HOW TO - BAREBACK

[melter]

Hi all,

I see a lot of idiots complaining about bareback. I also see a lot of idiots doing bareback without preparation.

I've been doing this for over 10 years, all around the world. Escorts, tinder sluts, virgins, you name it. Doesn't matter.

The only time I use a condom is when an escort insists. I do not want anyone to go outside of their comfort zone. That being said, you'd be surprised how many escorts who state "no bareback" actually do it 

Anyway, I'd like to keep you all guys as safe as I am. I'm surprised there isn't any more info about this online. A lot of the stuff I discovered was simply because I have a ton of gay friends and apparently if you're gay it's less okay for you to get an std.

So here is the quick and easy recipe to do it safe:
1. PrEP - keeps you safe from HIV. You can get it for free from sh.uk if you are as much of a bb monster as I am
2. PEP (Doxycycline) - lower your chances of catching a bacterial infection by roughly 2/3rds - that one is on you, but I can tell you they do prescribe it for really long trips to countries with risk of Malaria 
3. Vaccines - Get all the vaccines you can:
- HPV - Gardasil 9 - cost me around 500 but worth the absolute fkin journey I had
- Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B - idk, I think I got it for free from NHS?

And... that's it! From now on, you might occasionally get some bacterial infections, but these are treated easily - you get a shot and move on with your life. The only ones to really worry about would be syphilis (that will be treated fairly easily but might continue testing positive after treatement) and trich (cause it's neither bacteria or a virus - might just need a separate treatment).

Enjoy! 


I fucked about 50 girls raw in Pattaya Thailand this year over a course of 2 weeks, got nothing. Take it as you will.

[fairyguy]

Fair play for the honesty. Once you fuck raw it’s nearly impossible to have sex with condoms anymore.

SPs that advertise BB get a lot of unfair stick on this forum. Some of the most popular WGs and well-reviewed who advertise “no BB” most certainly provide BB (my experience in Birmingham)

[WelshClipper]

Thanks for blowing just about every piece of useful guidance on this subject that is found on UKP.

To each his own of course but I think I’d prefer to be guided by the many rather than the “one”

Can’t blame you trying but neah, no thanks.

 

[IBIZA]

You can’t beat BB sex that’s for sure. The only difference is that the girls in Pattaya don’t ask extra for BB(most of them), I’ve been to Pattaya myself.

Whereas the slappers in here charge an arm and a leg. Big difference there matey.

Also you can easily drill 18/19 year olds in Soi 6/7 it’s a totally different environment. You simply can’t compare the two.

[melter]

You can’t beat BB sex that’s for sure. The only difference is that the girls in Pattaya don’t ask extra for BB(most of them), I’ve been to Pattaya myself.

Whereas the slappers in here charge an arm and a leg. Big difference there matey.

Also you can easily drill 18/19 year olds in Soi 6/7 it’s a totally different environment. You simply can’t compare the two.

you make me miss the fkin place. 100 quid for a threesome with two teenage absolute hottest sisters on earth, all bb 

15 quid for the same but with just one girl, she was begging to fuck me

i am just discovering the bb scene here in the uk actually, the prices have restrained me quite a bit

anyway i did forget to mention, you might be unlucky enough to catch some bacterial disease that is resistant to antibiotics (doxycycline) and then you're pretty much fucked AND on top of that you probably end up with your name in some medical paper  but that's the gamble, still worth it for me. have fun guys

[daviemac]

i am just discovering the bb scene here in the uk actually, the prices have restrained me quite a bit

There's a forum dedicated to BB mate.

[melter]

oh sorry, what's that? you're speaking to a guy who had been lurking on this forum for 5 years and hasn't posted a review so excuse my ignorance, i really have no idea

[fairyguy]

you make me miss the fkin place. 100 quid for a threesome with two teenage absolute hottest sisters on earth, all bb 

15 quid for the same but with just one girl, she was begging to fuck me

i am just discovering the bb scene here in the uk actually, the prices have restrained me quite a bit

anyway i did forget to mention, you might be unlucky enough to catch some bacterial disease that is resistant to antibiotics (doxycycline) and then you're pretty much fucked AND on top of that you probably end up with your name in some medical paper  but that's the gamble, still worth it for me. have fun guys

[SonofAJohn]

Yes, I wish bareback sex wasn't looked at so negatively on here.
Especially if you test often, have vaccines and take care of your health.
Sex workers who don't provide bareback lose out on a lot of money.

