The advantages I can see are:
The agency manages all bookings, if the girl is only doing this part time then it may not be feasible to answer calls from potential punters 24/7
A lot of guys will prefer to use an agency especially if coming from out of town so they might miss out on potential clients (I know there are also those that won't touch agencies either)
Less administration for them, don't need to keep an AW profile up to date for example.
Punters can see exactly when they should be working on the agencies calendar, and I may be wrong here but it takes a bit more gall I imagine to call an agency as a time waster to set up fake bookings.
at the end if the day, £25 for half an hour's work is still good compared with say minimum wage working at Asda. And those 50% margins are only relevant if the agency provide a working flat, so that's another cost avoided.I just think it's naive to assume their stupid just because they could make more independently, don't think it's that simple for them all.
I never said they were all stupid, I know escorts that work for outcall agencies that clear £100 to £120 after paying out the agency fee and that is the very least they will get from one punter for just one hour, so those girls I don't consider to be stupid they are getting more per job and still working with an agency.
I just don't see the point working for Diamonds and clearing £25 for a booking with a punter they would be better off being independent and charging £60 for 30mins on AW.
I don't why people keep comparing prostitution to working at Asda or Mcdonalds . For one the staff at Asda don't swallow a bunch of guys cum or have to get there ass pounded by men that they don't fancy, some men that don't wash, risk catching STD's, and risk danger working alone, risk friends and family finding out.
Of course prostitution has to be more per hour then working in Asda!!