Author Topic: Propositioning a Woman you’d like to punt  (Read 14576 times)

Offline Cheltclient

Following on from women we wish were escorts, everyday we see women we’d love to punt at work on public transport and so on.
Has anyone risked their neck and had any joy in asking an attractive woman if she’s got a price and she’d be willing and being as polite as you can about it. A WG once said when other girls have found out what she does they’ve admitted that they’ve done it and would do so again

Just no pal. The level of disrespect here. We have AW. Those women will entertain and provide sex for money. And even then, interactions should have mutual respect. Approaching a random, beautiful woman and propositioning her in such a way is just not ok and misogynistic.

I suspect this was just a post fuelled by fantasy. But no. Wrong on so many levels

Offline syfodas

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 115
  • Likes: 6
  •  
  • Reviews: 7
Ok just asking if anyone has like I’m really going to sorry I spoke
Banned reason: Needs to review
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Waterhouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,375
  • Likes: 70
  •  
  • Reviews: 23

If someone said they would give me a million quid to eat shit straight from a cows arse



Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,611
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47

Offline Handel2020

I wouldn't like anyone to do this to my female relatives so wouldn't do it to anyone else's. Besides, if you have the balls to make conversation with a woman wouldn't it make sense to ask her out. The fact that someone would think of going up to a woman only to ask her about punting would show he doesn't think much of himself in relation to her. She would be bound to find it creepy.

Offline Davey80

I agree it is unacceptable in practice but how many of us have at least thought….those big tits are amazing, I wonder if she would be happy with £200 or so for 15 minutes on them?

Offline Poopster

And the winner of "Ill-advised fuckwit thread of the year, 2025" goes to...

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,540
  • Likes: 729
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I agree it is unacceptable in practice but how many of us have at least thought….those big tits are amazing, I wonder if she would be happy with £200 or so for 15 minutes on them?
That's what the 'Women who we wish were escorts?' thread's for, this one is about actually propositioning strangers which is wrong on so many levels as well as being illegal. 

Offline Hornydevil666

So you would be OK with a strange man coming up to your wife, mum or daughter and asking how much she charges for sex.You would think thats a reasonable question?

Obviously someone who looks at his sister or cousin and says "i would"

Offline Cheltclient

That’s the issue with this thread. It wasn’t worded as a fantasy. It was actually asking if anyone had done this and asking how they went about it, inferring that’s it’s something the OP would like to try.

Online RandomGuy99

I've never thought this but I was once on a train with a stripper who was trying to milk her sugar daddy for money over the phone. He was meeting her at the train station so she spend a lot of time rearranging her boobs in her push up bra to maximise them before she left the train.

Online Trex

It’s like a movie called Borat. When he approaches women. Very Nice, How Much?

Offline signy

It’s like a movie called Borat. When he approaches women. Very Nice, How Much?

Or even...

External Link/Members Only


Offline Jujy78

I once saw a very attractive lady back in 2000 I think and I had a gut feeling she's a WG we were walking in the same direction and I was so tempted to ask but didn't have the courage. On a separate note I was having a chit chat with a regular WG once and I just asked her what her first customer was like she said it was a friend so it was ok. Apparently the friend offered her money to shag her and that's how it all started for her. Not sure how true it was but that's what she told me

Offline alabama1

I once saw a very attractive lady back in 2000 I think and I had a gut feeling she's a WG we were walking in the same direction and I was so tempted to ask but didn't have the courage. On a separate note I was having a chit chat with a regular WG once and I just asked her what her first customer was like she said it was a friend so it was ok. Apparently the friend offered her money to shag her and that's how it all started for her. Not sure how true it was but that's what she told me
Sounds like a plausible scenario.

Offline SonofAJohn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,179
  • Likes: 66
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
I once saw a very attractive lady back in 2000 I think and I had a gut feeling she's a WG we were walking in the same direction and I was so tempted to ask but didn't have the courage. On a separate note I was having a chit chat with a regular WG once and I just asked her what her first customer was like she said it was a friend so it was ok. Apparently the friend offered her money to shag her and that's how it all started for her. Not sure how true it was but that's what she told me
One time I was driving in Fulham near the big Waitrose. I saw a white latina with a big booty in pink leggings at the bus stop but she looked very upset/worried about something....
I thought to myself, I bet she is an escort and I can find her profile online.
Later that night I found her advert then asked her for an outfit request when I booked in to see her.
You can guess what I asked her to wear for our meeting..   :lol: :D
Banned reason: Unacceptable abuse of other members.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline JontyR


Online sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,195
  • Likes: 173
  •  
  • Reviews: 142
Have to admit I am curious as to what OP's opening gambit of "Excuse me madam," would be.  Then again I think by starting this thread he's asking for a ChatGPT-style response with suggestions.

