means that for a normal 15-30min penetration and 20-25min oral the price would be more than £400. On the other hand going in the £150ph or higher price range you to do find plenty of stunners. If say there are 5 stunners up to the £100 mark (including skanks), there are 25 in the £120-£180 and 100 in the £200ph or higher. The co-existence of mingers in these price brackets means nothing.

However there is no correlation between price and service quality. Actually there is but not the one you might think… In my experience most independent prossies costing 140% or higher of the average hourly price just trade looks (and I mean those who CAN trade looks, not those who started from a lower price and because they were good service providers gradually increased their rates) and are as likely to offer a limited service as those who are priced 60% of the average. Only difference is that the former offer it to much less clients per week and are more likely to be more responsive during sex and if incall perhaps wrapped up in a luxurious atmosphere. If we consider the average (not median or mode) as being £130ph then roughly the majority of indies charging more than £180ph or lower than £80ph are likely (but not certainly) to offer the same limited service. For agency girls I will say go for girls up to £200ph maximum as above that boundary the same negative effect starts happening. Some may refer to maxes angels (in London) and pornstars but *most* of Maxes angels and pornstars don't trade looks.

Particularly photo-models who are those charging the most (on some agencies their fee goes up to £1000ph nb. the girl takes £600) almost always look forward to stop doing this job and this reflects on the poor service they give which is if doing the punting world a favour for a beauty of their calibre being available for paid sex. This attitude should come to no surprise though as some of them used to have ‘rich boyfriends’ and while they are looking for a replacement they occasionally escort so that together with their modelling income can facilitate the comfortable life they once used to have. From a morality point of view this is more gold digging greedy whore attitude than that of typical cheaper prossies but this is another story. Here (External Link/Members Only: External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only: External Link/Members Only) you can read the feedback of two photo-models on AW which further illustrate that splashing money on photo-models is extremely poor value for money. For those who cannot read between the lines of that review Chloe is charging £500ph and no FK, no OWO, no COB, covered handjob, only 2 mins missionary and Natalia is charging £300ph for foot fetish and amateur 'domination'…

[londonmaxxy]

I think there's a huge difference by region.
Parts of London clearly have issues on price & brothels have mainly be closed or are limited.
In Manchester for example you can fill your boots for £100- 120 with a lot of choice of British or foreign.
If you're a regular punter it's almost worth getting a train for a day & knocking a few off.

[portable]

It's purely a consumer mentality, the same way someone would shop at M&S, Waitrose etc over Tesco or Sainsbury's. It's the label, the illusion of quality. Although of course, sometimes quality will be there, sometimes not.

Same with the escorts themselves. They see themselves as a brand, and the high-maintenance ones (that's a polite way of putting it) apply the same logic to themselves. "I'm not a Greggs pasty, I'm an M&S baked pastry"

I can understand why some escorts who are both objectively gorgeous, great in bed, genuinely enjoy themselves and go out of there way to provide a great experience (location, clothes, etc not just services) can justify their cost, but only so much. Beyond £150 is taking the piss.

On top of that, there's the mentality that the guys with money to blow on £200+ punts aren't going to be "common" or dodgy, or unclean or whatever, so escorts in some areas naturally charge more just to avoid the "great unwashed".

[madeinwales56]

I go along with the theory that whores who charge over £100 an hour are overpriced. This is comes from decades of punting experience with prossies of all different shapes, sizes, colours & nationalities and ranging from cheap street walkers to agency girls charging a fortune. Ultimately, it is the market that dictates what they charge and if we refuse to pay an extortionate amount prices would come down. Trouble with that approach is as soon as one person weakens and pays up we're all fucked!

[Closet freak]

. . . taking the piss, in my opinion.

& those charging less than £100 ph ........are skanks 

Or so I've been told   

[madeinwales56]

& those charging less than £100 ph ........are skanks 

Or so I've been told   

Which is a fallacy masquerading as fact spread by whores who charge more or punters who pay more.

[Quesadilla]

Value for money is also subjective - depends what you're looking for and how much cash you have I guess.

I started punting before coming on UKP and was more concerned about finding someone local and who I fancied and who did all the services I wanted - as opposed to worrying too much about how much they cost. My first few punts were around £150ph and all absolutely repeatable experiences.

So to me I had an expectation of what a punt "should" cost based on those first few experiences, rightly or wrongly.

