Increasing trend for threads asking for recommendations

[LLPunting]

Maybe it's a new generation of punter joining or maybe the lazy are emboldened by the number of "tell me who is best to fuck based on my (scant) criteria" type threads being posted.

Could we have a separate board for these so that genuine other conversations aren't awash in people asking strangers on the internet to pimp girls to them ?

[sparkus]

^ this.

The corker was the dude asking for anal providers then rejecting any Thai suggestions off the bat because they're all dudes (or used to be, apparently) 

[Haderach]

^ this.

The corker was the dude asking for anal providers then rejecting any Thai suggestions off the bat because they're all dudes (or used to be, apparently) 

That is a bold claim, that I suspect is lacking in evidence

[daviemac]

We already have separate boards for members asking for recommendations, it's the regional general discussion sections.

Members have been asking for recommendations ever since the site started, if people don't want to reply just ignore the post.

[JontyR]

What would be helpful would be if posters posted decent thread titles. Recommendation required is simple enough but its the "Any intel?" type titles that are doing my bonce in. You want to support fellow punters but there's enough wasted time in this hobby as it is.

[FLYING BLUE]

When I am seeking 'recommendations' aka, the thoughts of our members, I take a little time to look through recent reviews - pretty much ALL the info that's being asked for, is already there, in plain sight.
Those asking for "any intel" etc, could easily do the same IMHO
FB

[bops909]

^ this.

The corker was the dude asking for anal providers then rejecting any Thai suggestions off the bat because they're all dudes (or used to be, apparently) 

That is a bold claim, that I suspect is lacking in evidence

Ahem....

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=434525.0

[daviemac]

Perhaps a read of this? 

Changes to rules 1 and 27 

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent—no favouritism, special treatment, vested interests, or pandering to service providers. We encourage all members to share their reviews to help others and keep the community thriving. General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate board.

27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who only ask without posting reviews may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 28-day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..

When I am seeking 'recommendations' aka, the thoughts of our members, I take a little time to look through recent reviews - pretty much ALL the info that's being asked for, is already there, in plain sight.
Those asking for "any intel" etc, could easily do the same IMHO
FB

I would agree in the main, however not every new member, who only joined the day before asking, knows how to search, would a bit of help and guidance not be appropriate in those circumstances?   

[FLYING BLUE]

I would agree in the main, however not every new member, who only joined the day before asking, knows how to search, would a bit of help and guidance not be appropriate in those circumstances?

Absolutely, and my guidance to those, has been, and would be, to look at the reviews, as they may not have thought of doing that.
My response to 'askers' has leaned towards being helpful rather than being sarcastic.

[daviemac]

I should add that this thread was started just after this ↓ was posted by a member of two days.

I'm new and going to start whacking the reviews up over the next week, can I ask for some recommendations in the mean time. Am on leave next week and looking to smash through a few a day at my hotel - so need outcall available girls.
Big natural tits are the main thing, white or thai. I like a curvy body, meat on the bone, BBW if she's facially very pretty but more in the size 12 range. Had some nice agency girls not quite my ideal. KennedyGold has the exact type of body I like and she was fantastic but looking for some more variety, and prefer brunettes.

Who I've seen the past year and will review is:
From AW, EnglishTaylorGrace, HornyNikki, LucyLu, KennedyGold.
From instagram I don’t think I can say if they are not public ads but 2 bbw “models” who shared pics saying how they wanted to be “taking out for dinner” and were easy to arrange (no dinner involved lol).
From Diva, Amicia, Clodia, Fallyn (also tried to book Malena a few times but never available, very interested in seeing Onida next).
From Allure, Olivia.
All positives for the girls and really great comms with Diva.
I might have forgotten a couple I saw on impulse but I’ll try to remember and get all the reviews up- understand as a new user the 6 month limit is extended to 12 months so I'll trawl my memory bank. I find pros/semipros on fetlife too but I suppose can’t review that either even though the girls are obviously advertising it’s all code words.

If that gives you a good idea of my type and you have suggestions thanks  I've decided to go all in punting now

* he posted 1 the day before he posted this.

* polite enough request? 

[daviemac]

Absolutely, and my guidance to those, has been, and would be, to look at the reviews, as they may not have thought of doing that.
My response to 'askers' has leaned towards being helpful rather than being sarcastic.

I personally don't think this reply to the post I've quoted is at all helpful or would go to encourage further contributions.

Read the rules again, it's a 6 months limit for ALL members now.

Why are you unable to search for SPs you like the look of and shortlist if they have reviews and then read said, kindly left reviews as is the expectation to make your own assessment?  If you have eliminated all reviewed SPs then tell is why.

The guy joined on July 23rd, posted a review on July 24th and asked the question on July 25th.   

[FLYING BLUE]

I personally don't think this reply to the post I've quoted is at all helpful or would go to encourage further contributions.

But the reply was not to you, therefore, whether you think it helpful or not is irrelevant - my intention was and is to be helpful so I'll just leave it there & we can agree to disagree.

[daviemac]

But the reply was not to you, therefore, whether you think it helpful or not is irrelevant - my intention was and is to be helpful so I'll just leave it there & we can agree to disagree.

I was talking about LLPunting's reply to the post I quoted as an example of what is or isn't helpful, not what you said, sorry if that wasn't clear.   

[FLYING BLUE]

I was talking about LLPunting's reply to the post I quoted as an example of what is or isn't helpful, not what you said, sorry if that wasn't clear.   

Quote from: FLYING BLUE on Today at 11:55:21 am
Absolutely, and my guidance to those, has been, and would be, to look at the reviews, as they may not have thought of doing that.
My response to 'askers' has leaned towards being helpful rather than being sarcastic.
I personally don't think this reply to the post I've quoted is at all helpful or would go to encourage further contributions.
[/b]

It looked as though you were quoting / replying to me, which rather threw me.
It wasn't clear but it is now 
All good.
FB