Author Topic: inna.tantric.massag - Old Street  (Read 2340 times)


7 review(s) for inna.tantric.massag (4 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by PilotMan]

Offline jimjeffries

External Link/Members Only

Recently single so back to punting & FBSM for me, thought I'd try Inna after reading some positive reviews here. This took place last week, had the morning off work and fancied a massage rather than sex. Messaged her on the morning of and agreed a 1hr incall for £120. Oral was offered for £40 extra if I remember correctly, but didn't seem worth it to me.

Arrived at the location slightly early (next to the Curzon cinema), 5mins from Old Street tube and was waiting outside, messaged to say I was there and sat down at the benches outside the restaurant next door. I was told to wait 5mins, as I'm sitting there 2 of the dodgiest looking blokes I've seen in a while walk up to the door, they're dressed in all black and are buzzed in almost in a hurry. They looked intimidating and were scanning around them like they were meerkats. My mind went from maybe they're her neighbours to pretty quickly - what if they're here for me. Decided in that moment to leave and not chance it. Didn't want my first foray back in years to be me getting mugged by some guys. I always remove myself from precarious situations, erring on the side of caution and this felt very off, so I went with my gut and left. Got a few angry texts telling me I was a timewaster. A timewaster with his phone, wallet, teeth and dignity - I'll take it thanks.

I understand some guys might have chosen differently and maybe I was being paranoid but for me my safety comes before me getting a rub & tug. The sequence of events was almost too much of a coincidence for me to think it was nothing. Stay safe fellas.

JJ

Offline Punterperson1971

Always go with your gut feeling mate I’ve done this a few times

Offline Massage Bloke

I agree, go with your gut. I can see why you didn't want to take any chances.  But did she deserve a neg? What did she do  to earn it?  :unknown: 

Offline jamiekinkxxx

I agree, go with your gut. I can see why you didn't want to take any chances.  But did she deserve a neg? What did she do  to earn it?  :unknown:

I agree with the go-with-your-gut-feeling approach however not sure a negative is fair, I agree with MassageBloke, you don't know they were anything to do with Inna?

« Last Edit: October 22, 2025, 08:47:58 am by jamiekinkxxx »

Offline paul_2407

Been to this joint before when it was another SP working there. Massage was fine and no fuss with payment or Sergei next door. Seems like you’ve got ahead of yourself mate.

Offline Rogertiger

Have to agree. There's about 15 flats in there. Was always fine

Offline Massage Bloke

The more I think about it, the more I'm puzzled as to why OP left a review. After all, nothing happened. How can you leave a review based on two blokes being buzzed into a building?

He didn't see her, and at the last minute walked away from the meet. To leave her a neg was a rotten thing to do.


Offline jimjeffries

If an admin can change the review to Neutral then I'm fine with that. On reflection a Negative is harsh because I didn't actually receive a service from her. The door number I was given was a 3 number range so I assumed it was 3 flats, didn't realise there's 15 flats there as someone has pointed out.

However I don't think there's a need to question why I'm writing a review. We're here to give information on SPs and that includes the environment. Me telling you that there's dodgy guys hanging around the door you're meant to walk into moments before you meet an SP, is as valuable as saying the street was clear or the door is right next to a busy bus stop, or the door is not very discreet with lots of people nearby so don't loiter etc. Some of us that value discretion like to know these things.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
If an admin can change the review to Neutral then I'm fine with that. On reflection a Negative is harsh because I didn't actually receive a service from her. The door number I was given was a 3 number range so I assumed it was 3 flats, didn't realise there's 15 flats there as someone has pointed out.

However I don't think there's a need to question why I'm writing a review. We're here to give information on SPs and that includes the environment. Me telling you that there's dodgy guys hanging around the door you're meant to walk into moments before you meet an SP, is as valuable as saying the street was clear or the door is right next to a busy bus stop, or the door is not very discreet with lots of people nearby so don't loiter etc. Some of us that value discretion like to know these things.