I then found a "bargain" at £120ph which turned out to be a b&s.  I didn't walk, the punt was blah - not absolutely awful but she didn't do most of the services advertised - as a result I gave my first ever review here as a negative to warn others.  But I have to say that put me off cheaper WG's for a while until my first RB at £100 which proved to be one of my best punts - but her regular rate is £150 and she is out of my manor so not repeatable. 

Since then I've in total had only a handful of punts at £120ph or less, but I'd say my success rate at that price has been about 50/50.  Those that have been genuinely good at that price range I have found really hard to book again (e.g. Platinum Cindy who is booked months in advance).  I still read reviews of those at £100-120 carefully in hope of grabbing a bargain but generally they seem to be inconsistent / have mixed reviews or are impossible to book. 

So most of my punts remain around £150ph and at that price have been 95% positive punts so I am perfectly happy to stick at that price level.  Can't say I feel the WG's in question are taking the piss - as I get what I'm looking for at a price I am happy to pay. 

[madeinwales56]

We aren't talking about value for money, we are talking about price.

[smiths]

It's purely a consumer mentality, the same way someone would shop at M&S, Waitrose etc over Tesco or Sainsbury's. It's the label, the illusion of quality. Although of course, sometimes quality will be there, sometimes not.

Same with the escorts themselves. They see themselves as a brand, and the high-maintenance ones (that's a polite way of putting it) apply the same logic to themselves. "I'm not a Greggs pasty, I'm an M&S baked pastry"

I can understand why some escorts who are both objectively gorgeous, great in bed, genuinely enjoy themselves and go out of there way to provide a great experience (location, clothes, etc not just services) can justify their cost, but only so much. Beyond £150 is taking the piss.

On top of that, there's the mentality that the guys with money to blow on £200+ punts aren't going to be "common" or dodgy, or unclean or whatever, so escorts in some areas naturally charge more just to avoid the "great unwashed".

Indeed, its also the case that some punters pay a higher fee in the hope it means the riff raff like me wouldnt of punted with their expensive WGs. Quite a few punters at parties that i have punted with held this view and out of being snobs paid more.

As paying more doesnt mean the WG is in anyway a better WG i see no point in paying what i view as silly money as its not VFM to me which is what i require when i punt.

[Sedlmayer]

I punt with WGs i fancy who charge between £60-190 an hour. My maximum is £200 an hour, i wouldnt pay more than this to punt with any WG. In the past i paid £350 an hour and those WGs were no better than others who charged me £80-100 an hour.

In London as reviews show there are many good WGs charging between £60-100 an hour and my usual range at present is £70-120 an hour where i have punted with many good WGs as well as met some low lifes.

If a punter knows there is no correlation between what a WG happens to charge and how good she might be he can save himself some serious money.

On here it doesnt help that a punter like redcab labels ALL WGs who charge under £100 an hour as skanks, disproven rubbish of the highest order or that he advised a WG to raise her prices while keeping him on her old rate, something he has posted he would do again. IMO its up to the WG what she charges, its certainly not my business.

I am actually paying less on average than i was 10 years ago, a mixture of finding punting forums and the help they can give, knowing other punters whose help is much appreciated and be able to locate good WGs at lower prices.

This pretty much exactly states my own position too. JRC himself says that he very rarely punts anymore, so his opinions are perhaps a bit out of date - there certainly are some decent girls out there in the £80 - £100 per hour range. There is only one girl that I would pay £140/hr for, and I wouldn't pay more than that under any circumstances. Up to £130, for a girl that I really like, preferably with anal thrown in, not as an extra, is the absolute max. No need to pay more.

[punk]

Indeed, its also the case that some punters pay a higher fee in the hope it means the riff raff like me wouldnt of punted with their expensive WGs. Quite a few punters at parties that i have punted with held this view and out of being snobs paid more.

As paying more doesnt mean the WG is in anyway a better WG i see no point in paying what i view as silly money as its not VFM to me which is what i require when i punt.

delusional comes to mind 

[smiths]

I go along with the theory that whores who charge over £100 an hour are overpriced. This is comes from decades of punting experience with prossies of all different shapes, sizes, colours & nationalities and ranging from cheap street walkers to agency girls charging a fortune. Ultimately, it is the market that dictates what they charge and if we refuse to pay an extortionate amount prices would come down. Trouble with that approach is as soon as one person weakens and pays up we're all fucked!

There is no such thing as we in punting though. Who knows how many punters have no idea or interest in this site and pay what they choose to pay. That will never change in my view. Its also why there are many WGs and Agencies in London that charge high to me rates and have been doing so for years, they get enough punters to continue charging those fees.

