Author Topic: Getting owo from a barebacker?  (Read 3727 times)

Offline PuntyMcPunter

Curious on people’s views here.
I know barebacking is generally frowned upon here, but mostly owo is considered fine.

So what do people think about getting owo from a barebacker?
Does the fact that she is a barebacker make you less likely to get just oral from her?

(Reason for asking is Ive seen a wg I quite like the look of, but noticed she is a barebacker. So of course I don’t want to fuck her at all. Should i avoid OWO from her or is that just as safe as getting owo from any other wg?)

Offline Thephoenix

How do you know SPs who don't show BB on their profile don't do BB?
Either with selected clients, civvies, partners etc.
Do SPs showing BB necessarily have BB with every client?
Can you rely on the accuracy of AW entries?

I guess it might give you more cause to worry, but don't the same rules and choices apply?

1. Use a condom to reduce the risk, and get tested regularly.
2. Don't use a condom to increase the risk, and get tested regularly.
3. Get tested regularly.
4. Get tested regularly.

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,057
  • Likes: 160
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
its about managing risk - and the level of risk guys will take will vary from guy to guy (sometimes because of the relationship status but sometimes just because if their personal risk level.

You can catch STI's from owo but the risk of doing so is (significantly) less than from unprotected sex. Those that participate in BB sex are  exposed to more risk of getting a STI than those who have owo and protected sex who in turn are exposed to more risk than those who have protected oral and protected sex.

Its a personal choice thing - as it seems that most guys on here are in a relationship then most guys seem to go for protected sex and either ow or owo. But whatever , get tested regularly!!

Offline Mstar86

As others have mentioned it’s all about risk.

Covered BJ & Sex you know you should be fine.

OWO for me is a bigger risk than covered sex in this situation.

Only real way is to not see at all but if you have to see her I’d do covered BJ as the fact that you’re asking shows you’re not 100% sure or ok with the risk involved

Offline Glengreycock

Can I throw my two-penneth worth in here... I for one frown upon BB and would personally never consider it, no matter how much I've been tempted in the past I have never succumbed, but yes, I'm happy for OWO as for me it is one of the best feelings ever and in most parts better than actual sex. I'm nearly 70 and to be looking into a 20-something's eyes whilst balls deep in her mouth is a sight to behold and if she is happy with CIM even better.

So, what is my point you may ask?

How many of you want DFK and is one of your musts when looking for a sp?

Surely, if I have just filled the sp's mouth with my spunk do you want to follow and then have her tongue tickling your tonsils?

Seems strange to me how many punters on here are happy with and wanting DFK knowing how many cocks have been in the mouth you so want on yours?

I try to avoid DFK at all times and let them work their magical tongue where it counts and not depositing the last guy's fluid down my throat.

I recommend everyone gets tested regularly, I get full health check every six to eight weeks and the nurses at the hospital couldn't be more friendly and they never judge. We're on first name terms and it's certainly nothing to be embarrassed about, it's called being responsible to yourself and your family.

So, to conclude. Do what you will, stay safe, or take risks, but always get checked out, better to be safe than sorry later.

Here endeth my lesson.

Offline exitonly

Curious on people’s views here.
I know barebacking is generally frowned upon here, but mostly owo is considered fine

(Reason for asking is Ive seen a wg I quite like the look of, but noticed she is a barebacker.

Do exactly what you want to do, guided by your own levels of acceptability... You quite possibly have already seen other non  BB offering SPs that have OWO'd punters that BB regularly..

Which SP are you referring to...

Offline JontyR

I recommend everyone gets tested regularly, I get full health check every six to eight weeks and the nurses at the hospital couldn't be more friendly and they never judge. We're on first name terms and it's certainly nothing to be embarrassed about, it's called being responsible to yourself and your family.

So, to conclude. Do what you will, stay safe, or take risks, but always get checked out, better to be safe than sorry later.

Here endeth my lesson.

I never thought I'd be saying this on the forum, but just what are you getting up to, how often, and who with to justify a six weekly test?

Offline KatieEdinburgh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 140
  • Likes: 71
  •  

Surely, if I have just filled the sp's mouth with my spunk do you want to follow and then have her tongue tickling your tonsils?

Seems strange to me how many punters on here are happy with and wanting DFK knowing how many cocks have been in the mouth you so want on yours?

I try to avoid DFK at all times and let them work their magical tongue where it counts and not depositing the last guy's fluid down my throat.

