Bullshit PG scamming profiles in the SW

[Jameson20]

Having come across a number of these stupid fucking profiles on AW, I thought it would be helpful to compile a list to save fellow punters some time. They are fake profiles designed to sell PG and videos under the guise of meets being possible (they're not.)

You'll notice common threads with these fake profiles, namely:

- They all have auto replies and never actually respond.
- The profiles all have similar setups (blurred pictures on the main AW profile page with unblurred videos.
- The profiles are written using similar patterns of speech and phrases "hobby hooker" being one.
They all lurk around the South West region, changing location every so often to attract more attention and convince punters to pay for PG and videos (although I've noticed a couple have now "branched out" to other areas.)
- The AW feedback is fake and there is a lot of crossover from (most likely) other fake profiles.

Please feel free to add more as and when you come across them.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[PuntyMcPunter]

You could well be right, but worth pointing out that a lot of legit girls have also started putting poured photos in the free gallery since the new rules came in

[pythondan]

Good idea for a thread.

This is another one that succeeded in duping me into paying for her private gallery.

External Link/Members Only

My own fault as there were warnings posted on here.

[Mr Garmin]

Not just the West Country, this one in MK has feedback from the same handful of touts
External Link/Members Only

[scutty brown]

there's something you've missed about these.......

under the name they nearly all state "of xxxxxxxx"...........
It's simple to filter them out - nearly all of those groups are set up for PG/video sales, or else for chatlines. Just disregard any group listings

[pythondan]

Another PG seller

External Link/Members Only

[JimmySW]

Another PG seller

External Link/Members Only

She has 2 negative reviews so she does meet although you wouldn't want to!

[FourSixEight]

Thankyou, J20, for an enlightening thread! Some of the profiles that you listed have now switched to "Distribute content only". However, of the remainder, three were in my hotlists. Thanks to yourself, I have moved them all to my "dodgy" list.

One common feature is that all of the profiles are of white British SWs. Another is that none of them gives a phone number. The latter alone is no proof of a scam - some very good SWs do not give out their phone number. But it is part of a pattern with the set of profiles that you have listed. And finally, several of them - though not all - express an aversion to French kissing.

If it is a single scammer, or ring of scammers, he/she/they take care to try to create variety to try to disguise the suspected fake feedback. ColHardon has given feedback on five of the profiles; BluesKing, Mo.King, and SandMan_69 on three each; DVLC, Maximus00XXII, Segmenta, and Showman7 on only two; and another 15 accounts give feedback on only one each. If these profiles are scam, you have been very vigilant to have noticed it at all!

[Jameson20]

Thankyou, J20, for an enlightening thread! Some of the profiles that you listed have now switched to "Distribute content only". However, of the remainder, three were in my hotlists. Thanks to yourself, I have moved them all to my "dodgy" list.

One common feature is that all of the profiles are of white British SWs. Another is that none of them gives a phone number. The latter alone is no proof of a scam - some very good SWs do not give out their phone number. But it is part of a pattern with the set of profiles that you have listed. And finally, several of them - though not all - express an aversion to French kissing.

If it is a single scammer, or ring of scammers, he/she/they take care to try to create variety to try to disguise the suspected fake feedback. ColHardon has given feedback on five of the profiles; BluesKing, Mo.King, and SandMan_69 on three each; DVLC, Maximus00XXII, Segmenta, and Showman7 on only two; and another 15 accounts give feedback on only one each. If these profiles are scam, you have been very vigilant to have noticed it at all!

Some very good points raised and I'm glad this thread has been of some help. It took me a while to connect the dots but once you do, it's actually fairly obvious that the profiles are fake and of the same ilk. My suspicion (as you have alluded to) is that these profiles are run by a network of wankers seeking to make money selling PGs and videos to punters seeking in-person meets (whether they are people working collaboratively with the girls featured in the content, or whether the profiles are run by the girls themselves remains to be seen.) I suppose the best we can do is to continue to report profiles on UKP as and when we find them. There's certainly no shortage of them on AW.

[Jameson20]

External Link/Members Only

Another one. Based in Salisbury,.familiar profile structure, stupidly edited pictures and fake feedback. Sent it a message and got the usual auto reply.

[Crackpot11]

The usual rule is if it looks too good to be true, it probably is!

[FourSixEight]

External Link/Members Only

Another one. Based in Salisbury,.familiar profile structure, stupidly edited pictures and fake feedback. Sent it a message and got the usual auto reply.