Even on here there are punters that wont pay under £100 an hour and thats after numerous reviews on WGs who offered a good service and charged less than that.

[Sedlmayer]

The thing is that there is correlation between price and looks. Yes there are a few exceptions here and there but statistically speaking the physically very attractive girls (and please spare me with the beauty is on the eye of the beholder) are charging high. Yes there are mingers who also charge high but the point is not about percentages but about absolute numbers. Numerically (not percentage wise) how many stunners can you count in the sub £100ph range?… very few is the answer and in those you also include some skanky piss-taking Romanians who charge £80ph for 3-5 minutes per hour penetration and half a minute shit blowjob which equivalently means that for a normal 15-30min penetration and 20-25min oral the price would be more than £400. On the other hand going in the £150ph or higher price range you to do find plenty of stunners. If say there are 5 stunners up to the £100 mark (including skanks), there are 25 in the £120-£180 and 100 in the £200ph or higher. The co-existence of mingers in these price brackets means nothing.

However there is no correlation between price and service quality. Actually there is but not the one you might think… In my experience most independent prossies costing 140% or higher of the average hourly price just trade looks (and I mean those who CAN trade looks, not those who started from a lower price and because they were good service providers gradually increased their rates) and are as likely to offer a limited service as those who are priced 60% of the average. Only difference is that the former offer it to much less clients per week and are more likely to be more responsive during sex and if incall perhaps wrapped up in a luxurious atmosphere. If we consider the average (not median or mode) as being £130ph then roughly the majority of indies charging more than £180ph or lower than £80ph are likely (but not certainly) to offer the same limited service. For agency girls I will say go for girls up to £200ph maximum as above that boundary the same negative effect starts happening. Some may refer to maxes angels (in London) and pornstars but *most* of Maxes angels and pornstars don't trade looks.

Particularly photo-models who are those charging the most (on some agencies their fee goes up to £1000ph nb. the girl takes £600) almost always look forward to stop doing this job and this reflects on the poor service they give which is if doing the punting world a favour for a beauty of their calibre being available for paid sex. This attitude should come to no surprise though as some of them used to have ‘rich boyfriends’ and while they are looking for a replacement they occasionally escort so that together with their modelling income can facilitate the comfortable life they once used to have. From a morality point of view this is more gold digging greedy whore attitude than that of typical cheaper prossies but this is another story. Here (External Link/Members Only: External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only: External Link/Members Only) you can read the feedback of two photo-models on AW which further illustrate that splashing money on photo-models is extremely poor value for money. For those who cannot read between the lines of that review Chloe is charging £500ph and no FK, no OWO, no COB, covered handjob, only 2 mins missionary and Natalia is charging £300ph for foot fetish and amateur 'domination'…

Anybody want to précis this for me? I got as far as the end of the first sentence and its highly contentious claim that there is a correlation between looks and price charged.........

[azrael]

Personaly think its more to do with service than price. Been with w.g who lye on there backs and expect you to do all the work or once you pop ask you to leave so the mext punt can come, plus depends on what you guys go for me i like the "gfe" so if the w.g pleases you in that aspect then price depends on service provided.

[smiths]

This pretty much exactly states my own position too. JRC himself says that he very rarely punts anymore, so his opinions are perhaps a bit out of date - there certainly are some decent girls out there in the £80 - £100 per hour range. There is only one girl that I would pay £140/hr for, and I wouldn't pay more than that under any circumstances. Up to £130, for a girl that I really like, preferably with anal thrown in, not as an extra, is the absolute max. No need to pay more.

For me there are WGs i am prepared to pay more to punt with such as Chelsea Heart, ex-Alex of the Bunny Lounge who cost me £190 for the hour and Keira Pharrell who cost me £180 for the hour, both good VFM to me, but as i said £200 an hour is my absolute limit.

Unlike some, i dont mean you,  i dont box myself into very narrow requirements, its no wonder such punters cant locate a WG who fits ALL their wants. I am flexible as that gives me more choice and works for me.

[smiths]

Anybody want to précis this for me? I got as far as the end of the first sentence and its highly contentious claim that there is a correlation between looks and price charged.........

He has his view, up to him, not one i agree with on this matter. Fortunately i have punted with stunning to me WGs at both parties and 121 at low cost. And all that matters to me is i found them stunners and they offered me a good service, its irrelevant whether others found the WG a stunner or not.