There's been multiple threads on here about how to proposition colleagues (:scare:), cleaners etc. and time again the response comes back that sex workers have made a choice to enter into the marketplace not the other way around.

In addition to AW and VS there used to be easier routes for those interested in providing sexual services to paying clients e.g. Craigslist and Gumtree but these both got closed off.

That said, even beyond the criminal repercussions (bear in mind that TfL now consider "staring" to be actionable harassment) surely you'd be setting yourself up for all kinds of blackmail etc?

Offline Colston36

Man to woman - "Would you sleep with me for a million pounds"
Woman - "Oooo Yes OK"
Man - "How about £100?"
Woman shocked - "What kind of woman do you think I am???"
Man - "We have already established that, now we are negotiating on price"

 :D

That was actually said by George Bernard Shaw at a dinner party about a century ago only with lower figures. 

Offline DastardlyDick

That was actually said by George Bernard Shaw at a dinner party about a century ago only with lower figures.
That's inflation for you!  :lol:

Offline Maak

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 113
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 2
I propositioned a few women on dating apps to set up a transactional relationship. Quite a few agreed, but I got civvy relationship before it happened
Banned reason: Needs to review more often
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline cunningman

That was actually said by George Bernard Shaw at a dinner party about a century ago only with lower figures.

I have quoted that at excessively greedy SBs who think they aren't sex workers.

Get's me an immediate WhatsApp ban usually but I don't care by that point.

Offline lewisjones23

Plenty of women I've met or seen about in public that I wish would be open to an offer.

The closest I've come to anything like it is messaging a WG who had stopped working, saying I was trying to get a message to ' her old working name ' from there I was able to establish a line of communication to sort out punts. Even that though had a bit of a lead in, she had told me that even though she was retiring from the AW free for all, she would see some people who had her personal number, how many people on she knows  :unknown:

Online sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,195
  • Likes: 173
  •  
  • Reviews: 142
Flipping this around, when was the last time you saw someone you fancied out and about and just asked them for a drink or their number?

Women still do this (albeit in work situations), though sadly I didn't find them attractive (flattering to be asked though). I guess they become more confident to do it in their 30s and 40s, especially if they're not getting any or are just lonely.

Offline puntingking

Katherine Ryan hits back after admitting she performed sex act on old boss to leave work early

Would this be ok if the gender roles were reversed?   :)

I fear it wouldn't be  :unknown:

Link for context - !5th August 2025 article.
External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: August 15, 2025, 06:51:07 pm by puntingking »

Offline alabama1

Katherine Ryan hits back after admitting she performed sex act on old boss to leave work early

Would this be ok if the gender roles were reversed?   :)

I fear it wouldn't be  :unknown:

Link for context - !5th August 2025 article.
External Link/Members Only
If it was consensual, of course it would. Get a life FFS !

Offline JontyR

Katherine Ryan hits back after admitting she performed sex act on old boss to leave work early

Would this be ok if the gender roles were reversed?   :)

I fear it wouldn't be  :unknown:

Link for context - !5th August 2025 article.
External Link/Members Only

The only reversal that would be an issue is if the boss was the one making the suggestion.

Online sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,195
  • Likes: 173
  •  
  • Reviews: 142
Katherine Ryan hits back after admitting she performed sex act on old boss to leave work early

Would this be ok if the gender roles were reversed?   :)

I fear it wouldn't be  :unknown:

Link for context - !5th August 2025 article.
External Link/Members Only

I don't see how 2022 counts as "an old interview"  :D

Offline sammathy

Ask if you’ve seen them on adult work or vivastreet
If they don’t know what you’re on about walk away
To add to what you’ve said, I met a woman on the train last year who was clearly an SP of some form. Skimpy outfit, suitcase and an air of confidence you never see in normal ladies. I sat across from her and asked what she did. She insisted that she was a carer to which we eventually both laughed at because of my reactions. I took her number down but got the silent treatment after trying to engage later. Out of curiosity, I put in as much as I knew about her into AW’s search tool, and she actually came up. Booked in the day after and was happy to find out, when I arrived, that it was actually her. I asked her why she didn’t admit to being monetized on the train, and she said because I don’t look like the type of person who would pay to see her and that guys who find out normally can’t handle it and try to “save” her.
My deducement: did you just see a girl that you think escorts? Have a normal conversation with her and ask her detailed questions. Later, search her up on AW with the answers she gives and book in with the SP who has the closest-looking photos to the girl you met earlier. It’s probably actually her.