Thankyou, J20! I recognise none of the accounts leaving feedback for Laura classy x. So if this account is part of the scam, the ring's network of fake client accounts is even bigger! However, her profile has features in common with other accounts in the ring: no phone number; no face photos; and FK is "discretionary". So you'r probably right about this one.

[FourSixEight]

Blonde_V looks like another AW profile in the content-selling scam. The profile has no 'phone number; her face is blurred in all photos; FK is "discretionary"; and the profile sells explicit videos. Her feedback includes one from Mo.King, who has given feedback to three of the other scam accounts.

There are also "feedback only" reports from two prospective clients complaining of getting no reply to emails. Both clients have zero feedback, but that may mean they are sockpuppets for clients who dare not risk getting negative feedback on their main account.

It may be time to start a list of AW client accounts who contribute feedback to suspected scam SW accounts. But that would be a large and growing task!

I took up punting to have more and better sex. Instead, I seem to have ended up as a full-time records clerk and part-time amateur detective, who only occasionally actually manages to meet an SW!
External Link/Members Only

[Mr Garmin]

Blonde_V looks like another AW profile in the content-selling scam. The profile has no 'phone number; her face is blurred in all photos; FK is "discretionary"; and the profile sells explicit videos. Her feedback includes one from Mo.King, who has given feedback to three of the other scam accounts.

There are also "feedback only" reports from two prospective clients complaining of getting no reply to emails. Both clients have zero feedback, but that may mean they are sockpuppets for clients who dare not risk getting negative feedback on their main account.

It may be time to start a list of AW client accounts who contribute feedback to suspected scam SW accounts. But that would be a large and growing task!

I took up punting to have more and better sex. Instead, I seem to have ended up as a full-time records clerk and part-time amateur detective, who only occasionally actually manages to meet an SW!
External Link/Members Only

I mentioned this one a while back when she was in Cambridge.  She was paying for 'Available Today' everyday, never advertises a phone number & if you send her a message you get an auto response saying 'everything you need to know is on my profile' 

[scutty brown]

I mentioned this one a while back when she was in Cambridge.  She was paying for 'Available Today' everyday, never advertises a phone number & if you send her a message you get an auto response saying 'everything you need to know is on my profile' 

but were any of the messages you sent actually asking her for a firm booking?

[Mr Garmin]

but were any of the messages you sent actually asking her for a firm booking?

I didn't put in a booking request if that's what you mean?

I always ask about availability first which is, I feel, the most polite way to enquire rather than them receiving some random booking.

In any event she's definitely a PG scammer.

[JohnsonSchlong]

How is it even worth doing? I have never - and will never - pay for private gallery access. Are there a lot of people that do? Setting up and maintaining an AW page must be time consuming - is there really enough money to be made through PG's to make it worthwhile?

[Mr Garmin]

How is it even worth doing? I have never - and will never - pay for private gallery access. Are there a lot of people that do? Setting up and maintaining an AW page must be time consuming - is there really enough money to be made through PG's to make it worthwhile?

My bet is that there's more money in it than you think otherwise they wouldn't do it.

I have paid for a PG when it's someone that I'd really like to meet and the cost is reasonable (a couple of pounds).  On more than one occasion it's decided me to both go ahead and not go ahead with a meet.

However I really can't believe that someone would pay £5+ for a 5 second video.  I have only once purchased a video on AW, it was about 20 minutes long and I used a freeview to save the £6 (it was good BTW and it's convinced me to try to meet the girl sometime)

[Cheltclient]

My bet is that there's more money in it than you think otherwise they wouldn't do it.

I have paid for a PG when it's someone that I'd really like to meet and the cost is reasonable (a couple of pounds).  On more than one occasion it's decided me to both go ahead and not go ahead with a meet.

However I really can't believe that someone would pay £5+ for a 5 second video.  I have only once purchased a video on AW, it was about 20 minutes long and I used a freeview to save the £6 (it was good BTW and it's convinced me to try to meet the girl sometime)

Agree with this. I’ve bought private galleries many times. They’ve often convinced me to go ahead with a booking and more importantly, have stopped me going ahead with a booking many times. I also will only purchase the reasonably priced ones. I recall seeing a profile once and the PG cost was like £72!!! Not a bloody chance.

