Author Topic: Chelsey Peach - Central London Hotel  (Read 3712 times)


1 review(s) for Chelsey Peach (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by chandlerhandler]

Offline Devil4thrill

External Link/Members Only
First found her on twitter.

Met Chelsey a few times now.
1 hour / £300
Prices have gone up since as she is very popular.
Services: GFE, OW, DFK and the works.

Girl: Absolute stunner. Fit. Sexy. Pretty face.

Meet: A hotel booked by her which changes obviously.

Chelsey was total fun. The way I like it.
Very friendly, smiling, great chat and sex.
No OWO which is what I like but I knew she does not provide OWO unless it’s a longer booking but she made up for it by a Snog fest.   
Felt like I was with someone who understands me.

Keeping it short. Ask me any questions and I will try to answer.






Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
Whereabouts in London did this punt take place?

Offline Devil4thrill

Ok…it was somewhere in Central London.
I met her a few times so it was all in different locations in Central London.
All places were upscale if you are worried about it.
 

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,366
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
No OWO but you got the works, kindly elaborate on which services constituted the works and give some description of the techniques she used in each to warrant her high rate.  :hi:

Note a review is meant to describe a single encounter.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2025, 07:08:34 pm by LLPunting »

Offline patelprat

No OWO at that price - well that's one way to put many off booking her, when everyone else in her league does OWO.

Shame as I might otherwise have considered.

Offline MichaelDBW

No OWO at that price - well that's one way to put many off booking her, when everyone else in her league does OWO.

Shame as I might otherwise have considered.

Saw on AW that she was touring near me in Brighton coming up, thought for a few days whether I should try and see her but in the end decided that the lack of OWO was a deal-breaker at £300

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
Ok…it was somewhere in Central London.
I met her a few times so it was all in different locations in Central London.
All places were upscale if you are worried about it.

Centrsl London is quite vague.

It's just to give some geographical context for members. For example some may consider Holland Park too far, yet Canary Wharf acceptable, or vice versa.

« Last Edit: August 19, 2025, 08:45:37 pm by PilotMan »

Offline FITFORWHAT

Anyone read her website? Sounds like a fruit loop

Whether you’re after a few hours of blissful company, on a date where you can impress me with your re search into vegan eateries I’d like and take it upon yourself to make a reservation

Never knew my job was to act as SP's PA booking the highest quality vegan restaurants. Then she goes on to add that you need two references from other working girls and your name age etc to apply for the chance to meet her.  :wackogirl:

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
Ok…it was somewhere in Central London.
I met her a few times so it was all in different locations in Central London.
All places were upscale if you are worried about it.

Who pays for the hotel, is this included or on top of £300?

Also, Hotels can be named, it's allowed see rule 22.


Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,694
  • Likes: 539
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
Who pays for the hotel, is this included or on top of £300?

Also, Hotels can be named, it's allowed see rule 22.

Hotels can be named, but it isn't a particularly good idea to do so

Offline snagz

Social media link removed as per rules.

Link for more pics/clips
« Last Edit: August 20, 2025, 09:50:54 pm by daviemac »

Offline finn5555

Wouldn’t name hotels personally  :hi:

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
« Last Edit: August 20, 2025, 04:24:28 pm by PilotMan »

Online Waterhouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,376
  • Likes: 70
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
I have, and don't have an issue with it  :hi:

As per https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=434624.0

The issue is that hotels can easily check on here and it can make things harder and more awkward for the SPs, (and potentially punters also) especially if the venue tends not condone such activities taking place on their premises.

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
The issue is that hotels can easily check on here and it can make things harder and more awkward for the SPs, (and potentially punters also) especially if the venue tends not condone such activities taking place on their premises.

Seriously, I really think you're wildly overthinking it, because you're looking at it from a Punters perspective.

If a hotel have a guest who they think is a working SP, surely their first port of call would be an Escort site to see if the girl is an escort. They wouldn't come to UKP. It's likely their IT system will prevent them visiting an 18 rated site.

And, which member of staff will be instructed to come on here and given permission to carry out a check to see if their hotel is mentioned in an Escort review?

So, if a member of staff is granted permission to visit an 18 rated site, they would have to pass all the age related tests.

They're not going to randomly visit UKP on their work computer and then report it back to their colleagues. If they use their own device, do you think they're going to report to their colleagues, "I saw a guest on an Escort review site". I seriously doubt it.

Hotels have been the go to for illicit sexual liaisons for centuries, they won't turn away revenue without good cause. Unless an SP is making it uncomfortable or inconvenient for other guests, they won't want to do anything about it.

All in all, very unlikely.

It makes me laugh when I see members write that they feel conspicuous hanging outside a particular place waiting for an SP. Do you seriously think that a regular member of the public is studying people in the street and wondering if they are going to a punt. It's more likely they will think you are a burglar or thief, but not a punter.