[IBIZA]

oh sorry, what's that? you're speaking to a guy who had been lurking on this forum for 5 years and hasn't posted a review so excuse my ignorance, i really have no idea

Google it and make sure your safe search is off. Unfortunately they don’t accept new members at this time as the registration is closed for the time being.

However, like I said the BB scene here in the UK is shite. Not worth the money to fuck some fat mingers.

[scouting]

Hi all,

I see a lot of idiots complaining about bareback. I also see a lot of idiots doing bareback without preparation.

The majority of us on here would disagree with your approach but may appreciate your honesty. We might be prepared to accept you have a different point of view, or not, but it is unreasonable to call us idiots.

You think we are idiots, we think you are. I sense we will not reach agreement.

I would be interested to hear what some of the SP's on here feel about your opinions.

[daviemac]

Google it and make sure your safe search is off. Unfortunately they don’t accept new members at this time as the registration is closed for the time being.

However, like I said the BB scene here in the UK is shite. Not worth the money to fuck some fat mingers.

You really mustn't like it here, I would strongly recommend you read the rules again and make sure you understand them.

 11 Other punting forums
Discussing other punting forums is not prohibited, but many are often very hostile. Other forums are also anti-punters; therefore, it is not in punters' interests to give them publicity. Posting links to other sites is prohibited, as is slagging off. Use your noodle. We are allowing links in the Punting Abroad section.

Why do you think that site is auto censored.

[melter]

The majority of us on here would disagree with your approach but may appreciate your honesty. We might be prepared to accept you have a different point of view, or not, but it is unreasonable to call us idiots.

You think we are idiots, we think you are. I sense we will not reach agreement.

I would be interested to hear what some of the SP's on here feel about your opinions.

thanks, point taken. the thing is, i am not saying everyone who is afraid of bareback is an idiot. i completely understand your point of view. i also am not saying everyone who is doing bareback is an idiot. same thing. they're just subsets of people. if you say i do bareback and i am reckless - i would counter that and say i might be actually safer than most people here going for owo as a first choice. you can get a lot of crap from receiving oral if you're not adequately protected.

i think you can have either point of view and i fully respect that and have nothing against it. people have girlfriends, families, cannot take risks, etc. i do not want to get into this discussion. i made a mistake using those words because it will only spark arguments, my only purpose here is to educate people who are already doing bareback to do it in a safer manner. i do not want to get into the discussion of anything else - that is pointless.

let's go with science guys. i am just listing the things to do if you're set on going bare.

[IBIZA]

You really mustn't like it here, I would strongly recommend you read the rules again and make sure you understand them.

 11 Other punting forums
Discussing other punting forums is not prohibited, but many are often very hostile. Other forums are also anti-punters; therefore, it is not in punters' interests to give them publicity. Posting links to other sites is prohibited, as is slagging off. Use your noodle. We are allowing links in the Punting Abroad section.

Why do you think that site is auto censored.

My mistake. Apologies

[melter]

You really mustn't like it here, I would strongly recommend you read the rules again and make sure you understand them.

 11 Other punting forums
Discussing other punting forums is not prohibited, but many are often very hostile. Other forums are also anti-punters; therefore, it is not in punters' interests to give them publicity. Posting links to other sites is prohibited, as is slagging off. Use your noodle. We are allowing links in the Punting Abroad section.

Why do you think that site is auto censored.

jesus christ, 1 day posting reviews and already getting a ban scare. do what you like, ban me if you like and i will simply create a new account, use a vpn and never post a review here. this forum is already getting on my nerves. i am just trying to share useful information.

use your noodle boss

[daviemac]

oh sorry, what's that? you're speaking to a guy who had been lurking on this forum for 5 years and hasn't posted a review so excuse my ignorance, i really have no idea

I know exactly how long you've been lurking, I can see how often you have logged in and to be honest with you using the site so often you must have seen what reception barebackers get it does make me wonder if you are just posting all this BB crap to get a reaction.