Offline JontyR

To add to what you’ve said, I met a woman on the train last year who was clearly an SP of some form. Skimpy outfit, suitcase and an air of confidence you never see in normal ladies. I sat across from her and asked what she did. She insisted that she was a carer to which we eventually both laughed at because of my reactions. I took her number down but got the silent treatment after trying to engage later. Out of curiosity, I put in as much as I knew about her into AW’s search tool, and she actually came up. Booked in the day after and was happy to find out, when I arrived, that it was actually her. I asked her why she didn’t admit to being monetized on the train, and she said because I don’t look like the type of person who would pay to see her and that guys who find out normally can’t handle it and try to “save” her.
My deducement: did you just see a girl that you think escorts? Have a normal conversation with her and ask her detailed questions. Later, search her up on AW with the answers she gives and book in with the SP who has the closest-looking photos to the girl you met earlier. It’s probably actually her.

Creepy and a bit stalkerish.

Offline sammathy

Creepy and a bit stalkerish.
How? I didn't out and out ask her for a fee. I didn't force her to give me her phone number. I didn't push for a meet through text because she didn't reply to my initial message. She advertised services on AW, which was how we ended up meeting again. If it hadn't have been her, I would've met her escort look alike and probably long forgotten about the girl on the train by now. It seems that people don't like you winning unless you stick to convention (even other dudes).

Offline JontyR

How? I didn't out and out ask her for a fee. I didn't force her to give me her phone number. I didn't push for a meet through text because she didn't reply to my initial message. She advertised services on AW, which was how we ended up meeting again. If it hadn't have been her, I would've met her escort look alike and probably long forgotten about the girl on the train by now. It seems that people don't like you winning unless you stick to convention (even other dudes).

Well it's quite simple. If you see someone in the outside world they are a civvie (even if they aren't).Let's say for instance you already had seen he advert and she was onyour hotlist...would you act the same?

When someone is iin the civvie world, they are a civvie. If you want to try and chat her up, then great...good for you...as long as you are respectful and not pushy then fine.  But to then go all Sherlock... it looks a bit obsessive. And well, creepy and a bit stalkerish.

Offline sammathy

Well it's quite simple. If you see someone in the outside world they are a civvie (even if they aren't).Let's say for instance you already had seen he advert and she was onyour hotlist...would you act the same?

When someone is iin the civvie world, they are a civvie. If you want to try and chat her up, then great...good for you...as long as you are respectful and not pushy then fine.  But to then go all Sherlock... it looks a bit obsessive. And well, creepy and a bit stalkerish.
Just because someone’s a civvie, it doesn’t mean I can’t have a normal conversation with them. I didn’t go into a part-by-part recount of everything we said to each other because being courteous should go without saying when talking about adult dialogue. Like I said earlier, just because it’s not conventional for a guy to cold approach women in public anymore, it doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Correct me if I’m mistaken, but that’s all I’m getting from what you’ve said.

Unless it’s about looking her up. But there’s nothing wrong with that either. I’ve had a bunch of civvie girls do background checks on me by Googling me and going through my LinkedIn and IG, which is quite normal and commonplace. They might not tell you, but they all do it. We all value our safety after all.

And if it isn’t that either,  I don’t understand how you think putting in blonde, blue eyes, 34DD, Sagittarius, 160cm, Colnbrook into AW’s search tool is creepy and stalkerish.

Offline puntingking

Creepy and a bit stalkerish.

I don't think what sammathy said is creepy  :unknown:

Sometimes, people on here overuse words like "creepy" or other similar words so much that it dilutes the true meaning of these  words.

 :hi:
 

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,354
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Just because someone’s a civvie, it doesn’t mean I can’t have a normal conversation with them. I didn’t go into a part-by-part recount of everything we said to each other because being courteous should go without saying when talking about adult dialogue. Like I said earlier, just because it’s not conventional for a guy to cold approach women in public anymore, it doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Correct me if I’m mistaken, but that’s all I’m getting from what you’ve said.