But the key benefit for me has been not going ahead. Where there’s 4 or 5 publicly available images that are tempting. And you purchase the PG gallery for less than £3 and you see she’s really not someone you want to see, for whatever reason. That £3 can save you £200. Always see it as worth it.

[FourSixEight]

Agree with this. I’ve bought private galleries many times. They’ve often convinced me to go ahead with a booking and more importantly, have stopped me going ahead with a booking many times. I also will only purchase the reasonably priced ones. I recall seeing a profile once and the PG cost was like £72!!! Not a bloody chance.

But the key benefit for me has been not going ahead. Where there’s 4 or 5 publicly available images that are tempting. And you purchase the PG gallery for less than £3 and you see she’s really not someone you want to see, for whatever reason. That £3 can save you £200. Always see it as worth it.

The record I have seen so far for a PG on AW is £90! I regret that I forget whose it is. I agree with your rationale to pay a small amount to help me to either confirm whether I want to try to meet an SW, or give her a miss. Each of us will have a different maximum that we are willing to pay. I am happy with 60p or £1.20, but am now getting fed up with anything much more than that, unless I'm really keen. It all adds up!

[Cheltclient]

The record I have seen so far for a PG on AW is £90! I regret that I forget whose it is. I agree with your rationale to pay a small amount to help me to either confirm whether I want to try to meet an SW, or give her a miss. Each of us will have a different maximum that we are willing to pay. I am happy with 60p or £1.20, but am now getting fed up with anything much more than that, unless I'm really keen. It all adds up!

I paid £2.60 this week for a PG and a girl I was tempted to see, having not had a booking for a fair old while. And it proved my point, in that her private images showed me she very much wasn’t my type. With very few options this week, has prob saved me a couple hundred (for now).

[JohnsonSchlong]

I dunno I think any escort worth seeing should have enough info on their page so that potential clients shouldn't have to pay money upfront just to get a half decent idea of what they look like. It's a red flag as far as I'm concerned - a small one but a red flag all the same.

[Cheltclient]

I dunno I think any escort worth seeing should have enough info on their page so that potential clients shouldn't have to pay money upfront just to get a half decent idea of what they look like. It's a red flag as far as I'm concerned - a small one but a red flag all the same.

I think that’s a fair take as well. But I guess it’s also their business and we don’t have to pay for the PG’s. Personally I don’t see it as a reg flag, as we can book on the basis of what we do see and pay a little extra for some sexy pics if we fancy it. In reality, if a girl had one discreet picture and 60 in the PG at £10, I wouldn’t linger on that profile anyway.

[Julius1966]

External Link/Members Only

Another one for the list

[Mr Garmin]

External Link/Members Only

Another one for the list

I'm not saying that you're wrong, but what points you to that conclusion?

[Julius1966]

A week or so back, she listed dates for a London tour. I emailed here a few days before to see if she was available.
Email read but no reply.
On the actual dates of the 'London' tour, she'd changed her location to Bristol.
Maybe she's available in Bournemouth but her tour dates just seem to be a way of enticing people into her pg/vids.

[Mr Garmin]

Disorganised doesn't necessarily equal scam.

Her profile looks likely genuine to me especially as she is showing her number and is on WhatsApp with a picture that matches.  Have you tried messaging her on there?

What is it about the barebacker that interests you?

[swlondonguy]

Her profile looks likely genuine to me especially as she is showing her number and is on WhatsApp with a picture that matches.  Have you tried messaging her on there?

She used to be Funtimeblonde
Reviewed as cancelling;
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=241288.0

I did contact her on WhatsApp a few years ago. I had also sent a few emails. I was enquiring about a 3 hour outcall to give time for photos. Back then her AW page had lots of freeview photos being uploaded regularly, supposedly taken by punters. I am a "serious amatuer photographer" and explained my ideas for a photoshoot in my home. She replied on WhatsApp to suggest we meet for a coffee to discuss. I agreed but that was never arranged or happened.
I decided to leave potential photoshoot for another time and try to meet her via a one hour incall while she was visiting London. I had a one hour booking confirmed and got to the Kensington apartments building a bit before my booked time. I got no reply to my WhatsApp requests for exact building / room number. I kept trying but gave up and went home. No further contact from her.

She does have some AW feedback, but so far nobody on here seems to have managed to meet her.
9 pictures in her PG does seem a low count to me if this is a PG scam. Her Funtimeblonde page had loads of photos.