[daviemac]

jesus christ, 1 day posting reviews and already getting a ban scare. do what you like, ban me if you like and i will simply create a new account, use a vpn and never post a review here. this forum is already getting on my nerves. i am just trying to share useful information.

use your noodle boss

Are you really that stupid to think when I quoted and replied to IBIZA,  the one who tried to post a link to that site and who's post was caught in the auto censor that I was somehow threatening to ban you.

Try reading what's written mate.

[melter]

Are you really that stupid to think when I quoted and replied to IBIZA,  the one who tried to post a link to that site and who's post was caught in the auto censor that I was somehow threatening to ban you.

Try reading what's written mate.

alright i did not get to see the link, and i am clearly not luring enough to even figure out you've replied to him instead of me  anyway its all good from my side but the rules do seem a bit too strict for my taste, i do not like censorship in general. like, what's the harm? but yeah you guys go on with whatever, i will post whatever i feel like posting and we will see how long my account lasts i guess. till then, we're all good 

[SonofAJohn]

More escorts should take the approach that if you have a client who you have good working relationship with. If the client has clean recent tests, is hygienic and showers before/after then bareback sex can be negotiated. If a escort has a hour rate of £150 then a regular booking for bareback sex at £300 should be part of the business for example. That way an escort can see less clients for more money and guaranteed income as they are with regulars.
Obsessing over condoms can become off-putting plus can make clients not want extras because it comes across as the escort has STDs. I'm sure most clients will even punt less WGs if they knew they were getting bareback sex from trusted regulars. This business is like no other so things like this have to be taken into consideration.

For example, an escort can earn guaranteed £1500 from 5 regulars in one day versus waiting for new guys to come for half an hour to test the waters. The business has changed since the online safety act as evidenced on SAAFE. Escorts should be trying to develop a group of clients they can trust to provide bareback services so their income is even more guaranteed now in these uncertain times. Some escorts already operate like this and it is better financially for them.

[IBIZA]

alright i did not get to see the link, and i am clearly not luring enough to even figure out you've replied to him instead of me  anyway its all good from my side but the rules do seem a bit too strict for my taste, i do not like censorship in general. like, what's the harm? but yeah you guys go on with whatever, i will post whatever i feel like posting and we will see how long my account lasts i guess. till then, we're all good 

I agree with you. Censorship is never ever a good thing. Also the site is not very tolerant when it comes to posting links, certain images, even some vulgar language is frown upon by some snowflakes here who immediately start spamming post reports. I would even go as far as to say this forum is definitely woke to say the least. But hey ho the owner sets the rules. Good luck and happy punting.

[daviemac]

alright i did not get to see the link, and i am clearly not luring enough to even figure out you've replied to him instead of me  anyway its all good from my side but the rules do seem a bit too strict for my taste, i do not like censorship in general. like, what's the harm? but yeah you guys go on with whatever, i will post whatever i feel like posting and we will see how long my account lasts i guess. till then, we're all good 

It has nothing to do with the link, I said to IBIZA that he might be banned so how do you translate that to me threatening to ban you. 

The rules are what they are, if you want to remain a member then all you have to do is what the vast majority of members do and abide by them, this isn't your personal playground.

As far as another account goes. -

27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..

Don't think we don't know, we do.

[alabama1]

Fair play for the honesty. Once you fuck raw it’s nearly impossible to have sex with condoms anymore.

SPs that advertise BB get a lot of unfair stick on this forum. Some of the most popular WGs and well-reviewed who advertise “no BB” most certainly provide BB (my experience in Birmingham)

For you to allegedly know this, you must have asked for this service. To keep the members safe, who are these 'most popular WGs and well reviewed'. I would like to know so as to avoid seeing them.

[melter]

It has nothing to do with the link, I said to IBIZA that he might be banned so how do you translate that to me threatening to ban you. 

The rules are what they are, if you want to remain a member then all you have to do is what the vast majority of members do and abide by them, this isn't your personal playground.