Unless it’s about looking her up. But there’s nothing wrong with that either. I’ve had a bunch of civvie girls do background checks on me by Googling me and going through my LinkedIn and IG, which is quite normal and commonplace. They might not tell you, but they all do it. We all value our safety after all.

And if it isn’t that either,  I don’t understand how you think putting in blonde, blue eyes, 34DD, Sagittarius, 160cm, Colnbrook into AW’s search tool is creepy and stalkerish.

Did it occur to you that if you'd have treated her as the civvy she claimed to be you might've gone on dates and gotten free sex? 
You found her via other details by the sounds of it so she didn't give you her SP number. So whilst she turned out to be an SP you searching for her on AW rather than social media is being a creep.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2025, 08:55:16 am by LLPunting »

Online Doc Holliday

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,066
  • Likes: 301
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
Unless it’s about looking her up. But there’s nothing wrong with that either. I’ve had a bunch of civvie girls do background checks on me by Googling me and going through my LinkedIn and IG, which is quite normal and commonplace. They might not tell you, but they all do it. We all value our safety after all.

And if it isn’t that either,  I don’t understand how you think putting in blonde, blue eyes, 34DD, Sagittarius, 160cm, Colnbrook into AW’s search tool is creepy and stalkerish.

Yes it's about looking her up. The clue is in Jonty saying 'going all Sherlock'

Vetting civilians in real life and where respective real life IDs are openly known, is quite different from trying to find someone who for the most part is trying to hide their sex work status and who you met once in real life.

I am actually astonished from the search criteria you have listed that you got any accurate hits. For two reasons. Firstly that your list is accurate? How could you know her chest size for example? Secondly that even if that data was accurate, that she had entered that same true data on her profile and that the limitations of the AW search engine actually picked up a match. Finally that she also happened to have a face pic as confirmation?

I'm sure someone can test this to see?  :D

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,644
  • Likes: 134
  •  
  • Reviews: 133

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,644
  • Likes: 134
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
I don't think what sammathy said is creepy  :unknown:

Sometimes, people on here overuse words like "creepy" or other similar words so much that it dilutes the true meaning of these  words.

 :hi:

Again, this says a lot about you. I don't have any surveys or articles to support this, not even from that respected source ladbible, but I would bet that sex pests, stalkers and boundary pushes generally don't regard their own behaviour to be unreasonable.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,644
  • Likes: 134
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Yes it's about looking her up. The clue is in Jonty saying 'going all Sherlock'

Vetting civilians in real life and where respective real life IDs are openly known, is quite different from trying to find someone who for the most part is trying to hide their sex work status and who you met once in real life.

I am actually astonished from the search criteria you have listed that you got any accurate hits. For two reasons. Firstly that your list is accurate? How could you know her chest size for example? Secondly that even if that data was accurate, that she had entered that same true data on her profile and that the limitations of the AW search engine actually picked up a match. Finally that she also happened to have a face pic as confirmation?

I'm sure someone can test this to see?  :D

I assume these were dummy data, Doc. He wouldn''t be so foolish to post information about a civvie on this forum, would he?

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,058
  • Likes: 160
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
i have stayed away from this thread so far because its just wrong wrong wrong!

just because it’s not conventional for a guy to cold approach women in public anymore, it doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
There is a difference between wrong and illegal. Depending on exactly what you say it may not be illegal or even "wrong" but what is considered "wrong" is surely about what most people in society would say is acceptable or unacceptable. you are getting little support on here where you might expect more guys to be on your side but they are not. surely that should be telling you something! Ladies getting wolf whistles or calling from passing motorists or from walking past building sites etc used to be ok but it is not regarded as acceptable these days so is wrong - and some polce forces are arresting guys for doing that so its also now potentially illegal.


To add to what you’ve said, I met a woman on the train last year who was clearly an SP of some form. Skimpy outfit, suitcase and an air of confidence you never see in normal ladies.

to me this says an awful lot about you and not in a complimentary way - its bloody arogant of you! You looked at a lady and jumped to the conclusion that she must be a a SP - probably because the way she was dressed she was also "asking for it" too?