[smiths]

Personaly think its more to do with service than price. Been with w.g who lye on there backs and expect you to do all the work or once you pop ask you to leave so the mext punt can come, plus depends on what you guys go for me i like the "gfe" so if the w.g pleases you in that aspect then price depends on service provided.

And that comes down to the WGs attitude which is what makes a good or bad WG, NOT what they charge.

[Jason]

He has his view, up to him, not one i agree with on this matter. Fortunately i have punted with stunning to me WGs at both parties and 121 at low cost. And all that matters to me is i found them stunners and they offered me a good service, its irrelevant whether others found the WG a stunner or not.

With which exactly thing you don't agree from what I said? I basically said stick with girls priced £80-£180ph (up to £200 if agency ones) and in this range you can *find* everything you want or need *including stunners* and that there is a greater chance a stunner priced in this range to offer a good service (e.g Mel who was charging £150ph) than a piss-taking £500ph one who only meets rich/fluffy/newbie guys with whom she can get away with covered handjobs and 2min missionary like Chloe does. But it is an observation that you can find more *in number* stunners in the higher price ranges (regardless of the fact that most of these expensive girls are poor service providers and poor value for money like Chloe). 

[smiths]

With which exactly thing you don't agree from what I said? I basically said stick with girls priced £80-£180ph (up to £200 if agency ones) and in this range you can *find* everything you want or need *including stunners* and that there is a greater chance a stunner priced in this range to offer a good service (e.g Mel who was charging £150ph) than a piss-taking £500ph one who only meets rich/fluffy/newbie guys with whom she can get away with covered handjobs and 2min missionary like Chloe does. But it is an observation that you can find more *in number* stunners in the higher price ranges (regardless of the fact that most of these expensive girls are poor service providers and poor value for money like Chloe). 

The correlation between price and looks.

[cylon]

For me I like to fuck women who in the real world wouldn't give me a second look. The sort of women in reality are totally out of my league. So looks are very important to me but also I don't expect a shit service. The fact of the matter is if I want to fuck a really hot woman who is also a fantastic fuck the chances are she's going to be charging well over a hundred notes an hour.

[Type_O_Negative]

I think even £100 an hour is too much.

Any other job giving that rate of pay other than doctors?

People who work on oil platforms in deadly environment?

[Type_O_Negative]

I only once paid more than £100 per hour - for my birthday. It was worth. I had lovely time with Brazilian milf 

However my iron rule is to pay maximum £100/hour. WG who wants £300/hour is not 3 times better than that one who asks for £100. Attitude is a key word for me 

[Sedlmayer]

The correlation between price and looks.

Yep, and the fact that you are also saying that there is actually a correlation between price and service (even if it's not the one that might be assumed).

If I have learned anything at all in well over 30 years it is this -

There. Is. No. Relation. Between. Price. And Service.

[password02]

I've only ever met one WG that charged £100 an hour, most I see now are £200+ and while I wish they were cheaper they'd be nuts to charge less if they can get that.

Can to share the names of the girls you have seen at £200+ or even any links? or reviews? and who was the girl you did see at £100?

However looking at your previous boasts and replies you just seem to come up with the usual shit comments - seen her and paid £200+ etc etc .

Have you actually had a punt? even a cheapo £50 - 30 mins?  Please share But PERHAPS you won't   

[ArtVandalay]

I think even £100 an hour is too much.

Any other job giving that rate of pay other than doctors?

Lots of other jobs pay that much, I work as a management consultant and make around that figure. I also have the advantage of making that much whilst working Monday-Friday mostly between 9am and 5pm, getting someone else to pay for all my business expenses and to top it all off I don't have to put up with other peoples BO rubbing across my face, unwashed cheesy knobs, stinky arses, threats against my person or being generally ostracised by the wider community.

WGs are going to charge as much as they can get away with. They are a private enterprise not a social service.
I wouldn't ever tell anyone I bought any service off that they should increase their prices. If they're big enough to go into business then they're big enough to know how to make a worthwhile living from it

[Anadin]

Can to share the names of the girls you have seen at £200+ or even any links? or reviews? and who was the girl you did see at £100?

However looking at your previous boasts and replies you just seem to come up with the usual shit comments - seen her and paid £200+ etc etc .

Have you actually had a punt? even a cheapo £50 - 30 mins?  Please share But PERHAPS you won't   

How the fuck is seeing an escort boasting and as for sharing information, I'll happily do that for anyone else but not you, go hassle someone else. 