As far as another account goes. -

27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..

Don't think we don't know, we do.

i am glad you know, i don't. might have had some account years ago, definitely have not logged in in years. i thought today was the day to actually share some reviews and be a useful member of the society. little did i know, that is not a very warm welcome.

if i have a stale account and you want to use that to ban me, like i said - feel free. there's absolutely no freaking way you will find my new one, and i will make sure not to post a single thing on here after i get jacked out. don't know what you're trying to achieve here, but i don't like the sound of it. let's be nice to each other, please. i don't think i even broke any rules on here after all.

i am sure you can see my ip right now and i believe you can use that to make your own judgement as to whether i know what i am doing or not  please let's keep it nice and safe around here

[melter]

For you to allegedly know this, you must have asked for this service. To keep the members safe, who are these 'most popular WGs and well reviewed'. I would like to know so as to avoid seeing them.

if i was dating a girl who is a wg on here, would you also like to know? because i surely wouldn't like to provide you with that information 

as long as you use condoms you're safe, right? or?...

[alabama1]

if i was dating a girl who is a wg on here, would you also like to know? because i surely wouldn't like to provide you with that information 

as long as you use condoms you're safe, right? or?...

Doing BB whilst dating a WG is a whole lot different to a WG doing BB with punters.

[IBIZA]

For you to allegedly know this, you must have asked for this service. To keep the members safe, who are these 'most popular WGs and well reviewed'. I would like to know so as to avoid seeing them.

 

[daviemac]

i am glad you know, i don't. might have had some account years ago, definitely have not logged in in years. i thought today was the day to actually share some reviews and be a useful member of the society. little did i know, that is not a very warm welcome.

if i have a stale account and you want to use that to ban me, like i said - feel free. there's absolutely no freaking way you will find my new one, and i will make sure not to post a single thing on here after i get jacked out. don't know what you're trying to achieve here, but i don't like the sound of it. let's be nice to each other, please. i don't think i even broke any rules on here after all.

i am sure you can see my ip right now and i believe you can use that to make your own judgement as to whether i know what i am doing or not  please let's keep it nice and safe around here

I can see how often you have logged in over the last few years, if you are saying it isn't you then you must have taken over someone else's account.

I have no idea what you are doing but I do know you have logged onto the site often enough.

Edit

I've gone back as far as 2019 and the only name associated with the IP's is yours.

[melter]

see... i think if there was a tiny bit less of resistance from all the other members (and the moderators) we'd be more willing to share that kind of thing. but right now, i don't feel any incentive to share that valuable piece of information with you all. might just keep it to myself for now... i can just say its 50/50 and if you wanna avoid it, probably find a different hobby.

[scutty brown]

..................
So here is the quick and easy recipe to do it safe:
1. PrEP - keeps you safe from HIV. You can get it for free from sh.uk if you are as much of a bb monster as I am
2. PEP (Doxycycline) - lower your chances of catching a bacterial infection by roughly 2/3rds - that one is on you, but I can tell you they do prescribe it for really long trips to countries with risk of Malaria 
3. Vaccines - Get all the vaccines you can:
- HPV - Gardasil 9 - cost me around 500 but worth the absolute fkin journey I had
- Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B - idk, I think I got it for free from NHS?

...................

Just to clarify a fundamental error here:

PEP is a combination of antiviral anti-HIV drugs. Doxycycline, which is antibacterial is not involved.
According to External Link/Members Only:

The medication now used for PEP is a single tablet of tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (also known as Truvada) and two tablets of raltegravir.

Not doxycycline or any other antibacterial
Suggesting that doxycycline be used as an anti-HIV treatment is wrong, dangerous and potentially lethal

Doxycycline does have use in treating bacterial STDs, but that's a different problem. Nothing to do with HIV

[Kev40ish]

Just to clarify a fundamental error here:
PEP is a combination of antiviral anti-HIV drugs. Doxycycline, which is antibacterial is not involved.
According to External Link/Members Only:
Not doxycycline or any other antibacterial
Suggesting that doxycycline be used as an anti-HIV treatment is wrong, dangerous and potentially lethal

He wasn’t suggesting that it was that.. more this..
Doxy PEP (doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis) significantly reduces the risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea, by approximately two-thirds in high-risk individuals, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. It involves taking a single 200mg dose of doxycycline within 72 hours of unprotected sex. While effective, ongoing research is monitoring for potential impacts on antibiotic resistance, and long-term effects and use in other populations are still being studied

[CigarSmoke]

I've been thinking why loads and loads of AW profiles always say, "Do not ask for bareback or you'll be blocked." Is bareback is that really in demand? To a point nearly every girl is annoyed by it.