I didn't force her to give me her phone number.
maybe its because of men like you that many younger women feel like the do - some of my Seeking young ladies when they go out with a couple of their girl friends for a dance and chat, go to gay clubs - not because they are gay (they are not) but so that they don't get hassled by guys all night. also they have told me that they contstantly get hassled / tried to be chatted up wherever they are - even in airports etc and get asked for their number, when i said why not just say "no thanks " and don't give your number they said because some guys then get aggressive and or abusive . so i said give a false number but no, they said in front of them and dial it then to make sure it works!

So whilst you think "i didn't force her to give me her number" maybe she felt she had it otherwise the situation might have got nasty.


  It seems that people don't like you winning unless you stick to convention (even other dudes).

again this says a lot about you - its not about "winning"

Offline sammathy

Did it occur to you that if you'd have treated her as the civvy she claimed to be you might've gone on dates and gotten free sex? 
You found her via other details by the sounds of it so she didn't give you her SP number. So whilst she turned out to be an SP you searching for her on AW rather than social media is being a creep.
I prefer not to go on dates and have "free" sex. That's the disconnect here. Why go through all of that time investment when she's openly advertising online that I can fuck her for a fee? Just because she gave me her personal number, it doesn't mean I'm automatically constrained to only being able to contact her the civvy way. Since when was there an issue in searching up my preference on AW? She happened to match it completely that day, that's all.
And if we want to delve into the spoken word and the great unsaid, she also had the choice to tell me or get her security to tell me to get lost when I turned up at her door for our booking, if she had been ever so terrified of me on the train, felt forced to give me her number out of fear, upset enough to not reply to my initial text and freaked out that I had found out she was "secretly" an escort and booked her, but she didn't.

I am actually astonished from the search criteria you have listed that you got any accurate hits. For two reasons. Firstly that your list is accurate? How could you know her chest size for example? Secondly that even if that data was accurate, that she had entered that same true data on her profile and that the limitations of the AW search engine actually picked up a match. Finally that she also happened to have a face pic as confirmation?
I asked her about her chest size during our conversation. Like I said earlier, I don't see the point of doing a piece-by-piece recount of our dialogue because it would probably take up a whole page. Nonetheless, there are courteous ways to bring subject matters like that into conversations without being offensive. She also had the choice to speak to train staff, another passenger or even text BTP on both of the occasions that I left to get food in the onboard shop, if she was secretly offended or felt harassed, but she didn't. Also, what makes you think her or any other SP are so dim that they can't accurately enter their info into AW? SPs with photos of the face within them were also quite commonplace on AW before the new law came in.

I assume these were dummy data, Doc. He wouldn''t be so foolish to post information about a civvie on this forum, would he?
She's clearly both a civvie and an SP, like every single other girl is on AW. They're not just the "dirty girls over there". I haven't posted anything about her that wasn't readily available info on her interview tab and set location at the time.

I don't think what sammathy said is creepy  :unknown:

Sometimes, people on here overuse words like "creepy" or other similar words so much that it dilutes the true meaning of these  words.

 :hi:
Thank you! :thumbsup: It's the going against convention that people can't handle. I won because I met a girl I liked, got it in with minimal investment, and moved on. A world where this becomes normal is scary to some.

Offline sammathy

i have stayed away from this thread so far because its just wrong wrong wrong!
There is a difference between wrong and illegal. Depending on exactly what you say it may not be illegal or even "wrong" but what is considered "wrong" is surely about what most people in society would say is acceptable or unacceptable. you are getting little support on here where you might expect more guys to be on your side but they are not. surely that should be telling you something! Ladies getting wolf whistles or calling from passing motorists or from walking past building sites etc used to be ok but it is not regarded as acceptable these days so is wrong - and some polce forces are arresting guys for doing that so its also now potentially illegal.


to me this says an awful lot about you and not in a complimentary way - its bloody arogant of you! You looked at a lady and jumped to the conclusion that she must be a a SP - probably because the way she was dressed she was also "asking for it" too?

maybe its because of men like you that many younger women feel like the do - some of my Seeking young ladies when they go out with a couple of their girl friends for a dance and chat, go to gay clubs - not because they are gay (they are not) but so that they don't get hassled by guys all night. also they have told me that they contstantly get hassled / tried to be chatted up wherever they are - even in airports etc and get asked for their number, when i said why not just say "no thanks " and don't give your number they said because some guys then get aggressive and or abusive . so i said give a false number but no, they said in front of them and dial it then to make sure it works!

