Author Topic: Jasmin_xoxo - Cheadle  (Read 1849 times)


4 review(s) for Jasmin_xoxo (1 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by scouting]

Offline issy

just registered, bear with me, need to get the hag off how to write these reviews. Im a young lad who just started punting within the last year and working my way backwards on the girls ive met, so I have more reviews to post.

External Link/Members Only  (Link corrected)

1 hr £170
this week

comms:
guessing her manger handles the comms so quick replies. nothing to fault

location:
common hotel in Cheadle, quite busy so discrete, free parking for uptown 4hrs.

girl:
honestly when I saw her I though it would be a great session, definitely girl in the photos, all natural, dark hair, age around early 20s, height correct 5'6, if the review was based on the girls looks only it would be high positive. Unfortunately
her personality will make this review her strong negative.

action:
handed over the notes, totally forgot to ask if the hr meant 2 rounds (very big mistake), (I'm a young lad the first rounds usually goes quick and then I enjoy the second round and take my time). got into the action, with some kissing (no tongue, which was disappointing) and then onto the BJ which was quite decent and she didnt rush. now onto the sex , starting in missionary where I could read her face as she just laid there not bothered no emotion and then onto doggy which was ok. then finished in misionary. she showed no interest and I could tell she was a bit shy from the way she spoke when I entered. Then I asked about the second round and she goes she doest do this (in my head now I realised ive fck up spent big dollar and only 1 round). she said she'll have to ask her manger if she could do a second round, which she said she couldn't. 25 mins in and now I'm like what do I do. she just laid on the bed on her phone like I wasn't even there had a towel wrapped around. laid down for about 5 mins then got dressed and legged it.

wouldn't recommend her to anyone as she has no social skills not willing to have a discussion. For me a big part of punting is the GFE which I like and I would rather be with a less attractive girl who gives a better GFE  than a stunner like Jasmin. Jasmin is very attractive but I think she doesn't have the personality to be an escort as she is the total opposite of her description.

overall a waste of money and time as I did travel around 50mins.

shout me any question will be quite active as I need to write my other reviews.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2025, 07:36:05 am by daviemac »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,775
  • Likes: 756
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
just registered, bear with me, need to get the hag off how to write these reviews. Im a young lad who just started punting within the last year and working my way backwards on the girls ive met, so I have more reviews to post.
Welcome to the site mate and thanks for your first review.

Please bear in mind reviews can only be posted for bookings that took place within the previous 6 months.

Offline lewisjones23

Thanks for the review.

Another of the NW ' agency ' girls that all have the same type of profile.

They get some fit girls, can't deny them that, but fuck me the service is hit and miss with the majority of them

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,785
  • Likes: 251
  •  
  • Reviews: 179

Offline smit1234

Shame as she's been on my HL for a while

Offline Punterplus

Her profile clearly states that there's no cum limit. Another lying whore, onto the blacklist with her.

Offline Boystud23

 I completely agree, the girls are quite good, like Amber_Double D, Bea Double D, Valentina Seductress , Chloe02x,  Angel Babe British,etc,  however they don't tend to stick with that agency, either vanishes from the scene or move as independent..

Thanks for the review.

Another of the NW ' agency ' girls that all have the same type of profile.

They get some fit girls, can't deny them that, but fuck me the service is hit and miss with the majority of them