[FourSixEight]

Is mystic_chloe another scam profile on AW, selling content but never meeting clients?

External Link/Members Only

Her private gallery is £9.60 for 24 hours. She offers 20 short videos, for prices ranging from £2.40 to £9.60. She has eight positive AW ratings, but all from punters whose pseudonyms I don't recognise, and who themselves have feedback only in single figures. And she has a "feedback only" dated 30 Oct 2025, accusing her of only selling photos and videos, and of not meeting clients.

Her account as created on 11 September 2025. Since then, she has supposedly toured locations including Northampton, Glasgow, Bootle, and now Leeds. However, unlike some of the suspect profiles listed in the thread above, Chloe's actually gives a phone number. If anyone on UKP establishes that she really does meet clients, and is not a content scammer, that would be helpful both to us, and to her.

[JohnsonSchlong]

Is mystic_chloe another scam profile on AW, selling content but never meeting clients?

External Link/Members Only

Her private gallery is £9.60 for 24 hours. She offers 20 short videos, for prices ranging from £2.40 to £9.60. She has eight positive AW ratings, but all from punters whose pseudonyms I don't recognise, and who themselves have feedback only in single figures. And she has a "feedback only" dated 30 Oct 2025, accusing her of only selling photos and videos, and of not meeting clients.

Her account as created on 11 September 2025. Since then, she has supposedly toured locations including Northampton, Glasgow, Bootle, and now Leeds. However, unlike some of the suspect profiles listed in the thread above, Chloe's actually gives a phone number. If anyone on UKP establishes that she really does meet clients, and is not a content scammer, that would be helpful both to us, and to her.

Shoot her a message - if she gives you her precise location/postcode she's less likely to be a scammer. You may even recognise the location as somewhere you've previously punted.

[Jameson20]

Is mystic_chloe another scam profile on AW, selling content but never meeting clients?

External Link/Members Only

Her private gallery is £9.60 for 24 hours. She offers 20 short videos, for prices ranging from £2.40 to £9.60. She has eight positive AW ratings, but all from punters whose pseudonyms I don't recognise, and who themselves have feedback only in single figures. And she has a "feedback only" dated 30 Oct 2025, accusing her of only selling photos and videos, and of not meeting clients.

Her account as created on 11 September 2025. Since then, she has supposedly toured locations including Northampton, Glasgow, Bootle, and now Leeds. However, unlike some of the suspect profiles listed in the thread above, Chloe's actually gives a phone number. If anyone on UKP establishes that she really does meet clients, and is not a content scammer, that would be helpful both to us, and to her.

I messaged her on AW and on her number - no reply to either. Most likely another BS profile with fake AW feedback.

[Jameson20]

Another one for the pile - External Link/Members Only

Alongside bearing all the usual hallmarks, the retard who is running the profile notes "I do dinner date...nice restaurant only, or great country pub, no fish chip or pizza hut for £400" (whatever that means) but has then included a picture of the subject woman having a Spoons breakfast. Who ARE these people?

[JimmySW]

Another one for the pile - External Link/Members Only

Alongside bearing all the usual hallmarks, the retard who is running the profile notes "I do dinner date...nice restaurant only, or great country pub, no fish chip or pizza hut for £400" (whatever that means) but has then included a picture of the subject woman having a Spoons breakfast. Who ARE these people?

Not forgetting the creampie videos!

[simping]

External Link/Members Only

Enquired and recieve this, "Hiya due to time wasters and no shows, i’m only booking clients in that show interest by buying my content first hun 🫶🏻x"

[Jameson20]

External Link/Members Only

Enquired and recieve this, "Hiya due to time wasters and no shows, i’m only booking clients in that show interest by buying my content first hun 🫶🏻x"

Ahhhh the cornerstone of all fantastic punts! Cheers for the intel.

[Jameson20]

Is mystic_chloe another scam profile on AW, selling content but never meeting clients?

External Link/Members Only

Her private gallery is £9.60 for 24 hours. She offers 20 short videos, for prices ranging from £2.40 to £9.60. She has eight positive AW ratings, but all from punters whose pseudonyms I don't recognise, and who themselves have feedback only in single figures. And she has a "feedback only" dated 30 Oct 2025, accusing her of only selling photos and videos, and of not meeting clients.