The guys weren't hanging around, they just used the door before you got to it, unless you're going to change the story to justify your taking offence?

It's totally fine to post a review about circumstances that caused the booking to not take place, however it is wrong to blame the SP for your assumptions which may not be very sound.  The criticism was more for the neg rather than posting a review.  Again it is helpful to mention any conditions that might be a problem for other punters but when the condition is psychological you have to own how much of the problem is of your own making.

A street being clear is a pretty long stretch to providing a critical green light to a meet, it is nothing like saying the door is exposed to a place where people might congregate regularly and for a while.  I recall some review where the punter said the venue was opposite some office where an acquaintance of his worked, he still went. 

Offline jimjeffries

Thanks for changing to a Neutral, I've conceded the Negative was harsh on reflection.

His criticism of my review initially was a negative was harsh and then 2 days later he commented again questioning why I even wrote anything. I still think what I wrote is useful, always will. If some don't then that's fine, they can have their opinion. I'm not actively telling people not to go see her, I'm just telling them of my experience in the build up to the meet. Apologies if the Negative has made it look like that but it's changed now and people can read these comments.

He then commented on another review of Inna to call me a timewaster. Uncalled for but again his opinion. He also hasn't contributed any reviews to this forum so I'm questioning why he's on the site in the first place. 3 comments about my review, days apart of eachother from a lurker isn't on IMO so I'm going to speak up. He seems a bit obsessive about Inna which is funny considering he hasn't been to see her. A "zero review wanker" (his words from a previous post, not mine) doesn't need to be questioning someone writing an honest review, that's all I'm saying here.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,179
  • Likes: 537
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
The guys weren't hanging around, they just used the door before you got to it, unless you're going to change the story to justify your taking offence?

It's totally fine to post a review about circumstances that caused the booking to not take place, however it is wrong to blame the SP for your assumptions which may not be very sound.  The criticism was more for the neg rather than posting a review.  Again it is helpful to mention any conditions that might be a problem for other punters but when the condition is psychological you have to own how much of the problem is of your own making.

A street being clear is a pretty long stretch to providing a critical green light to a meet, it is nothing like saying the door is exposed to a place where people might congregate regularly and for a while.  I recall some review where the punter said the venue was opposite some office where an acquaintance of his worked, he still went.
The above comment would seem to break rule 32, there’s a report button for any issues with other members remember


Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,179
  • Likes: 537
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
Thanks for changing to a Neutral, I've conceded the Negative was harsh on reflection.


Review appreciated matey, the site is about sharing information, a neutral is fair based on you wasn’t sure about your personal safety and warned others.

Offline Massage Bloke

Thanks for changing to a Neutral, I've conceded the Negative was harsh on reflection.

His criticism of my review initially was a negative was harsh and then 2 days later he commented again questioning why I even wrote anything. I still think what I wrote is useful, always will. If some don't then that's fine, they can have their opinion. I'm not actively telling people not to go see her, I'm just telling them of my experience in the build up to the meet. Apologies if the Negative has made it look like that but it's changed now and people can read these comments.

He then commented on another review of Inna to call me a timewaster. Uncalled for but again his opinion. He also hasn't contributed any reviews to this forum so I'm questioning why he's on the site in the first place. 3 comments about my review, days apart of eachother from a lurker isn't on IMO so I'm going to speak up. He seems a bit obsessive about Inna which is funny considering he hasn't been to see her. A "zero review wanker" (his words from a previous post, not mine) doesn't need to be questioning someone writing an honest review, that's all I'm saying here.


Are you talking about me?

« Last Edit: October 27, 2025, 04:47:59 pm by Massage Bloke »

Offline jimjeffries


Are you talking about me?

Yes mate. Didn't appreciate being called a timewaster on the other review, when I'm sharing info relating to an SP. 

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,179
  • Likes: 537
  •  
  • Reviews: 501