So whilst you think "i didn't force her to give me her number" maybe she felt she had it otherwise the situation might have got nasty.


again this says a lot about you - its not about "winning"
I'll engage with all your points 1 by 1 to avoid confusion in my reply;

1. A lot of guys on here probably don't support Liverpool, but that hasn't stopped me going to Anfield the last few years. I disagree with it being wrong. I'd suggest that people have a problem with it because it's a cheatcode to getting the women you want. All I've actually recommended originally is to go get a lookalike escort or even the real thing if she's an SP. If I had the spare time and necessary funds, I would have eventually met her anyway, just from putting into AW what I would have seen without approaching and going through the the massive list of blonde girls with blue eyes who are shorter than 165cm 1 by 1. That is a world apart from wolf whistling at a passerby in the hopes of getting reciprocated attention.

2. We all make judgements of what we see when we first meet someone. I didn't say she looked like she was asking for it. I said she looked like she openly sold sex, that's all. There's nothing wrong with that and I have the utmost respect for women who do. However, at no point did I proposition her and she felt comfortable and attracted to me in enough of a way to give me her phone number.

3. So unless a girl meets a guy on Seeking, she automatically feels hassled? Maybe some girls just prefer to meet guys through Seeking because they're more inclined to men who can afford to go on dates with them at Benihana instead of Burger King. Like I said in my previous reply, she had the choice to leave at any time, speak to another passenger or train staff when I went off to get food, or contact the BTP who would most definitely have come to arrest me by now if I had done something wrong. I'm also socially calibrated enough to be able to tell when I'm bothering someone. I also have an unlimited amount of sexual options on AW amongst all the other sites, as we all do, that I don't feel the need to be nasty with women in the slightest because of sexual frustration, which is what you're trying to insinuate. If things aren't going my way, I leave because I don't feel any owe me anything and there's always another girl who might like me, so why waste time trying to convince the one in front of me if she doesn't already?

4. So if it's not about winning, then I'm supposed to feel hard done by and that I lost out, every time I interact with women? At the end of the day, what is the difference between my original advice and for example, my mate telling me after a double date with him and his new beau, that the girl I was with is so-and-so off of AW, an escort site? If anything, I’d feel like a mug for unknowingly taking a prostitute out on dates in the hopes of sex when I could’ve just paid her.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2025, 01:10:39 pm by sammathy »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,540
  • Likes: 729
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I'll engage with all your points 1 by 1 to avoid confusion in my reply;
Whilst not commenting on the specifics of what you did, the only thing I'll say about this is a lot of people are surprised at the moral standards shown by members of this site especially when they do not get the 'pat on the back' they were expecting following a course of action.

More often than not behaviour deemed to be unacceptable will be called out as shown on this thread and also on various other threads on the site.

Having said that there will always be those who condone something the majority think is unacceptable, both are equally entitled to their opinion.

Online Doc Holliday

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,066
  • Likes: 301
  •  
  • Reviews: 5

I asked her about her chest size during our conversation.... Nonetheless, there are courteous ways to bring subject matters like that into conversations without being offensive......

Also, what makes you think her or any other SP are so dim that they can't accurately enter their info into AW?


If you say you know how to drop into conversation with a stranger on a train what their chest size is then I must accept that though I struggle to see how.

But assuming she was truthful, then I was not accusing SPs of being so dim that they cannot enter accurate info but (as you well know) it is very common for them to deliberately enter inaccurate data.

I personally am not entering into a lecture about whether your actions are creepy etc or otherwise, though surely you knew they would? It is a pointless exercise.

I am simply struggling with the logistics of an AW search for the reasons I gave earlier. It does not seem feasible.




Offline sammathy

Whilst not commenting on the specifics of what you did, the only thing I'll say about this is a lot of people are surprised at the moral standards shown by members of this site especially when they do not get the 'pat on the back' they were expecting following a course of action.

More often than not behaviour deemed to be unacceptable will be called out as shown on this thread and also on various other threads on the site.

Having said that there will always be those who condone something the majority think is unacceptable, both are equally entitled to their opinion.
I don’t think that they’re “moral standards”. I think that some of the gentlemen on here still have an old fashioned perception of women. In that they think all women are prudish, embarrassed by sex work and can’t stand up for themselves against the “big scary male”.
The consensus within that group also appears to be that we’re all on here seeing escorts because we have no other choice and are socially awkward, rather than because it’s more convenient and less time consuming. A pity that it’s assumed being good with women is mutually exclusive to wanting to meet prostitutes. I’ve never struggled without paying, but that doesn’t mean I want to have to constantly succumb to the dating rituals that aren’t present in the prostitution world.