[JontyR]

More escorts should take the approach that if you have a client who you have good working relationship with. If the client has clean recent tests, is hygienic and showers before/after then bareback sex can be negotiated. If a escort has a hour rate of £150 then a regular booking for bareback sex at £300 should be part of the business for example. That way an escort can see less clients for more money and guaranteed income as they are with regulars.
Obsessing over condoms can become off-putting plus can make clients not want extras because it comes across as the escort has STDs. I'm sure most clients will even punt less WGs if they knew they were getting bareback sex from trusted regulars. This business is like no other so things like this have to be taken into consideration.

For example, an escort can earn guaranteed £1500 from 5 regulars in one day versus waiting for new guys to come for half an hour to test the waters. The business has changed since the online safety act as evidenced on SAAFE. Escorts should be trying to develop a group of clients they can trust to provide bareback services so their income is even more guaranteed now in these uncertain times. Some escorts already operate like this and it is better financially for them.

Is there a full moon or something? Who are you to suggest what SPs should do? You take no account of an individuals situation, their motivations, their own attitudes to risk - not only of STDs but pregnancy, their own attitudes towards intimacy. Not to mention the attitudes of the other significant personnel in that SPs life.

There is also serious conisderation of the increased risk if you are the "receptive" party in any intercourse.

As to the general attitude towards BB on this forum...again you need to consider the situations of the SS's on here. If there is an acknowledgement of the need to keep our activites separate from all aspects of our lives including separate phones and social media access - just how would you explain away an STD in a committed relationship?

As for once you go bare you can't go back...utter bollocks. I'd wager that most punters in relationships BB at home but johnny up away.

There are plenty of SPs who make a decent living providing the services they are happy to provide. To say that some providers provide services extra to those advertised...well durrrrrhhhh...but seeking or pushing for services not advertised is crass and shitty behaviour.

[Maak]

Personally, BB is for when Im dating civvies, civvy relationships & we both been tested.

With WGs im always covered & sometimes avoid OWO.

[KatieEdinburgh]

More escorts should take the approach that if you have a client who you have good working relationship with. If the client has clean recent tests, is hygienic and showers before/after then bareback sex can be negotiated. If a escort has a hour rate of £150 then a regular booking for bareback sex at £300 should be part of the business for example. That way an escort can see less clients for more money and guaranteed income as they are with regulars.
Obsessing over condoms can become off-putting plus can make clients not want extras because it comes across as the escort has STDs. I'm sure most clients will even punt less WGs if they knew they were getting bareback sex from trusted regulars. This business is like no other so things like this have to be taken into consideration.

For example, an escort can earn guaranteed £1500 from 5 regulars in one day versus waiting for new guys to come for half an hour to test the waters. The business has changed since the online safety act as evidenced on SAAFE. Escorts should be trying to develop a group of clients they can trust to provide bareback services so their income is even more guaranteed now in these uncertain times. Some escorts already operate like this and it is better financially for them.

Delusional.

Barebacking 5 guys in a day, yea a very sensible way to work

The factor whether should allow this is……drumroll……if the guy has a shower? Lol
You realise STDs don’t get scared off by having a bath right? Unable to detect by hygiene alone

And that we do require you to shower even if you use a condom   

Crazy stuff here

[Kev40ish]

Is there a full moon or something? Who are you to suggest what SPs should do? You take no account of an individuals situation, their motivations, their own attitudes to risk - not only of STDs but pregnancy, their own attitudes towards intimacy. Not to mention the attitudes of the other significant personnel in that SPs life.

