HSG- Warren Street

[venicestar]

I have been away from the UK, recently came back and punting again.

External Link/Members Only

I saw her 2 months ago for incall pse.

Price: 60 min pse 260

Location: great location very easy to find.

Meet: I had high expectations because she is a top sp here on UKP and you guys never disappointed me, but I have to say when she opened the door and I saw her face/body I was not impressed at all. She is overweight, face 6/10, boobs big and natural (8/10) but the bum is flat even if she is not ''skinny'' (4/10) I was expecting a sexy bubble butt. overall her body looks and feels heavy, she could be one of those girls you see serving burgers in mac donald, not a head turner. She is 40yo, she has a few lines on her forehead, her breath was a mix of listerine and old sperm from the previous client (bitter smell) . In my mind I thought her rate was not justified by her look so I got even higher expectations for her performance.

The OWO was good do not get me wrong but not deep, SHE DOES NOT DEEPTHROAT, definetly no throat fucking... for this kind of fame and success I was expenting something like Veronica or miamoist.

We then had sex, her pussy felt great but she did not put much lube for anal so I could not fuck her deep, there was no anal gape or squirting or anything PSE like while fucking, very normal.

I found the dirty talk annoying, she was saying stupid things while sucking me and having sex, it felt artificial... not my thing...

Maybe I was unlucky, maybe she was having a bad day, I was thinking of not leaving a review because I did not want to get insulted by her fans on here but I felt extremely disappointed not only for the money but also by you guys that with all this amazing reviews brought my expectations to the moon 

For me this is a negative, if i spent 100 less would have been neutral or even low positive.

[PilotMan]

It's well documented in several reviews that she is a chunky unit and isn't a looker. She claims to be 32, but even her positive reviews say she is in her 40's.

Whenever I see a profile where the girl covers up her midriff and doesn't show full length unclothed body pictures, they are always concealing a fat / square middle, I've never seen an exception.

I couldn't go there, no matter how good her service is.

As this is her first negative, I've no doubt her fan boys will be on here with their lances and swords.

[Fuzzyduck]

It's well documented in several reviews that she is a chunky unit and isn't a looker. She claims to be 32, but even her positive reviews say she is in her 40's.

Whenever I see a profile where the girl covers up her midriff and doesn't show full length unclothed body pictures, they are always concealing a fat / square middle, I've never seen an exception.

I couldn't go there, no matter how good her service is.

As this is her first negative, I've no doubt her fan boys will be on here with their lances and swords.

If you look at her reviews, there's a mixed bag on her looks/size but many recent ones seems to be overly rose-tinted. In my review from 4 years ago, I said she was late 30s at best. At the time, there were 2 negative reviews (one of them is still there; the other might have disappeared because of a banning or some other reason) so OP isn't breaking new ground. I think HSG is a great fuck but these reviews are important to show some balance.

[patelprat]

Assuming this is a genuine take on her, it also has helped me decide not to see her, as for ages I have been on the fence in terms of whether I would find her physically attractive enough for my tastes.

[dubhcarr]

Thanks for your review I am sorry that she did not work for you. I was another on the fence and now have dropped off. Against the flow with 95% positive review rate? One swallow etc but a very useful input saying what others dare not? In fairness her rate of £260 ph for pse with others at £220 for gfe does not seem so high but it is about value and service. Your comments are noted and I trust others will read your review fairly and objectively. As the Don says YMMV with any working girl so true. Thanks again for sharing your experience. 

[stayer]

If her breath had a bitter smell it could be that she was doing back-to-back bookings. This squares with my belief that she lives in Poland but comes to work in London for a period each month from 6am to midnight each day. That small flat in Warren Street must cost a lot so she needs to cover her overheads.

[downdog]

Assuming this is a genuine take on her, it also has helped me decide not to see her, as for ages I have been on the fence in terms of whether I would find her physically attractive enough for my tastes.

Yes, based on reading your reviews I don't think she would be your type.
With her it's more about her great attitude.

[mightymunce]

It's well documented in several reviews that she is a chunky unit and isn't a looker. She claims to be 32, but even her positive reviews say she is in her 40's.

