Clarification on rule 4 - reviews

[NickyBobby]

After some advice here, would the following situation qualify for a review?

Messaged an SP on AW a number of times, each time the message is read after the requested booking day.

The final time, the SP replies with “yes [punter name] available” but then hasn’t logged in to AW since so didn’t see the follow up message confirming the time.

The SP doesn’t show their phone number but I noticed after the booking date that they have a “send SMS” on their profile, this feature is a new one to me 

Review or not a review?

[scutty brown]

Not a review - there was no accepted booking.

You would have needed to follow up with an unequivocal statement like "OK I'll see you at x" to which she replies and agrees

[daviemac]

After some advice here, would the following situation qualify for a review?

The rules are very clear mate, you have to have an agreed booking, as in she has said yes to a specific date, time and duration, before a review can be left.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criterion is that she has accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban.
Reviews must be within the last 6 months, for ALL members now.
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exceptions are sex parties, duos, etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider).
The title of the review should only have SP Name - Location - (B&S / TOFTT / SCAM label if needed), and there are no abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

[NickyBobby]

Thanks both