Mouthwash exists. Most will use it, for one reason because if we don’t have fresh breath = bad review
If that helps with being less scared  :unknown:
« Last Edit: October 06, 2025, 03:00:39 pm by KatieEdinburgh »

Offline Glengreycock

I never thought I'd be saying this on the forum, but just what are you getting up to, how often, and who with to justify a six weekly test?
I've done it for years now and see nothing wrong with keeping up the good practice. I aim to get at least one or two punts in a month, therefore I feel being tested every 6 - 8 weeks is necessary, for both myself and the future sp's.
I used to regularly punt twice a week in my prime 10- years ago, but now travel, lack of decent parlours, increased costs etc has slowed me down somewhat, but I still get while I can and I have no plans to stop.
I'm just hoping I don't kick the bucket under a sp, they'd have a hard time explaining to my wife why I was there and not at my car club meetings I regularly attend...

Offline The man

As others have said it's about how much risk you're comfortable with / willing to take.

There's a sp that I'd really love to see, she has absolutely HUGE tits which are literally a dream come true size for me (External Link/Members Only), however previous posts on here state that she's an UTC barebacker and as I'm very risk averse when punting it's an automatic no go for me. I briefly thought about just going for an hour to play with her tits, have ow and then cum on her tits but I know I'd be disappointed that I couldn't fuck her so what's the point? Better to book someone else and have the session that I really want to.

Offline recycler

How do you know SPs who don't show BB on their profile don't do BB?
Either with selected clients, civvies, partners etc.
Do SPs showing BB necessarily have BB with every client?
Can you rely on the accuracy of AW entries?

I guess it might give you more cause to worry, but don't the same rules and choices apply?

1. Use a condom to reduce the risk, and get tested regularly.
2. Don't use a condom to increase the risk, and get tested regularly.
3. Get tested regularly.
4. Get tested regularly.

Do you need to have specific blood tests to detect STI's or do general health blood tests detect these?

Offline RandomGuy99

Do you need to have specific blood tests to detect STI's or do general health blood tests detect these?
You need specific blood, swab and urine tests

Might be worth your while to read External Link/Members Only

Offline DastardlyDick

I think you have to assume that SPs are doing BB with their partner, so you're taking a bit of a gamble on his fidelity or lack thereof.

Offline big-al93

I think you have to assume that SPs are doing BB with their partner, so you're taking a bit of a gamble on his fidelity or lack thereof.

Remember that goes both ways though, SP's have to assume that we may be having unprotected sex in our non punting sex lives, and they are gambling on our partners fidelity too.

Offline Glengreycock

Do you need to have specific blood tests to detect STI's or do general health blood tests detect these?
You can get home testing kits available online, or easier to just attend your local sexual health centre. All confidential and they will only use whatever contact details you give them.
You have blood and urine samples taken, a quick mouth swab and that's it, you're out.
They test for all STI's and Aids, with varying tests if you have any male partners as well.
Then 5-7 days later you get the results and you can get certificates if you need them to show you are tested and clean (hopefully)...
No embarrassment, no judgement, no problems.

Offline JontyR

You can get home testing kits available online, or easier to just attend your local sexual health centre. All confidential and they will only use whatever contact details you give them.
You have blood and urine samples taken, a quick mouth swab and that's it, you're out.
They test for all STI's and Aids, with varying tests if you have any male partners as well.
Then 5-7 days later you get the results and you can get certificates if you need them to show you are tested and clean (hopefully)...
No embarrassment, no judgement, no problems.

Just a couple of provisos, reports on here suggest that in person clinic visits are no longer geogrphically universal. You may need to check, you may need to make an appointment, you may need to be triaged first.

A first visit will often involve a farily lengthy list of yes or no questions before there is a decision as to what tests you will get.

There may also be an offer of various treatments or vaccinations dependent on the activities which you get up to.

One thing that is certain, there is no judgement, and there isn't they haven't seen or heard before - including all the cover stories that you will detail to save your embarrassment.

You may also wish to ask, just how often they feel you should be checked based on your activities and background. 

Also don't panic, on one occasion I received a text (my preferred method of comms for this) saying that there was an issue with processing one of my tests and could I make an appointment, I shit myself, thinking it was a cover story to get me to go back in at which point they'd tell me what I had copped a dose of. And in reality? There was an issue with the processing of one of my tests. Phew.

Offline Lou2019

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 646
  • Likes: 76
  •  
I’m getting the feeling of déjà vu? I’m sure this has been discussed multiple times before  :wacko:
Banned reason: Can’t stop having a pop at punters, on a punting forum, warned to many times now, no more!!
Banned by: Iloveoral