Author Topic: High_Heels_Honey - Liverpool St  (Read 2124 times)


2 review(s) for High_Heels_Honey (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by scouting]

Offline oinki

High_Heels_Honey - Liverpool St

45 min - total £120

Punt happened last month.

External Link/Members Only
   
+447448628873

In short: Negative
Pictures (facial/ breast are representative), body is generally represented. She has a mummy tummy though (somewhat visible from video still from her aw page), and facially she looks better than the pictures I would say. For a pump and dump I would say she would actually be a high neutral but unfortunately this was a 45 min booking that became a 25 min booking at best. She also advertised services that were not available (filming). So ended up with LFK, OWO, protected intercourse, RO (69), and CIM. BJ technique below par (teeth), and too vigorous on the handjob. Intercorse was actually OK and engaging which would have taken this to neutral were it not for the too eagerness to make me cum. With more assertiveness (from me) this could have maybe made it to neutral.

Also noting, that some of her pictures seem to have her face put on the body of other models, but you can probably see which those glammed up photos are - joy of AI/photoshop.

======
The long version:

Booking process / Location:
Only communicated through whatsapp, confirmed on the day with a list of extras - probably around 3 hours before the meet. Actually had her as plan C (if filming was offered - which it was over text - with mask) so I was happy with the extras as kissing, and cim was also on offer. Location isnt discreet and flat entrance between/opposite restaurants but all good, Im not too bothered and definitely can spot the punters waiting to enter (which I did on exit). Got to the location and was texted to enter. She was hidden behind the door, but had a nice white lingerie set on - looked gorgeous.

Small room (which meant it was hot in the room, with no fan on) + bed was just a mattress on the floor so not the best.

Services had: LFK, OWO, RO/69, protected intercourse (with lube), CIM
Services told not available: Filming (due to her not having a mask)

Looks/Face 8/10: Found her better looking than her pictures which are representative, also what made me actually push for 45 min, but should have gone with the 30 min option.

Body
Really nice body, and again pictures are representative - tall although cant remember if it was due to heels or not but 180cm+. She does have a mummy tummy though and this is somewhat hidden in her pictures and somewhat out of place because her size in the pictures seem accurate at around size 8. Perky breasts, and nice ass - with not much jiggle (if I remember right), but her pussy was tight and felt good. Aside from the tummy she looked great.

Services:
Was a planned 30 min booking (then at £80) + filming (£50), but was declined filming despite agreeing on whatsapp (due to no mask) which was disappointing. Had a quick shower as her flat was hot, as was outside, and was quick out with the session starting.

FK 2/5 - Lip kissing with not much tongue that I can recall. Disappointing, and she also disengaged relatively quickly, had to ask her for more kissing as she was eager for the sucking cock and condom, this was somewhat disappointing. Had to usher her that I wanted more kissing.

OWO / BJ: 2/5 - Need to direct her for ball licking (perhaps) but I wasnt too assertive - punting on and off so didn't ask her to service the balls more. Irregardless, her owo / bj game wasnt great - could feel teeth and there was a distinct eagerness for more handjob than blowjob. Switched to 69 to see whether RO could help.

69 / RO: Clean shaven, neat pussy but I could taste some lube, so hygiene wise - not great. Didn't stay too long on 69 as a result. Not the best of mood setters when you can taste some lube!

Protected sex (with some lube) 3.5 / 5 - Protected intercourse was good actually, she took directions well and did some engaging fucking back. Encouraging from a vocal level, but not perhaps convincing she was fully enjoying it throughout. Went through the usual positions, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, missionary, doggy. Definitely not the worse fuck I've had, but not the best either - perhaps it was due to the mattress. In either case, I wanted to rest after the positions and had intended for her to blow me - but too much teeth + vigorous handjob led me too much to the edge and I came in her mouth as she was half giving me a vigorous HJ and BJ.

Had a final shower and some minor chat. She was back in her lingerie and had perfumed herself - so clearly not hygienic for us punters - at best a pump and dump I would say. All in all, paid for 45 min and was out in 25 min. If I had a video of this at 30 min, I would have been at least happier.

In summary: Negative due to BJ/LFK technique were not great + missold on service on initial comms. Good and enjoyable fuck with CIM, but shortened on time. She needs to consider hygiene rather than conveyor belt (in particular given that she shortened me on time!).

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline downdog

Thanks for the review, had her on my plan B list, now removed.

Offline Aragonhouse

99pc sure this is seductive Sandra's stable mate I briefly saw from my review below.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=437658.0

A lot of it chimes with the location, bed, and in the stills of her video I'm sure it's the same room.

Slight worry as those stills seem to show a punters face as he goes down on her. Would like to think he knows he is in her content!

Offline mightymunce

Thats a shame as she has great potential

Offline Insideman

the good old "dont have a mask" excuse.

i hate when SP's advertise things and they dont do them

found more pics of her on google , is the face accurate to what you saw in person ?  External Link/Members Only

im already put off by the misselling traits. it means she doesnt respect or take pride in the service.



Offline oinki

the good old "dont have a mask" excuse.

i hate when SP's advertise things and they dont do them

found more pics of her on google , is the face accurate to what you saw in person ?  External Link/Members Only

im already put off by the misselling traits. it means she doesnt respect or take pride in the service.

Nice find, that page is good representation and photos are of her. She looks better in flesh facially than her photos as mentioned.

I always give them some benefit of doubt - hopefully someone else might have seen her and had better time but the price increase and lack of better technique doesn't make me want to revisit.



Offline Insideman

Nice find, that page is good representation and photos are of her. She looks better in flesh facially than her photos as mentioned.

I always give them some benefit of doubt - hopefully someone else might have seen her and had better time but the price increase and lack of better technique doesn't make me want to revisit.

Thank you. noted.

The toothy BJ is a bit of a turn off as i feel sensitive.

(i dont know if high heel honey has turkey teeth) But I have come to realise that many SP's with turkey teeth give toothy blowjobs, or cant deepthroat because as the shaft gets thicker it cant pass the front teeth.


Offline MLawro93

Thanks for the review OP, one to avoid. Pretty sure I remember her having a profile on Seeking some time ago

Offline Insideman

Thanks for the review OP, one to avoid. Pretty sure I remember her having a profile on Seeking some time ago

whats an old crow doing on seeking