It's a tricky one. There will be many on here who keep some hidden gems to themselves, either because they are very selfish or they worry about the idiots who blab too much and kill the golden goose. I'll come back it again - discretion is important here.
Judging by how much traffic surges to positively reviewed SPs there are a majority of punters who think it's ok to sponge off the goodwill of the comparatively few sharing souls. It seems unlikely that they would all not be seeing any unreviewed SPs with so many thousands here and unremarked. Everytime I find another unsung lass that's been round for at least a week if not yonks I am amazed, given the sampling ability and demand for talent in just this community, that no one has made mention. We know there are limited contributors who don't share good finds at all, or at least not until they've had their fill or it's gone sour (bored or off-menu or other graces withdrawn). And there are those who have been driven to withholding some of their generosity because of the exploitation by the many minimal and non-contributors not just not sharing but also fucking up the game with those SPs who are well mentioned.
In a genuinely collaborative community:
- There is almost no excuse for non-review or useful commentary due to privacy about any one meeting.
- Zero excuse to not review or usefully comment about most meetings had.
- There is no obligation for grand erudition; a short, concise, discrete assessment takes (much) less than 5 minutes, much less than most spend reading/lurking/interacting here any day or week. Anyone, regardless of dyslexia or other difficulty of expression can still produce a useful review. Voice to text is good enough to solve for those with dexterity issues.
If you're blind, mute and unable to use your hands, feet or other pointing device and you're here then all credit to you for punting and I suppose you get your exemption.
- There is no good reason to not review within weeks/the month of a visit if you're properly discrete about details. Anyone claiming they need the passage of time only does so because they think they have to say something singularly revealing. Ironic because so many apologise for the lack of clarity on useful, safe to disclose details because they forgot because it was "so long" ago (not even weeks).
- There is no obligation to post positive reviews. Just help us avoid all the SPs who aren't as advertised or don't do what they offer or agree to or lack the skills or perform poorly or waste your time ghosting, double booking or refusing entry on some criteria that could've been discussed when booking.
There are many examples of brief, concise reviews that stick to the useful facts (and add some limited personal flair and flourish if inclined). Emulate them if nothing else.
If you want to be more florid and indiscrete then by all means but first and foremost get the useful info out there, especially for SPs to be wary of or avoid.