The general public don't think like we do. Only punters think like that, regular members of the public know little to nothing about punting.




« Last Edit: August 20, 2025, 05:57:11 pm by PilotMan »

Offline Heph

She has a very appealing and pretty face.


Re Pilot-man. I take your point about the unlikelihood of Hotel staff alighting here following complaints (though, as we all know, it's seldom a problem to hop on the guest wi-fi and roam at will). Nevertheless, we can recall the effect of unwelcome reputational damage that, for example, saw Chelsea Cloisters clamp down on prossies; and if we're attached to the convenience of using these venues for our trysts, it seems best, to me, not to be a part of drawing unwelcome attention to a given hotel.

'Central London' is good enough (we all know the rough bounds of where that is), though yes, a close-enough Tube Station would be a better location-marker, whilst maintaining some discretion.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2026, 09:27:35 pm by Head1 »

Offline deg_dilemma

<snip>
It makes me laugh when I see members write that they feel conspicuous hanging outside a particular place waiting for an SP. Do you seriously think that a regular member of the public is studying people in the street and wondering if they are going to a punt. It's more likely they will think you are a burglar or thief, but not a punter.

The general public don't think like we do. Only punters think like that, regular members of the public know little to nothing about punting.

I have to agree. It's hilarious and dumbfounding how so many people think they are the main character when in reality everyone is just a NPC. Especially in London, who the heck cares - no one is looking and no one give a damn about you. I once had to interrupt and walk through a queue of people lining up at a sandwich shop to enter a block of flats in the middle of a City street to meet a SP. Yes people looked, but did anyone know, or care, or even if they did - I didn't.

Offline deg_dilemma



Link for more pics/clips

this is amazing - thanks.

Helps me confirm that I'm not paying £300/hour for her!  :lol:
« Last Edit: August 20, 2025, 09:52:14 pm by daviemac »

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
a close-enough Tube Station would be a better location-marker, whilst maintaining some discretion.

Exactly.

LT isn't going to shut down a tube station because punters travel through it, or prossies work nearby  :D :D

For someone like me, I might venture to the City, WC1/2 or maybe even W1, but Knightsbridge or Belgravia are way too far. I think the furthest I've punted west is around Paddington.

So knowing an identifiable locale where an SP is available, saves me from A) bothering to read the review and B) contacting her, wasting both hers and my time.


Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
this is amazing - thanks.

Helps me confirm that I'm not paying £300/hour for her!  :lol:


Girl: Absolute stunner. Fit. Sexy. Pretty face.



Wow, it shows how people see things differently.

She's looks a rotter to me. Looks like she's late 30's to me.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,571
  • Likes: 731
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Hotel names can be posted just not room numbers, unlike links to social media which are not allowed.

Offline Mstar86

So you TOFTT with a pricier escort but kept the review short and vague when ALL of your other reviews give location and more detail…..


Is she better than her pics? Because most wouldn’t call her a stunner so more detail would really help here…

Online Waterhouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,376
  • Likes: 70
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
Seriously, I really think you're wildly overthinking it, because you're looking at it from a Punters perspective.

If a hotel have a guest who they think is a working SP, surely their first port of call would be an Escort site to see if the girl is an escort. They wouldn't come to UKP. It's likely their IT system will prevent them visiting an 18 rated site.

And, which member of staff will be instructed to come on here and given permission to carry out a check to see if their hotel is mentioned in an Escort review?

So, if a member of staff is granted permission to visit an 18 rated site, they would have to pass all the age related tests.

They're not going to randomly visit UKP on their work computer and then report it back to their colleagues. If they use their own device, do you think they're going to report to their colleagues, "I saw a guest on an Escort review site". I seriously doubt it.

Hotels have been the go to for illicit sexual liaisons for centuries, they won't turn away revenue without good cause. Unless an SP is making it uncomfortable or inconvenient for other guests, they won't want to do anything about it.

All in all, very unlikely.

It makes me laugh when I see members write that they feel conspicuous hanging outside a particular place waiting for an SP. Do you seriously think that a regular member of the public is studying people in the street and wondering if they are going to a punt. It's more likely they will think you are a burglar or thief, but not a punter.

The general public don't think like we do. Only punters think like that, regular members of the public know little to nothing about punting.
I agree with most of what you say, personally I don’t give a hoot about visiting hotels and I never feel inconspicuous as I often meet colleagues and pals in hotel lobbies, bars and foyers.  I’m very used to it.  Same with going to a flat, house or other venue for a punt. It doesn’t bother me.  However, there have been mentions in the past on here that hotels were checking UKP.

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,317
  • Likes: 345
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
However, there have been mentions in the past on here that hotels were checking UKP.

I reckon that's a lot harder to do now we have the new adult content laws in place.