There is also serious conisderation of the increased risk if you are the "receptive" party in any intercourse.

As to the general attitude towards BB on this forum...again you need to consider the situations of the SS's on here. If there is an acknowledgement of the need to keep our activites separate from all aspects of our lives including separate phones and social media access - just how would you explain away an STD in a committed relationship?

As for once you go bare you can't go back...utter bollocks. I'd wager that most punters in relationships BB at home but johnny up away.

There are plenty of SPs who make a decent living providing the services they are happy to provide. To say that some providers provide services extra to those advertised...well durrrrrhhhh...but seeking or pushing for services not advertised is crass and shitty behaviour.

Think everyone needs to way up the risks they are willing to take be it service providers or punters..
It’s up to them to decide and manage their risk accordingly.
Everyone will have an idea of what they are willing to do that is their choice.
You may not agree with their choice and can never assume that the person you meet will follow what you think they do..
Your pretty naive if you trust everyone you meet…

[Waterhouse]

More escorts should take the approach that if you have a client who you have good working relationship with. If the client has clean recent tests, is hygienic and showers before/after then bareback sex can be negotiated. If a escort has a hour rate of £150 then a regular booking for bareback sex at £300 should be part of the business for example. That way an escort can see less clients for more money and guaranteed income as they are with regulars.
Obsessing over condoms can become off-putting plus can make clients not want extras because it comes across as the escort has STDs. I'm sure most clients will even punt less WGs if they knew they were getting bareback sex from trusted regulars. This business is like no other so things like this have to be taken into consideration.

For example, an escort can earn guaranteed £1500 from 5 regulars in one day versus waiting for new guys to come for half an hour to test the waters. The business has changed since the online safety act as evidenced on SAAFE. Escorts should be trying to develop a group of clients they can trust to provide bareback services so their income is even more guaranteed now in these uncertain times. Some escorts already operate like this and it is better financially for them.

What utter bollox.

Who are you to say how an escort should work and what risks they or their clients should take?  Are you plain stupid, or as I strongly suspect, just plain stupid?

[DastardlyDick]

Leaving the subject of BB in the background for a moment.
If an SP has made a choice about the services she provides, has clearly listed  them on her profile, and is happy to provide them, why are you demanding extras?

[markballoon]

How about the most expensive fall out from bareback..... pregnancy?  Both from a moral and and monetary stance.  If you've the snip then fair enough.  But I wouldn't like anymore children.

[puntingking]

see... i think if there was a tiny bit less of resistance from all the other members (and the moderators) we'd be more willing to share that kind of thing. but right now, i don't feel any incentive to share that valuable piece of information with you all. might just keep it to myself for now... i can just say its 50/50 and if you wanna avoid it, probably find a different hobby.

This is a sharing community. 

I appreciate your recent reviews and insightful views. 

Keep sharing, even if some members don't agree with bb. This is a sharing platform and as someone who doesn't bb am really grateful there are people here who does.
More members with different views and punting interests means a better site all round. 


So keep posting and sharing your bb reviews. Just ignore the ones that want to always give you their views on bb.

 

[puntingking]

To Daviemac -

Hi Daviemac 

Is it worth changing this rule?

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members can express disapproval of such activities.

to this -

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, members can no longer express disapproval of such activities. This site is meant to encourage reviews and not put off punters from posting reviews even though you may not agree with what went on between two consenting adults.

 

[myothernameis]

Doing BB whilst dating a WG is a whole lot different to a WG doing BB with punters.

Currently on hols in New York, and when it comes to Asian Spa, seemingly bareback is commonly offered  $100

[Strawberry]

But it's not all about HIV, vaccines arent 100% and don't protect against everything.

If I test positive for an STI I would have to go back 3 months, find a way to contact as many as possible, they'd have to be tested before booking me again otherwise we'd be in a reinfection cycle. And who do I cut from my client base? 'Sorry long term regular I've decided to offer bareback interciurse, I am earning more so you are on the redundant list'.

[Doc Holliday]

To Daviemac -

Hi Daviemac 

Is it worth changing this rule?