But I agree, others are entitled to make their views known!!

If you say you know how to drop into conversation with a stranger on a train what their chest size is then I must accept that though I struggle to see how.

But assuming she was truthful, then I was not accusing SPs of being so dim that they cannot enter accurate info but (as you well know) it is very common for them to deliberately enter inaccurate data.

I personally am not entering into a lecture about whether your actions are creepy etc or otherwise, though surely you knew they would? It is a pointless exercise.

I am simply struggling with the logistics of an AW search for the reasons I gave earlier. It does not seem feasible.
Of course it can be common for them to lie, but that would have only meant that I never ended up meeting her. I would’ve just met a girl who matched the data. What’s wrong with that?
No one has been able to quantify what part of my actions were actually creepy because they weren’t. Just misappropriations and unfounded insinuations. Was what I said unconventional? Yes. Unheard of? Probably. Just because my advice challenges outdated dynamics between men and women, doesn’t make it sinister.
Funnily enough, after typing in her info, bar breast size and location, she still comes up. Looks like perhaps she took out her implants and subsequently updated her info.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2025, 06:42:12 pm by sammathy »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,540
  • Likes: 729
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I don’t think that they’re “moral standards”.
You are entitled to your opinion but I'm telling you how it is from my experience both as a member for 12 years and a moderator for 6.

I've seen dozens of threads like this where a member has posted something they think acceptable only to find most members make it clear they don't agree. It doesn't really matter what label you put on it, moral values or whatever else you want.

I don't need to say any more than have a look at how many have condemned your action compared to the one who supported it.

I think that some of the gentlemen on here still have an old fashioned perception of women. In that they think all women are prudish, embarrassed by sex work and can’t stand up for themselves against the “big scary male”.
The consensus within that group also appears to be that we’re all on here seeing escorts because we have no other choice and are socially awkward, rather than because it’s more convenient and less time consuming. A pity that it’s assumed being good with women is mutually exclusive to wanting to meet prostitutes. I’ve never struggled without paying, but that doesn’t mean I want to have to constantly succumb to the dating rituals that aren’t present in the prostitution world.

The only thing to say about that is I've never read so much rubbish in a long time, in my experience you are so far wrong you wouldn't believe.




Offline puntingking

Again, this says a lot about you. I don't have any surveys or articles to support this, not even from that respected source ladbible, but I would bet that sex pests, stalkers and boundary pushes generally don't regard their own behaviour to be unreasonable.

my female friend have looked up on her "recently" past boyfriend up on social network. How is she not a creep but a guy who search for a woman on adult work is  :unknown:

Makes no sense to me, Unless you also think the woman who looked up her old boyfriend on social network (ie - facebook) is a creep.

By the way, the reason why my friend looked up her ex on fb is to see if he has a new girlfriend. If that is not creepy and stalking like behaviour then I don't know what is.

By the way, I still did not see something wrong with my female friend doing that, I also don't see nothing wrong with this op doing this via adult work.  :unknown:

Opinions are opinions. No one is wrong and no one is right. It just people have different standards and differnt levels of what they would seem to think is appropriate :hi:.

Offline puntingking

both are equally entitled to their opinion.

I agree wholeheartedly to this  :hi:

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,540
  • Likes: 729
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
boyfriend
Being the operative word, not the same as a stranger out in public. It's all to do with the circumstances and comparisons.

Offline sammathy

Being the operative word, not the same as a stranger out in public. It's all to do with the circumstances and comparisons.
Again, we keep treating women like they don’t have their own agency. Whether you’re a stranger or a boyfriend or girlfriend or whoever, I have the right to do research about you using whatever information you give me. What I do after is where it falls into circumstance and not every single instance is illegal. I struggle to grasp how puntingking’s recount isn’t a direct comparison.
I can’t speak on the other threads because I wasn’t here to see them. As for morals, people tend to set the bar wherever they want. My moral standards would prevent me from cheating on my wife if I were married, whereas some here wouldn’t give it a second thought and actively engage in that culture. But I wouldn’t put myself in an ivory tower in order to criticize anyone if they promoted that they did. That’s my point of contention here. It’s offensive to call someone a creep and a stalker.

But I have no more to add, because I must also agree with puntingking again where he says: Opinions are opinions. No one is wrong and no one is right.