baby ariel - Canary Wharf

[ratedj]

Link: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location: Well-known hotel in Canary Wharf.

Price: £80 for 15 mins.

Comms: All via WA. Very receptive to messages and all easily done.

Services: FK, OWO, penetration.

Appearance: Answered the door wearing lingerie and I liked what I saw. Found her facially attractive, and as already well reported, a thiccers and authentic PAWG.

Meet: After being let in, exchanged pleasantries with Ariel and had a little chit chat first, all the while rubbing her thighs and taking in the view. Ariel is very well spoken and easy to engage with. Eventually got more comfortable before engaging in some FK. Ariel then moved into position and proceeded to give me OWO, which felt good, also using some saliva. Eventually rubbered up and started off in missionary. Stayed here for a while before it was time for the main event and some of the cake! Ariel's ass is in proportion with her thighs and does look real good in doggy. It's soft and jiggly, and feels nice when holding onto. Started off slow before picking up the pace but kept it steady rather than going 'full throttle'. Plowed away until I came in the dom. Exchanged more words while cleaning up before making my exit.   

Conclusion: Enjoyed my time with Ariel. She's very chilled and easy to converse with. Would see her again.

[Barneypunt]

Cheers for the review. She appears to have moved locations. Will try to see her again next week 

[Jardent6]

I’ve seen her multiple times and I refute that she’s a pawg . She’s thick borderline overweight . Lovely face and even better personality but certainly not a pawg imo

[Barneypunt]

I’ve seen her multiple times and I refute that she’s a pawg . She’s thick borderline overweight . Lovely face and even better personality but certainly not a pawg imo

You not gonna review any of your multiple visits?

[anujok]

The ‘well known’ CW hotel exists no more. It’s been taken over by the Govt to house illegal migrants. So she has definitely moved from this place. Saw her!a few times and have posted a review. It’s been standard all times.

She has now stopped replying to my messages so haven’t seen her lately. 

[SonofAJohn]

I’ve seen her multiple times and I refute that she’s a pawg . She’s thick borderline overweight . Lovely face and even better personality but certainly not a pawg imo

I have seen her too but I walked away from her.
She's not a pawg, she's just a chubby white girl and I was shocked that in reality what she looked like compared to the reviews. Some members on here are either liars, paid shills or they don't have any understanding of what a pawg is. Her pictures are very misleading!!!

[Garyhart]

I have seen her too but I walked away from her.
She's not a pawg, she's just a chubby white girl and I was shocked that in reality what she looked like compared to the reviews. Some members on here are either liars, paid shills or they don't have any understanding of what a pawg is. Her pictures are very misleading!!!

Saw her around 2 years ago, I didn’t review but fully agreed. Something’s off with her reviews as she’s objectively just a bit chubby but due to her young age, it holds up well on her body. Facially, nothing special too but I guess these things are subjective.

She was a good punt but I’ve learned a lot of lessons from punting 2 years ago and usually only trust reviewers who have a similar taste to my own based on girls they’ve reviewed.

[Mstar86]

Wow, she was on my HL from reviews but these comments making me think twice now. I did think “is she a real PAWG”

I think if you’re truly into Bunda then you can only really trust reviews and comments from the connoisseurs.

I do also feel that these reviews are good for those who want a bit of bum but not the HUGE. Those who’ve want more than peachy but not fake or out of proportion, those who want “curvy” but we need to stop calling these girls PAWG’s to stop the confusion!!

[Garyhart]

Wow, she was on my HL from reviews but these comments making me think twice now. I did think “is she a real PAWG”

I think if you’re truly into Bunda then you can only really trust reviews and comments from the connoisseurs.

I do also feel that these reviews are good for those who want a bit of bum but not the HUGE. Those who’ve want more than peachy but not fake or out of proportion, those who want “curvy” but we need to stop calling these girls PAWG’s to stop the confusion!!

True. She hasn’t got that insta model type BBL body, hence she’s not a PAWG in my eyes and very few women have that naturally. Girls like Caitlin Jessica, education model (who I’ve both reviewed) count as that for me at least (big bubble backs). Most people who’d agree that Ariel isn’t a PAWG have usually seen a lot of the same girls I’ve reviewed. Not saying I’m the judge but myself a few other punters have reviewed a lot of the same girls, that’s why I usually go off their reviews / posts when I decide to see someone with a specific body type / aesthetic.

[ratedj]

I’ve seen her multiple times and I refute that she’s a pawg . She’s thick borderline overweight . Lovely face and even better personality but certainly not a pawg imo

I respect your opinion, and that's what we have reviews for, so we can get different perspectives and views. My perception of thiccness might differ to yours, but I stand by my view.

[tantraman]

So, is the consensus that Ariel's ass doesn't look like the photios in her AW Gallery ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

... 'cos I would fancy a bit of butt like that

[Barneypunt]

So, is the consensus that Ariel's ass doesn't look like the photios in her AW Gallery ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

... 'cos I would fancy a bit of butt like that

Seen her a few times and that’s the ass I pound