[NIK]

Lots of other jobs pay that much, I work as a management consultant and make around that figure. I also have the advantage of making that much whilst working Monday-Friday mostly between 9am and 5pm, getting someone else to pay for all my business expenses and to top it all off I don't have to put up with other peoples BO rubbing across my face, unwashed cheesy knobs, stinky arses, threats against my person or being generally ostracised by the wider community.

WGs are going to charge as much as they can get away with. They are a private enterprise not a social service. 
I wouldn't ever tell anyone I bought any service off that they should increase their prices. If they're big enough to go into business then they're big enough to know how to make a worthwhile living from it

What the fuck does a management consultant actually do  I hope they're not like recruitment consultants.
It seems everyone's a 'consultant' these days.
At £100 an hour I want to be one!   

[ArtVandalay]

What the fuck does a management consultant actually do 

For me its generally a case of hand holding companies through a change process which they haven't done before.

[password02]

How the fuck is seeing an escort boasting and as for sharing information, I'll happily do that for anyone else but not you, go hassle someone else. 

Please explain to the good members of UKP how you share information with 0 reviews? Or do you just do PM's to certain individuals?

I am not hassling you but the type of member you represent on UKP where they keep saying that they have seen girls and at £200+ but not willing to share information to other UKP members- This is a forum where people discuss and share information about their experiences - If you are a genuine punter why would you be a member and not share the good and more importantly the bad girls on this fourum.

It is not just you - there are several that read and use the info and the reviews here but never give anything back to the members

[Type_O_Negative]

For me its generally a case of hand holding companies through a change process which they haven't done before.

Do you mean you make cuts everywhere, you make people redundant and then you get another 5 or 6 digits bonus?

[seeker]

Do you mean you make cuts everywhere, you make people redundant and then you get another 5 or 6 digits bonus?

There are so many who say they have been punting with loads of wg YET 
None or maybe 1 or two reviews. ..even then the wg has left...so no good info to anyone 
At least a newbi has the excuse he hasn't seen anyone yet ...

[seeker]

Please explain to the good members of UKP how you share information with 0 reviews? Or do you just do PM's to certain individuals?

I am not hassling you but the type of member you represent on UKP where they keep saying that they have seen girls and at £200+ but not willing to share information to other UKP members- This is a forum where people discuss and share information about their experiences - If you are a genuine punter why would you be a member and not share the good and more importantly the bad girls on this fourum.

It is not just you - there are several that read and use the info and the reviews here but never give anything back to the members

Sorry .mentioned to quote this one .

[shagbambi]

I have found a sweet spot in the 100 to 130 range. I have pushed the boat out on occasion up to 250 an hour, but in terms of service there is very little difference for me as a fairly vanilla punter.  The girls at that 100-130 level have been great in terms of service, attitude and looks.  As I have punted up the scale in terms of price I have experienced better looks/bodies/locations but the service has not been proportionately greater and often the attitude is shit (with exceptions of course). 

[punk]

For me I like to fuck women who in the real world wouldn't give me a second look. The sort of women in reality are totally out of my league. So looks are very important to me but also I don't expect a shit service. The fact of the matter is if I want to fuck a really hot woman who is also a fantastic fuck the chances are she's going to be charging well over a hundred notes an hour.

i find that sad. Its the gift of the gab that counts.

As overs have said higher the price and looks do not mean you will get a better performance, of course its your business.

[fredpunter]

Lots of other jobs pay that much, I work as a management consultant and make around that figure. I also have the advantage of making that much whilst working Monday-Friday mostly between 9am and 5pm, getting someone else to pay for all my business expenses and to top it all off I don't have to put up with other peoples BO rubbing across my face, unwashed cheesy knobs, stinky arses, threats against my person or being generally ostracised by the wider community.

WGs are going to charge as much as they can get away with. They are a private enterprise not a social service.
I wouldn't ever tell anyone I bought any service off that they should increase their prices. If they're big enough to go into business then they're big enough to know how to make a worthwhile living from it

If you are a management consultant I'm not sure you are right about being ostracised by the wider community

[Jimmyredcab]

..... or tell a pro$$ie to up her prices. 

Yes, and I would do it again under identical circumstances -------------------- £50 for 30 minutes with an English girl is far too low.   

[smiths]

Yes, and I would do it again under identical circumstances -------------------- £50 for 30 minutes with an English girl is far too low.

Your an absolute disgrace redcab.