Her account as created on 11 September 2025. Since then, she has supposedly toured locations including Northampton, Glasgow, Bootle, and now Leeds. However, unlike some of the suspect profiles listed in the thread above, Chloe's actually gives a phone number. If anyone on UKP establishes that she really does meet clients, and is not a content scammer, that would be helpful both to us, and to her.

Update on this one, definitely a scam. The profile has been showing a green light all week and after texting the number, the stupid reply was along the lines of "not meeting until the new year but would you like to buy some of my content?" Also the AW feedback is fake (same names reviewing the same kinds of profiles.)

[Jameson20]

External Link/Members Only

Latest one. Similar setup to the others. I had a hunch and sent a message on AW and hey presto, got a stupid auto reply saying to "call the number on my profile" (there isn't one displayed.)

[tigerbiker]

And another External Link/Members Only

I think Shelley either has a PG side hustle or is a male fantasist quietly wanking over the emails and requests "she" gets.

[Coriniumstud]

And another External Link/Members Only

I think Shelley either has a PG side hustle or is a male fantasist quietly wanking over the emails and requests "she" gets.

Also has no feedback, which if she did you can’t read it

[ian cognito]

Shelley crrtainly used to be an active SP. She worked from a place in Clifton. I saw her a few times before I joined UKP. The pictures on her current AW profile are the same as she used then - so way out of date. Her AW age of 56 is plausible.

[tigerbiker]

Well, she won't take a booking from me even though I have tried several times. It is not that she does not like me or has reason to never see me - her response is that she is unable to see me at any of the times I suggest and that she will contact me when she is ready to "do business". However, she never comes back with any follow-up even when politely reminded that she was going to suggest times and dates.

Maybe she just does not want to see me in particular - how about others on here doing a TOFT booking? That pic of her hairy pussy looks inviting. Has anyone ever seen her in BoS? Will she accept any sort of booking?

[ian cognito]

She only used to do evening meetings as she had a day-time job.

[FourSixEight]

External Link/Members Only

Latest one. Similar setup to the others. I had a hunch and sent a message on AW and hey presto, got a stupid auto reply saying to "call the number on my profile" (there isn't one displayed.)

The "Blonde_TnA" profile has now vanished from AW.

[FourSixEight]

"ENGLISHFELICITYBELLE"
Does this recent profile look genuine, or could it be another content-selling scam? No phone number; only one profile photo (dark and blurred); private gallery £4.80 for a week. Account opened 6 August, only three AW ratings, only one of those is from a highly-rated client, and no ratings since 10 October.

I don't assume that a profile could be a scam, just because it has no phone number. Some very reputable SW's do not publish their phone number on their AW profiles. But with a relatively "unknown" account, and asking the price of a pint for PG access, I'm apprehensive!
External Link/Members Only

[FourSixEight]

PRINCESS CHARLOTTE
"Charlotte" used to be "Hot Roxanne". She claims to be in Winchester. Her AW profile gives no 'phone number, and has no public gallery. Her private gallery costs £12, and she offers 13 explicit videos, with prices ranging from £2.40 to £14.40.

Her AW feedback includes seven positive ratings; three accusations of ghosting; and two of no reply to booking enquiries. Five of her seven positive ratings are from clients with relatively little feedback.

"Charlotte" is welcome to put me right, but she seems to have all the hallmarks of a content scam.
External Link/Members Only

[FourSixEight]

"DAYDREAM-X"
A new profile, created this May, with no AW ratings yet, and located in or near Abingdon. It could be genuine, but the profile has no phone number, no public gallery, only one profile photo, charges £8.40 for the private gallery, and offers six explicit videos from £2.40 to £9.60. By themselves, each of those features is innocent, but all combined, they fit the pattern of a content scam. I hope I am mistaken, and I apologise if I am, but it's up to her to consider making her profile look less like the pattern that we have identified in this thread.
External Link/Members Only

[scutty brown]

"DAYDREAM-X"
A new profile, created this May, with no AW ratings yet, and located in or near Abingdon. It could be genuine, but the profile has no phone number, no public gallery, only one profile photo, charges £8.40 for the private gallery, and offers six explicit videos from £2.40 to £9.60. By themselves, each of those features is innocent, but all combined, they fit the pattern of a content scam. I hope I am mistaken, and I apologise if I am, but it's up to her to consider making her profile look less like the pattern that we have identified in this thread.
External Link/Members Only

looks like a content scam to me

[pythago]

Now "Perfectpatience_x"