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members can express disapproval of such activities.

to this -

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, members can no longer express disapproval of such activities. This site is meant to encourage reviews and not put off punters from posting reviews even though you may not agree with what went on between two consenting adults.

 

So you constantly advocate the freedom of individual speech yet you want to change the rules so people cannot express an opinion?

[Stevelondon]

I’m just your simple bloke who enjoys sex. In all its varied kinky forms.
I’ve certainly risked unprotected sex before, but not with a SP and yes I’ve been to all the places mentioned here. Oh those crazy younger days.

Do I want to wear a rubber. I don’t give it a moments thought. Maybe I’m sensitive enough so it doesn’t matter. Maybe I just don’t have a mental block about it whereas some blokes have a psychological hang up.
“Oh my cocks covered I can’t enjoy it”

Maybe some guys wear the BB badge like it’s a sign of honour.

Who knows. Who cares.

Personally it’s good to know who offers BB and the reviews will show that. Information from some bloke who BB’s on how I can protect myself (pun intended)…….. I don’t need.

Onwards and upwards as they say in the alps.

[Doc Holliday]

Melter, welcome to the forum. Firstly I have a neutral and pragmatic view on the subject of BB and everyone must make their own choices based on a full understanding of the risks.

I am more curious about this?

i thought today was the day to actually share some reviews and be a useful member of the society.

So what made yesterday evening so special after 5+ years?

[daviemac]

To Daviemac -

Hi Daviemac 

Is it worth changing this rule?

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members can express disapproval of such activities.

to this -

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, members can no longer express disapproval of such activities. This site is meant to encourage reviews and not put off punters from posting reviews even though you may not agree with what went on between two consenting adults.

 

No, there's other sites dedicated to that sort of thing. The vast majority of members on this site don't agree with bareback in the same way they don't agree with any form of boundary pushing so should be free to comment on it.

Ask yourself why the other site is closed, could it be because the whole concept of barebacking escorts is frowned upon and they want to keep it within a relatively small niche group?

Oh and I don't set the rules I just enforce them.

[SonofAJohn]

Delusional.

Barebacking 5 guys in a day, yea a very sensible way to work

The factor whether should allow this is……drumroll……if the guy has a shower? Lol
You realise STDs don’t get scared off by having a bath right? Unable to detect by hygiene alone

And that we do require you to shower even if you use a condom   

Crazy stuff here

You misinterpreted what I said.
Ain't you got clients to see? You're always on here emotionally responding to posts.

[SonofAJohn]

What utter bollox.

Who are you to say how an escort should work and what risks they or their clients should take?  Are you plain stupid, or as I strongly suspect, just plain stupid?

And who are you to talk to me like that?
Go cry elsewhere

[hamchang]

I tend to stick to massage and mutual oral these days not that I have had any action for a while. The very thought of a condom is enough to make my cock shrivel up and die the older I get. Always thought though that the churlish (and yes, UKP rule encouraged) response to BB reports which basically amounts to "me too ..... I want everyone to know loudly that I am anti BB" is self defeating. Anti' Bb'ers should encourage BB reports of every kind because they will see the girls who are BB'ing even when the box is not ticked. Biggest issue though is false or malicious accusations of BB against a girl to harm them and the ramification that might have for the forum perhaps? Dare say the mods are all over this anyway keeping things clean. Perhaps the rule 12 doesn't need to be changed, but members understand that just because the rule allows expressions of disapproval it does not mandate it so take a break lads.

As for the SPs - if they want to offer it, its up to them. Cut them some slack and leave them alone. Being forced to offer by a pimp is a different kettle of cum though.

[Doc Holliday]

He wasn’t suggesting that it was that.. more this..
Doxy PEP (doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis) significantly reduces the risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea, by approximately two-thirds in high-risk individuals, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. It involves taking a single 200mg dose of doxycycline within 72 hours of unprotected sex. While effective, ongoing research is monitoring for potential impacts on antibiotic resistance, and long-term effects and use in other populations are still being studied

Yes that is what he meant. It is 'technically' not currently available in the UK. Melter mentions getting it prescribed for Malaria in order to obtain it.

This is quite a good site with Q&As to read External Link/Members Only