Whenever I see a profile where the girl covers up her midriff and doesn't show full length unclothed body pictures, they are always concealing a fat / square middle, I've never seen an exception.

I couldn't go there, no matter how good her service is.

As this is her first negative, I've no doubt her fan boys will be on here with their lances and swords.

Yep -.saw her years ago.amd.she was slim.and hot. Went back amd she was round and chunky

[Insideman]

i had a similar experience over a year ago. also she was drunk when i turned up. she is chunky, and the deepthroat wasnt actually deep but it was theatrical.

[Waterhouse]

Assuming this is a genuine take on her, it also has helped me decide not to see her, as for ages I have been on the fence in terms of whether I would find her physically attractive enough for my tastes.

Why would think this was not a genuine account of OP’s experience? 

[patelprat]

Why would think this was not a genuine account of OP’s experience? 

I never said that I thought it wasn't. Hence I won't be seeing this SP.

[Mstar86]

Really love this place as it does help to sway or at least add balance to decisions. Was on the fence but after reading this I think I’ll leave it. Good that she’s enthusiastic etc but for that price I need some serious attraction ORRRR some SERIOUS skills in the sack.

Thanks for the review 

[Waterhouse]

I never said that I thought it wasn't. Hence I won't be seeing this SP.

You posted  “Assuming this is a genuine take on her”.  That would usually suggest an element of doubt in the poster’s mind as to the authenticity of the subject matter, at least in my opinion.

[patelprat]

You posted  “Assuming this is a genuine take on her”.  That would usually suggest an element of doubt in the poster’s mind as to the authenticity of the subject matter, at least in my opinion.

That is the mindset I take for all reviews.
Generally know one really knows each other here and we take what we read on good faith. Thankfully in most cases, the intel turns out to be true/valid/useful.

[Bartolomeo]

A negative review will always hold far more weight than a positive one. Not just here but for anything. It's just how people are.

[zigzag]

Seems very odd everyone else has a good review of her, you sure it was her you met?

[zigzag]

You see girls for less than £100, tell us who!!!

[zigzag]

Only my opinion but I think this review is BS!

[PilotMan]

You see girls for less than £100, tell us who!!!

You misunderstood what he was saying.

He said if he paid £100 less, it would still be a negative review.

[PilotMan]

Only my opinion but I think this review is BS!

Everything tallies with what others have already said.

I have no reason to doubt the review.

If there's something that you think makes this review BS, then say what it is. Just saying "I think it's BS", isn't of much use without context or a reason why.

[tightfoot69]

I saw her a couple of years ago and I think I gave her a neutral.

I still found her quite attractive but is overpriced. The over the top moaning was fake. It still would have been a positive but she didn’t provide CIM properly which is important to me.

I have no reason to doubt the review.

[PilotMan]

Seems very odd everyone else has a good review of her, you sure it was her you met?

Other reviewers have described her as not a looker and round and chunky. Most have said her age is no way 32, late 30's at best, most likely in her 40's.



From your review

Not punting much these days but I do visit Kasia on a regular basis, thought I would update.

....................

Looks: Kasia looks as good as ever, if not more so, pretty face and good sized boobs with a fit body. Age on profile is accurate.

Are you sure it was her you met?

[JonasG]

Always embarrassing when guys fanboy over WGs on here lol. Bizarre. WGs aren't our mates.

As long as you enjoy her why does it matter if others didn't like her/rate her?

Nearly all his recent posts are about HSG going back a number of years.

[londonchap]

I've seen HSG three times, and I actually think this review is probably pretty genuine.

On the size thing, I'll never understand this. If you'd read any of her reviews here or looked at her photos on AW, you'd be a bit special to turn up expecting a gymrat. She's curvy. It's either your bag, or it's not.

Ditto the age. Her reviews here tell the truth.

On the experience side, I'm going to say that my most recent review (and what will be my last visit) probably corroborates. If you've seen girls like xxxDaisy, MissKDD or Veronica69, HSG's version of "PSE" is going to feel a bit weak by comparison. She's not a submissive type, who will let you do absolutely anything to her. Her "PSE" has very carefully-measured limits (it's very rare that she will properly deepthroat), and it's more of a 'PSE-lite' in my view.

