I note your snarky contempt.
Let me explain.
I frequently try to provide input into these STI threads based on my knowledge base and experience. In particular this includes correcting what I perceive to be any inaccuracies within what is a complex subject.
I always try to do this in a polite and civil manner and where possible provide links.
I had actually started to type a reply to explain why cunnilingus is considered a low risk activity. It is not ‘no risk’ but it is graded low risk compared to other sexual activities. This included a link.
However, I reread your post which confirmed my initial perception that it was both aggressive and deliberately confrontational.
I also felt that 'logically' you couldn’t possibly think that the experience of one punter and which, if accurate, was clearly a highly unusual outlier, would outweigh the accepted body of medical/scientific opinion.
Then I noted your continued attack on SP’s and also the highly illogical view that self-interest would also outweigh the same body of evidence.
I came to the conclusion that I was wasting my time as you clearly had another agenda and were being deliberately provocative.
So I didn’t post it and thought 'fuck it'.
I note you also appear to be exhibiting this same deliberately confrontational ‘rant’ style of post in Scutty’s ‘Parlour arrest’ thread.
This confirms my belief that I made the correct decision with my reply in this thread