She's still a lovely girl, and a cracking shag. But if you're looking for someone skinny or something more extreme, you're not getting it with her.

[puntingking]

her breath was a mix of listerine and old sperm from the previous client (bitter smell) .

 

[puntingking]

Always embarrassing when guys fanboy over WGs on here lol. Bizarre. WGs aren't our mates.

+1

[Garyhart]

I have been away from the UK, recently came back and punting again.

External Link/Members Only

I saw her 2 months ago for incall pse.

Price: 60 min pse 260

Location: great location very easy to find.

Meet: I had high expectations because she is a top sp here on UKP and you guys never disappointed me, but I have to say when she opened the door and I saw her face/body I was not impressed at all. She is overweight, face 6/10, boobs big and natural (8/10) but the bum is flat even if she is not ''skinny'' (4/10) I was expecting a sexy bubble butt. overall her body looks and feels heavy, she could be one of those girls you see serving burgers in mac donald, not a head turner. She is 40yo, she has a few lines on her forehead, her breath was a mix of listerine and old sperm from the previous client (bitter smell) . In my mind I thought her rate was not justified by her look so I got even higher expectations for her performance.

The OWO was good do not get me wrong but not deep, SHE DOES NOT DEEPTHROAT, definetly no throat fucking... for this kind of fame and success I was expenting something like Veronica or miamoist.

We then had sex, her pussy felt great but she did not put much lube for anal so I could not fuck her deep, there was no anal gape or squirting or anything PSE like while fucking, very normal.

I found the dirty talk annoying, she was saying stupid things while sucking me and having sex, it felt artificial... not my thing...

Maybe I was unlucky, maybe she was having a bad day, I was thinking of not leaving a review because I did not want to get insulted by her fans on here but I felt extremely disappointed not only for the money but also by you guys that with all this amazing reviews brought my expectations to the moon 

For me this is a negative, if i spent 100 less would have been neutral or even low positive.

Sorry to hear about this review. I had a similar feeling in my most recent review. I think the issue lies when an SP is super well-reviewed and it feels like hype but when you turn up and see what they look like, you’re left a little dumbfounded. Best thing I’ve learned since when going for punts with well reviewed SPs is to look at those who reviewed that SP’s previous reviews and how they rate girls vs your assessment of their looks.

I know from history, certain punters who are now banned on here have similar taste to me based on how they rate the SPs I’ve also seen, so when I see girls from their reviews for the first time, I’m never disappointed. You can never go wrong once you identify a few punters who have similar taste to you and try and stick to what they go for or rate in terms of appearance.

I have no clue who you are but based on other punters post / review history, the ones that have a similar generic background to me (age, race etc) are the ones who tend to like the same SPs as myself.

[NotThe]

@Garyhart, that's so true. That's why in my reviews I try to comment on who might like a WG and who might not.

I haven't seen HSG in a while. I remember her as facially pretty, very nice, talkative, not slim but I wouldn't have said fat.no idea about PSE as that's not my thing.

But, yes, those looking for a slim 20 something will be disappointed. Those who want a good GFE service from a Polish MILF in her mid 30s (my guess, not sure exactly) would probably like it.

This kind of feedback and distinction is much more useful than the white knighting we see sometimes.

[JonasG]

As long as you put the relevant information in your reviews, that's all you can do. How other people interpret that is down to them.

If she looks older than her stated age/is size 14 etc. All you do is state what you can see.

Obviously you have fanboys of WGs which as i said above is very strange behaviour.
And some reviews are more factual and some are more giddy like a teenager.

But with HSG, there's enough reviews that say she's chubby and not all that facially. Of course she has glowing reviews but there's enough reviews saying otherwise for a punter to have the full story about her.

It's never really about the number of greens vs number of reds, it's about the content of the reviews really.

[puntingking]

She has glowing reviews because she is a solid good service provider, not because she is attractive or young. Make that of what you will.

If you want a solid good service provider then HSG may be a good choice for you but if looks and an age limit is your preference then you should look elsewhere would be my advice.

[puntingking]

Those who want a good GFE service from a Polish MILF in her mid 30s (my guess, not sure exactly)

She is more close to early 40s I would say but I get what you mean